D
Deleted member 23772
Apricot
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Posts
- 4,231
- Reputation
- 6,607
Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
im 6'3. i am just extremely downward grown and have underbite with no ramus maxilla or chin and also have severe asymmetrymaybe they're short, you can't be a blackcel if you're tall, like faceandlms
Interesting. Are u high inhib and non nt as well?im 6'3. i am just extremely downward grown and have underbite with no ramus maxilla or chin and also have severe asymmetry
thats what i thought too, but it seems like they really are struggling. Maybe this BBC niche only applies to some. i dont know the factors though but thugmaxxing might be the biggest part of it.I don't think most black guys here struggle to get laid unlike individuals such as ozell
high inhib? yea. Used to be much lower inhib tho, high inhib came after realizing I was ugly.Interesting. Are u high inhib and non nt as well?
Non-NT.Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
Because JBW is reality.Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
aspie tax hits niggers the hardestCaught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
Can you link me proof to back your claim? JBW seems to be more in-line with betabuxing.Because JBW is reality.
Can you link me proof to back your claim? JBW seems to be more in-line with betabuxing.
Because approaching IRL is less and less common and blacks are less likely to do well online then any other race.Caught me off guard tbh. Not to mention there has been a recent increase of blackcels ever since i joined this forum.
That's outdated data. I want to see new and updated studies. I'd also like to add. We're evolved to find those who're most genetically similar to ourselves the most attractive. Because said genes are best suited for the ecology they're specifically evolved to, hence the attraction to said features and characteristics that define the race.
Mixed race offspring have a lower fertility rate on average.
Because I wasn't born a woman (or transitioned to one)Why is there so many blackcels in this forum
I don't think most black guys here struggle to get laid unlike individuals such as ozell
Asian peoples were whitening their skin prior to any white influence. It's down to status. Those who're high class in asian societies, stay indoors. Hence, their skin is a lighter colour in comparison to the working class. It has nothing to do with genetic based attraction as having pale skin in places like Africa is maladaptive for survival.Studies don't have expiration dates. If you think the data is inaccurate, find studies that you think are accurate. But it seems pretty obvious to me that if skin whitening is a billion dollar industry ubiquitous nearly everywhere outside of Europe that it follows only logical that the whiter the better for attraction. Not to mention the historical evidence that whiter males have always outcompeted their darker counterparts when it comes to sexual selection.
I'm asking for new data which is replicating the old data. If you can't do this. The data is worthless and is pseudoscience unless proven otherwise with updated data.Studies don't have expiration dates. If you think the data is inaccurate, find studies that you think are accurate. But it seems pretty obvious to me that if skin whitening is a billion dollar industry ubiquitous nearly everywhere outside of Europe that it follows only logical that the whiter the better for attraction. Not to mention the historical evidence that whiter males have always outcompeted their darker counterparts when it comes to sexual selection.
OKCupid repeated these studies over the years multiple times and got the same exact racial hierarchy each time. You're just in denial of reality, which is ok.I'm asking for new data which is replicating the old data. If you can't do this. The data is worthless and is pseudoscience unless proven otherwise with updated data.
Asian peoples were whitening their skin prior to any white influence. It's down to status. Those who're high class in asian societies, stay indoors. Hence, their skin is a lighter colour in comparison to the working class. It has nothing to do with genetic based attraction as having pale skin in places like Africa is maladaptive for survival.
OKCupid repeated these studies over the years multiple times and got the same exact racial hierarchy each time. You're just in denial of reality, which is ok.
Until new data is released. This is pseudoscience. Kpop is proof that these kinds of trends in the dating scene are situational and aren't static.
Selecting for lighter skin in Africa from an evolutionary standpoint. Doesn't make any sense. The reason we find certain things attractive is down to said characteristics being a marker of high fitness, which we pass onto our offspring. For instance, dark skin increases the survival of offspring in Africa, because they are better protected against the elements. So, pale skin in Africa is a marker of bad genes.Preference for lighter skin is consistent in literally every Eurasian society and even African societies. Conceptions of what counts as status or high class aren't. The Proto-Indo-Europeans of the Steppe and the sedentary Yellow River peoples and hunter gatherers in East Africa all sexually selected for lighter features despite living in radically different circumstances.
That's cherrypicked data. I could do the same and push JBB. There's studies showing women of all races rating black men's faces as more attractive. I could link a video showing a 4/10 manlet black man's Tinder and he's slaying in the West. I could compile this and claim JBB is real.If you want to call census data, dating app data, studies on cultural preferences, haplogroups and more all pseudoscience, then you live in a fantasy land and not in reality. Stay in denial.
Selecting for lighter skin in Africa from an evolutionary standpoint. Doesn't make any sense. The reason we find certain things attractive is down to said characteristics being a marker of high fitness, which we pass onto our offspring. For instance, dark skin increases the survival of offspring in Africa, because they are better protected against the elements. So, pale skin in Africa is a marker of bad genes.
