Redpill After much research I’ve come to this his huge conclusion regarding maxillas....

KrissKross

KrissKross

Roped
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Posts
7,131
Reputation
9,637
They’re meaningless. There’s too many good looking models, actors and actresses with both forward and not so forward maxillas for it to play any major defining role in accounting for facial beauty. There’s far too many exceptions that the rule of maxillas being key for an attractive face is just not practical or defendable. Basically, as long as your maxilla isn’t really really retruded (like extremely) which in most people it isn’t, your fine. This mike “the Jew” Mew nonsense of a forward maxilla must cease.

A forward mandible might be another case however....
To be continued.....
 
speedmaxx

speedmaxx

Iron
Joined
Dec 20, 2018
Posts
55
Reputation
15
Mike Mew's true mission is to improve health. A forward maxilla allows better breathing. There is far more to beauty than maxillas. You could say that other elements of beauty, such as averageness, are overrated by pointing out highly dimorphic but attractive faces. It's certainly not wrong to be suspicious, however, given the lack of scientific evidence. I disagree that a forward mandible would be attractive in the absence of a forward maxilla.
 
KrissKross

KrissKross

Roped
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Posts
7,131
Reputation
9,637
Mike Mew's true mission is to improve health. A forward maxilla allows better breathing. There is far more to beauty than maxillas. You could say that other elements of beauty, such as averageness, are overrated by pointing out highly dimorphic but attractive faces. It's certainly not wrong to be suspicious, however, given the lack of scientific evidence. I disagree that a forward mandible would be attractive in the absence of a forward maxilla.
Yes but John Mew just goes on and on about “what will make an attractive face”. It’s a major part of their mission
 
FiveFourManlet

FiveFourManlet

Too short to do anything
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Posts
392
Reputation
317
cope
 
Wincel

Wincel

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Posts
1,803
Reputation
2,238
Mewing and chewing will help your face, while mewing you should be doing the mew push swallow, which will atrophy your buccinator giving you hollow cheeks or at least a less bloated look, chewing obviously enhances the width of the jaw but also the width of your zygomatic arches as the masseter runs underneath them and an increase in size would mean required bone remodeling. If you think profile, gonial angle, and what I mentioned here in terms of the front of the face is all cope then fine don't mew. Not all models have forward growth but all people with forward growth look like models.
 
VST

VST

Mentalcel Supreme™ with Cheese
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Posts
2,395
Reputation
2,510
They’re meaningless. There’s too many good looking models, actors and actresses with both forward and not so forward maxillas for it to play any major defining role in accounting for facial beauty. There’s far too many exceptions that the rule of maxillas being key for an attractive face is just not practical or defendable. Basically, as long as your maxilla isn’t really really retruded (like extremely) which in most people it isn’t, your fine. This mike “the Jew” Mew nonsense of a forward maxilla must cease.

A forward mandible might be another case however....
To be continued.....
True, maxilla only has a profound effect on your profile, and your profile doesn't matter that much.
 
elfmaxx

elfmaxx

Zephir
Joined
Jan 6, 2019
Posts
4,955
Reputation
6,138
It is overrated.
Eye area is the most important thing in my opinion, Orb is invisible without his 10/10 eye area.
 
SHARK

SHARK

Zephir
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Posts
3,190
Reputation
6,698
Eye area is 80% of attractiveness.

You can tell this guy below gets chicks.

iu


'B-bbut we can't see his maxilla!' Cope.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top