80/20 rule is blue pill, it's literally 95/5

vinn98

vinn98

Kraken
Joined
Dec 7, 2021
Posts
4,863
Reputation
8,719
Normies used to think the incel community was exaggerating and being ridiculous when they said 80% of women just want the top 20% of men. Online dating statistics prove that even being top 20% isn't enough. Women only swipe right on 5% of guys, so they consider 95% of guys too ugly to date.



This is why all civilizations created the institution of marriage, one woman for each man, because they knew if female nature was unrestricted they would only go for top tier men and they'd have an unstable society full of lonely angry men. Traditional marriage was actually a form of sexual socialism to keep the peace.

In this thread there are women confirming they only swipe right on about 5% of guys. It's over.

 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer, aleksander, 케이제이 and 6 others
Probably closer to 15% but you have a point.

The problem arises when chads appear. The rest don't exist anymore because foids always go for the best option. I have been a witness to this in high school, there were even some htns around, all invisible when chad is there.

Also foids have similair taste whereas men like foids of different builds,leaness and face proportions.

Just avoid chads is your only option
 
  • +1
Reactions: tombradylover, aleksander, forevergymcelling and 2 others
Probably closer to 15% but you have a point.

The problem arises when chads appear. The rest don't exist anymore because foids always go for the best option. I have been a witness to this in high school, there were even some htns around, all invisible when chad is there.

Also foids have similair taste whereas men like foids of different builds,leaness and face proportions.

Just avoid chads is your only option
True because that 5% isn't all the same guys, so there is some variation. However it's safe to say the bottom 80% of males get almost nothing. Even being above average but sub-chad isn't enough, you'll be practically on the same level as an incel.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane and Manana
Normies used to think the incel community was exaggerating and being ridiculous when they said 80% of women just want the top 20% of men. Online dating statistics prove that even being top 20% isn't enough. Women only swipe right on 5% of guys, so they consider 95% of guys too ugly to date.



This is why all civilizations created the institution of marriage, one woman for each man, because they knew if female nature was unrestricted they would only go for top tier men and they'd have an unstable society full of lonely angry men. Traditional marriage was actually a form of sexual socialism to keep the peace.

In this thread there are women confirming they only swipe right on about 5% of guys. It's over.


99/1 within 10 years too buddy boyo
Also..
Wet
 
Incel trait: unironically believing that Tinder/OLD data represents real life
 
  • +1
Reactions: distance decay and NotoriousLoser
Another important point, if heterosexual means being attracted to the opposite sex then women cannot be considered heterosexual if they're only attracted to 5% of men and repulsed by 95%. They're chadsexual.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 케이제이 and Mister Fuwy
Probably closer to 15% but you have a point.

The problem arises when chads appear. The rest don't exist anymore because foids always go for the best option. I have been a witness to this in high school, there were even some htns around, all invisible when chad is there.

Also foids have similair taste whereas men like foids of different builds,leaness and face proportions.

Just avoid chads is your only option
I just realized the number is probably much worse than 5%. Think about how common it is for a guy to match with a woman but she either doesn't respond or ghosts him. Happens most of the time. The other way around, if a man matches with an attractive woman is he going to ignore her when she messages? HELL NO. This must mean women aren't even that attracted to most of their matches, but then why did they match in the first place? My theory is that women swipe left so many times in a row that they get a fleeting moment of realization that their standards are ridiculous, then they see a guy pop up that isn't ugly but not attractive either but acceptable so they swipe right to give the app a chance. Then when they match she doesn't respond because she wasn't that attracted in the first place.

This means on average the actual number of men that a women is attracted to and eager to meet up and possibly have sex has got to be around 1% or less JFL.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Recessed Life, BrahminBoss and Manana
I just realized the number is probably much worse than 5%. Think about how common it is for a guy to match with a woman but she either doesn't respond or ghosts him. Happens most of the time. The other way around, if a man matches with an attractive woman is he going to ignore her when she messages? HELL NO. This must mean women aren't even that attracted to most of their matches, but then why did they match in the first place? My theory is that women swipe left so many times in a row that they get a fleeting moment of realization that their standards are ridiculous, then they see a guy pop up that isn't ugly but not attractive either but acceptable so they swipe right to give the app a chance. Then when they match she doesn't respond because she wasn't that attracted in the first place.

This means on average the actual number of men that a women is attracted to and eager to meet up and possibly have sex has got to be around 1% or less JFL.
You are right about that, but since 90% of foids want that top 5% (let's give them that) not all can get it.

So they lower standards eventually. A lot of productive dating goes on early on in the teens while foids egos aren't as inflated. That's why just be first is law.


As far as tinder and instant attraction goes, you are right, top 10% of men are taken into real consideration based on looks. Low quality women will settle, just as men do, eventually.
 
  • +1
Reactions: vinn98
I just realized the number is probably much worse than 5%. Think about how common it is for a guy to match with a woman but she either doesn't respond or ghosts him. Happens most of the time. The other way around, if a man matches with an attractive woman is he going to ignore her when she messages? HELL NO. This must mean women aren't even that attracted to most of their matches, but then why did they match in the first place? My theory is that women swipe left so many times in a row that they get a fleeting moment of realization that their standards are ridiculous, then they see a guy pop up that isn't ugly but not attractive either but acceptable so they swipe right to give the app a chance. Then when they match she doesn't respond because she wasn't that attracted in the first place.

This means on average the actual number of men that a women is attracted to and eager to meet up and possibly have sex has got to be around 1% or less JFL.
holy shit It proves that I'm chad. Ugly shitskins here rate me LTN cuz muh perfect face but no sex appeal! Everyday I get more matches than them in entire life.
 
Incel trait: unironically believing that Tinder/OLD data represents real life
I saw last week in the mall a becky with a ltn guy and he even was fcking shorter than her. She is probably mentally ill, so there r always attractive niche girls that u can go for but they r hard to find.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Swarthy Knight and <6PSLcel
Incel trait: unironically believing that Tinder/OLD data represents real life
Retard trait: not knowing the majority of people date through OLD now
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeanletMogger
Incel trait: unironically believing that Tinder/OLD data represents real life
It's the most common way people meet now. Social circle is very limited. Most guys don't have the guts to cold approach in day time, and most women are not in clubs at midnight to get approached by guys they think are ugly.
 
Theres virtually no slim/fit average guys on r/Ladyboners. (you might find 1 in 2000)


Brutal.

And the 47% of girls that guys pass up - i guarantee that 44% are too fat/obese chicks.
 
Retard trait: not knowing the majority of people date through OLD now
.org autist trait: not realizing that <30% of OLD population is made up of females
 
It's the most common way people meet now. Social circle is very limited. Most guys don't have the guts to cold approach in day time, and most women are not in clubs at midnight to get approached by guys they think are ugly.
Most women aren't using OLD. The gender ratios on these apps are trash for a reason. If anything most foids are meeting dudes on normies social media apps (IG, tik tok, etc)
 
Eh, most girls ik are obsessed with a htn thats nt, thats more than enough to live a good life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uglyzayn

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top