R@m@
🇵🇹 . Man made Portuguese
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Posts
- 15,089
- Reputation
- 24,069
they choose not to not because they are morally superior they so commonly claim, but because they are imprisionedAbsolutely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
they choose not to not because they are morally superior they so commonly claim, but because they are imprisionedAbsolutely.
yeah most people are just scared of being caughtthey choose not to not because they are morally superior they so commonly claim, but because they are imprisioned
They only have 1 life. (I don't make assumptions on what happens after death since I do not know.)Suppose I hypothetically killed someone, what would the results of said action be?
1. I get pleasure from acting out my impulses
2. person dies
Now consequence one is a net positive because I experience pleasure.
Consequence two is a net positive because death is neither good or bad, it's the the ending of any experiences for them all together, good and bad, and it results in less people to suck up resources.
that's true. Killing someone is usually going to end up with you getting fucked too, most of us are dumb and will be caught.They only have 1 life. (I don't make assumptions on what happens after death since I do not know.)
But I believe life to be a blessing. To take someone else's life for temporary pleasure seems ridiculous to me.
The happier you are, the more selfless you tend to be. You would want to cause harm to others ONLY if it's absolutely necessary.
But when you are sad and miserable, most wouldn't mind killing just about anything/everything.
Not only that the issue is if everyone had this sort of thought process your life would be in danger.
Also, everything you do in life has consequences. When making tough decisions, you should always go with the option where you can bear the consequences the most. I personally think, later in life many of us would regret killing someone.
My argument isn't to legalise murder.If murder is legal then there will be anarchy which is irrational because anarchy creates no good or prosperity instead suffering. Also the government needs a monopoly of power in order to function.
So it’s rational to make it illegal.
At least a handful. There are 11,000 users rn.I wonder if anyone on this forum registered, deleted, banned or lurking(not registered) is a serial killer.
If murder isn’t wrong then the consequences would be badMy argument isn't to legalise murder.



Murder going on on a mass scale would be a net negative but on a small scale wouldn't have any devastating effects overall.If murder isn’t wrong then the consequences would be bad
what?Oyy Tom Holland , I'm Dr Octopus yakhi![]()
Mmm just read up. About 0.0001% of general population or 1 in 10,000. But PSL sites more likely to attract non NT people and breed hateful ideas so may be higher here.At least a handful. There are 11,000 users rn.
If you think suffering and pain is bad then murder is bad no?Murder going on on a mass scale would be a net negative but on a small scale wouldn't have any devastating effects overall.
Im out in the car with family rnCall me in disc I'll say![]()
Oyyy aspie boy . Thou shalt eat big Mac with friesIm out in the car with family rn




Bruh, so maybe like five amogusMmm just read up. About 0.0001% of general population or 1 in 10,000. But PSL sites more likely to attract non NT people and breed hateful ideas so may be higher here.
But if incels do murder it’s usually mass murder rather than serial.
of course it does, that's why I said it's not a net negative. There are benefits and losses involved for all sorts of people.If you think suffering and pain is bad then murder is bad no?
Because murder isn’t an instant thing, there’s struggle and pain
Bruh, so maybe like five amogus![]()