Women are inherently evil, and the more you reject this, the more it wont change.

[mrdouchebag]

To combat evil you have to become an even greater evil. Darktriadmaxxing is as mandatory as looksmaxxing.

 

[Deleted member 65658]

Boy bye

you cant just drop some esoteric information about the creation of the universe and then proceed to not elaborate

 

[Deleted member 19567]

you cant just drop some esoteric information about the creation of the universe and then proceed to not elaborate

I wont pretend to give you a complete guidebook on what constitutes evil, as it would require a lot more data and personal/individual calculation of truth that i should muster. But i don't think its arbitrary.

There's more to evil than arbitrary ideology. One, is that we ourselves judge what is evil by sustainability. Does anyone who thinks thievery is not evil, want to be robbed? Thieves themselves do not want to be stolen from. Do what you want done to you, is essentially a fundamental law in what constitutes good and bad. Our consciousness system that resides in our bodies is one important judge in factoring good and bad. (assuming everyone has a consciousness. But if not, those who do should be prioritized).

But i do not think this is all.

Another reason i portray the animal aspect of human preposition to be evil, is because consciousness itself testifies against it. Meaning, if you were to just sit outside in nature all day without moving, with your animal bodies, your consciousness will certainly be uncomfortable and feel pain to varying levels. Evil, or suffering and such, would be exerted to consciousness and portrayed by it as such.

Same with when we physically exert ourselves. There may be a pain/reward system. But understand that is of the mind. And when it comes to the mind, which is a higher, more preferable animal preposition. Even this is at odds with the base level animal nature we reside in. As the mind often desires what it does not have. This is another witness against the biological human animal preposition/element.

The next witness against our lives is nature//the elements itself. Biologically, we are so extremely weak, that, every element in nature is at least perpetually attempting to destroy us. Yes nature does sustain our bodies, but at a base level, its requiring what its giving to us. Nature gives life, but requires death.

This is where the concept of duality comes into play that is exclusive to our dimension and nature. Newton's third law. for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

To combat evil you have to become an even greater evil. Darktriadmaxxing is as mandatory as looksmaxxing.

As even a greater good in this world is within Newton's third law. Which is essentially a fundamental aspect of our bodies. To give is to lose. And if we really wanted to solve world peace, we would have to lose everything.

The best thing mankind can prepare Ai for, is to replace every human.

Think about it. This place is like hell. And lets be fucking honest. I'm not just talking about other humans and how shit they are in modern times. Im talking about at a base level. Humanity itself, our bodies, and how nature interacts with it, is a very clear flaw. The system we are in, is...

looksmax.org

 

[SteveLorde]

Tldr?

The human body system is in a constant state of neediness and pain to proper...

Let it burn... Stop trying to fix shit if women and most men themselves don't want shit fixed.

Stop trying to control everything and just let go. [Fight Club 1999]

 

[Mastermind]

Most men and women are evil and hypergamous in nature, the one critical difference being the average man cannot afford to be picky while the average woman can virtually flirt and settle with most above average men.
At the end of the day this newfound liberated presence women experience is all a facade and mostly limited to sex and relationships since their de facto natural imperative is to be submissive towards the most goodlooking, tallest, strongest, aggressive, richest man around and provide him and only him children.
Women have been forced into academias, work environments, all kinds of intellegentsia yet their only relevant intellectual achievement remained the same: being Chad's cumdumpster.
This holds especially true when you consider the fact masculine/career women are typically considered the most scorned, unattractive, depressed and unwanted population in existence by all reports, beating incels at their own game.

 

[Deleted member 33112]

Let it burn... Stop trying to fix shit if women and most men themselves don't want shit fixed.

Stop trying to control everything and just let go. [Fight Club 1999]

Real I just want society to collapse at this point

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Let it burn... Stop trying to fix shit if women and most men themselves don't want shit fixed.

Stop trying to control everything and just let go. [Fight Club 1999]

I'm not necessarily trying to fix anything to be honest. Except for what I can do.

I am aware, its a big club.

