Why is there so many blackcels in this forum

D

Deleted member 23772

Apricot
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Posts
4,231
Reputation
6,607
Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
 
maybe they're short, you can't be a blackcel if you're tall, like faceandlms
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 23772
maybe they're short, you can't be a blackcel if you're tall, like faceandlms
im 6'3. i am just extremely downward grown and have underbite with no ramus maxilla or chin and also have severe asymmetry
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16275, bishōnenmaxxer, fauxfox and 10 others
General increase in urkels?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bishōnenmaxxer, Deleted member 21766 and Deleted member 23772
Being black is a disability
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: karbo, Deleted member 16275, ManletBlackcel and 9 others
It's not the 2000s anymore when black SMV was at its peak with hiphop and the culture in general. Plus a lot of these blackcels are zoomers, I don't think the previous generations of blacks even struggled as much as these blackcel zoomers, hell, zoomers as a whole are struggling hard to get female attention.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23772
I don't think most black guys here struggle to get laid unlike individuals such as ozell
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: mazzi, Deleted member 21766, Deleted member 24507 and 3 others
im 6'3. i am just extremely downward grown and have underbite with no ramus maxilla or chin and also have severe asymmetry
Interesting. Are u high inhib and non nt as well?
 
I don't think most black guys here struggle to get laid unlike individuals such as ozell
thats what i thought too, but it seems like they really are struggling. Maybe this BBC niche only applies to some. i dont know the factors though but thugmaxxing might be the biggest part of it.
 
Interesting. Are u high inhib and non nt as well?
high inhib? yea. Used to be much lower inhib tho, high inhib came after realizing I was ugly.

Non NT? no, ppl actually call me charismatic pretty frequently and have an easy time making female friends.

i remmeber being at a party with some girl who was oomf at the time, and she was hanging around me and my boy thought we were dating. So when I left to go talk to some other ppl he started grilling her about me for some reason. "Oh whiteissuperior is so great he's so funny I love him blah blah blah".

My boy: "so are you into him"

My friend: "ewwww no."

My boy: "you keep going on about how much you love him why did you react like this"

Friend: "I mean he's just uhhhhh he's just uhhh not attractive. PLEASE DONT TELL HIM I SAID THAT THO"

I have a million stories like this btw. I overheard that shit and had to keep it pushing
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: aBetterMii, Blackgymmax, bwrauycnee and 1 other person
All races of women have more options now. Asian women want white men. Latinas want whites men. Curry women want white men, White women want white men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bishōnenmaxxer
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21766 and Deleted member 29155
Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
aspie tax hits niggers the hardest

being white or asian and aspie is acceptable
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29710
Can you link me proof to back your claim? JBW seems to be more in-line with betabuxing.
Original 1
Cons
Slaynothing


R1b map
Main qimg 504068cc8d41385caa2337c1b6b90fea pjlq


Hallstattm
Northpontidm
Northatlantidm
Middlenilem
Prenilotidm
Indomelanidm
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21766 and Deleted member 29155

That's outdated data. I want to see new and updated studies. I'd also like to add. We're evolved to find those who're most genetically similar to ourselves the most attractive. Because said genes are best suited for the ecology they're specifically evolved to, hence the attraction to the characteristics that define the race.

Mixed race offspring have a lower fertility rate on average.
 
Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
Because approaching IRL is less and less common and blacks are less likely to do well online then any other race.
 
That's outdated data. I want to see new and updated studies. I'd also like to add. We're evolved to find those who're most genetically similar to ourselves the most attractive. Because said genes are best suited for the ecology they're specifically evolved to, hence the attraction to said features and characteristics that define the race.

Mixed race offspring have a lower fertility rate on average.

Studies don't have expiration dates. If you think the data is inaccurate, find studies that you think are accurate. But it seems pretty obvious to me that if skin whitening is a billion dollar industry ubiquitous nearly everywhere outside of Europe that it follows only logical that the whiter the better for attraction. Not to mention the historical evidence that whiter males have always outcompeted their darker counterparts when it comes to sexual selection.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766

Why is there so many blackcels in this forum​

Because I wasn't born a woman (or transitioned to one)
 
I don't think most black guys here struggle to get laid unlike individuals such as ozell

I don’t know who “ozell” is but I do know you’re a bastard (mixed) nigger who admitted to me that you’re an ogre faced blackcel in my DMs before you deleted them. Also, it’s ironic you deleted your account after you admitted to being a mutt nigger from Brazil of all places. Niggers like you can’t even get women. Israelite (so-called Negro) men like myself don’t struggle with women unlike nigger mutts like yourself, hence why I never complained about women while you have numerous comments complaining about women because you’re an ugly bastard nigger. I’m glad you embraced your Blackcel identity, nigger.





