What humans find attractive will vary according to the environment the different races have evolved to.
That's cherrypicked data. I could do the same and push JBB. There's studies showing women of all races rating black men's faces as more attractive. I could link a video showing a 4/10 manlet black man's Tinder and he's slaying in the West.
Does any of this prove JBB, no because it's cherrypicked nonsense.
I never said pale skinned people can't live in Africa. What I said was that it's maladaptive for pale skin individuals to do so overall. The populations in Africa that have paler skin in certain geological regions. Normally, those regions have lower levels of UV, thus, they have lighter skin.Evolution has no purpose. Peacocks aren't advantaged by their incredibly colorful and large fans-- it actually makes them more vulnerable to predators. But it's better at attracting a mate, so that trait gets passed on. Also, saying that pale skin can't live in Africa while North Africa exists is just lmao.
I never said pale skinned people can't live in Africa. What I said was that it's maladaptive for pale skin individuals to do so overall. The populations in Africa that have paler skin in pockets of Africa. Normally those areas have lower levels of UV, thus, they have lighter skin.
Fisherman's runaway doesn't disprove what I'm saying. We are attracted to markers of high fitness. When this is taken to the extremes by very powerful sexual selection, it may result in said selection becoming maladaptive. For instance, women prefer a man to be tall. If the average male height in Western populations in a thousand years was 6'5", 6'3" would be considered short. Even though it is the most optimal height for men. Every inch above 6'4" is too tall and affects the health of the individual.
Do you have a source on that?That's outdated data. I want to see new and updated studies. I'd also like to add. We're evolved to find those who're most genetically similar to ourselves the most attractive. Because said genes are best suited for the ecology they're specifically evolved to, hence the attraction to the characteristics that define the race.
Mixed race offspring have a lower fertility rate on average.
im 6'3. i am just extremely downward grown and have underbite with no ramus maxilla or chin and also have severe asymmetry
Another thing. All of this data was taken before Tinder vertified. So, there's no way of proving who was on the other end. There has to be new data using verified profiles. To prove the previous research or else it's completely worthless.No, you couldn't. Because there's no dating app wide study or census wide study that pushes JBB like that because JBB doesn't exist. Nor are there any haplogroup maps that suggest it, or admixture that does either.
Ima the definition of a mutt, pussy comes Ez brudder jBB onI don’t know who “ozell” is but I do know you’re a bastard (mixed) nigger who admitted to me that you’re an ogre faced blackcel in my DMs before you deleted them. Also, it’s ironic you deleted your account after you admitted to being a mutt nigger from Brazil of all places. Niggers like you can’t even get women. Israelite (so-called Negro) men like myself don’t struggle with women unlike nigger mutts like yourself, hence why I never complained about women while you have numerous comments complaining about women because you’re an ugly bastard nigger. I’m glad you embraced your Blackcel identity, nigger.
![]()
Mixed-race Brazilians increasingly embrace blackness
When Bianca Santana was little, her grandmother used to put her forearm alongside her mother's and her own, proudly showing how the family's skin had lightened across the generations.amp.france24.com
Hopefully your mother kicks you out of her basement.
It makes perfect sense.
It makes perfect sense.
'Scientists have found that differences in skin color are most highly related to geographic latitude and average dose of UV radiation (UV-R), allowing for selection of dark skin in equatorial regions of the world and light skin at the pole'
Ima the definition of a mutt, pussy comes Ez brudder jBB on![]()
The enviornment isn't static...If UV rays were the prime selector of skin color, populations on the Arabian Peninsula should be of similar skintone to Nilotes. Instead, they're much closer to other MENA populations. That's just one of many inconsistencies with the UV theory.
Another thing. All of this data was taken before Tinder verified. So, there's no way of proving who was on the other end. There has to be new data using verified profiles. To prove the previous research or else it's completely worthless.
L penismaI don’t understand nothing of what you said, bastard (mixed) man.
L penisma
Not at all. I am simply highlighting flaws in the data which make it worthless. We need all of the dating app date to have their users vertified. Until then, the current old dating app data is worthless.That just seems like you grasping at straws to throw out data that doesn't agree with your priors. This isn't even Tinder doing the study.
Not at all. I am simply highlighting flaws in the data which make it worthless. We need all of the dating app date to have their users vertified. Until then, the current old dating app data is worthless.
Because there's no way of proving if the person on the other end is really a woman with the old data. For all we know it's a man. Which makes the data completely worthless. I'm patiently waiting for the new updated data.Why would verification be relevant? The point is seeing who responds to messages from what groups. Even if we were to posit that these accounts were catfishes, people would still be responding based on perceived attractiveness. Your argument is a cope and irrelevant to the actual results.
Because there's no way of proving if the person on the other end is really a woman. For all we know it's a man. Which makes the data completely worthless. I'm patiently waiting for the new updated data.
The enviornment isn't static...