I've given up on society a long time ago.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Real I just want society to collapse at this point

I get it.

 

[Deleted member 68446]

Since you bring up parasitism, it's what I believe to be the most prominent cause of rendering women entirely evil. It's crazy how you see stories of dogs and horses displaying extreme loyalty to the bonds they form with men, even enduring the horrors of war with them which must be utterly incomprehensible hell to a creature like a dog and yet they still dive into the fire over and over again on the side of man throughout all of our history together. Or stories of cats or birds or other creatures sacrificing themselves to cover or save their young during earthquakes or forest fires etc. Science likes to preach that animals only care about the most absolute base elements of their own survival and nothing else but the higher an animal climbs on the IQ scale, we see a lot of basically inexplainable levels of sacrifice or loyalty/empathy/devotion occurring from their end if you were to look at things from a purely evolutionary perspective.

But then we come to women. At some point in our evolutionary history, the capabilities of our male and female ancestors had to be a lot more similar than what they are today. If you look at most wildlife, it is extraordinarily rare for any species to exist where one sex is entirely dependent on the other for every minute aspect of its survival. Male and female lions both instinctually know how to hunt or fight and survive on their own even though they choose to live in prides because its safer, male and female birds or mice both instinctually know how to scavenge for scraps of food, foliage for worms or insects and how to hide from predators etc etc. And at some point when we were more ape like, our females also had to be capable of dashing up a tree at full speed or controlling their emotion state to hide or remain quiet if a predator came or how to navigate forests or collect food for themselves when we were at our most primitive evolutionary stages and hadnt developed to be as communal. But as man continued to evolve, all of a woman's evolutionary and survival pressures became removed in place of just finding a man to leech off of.

There's extraordinarily few species where one sex is entirely parasitic to the other like this, where absolutely all physical mental and survival capabilities entirely vanish in place of just depending on the male, and among mammals or higher IQ animals it is literally non existent except for in humans. Almost all species in the world are more dependent on their environmental factors for their survival as opposed to not only other members of their own species but specifically only one particular sex of that species. But you could put a colony of human women in the most safest and fertile lands possible and they will still all die without men to teach them how to utilise it. Not only that, you could introduce a species as harmless as wild rabbits or birds into the same environment and they would literally drive the women to extinction, women haze zero physical or mental capacity to compete against any creature in terms of territory or resource accumulation, they wouldn't even notice that rabbits have taken over their land and eaten all their food

There is no such thing as a woman surviving in any situation on their own, men simply became too capable of securing the protection of our own species for there to be an kind of evolutionary pressure on women at all other than to latch onto a male. No other species has risen to the height of the human males capability and as a result there's no other species that has become so parasitic to their opposite sex as human females

High IQ.

 

[Deleted member 68446]

the universe is an evil place in general, not much place for happiness and good to take place, every good life ends with death and a once beautiful universe will end up swallowed by black holes, yet foids have managed to be even more evil than all these phenomenas combined.

 

[MostGLSlayer]

Fuck it, I’ll be evil too. Let the world get fucked.

 

[einzigartig]

Npc character types usually try to influence their troupes to other fellow NPCs by suggestion.

By repeating the same did not read suggestions through the comments, the NPC behavior hopes to suggest this pattern of thinking to other impressionable people.

Read when your ready. For long posts, i tend to read when im fully charged up so to speak. Usually after or during a big meal or in moments where its preferable to delay an incoming activity.

you're*

 

[Deleted member 19567]

To combat evil you have to become an even greater evil. Darktriadmaxxing is as mandatory as looksmaxxing.

The more i read this the more i understand it. Reminds me of the colonization of modern society.

 

[Klasik616]

I don't understand why are you typing so much, who is paying you to type all these text in an academic article format? Why in an incel forum and not in another place.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

I don't understand why are you typing so much, who is paying you to type all these text in an academic article format? Why in an incel forum and not in another place.

Typing is like speaking to me. I did a lot of research for a very long time so typing these types of things are far from high effort despite it sometimes seeming so. If i was truly trying to write a very elaborate thing, i would amalgamate the bulk of my content, reuse and tailor it, an cite sources and such.