Hopefully your mother kicks you out of her basement.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bishōnenmaxxer and Deleted member 29155
Studies don't have expiration dates. If you think the data is inaccurate, find studies that you think are accurate. But it seems pretty obvious to me that if skin whitening is a billion dollar industry ubiquitous nearly everywhere outside of Europe that it follows only logical that the whiter the better for attraction. Not to mention the historical evidence that whiter males have always outcompeted their darker counterparts when it comes to sexual selection.
Asian peoples were whitening their skin prior to any white influence. It's down to status. Those who're high class in asian societies, stay indoors. Hence, their skin is a lighter colour in comparison to the working class. It has nothing to do with genetic based attraction as having pale skin in places like Africa is maladaptive for survival.
 
Last edited:
Studies don't have expiration dates. If you think the data is inaccurate, find studies that you think are accurate. But it seems pretty obvious to me that if skin whitening is a billion dollar industry ubiquitous nearly everywhere outside of Europe that it follows only logical that the whiter the better for attraction. Not to mention the historical evidence that whiter males have always outcompeted their darker counterparts when it comes to sexual selection.
I'm asking for new data which is replicating the old data. If you can't do this. The data is worthless and is pseudoscience unless proven otherwise with updated data.
 
I'm asking for new data which is replicating the old data. If you can't do this. The data is worthless and is pseudoscience unless proven otherwise with updated data.
OKCupid repeated these studies over the years multiple times and got the same exact racial hierarchy each time. You're just in denial of reality, which is ok.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
Asian peoples were whitening their skin prior to any white influence. It's down to status. Those who're high class in asian societies, stay indoors. Hence, their skin is a lighter colour in comparison to the working class. It has nothing to do with genetic based attraction as having pale skin in places like Africa is maladaptive for survival.

Preference for lighter skin is consistent in literally every Eurasian society and even African societies. Conceptions of what counts as status or high class aren't. The Proto-Indo-Europeans of the Steppe and the sedentary Yellow River peoples and hunter gatherers in East Africa all sexually selected for lighter features despite living in radically different circumstances.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
OKCupid repeated these studies over the years multiple times and got the same exact racial hierarchy each time. You're just in denial of reality, which is ok.

Until new data is released. This is pseudoscience. Kpop is proof that these kinds of trends in the dating scene are situational and aren't static.
 
Until new data is released. This is pseudoscience. Kpop is proof that these kinds of trends in the dating scene are situational and aren't static.

If you want to call census data, dating app data, studies on cultural preferences, haplogroups and more all pseudoscience, then you live in a fantasy land and not in reality. Stay in denial.
 
  • +1
Reactions: User49 and Deleted member 21766
Preference for lighter skin is consistent in literally every Eurasian society and even African societies. Conceptions of what counts as status or high class aren't. The Proto-Indo-Europeans of the Steppe and the sedentary Yellow River peoples and hunter gatherers in East Africa all sexually selected for lighter features despite living in radically different circumstances.
Selecting for lighter skin in Africa from an evolutionary standpoint. Doesn't make any sense. The reason we find certain things attractive is down to said characteristics being a marker of high fitness, which we pass onto our offspring. For instance, dark skin increases the survival of offspring in Africa, because they are better protected against the elements. So, pale skin in Africa is a marker of bad genes.

What humans find attractive will vary according to the environment the different races have evolved to.
 
If you want to call census data, dating app data, studies on cultural preferences, haplogroups and more all pseudoscience, then you live in a fantasy land and not in reality. Stay in denial.
That's cherrypicked data. I could do the same and push JBB. There's studies showing women of all races rating black men's faces as more attractive. I could link a video showing a 4/10 manlet black man's Tinder and he's slaying in the West. I could compile this and claim JBB is real.

Does any of this prove JBB, no because it's cherrypicked nonsense.
 
Selecting for lighter skin in Africa from an evolutionary standpoint. Doesn't make any sense. The reason we find certain things attractive is down to said characteristics being a marker of high fitness, which we pass onto our offspring. For instance, dark skin increases the survival of offspring in Africa, because they are better protected against the elements. So, pale skin in Africa is a marker of bad genes.

What humans find attractive will vary according to the environment the different races have evolved to.

Evolution has no purpose. Peacocks aren't advantaged by their incredibly colorful and large fans-- it actually makes them more vulnerable to predators. But it's better at attracting a mate, so that trait gets passed on. Also, saying that pale skin can't live in Africa while North Africa exists is just lmao.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
That's cherrypicked data. I could do the same and push JBB. There's studies showing women of all races rating black men's faces as more attractive. I could link a video showing a 4/10 manlet black man's Tinder and he's slaying in the West.

Does any of this prove JBB, no because it's cherrypicked nonsense.

No, you couldn't. Because there's no dating app wide study or census wide study that pushes JBB like that because JBB doesn't exist. Nor are there any haplogroup maps that suggest it, or admixture that does either.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
Evolution has no purpose. Peacocks aren't advantaged by their incredibly colorful and large fans-- it actually makes them more vulnerable to predators. But it's better at attracting a mate, so that trait gets passed on. Also, saying that pale skin can't live in Africa while North Africa exists is just lmao.
I never said pale skinned people can't live in Africa. What I said was that it's maladaptive for pale skin individuals to do so overall. The populations in Africa that have paler skin in certain geological regions. Normally, those regions have lower levels of UV, thus, they have lighter skin.



Fisherman's runaway doesn't disprove what I'm saying. We are attracted to markers of high fitness. When this is taken to the extremes by very powerful sexual selection, it may result in said selection becoming maladaptive. For instance, women prefer a man to be tall. If the average male height in Western populations in a thousand years was 6'5", 6'3" would be considered short. Even though it is the most optimal height for men. Every inch above 6'4" is too tall and affects the health of the individual.
 
I never said pale skinned people can't live in Africa. What I said was that it's maladaptive for pale skin individuals to do so overall. The populations in Africa that have paler skin in pockets of Africa. Normally those areas have lower levels of UV, thus, they have lighter skin.



Fisherman's runaway doesn't disprove what I'm saying. We are attracted to markers of high fitness. When this is taken to the extremes by very powerful sexual selection, it may result in said selection becoming maladaptive. For instance, women prefer a man to be tall. If the average male height in Western populations in a thousand years was 6'5", 6'3" would be considered short. Even though it is the most optimal height for men. Every inch above 6'4" is too tall and affects the health of the individual.
Fvb0e0xc6ni91


The UV theory makes no sense.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
That's outdated data. I want to see new and updated studies. I'd also like to add. We're evolved to find those who're most genetically similar to ourselves the most attractive. Because said genes are best suited for the ecology they're specifically evolved to, hence the attraction to the characteristics that define the race.

Mixed race offspring have a lower fertility rate on average.
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
 
No, you couldn't. Because there's no dating app wide study or census wide study that pushes JBB like that because JBB doesn't exist. Nor are there any haplogroup maps that suggest it, or admixture that does either.
Another thing. All of this data was taken before Tinder vertified. So, there's no way of proving who was on the other end. There has to be new data using verified profiles. To prove the previous research or else it's completely worthless.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know who “ozell” is but I do know you’re a bastard (mixed) nigger who admitted to me that you’re an ogre faced blackcel in my DMs before you deleted them. Also, it’s ironic you deleted your account after you admitted to being a mutt nigger from Brazil of all places. Niggers like you can’t even get women. Israelite (so-called Negro) men like myself don’t struggle with women unlike nigger mutts like yourself, hence why I never complained about women while you have numerous comments complaining about women because you’re an ugly bastard nigger. I’m glad you embraced your Blackcel identity, nigger.





