Most of this is one takes. Straight from my brain. I dont really bother to do prior spell checks either. My main motivation is that shower thought or when i see some idiot take. Instead of boiling my frustration i just type out my perspective on the subject. In a way its a form of self medication or therapy.

Nobodys paying me. Absolutely no profit involved but it would be nice to get a fat donation. Though, if this was the goal i would be better off appealing to peoples desires, including doxxing myself and creating a image and persona through my media.

Incel forums are far superior than most places. The forum format also just ensures that not much foul play is going on with people viewing your content. No shadow bans or only 1/5th of the people seeing your content. Other places are also too filled with NPCs. And the moment you type anything even slightly emotionally reactive your probably getting banned.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

the universe is an evil place in general, not much place for happiness and good to take place, every good life ends with death and a once beautiful universe will end up swallowed by black holes, yet foids have managed to be even more evil than all these phenomenas combined.

Agreed

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Since you bring up parasitism, it's what I believe to be the most prominent cause of rendering women entirely evil. It's crazy how you see stories of dogs and horses displaying extreme loyalty to the bonds they form with men, even enduring the horrors of war with them which must be utterly incomprehensible hell to a creature like a dog and yet they still dive into the fire over and over again on the side of man throughout all of our history together. Or stories of cats or birds or other creatures sacrificing themselves to cover or save their young during earthquakes or forest fires etc. Science likes to preach that animals only care about the most absolute base elements of their own survival and nothing else but the higher an animal climbs on the IQ scale, we see a lot of basically inexplainable levels of sacrifice or loyalty/empathy/devotion occurring from their end if you were to look at things from a purely evolutionary perspective.

But then we come to women. At some point in our evolutionary history, the capabilities of our male and female ancestors had to be a lot more similar than what they are today. If you look at most wildlife, it is extraordinarily rare for any species to exist where one sex is entirely dependent on the other for every minute aspect of its survival. Male and female lions both instinctually know how to hunt or fight and survive on their own even though they choose to live in prides because its safer, male and female birds or mice both instinctually know how to scavenge for scraps of food, foliage for worms or insects and how to hide from predators etc etc. And at some point when we were more ape like, our females also had to be capable of dashing up a tree at full speed or controlling their emotion state to hide or remain quiet if a predator came or how to navigate forests or collect food for themselves when we were at our most primitive evolutionary stages and hadnt developed to be as communal. But as man continued to evolve, all of a woman's evolutionary and survival pressures became removed in place of just finding a man to leech off of.

There's extraordinarily few species where one sex is entirely parasitic to the other like this, where absolutely all physical mental and survival capabilities entirely vanish in place of just depending on the male, and among mammals or higher IQ animals it is literally non existent except for in humans. Almost all species in the world are more dependent on their environmental factors for their survival as opposed to not only other members of their own species but specifically only one particular sex of that species. But you could put a colony of human women in the most safest and fertile lands possible and they will still all die without men to teach them how to utilise it. Not only that, you could introduce a species as harmless as wild rabbits or birds into the same environment and they would literally drive the women to extinction, women haze zero physical or mental capacity to compete against any creature in terms of territory or resource accumulation, they wouldn't even notice that rabbits have taken over their land and eaten all their food

There is no such thing as a woman surviving in any situation on their own, men simply became too capable of securing the protection of our own species for there to be an kind of evolutionary pressure on women at all other than to latch onto a male. No other species has risen to the height of the human males capability and as a result there's no other species that has become so parasitic to their opposite sex as human females

Late reply but 100% agree btw

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Women have the dark yin energy
Ancient priests knew this that’s why they stay celibate

 

[Deleted member 71093]

The real issue is that humanity itself is inherently evil, as well as our current systems and metaphysics that constitutes our flesh and living (like entropy, and gravity laws).