Hopefully your mother kicks you out of her basement.
Ima the definition of a mutt, pussy comes Ez brudder jBB on 🔝
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 24507
View attachment 2207348

The UV theory makes no sense.
It makes perfect sense. 🤣

'Scientists have found that differences in skin color are most highly related to geographic latitude and average dose of UV radiation (UV-R), allowing for selection of dark skin in equatorial regions of the world and light skin at the pole'
 
It makes perfect sense. 🤣

'Scientists have found that differences in skin color are most highly related to geographic latitude and average dose of UV radiation (UV-R), allowing for selection of dark skin in equatorial regions of the world and light skin at the pole'

If UV rays were the prime selector of skin color, populations on the Arabian Peninsula should be of similar skintone to Nilotes. Instead, they're much closer to other MENA populations. That's just one of many inconsistencies with the UV theory.
 
Ima the definition of a mutt, pussy comes Ez brudder jBB on 🔝

I don’t understand nothing of what you said, bastard (mixed) man 🤣.
 
If UV rays were the prime selector of skin color, populations on the Arabian Peninsula should be of similar skintone to Nilotes. Instead, they're much closer to other MENA populations. That's just one of many inconsistencies with the UV theory.
The enviornment isn't static...
 
Another thing. All of this data was taken before Tinder verified. So, there's no way of proving who was on the other end. There has to be new data using verified profiles. To prove the previous research or else it's completely worthless.

That just seems like you grasping at straws to throw out data that doesn't agree with your priors. This isn't even Tinder doing the study.
 
L penisma

Red Al Ijaan.


Ibn Atheer narrates in his book Al Nihaayah Fee Ghareeb Al Hadeeth Wal Athar Chapter 1 Page 440

“And in the hadeeth Ali.. A man from the mawaali (clients) opposed him so Ali said, “Shut up you son of a red Ijaan, “meaning son of a slave woman. 👉The Al Ijaan is the area between the anus and the scrotum or vulva👈” and this is the way the Arabs talk when being derogatory and insulting.”


(In Ghareeb Al Hadeeth by Ibn al Jawzy Chapter 1 Page 241 Ibn Al jawzi repeats this.)

قال ابن اثير في كتابه النهاية في غريب الحديث ج ١ ص ٤٤٠


قال مجد الدين أبي السعادات المبارك بن محمد (ابن الأثير) في النهاية في غريب الحديث والأثر – حرف الحاء – باب الحاء مع الميم

هـ ) وفي حديث علي ” عارضه رجل من الموالي فقال : اسكت يا ابن حمراء العجان ” أي يا ابن الأمة ، والعجان ما بين القبل والدبر ، وهي كلمة تقولها العرب في السب والذم .
 
That just seems like you grasping at straws to throw out data that doesn't agree with your priors. This isn't even Tinder doing the study.
Not at all. I am simply highlighting flaws in the data which make it worthless. We need all of the dating app date to have their users vertified. Until then, the current old dating app data is worthless.
 
Not at all. I am simply highlighting flaws in the data which make it worthless. We need all of the dating app date to have their users vertified. Until then, the current old dating app data is worthless.

Why would verification be relevant? The point is seeing who responds to messages from what groups. Even if we were to posit that these accounts were catfishes, people would still be responding based on perceived attractiveness. Your argument is a cope and irrelevant to the actual results.
 
Why would verification be relevant? The point is seeing who responds to messages from what groups. Even if we were to posit that these accounts were catfishes, people would still be responding based on perceived attractiveness. Your argument is a cope and irrelevant to the actual results.
Because there's no way of proving if the person on the other end is really a woman with the old data. For all we know it's a man. Which makes the data completely worthless. I'm patiently waiting for the new updated data.
 
Because there's no way of proving if the person on the other end is really a woman. For all we know it's a man. Which makes the data completely worthless. I'm patiently waiting for the new updated data.

Yeah you're unironically just looking for reasons to discredit these studies at this point lmao. It's not like Tinder verification prevents catfishes. Just accept the truth.
 
The enviornment isn't static...

This is the problem with 'just-so' theories, they attempt to create grand theories of everything that often don't stand up to closer scrutiny. Sexual selection is much more significant than you think it is in humans.



Amazon product ASIN 0060556579
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
10
Views
128
halyk
halyk
.zonic
Replies
10
Views
121
FiendFiend
FiendFiend
PrinceLuenLeoncur
LifeFuel Bye
Replies
10
Views
120
Alias!
Alias!
acm
Replies
9
Views
130
acm
acm
fashioncel
Replies
73
Views
579
Hitlerstopguy05
Hitlerstopguy05

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top