---

Women are inherently sociopathic, and you must see this even in what you think is normal behavior. First, lets understand out bodies. Humans on a base level are parasitical animals. Even worst than some animals in nature that actually provide more synergy amongst each other and are able to live in harmony. Humans are unable to operate on this level without the assistance of technology or higher than the common animals thinking. We would destroy ourselves if forced on the same grounds and conditions as a animal, partially due to our unique set of consciousnesses. Things like murder is natural and seen as a normal thing to animals (some animals even eat their babies), but absolutely unacceptable and horrible to a proper humans perception due to the level of consciousness. If not unacceptable to you, than to the victim. And just like i said, sometimes you have to stop at the red light, for someone to be able to go at the green light. Forsaking the common animal nature for a common goal or imagination is in essence part of what makes humanity great.

The body system in itself in an entropy, which makes it impossible for a human to not be needy. Higher levels of intelligence or building requires you in some sort to abandon the desires of the animal body system for a greater goal. For example, even though we want to run a red light when we're late, we stop and control our impulsive desires for the sake of a greater order. This brings us a certain level of pain though, because the state our body and existence is in. Science and tech has advanced partially off the sacrifices of many humans. In order for us to build a machine we need to exert (or sacrifice) energy and time etc.

My point is to highlight that at a base level, the male and female human, as an human animal, are disgusting, sick, sociopathic, murderous, selfish creatures in a painfully pathetic state. Women are not exempt from this, and the situation with women in todays time is that their own animal prepositions goes unaware at best. In essence, it is cultivated and even encouraged as a morally normal or upright behavior.

Think about it, men are encouraged and forced to control their desires and nature, such as rape, murder impulses, polygamy and even mental divergency through societal norms, but women are not. They are more systems in place that encourage women's nature and just as much that destroy a mans nature.

Most people seem to not understand (or ignorantly try to reject) how at a base level, women are repulsive, unrighteous creatures. Lets add the greater variance theory, which explains that most women are in a smaller pool of characteristics and behavior (essentially the NPC theory). This means in short that, women are more prepositioned to behave in a socially determined manner. Their psyche is more prone to likely lacking deviancy, and is thus inherently determined/dominated by the environment around them. This is why it can be observed that women are the most fanatically obsessed with keeping up with societal normalcies and dynamics.

Systems in place like capitalism, feminism, or matriarchal society structures would mean most women would not question being raised or deviate from the nature of what's prescribed due to their nature. And lets be honest here, todays society particularly encourages sociopathy. I noticed women would gladly insult a man and even harass a man who is not seen as "higher" in the social reigns of the world. Being broke is considered bad socially, as well as lame or weird (divergent). And i think this can be attribed to women not being prepositioned to question their own behavior independently, regardless if society or implied dynamics judge it as normal or correct.

Outside of this socially implied bad and good, you will discover that most women find difficulty forming judgement. They are simply biologically prepositioned to follow the code of their nature. Which is (in short, or applicable sense) to follow and operate under society or the worlds pattern suggested.

This also includes the sick system of harlotry and sociopathy disguised as natural mating patterns. Don't for a second believe todays romance dynamics between male and female is anything short of exploitative sociopathy. Date culture scam, Non committed relationship dynamics like boyfriend and girlfriend (resource trap), "pick me up and chameleon natures" women use to deceive men with. All are sociopathic and disgustingly evil to endure as a man in todays society. What you should understand is, women are today raised to extract resources from a man in all manners of deception, one way or another. It is not moral or even sustainable from a nature POV.

This is why some say its harder to find a good woman than a good man. Divergency. A man is more biologically prepositioned to reject a system in place or be in a higher variance pool of behavior that can deviate from the norm (break outside the box of environmental factors). And this is important because naturally, our environment is far from moral, and of higher virtue to our consciousness. This divergency in essence, is also why i suspect men are so heavily oppressed, and instead homosexual men (or women/those more biologically prepositioned to favor or fashion a women's traits) are seen as a more suitable for a replacement for society and put in higher positions of power, either intentionally or by a natural ai of sorts for contingency.

Bump high IQ

 

[SquareChinOrDeath]

Insanely high IQ post, it's a shame not many men understand this. Simps and cucks are the cause for the downfall of our societal gender balance.