nvck_pilled
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
- Posts
- 3,630
- Reputation
- 4,764
you ere seen they black ass nipples??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
you ere seen they black ass nipples??
Those ethnic groups i mentioned do not have naturally wavy hair so that should tell you enough that the original main dominant population before the Amhara would had looked like thisOf course. South Sudanese are full-blooded Nilotes. Some of them can have pseudo-Caucasian facial features, some of them don't. They evolved that bone structure independently. However, other East Africans like Cushites, Nubians, & Ethiosemites are admixed. full-blooded Nilotes are what Cushites, Nilotes, & Nubians would look like without their MENA ancestry.
They live in the southern part of Ethiopia the northern part of Ethiopia is more grassey and has more mountain areasYes because there are Nilotes that live in Ethiopia & they're as dark as their as their kin in South Sudan.
Selective imagery. Nilotes don't have wavy hair. Ethiopians with wavy hair have West Eurasian ancestry. They also have an additional amount of South Arabian admixture due to Bronze Age Yemenites from 3,000 years ago.Those ethnic groups i mentioned do not have naturally wavy hair so that should tell you enough that the original main dominant population before the Amhara would had looked like this
Some may have slight Middle Eastern dna
View attachment 1249754
View attachment 1249755
View attachment 1249756
View attachment 1249757
It doesn't matter.They live in the southern part of Ethiopia the northern part of Ethiopia is more grassey and has more mountain areas
I just said the people I’m showing don’t have natural wavy hair it looks exactly like other sub Saharan hair.Selective imagery. Nilotes don't have wavy hair. Ethiopians with wavy hair have West Eurasian ancestry. They also have an additional amount of South Arabian admixture due to Bronze Age Yemenites from 3,000 years ago.
It doesn't matter.
What exact people? be specific.I just said the people I’m showing don’t have natural wavy hair it looks exactly like other sub Saharan hair.
It doesn't matter if it it is the Ethiopian Highlands or the South Sudanese Lowlands they obviously will still have brown to dark skin. Dumbfuck.View attachment 1249761View attachment 1249762
the northern part is a lot colder with less uva lights compared to south Sudan
Can't believe I'm arguing with someone who looks like this:I just said the people I’m showing don’t have natural wavy hair it looks exactly like other sub Saharan hair.
The south Sudanese have Jet black skin there’s no brown skin.It doesn't matter if it it is the Ethiopian Highlands or the South Sudanese Lowlands they obviously will still have brown to dark skin. Dumbfuck.
And? What difference does it make exactly? One group has Eurasian influence in their DNA, the other clearly does not. Skin tone doesn't matter.The south Sudanese have Jet black skin there’s no brown skin.
the ethnic groups I showed you are dark skinned but not jet black
Yeah I’m half Sudanese
Beja people are Cushites who have West Asian ancestry as well.
What tribe exactly?Yeah I’m half Sudanese
It does matter because genotype does not always equal phenotypeAnd? What difference does it make exactly? One group has Eurasian influence in their DNA, the other clearly does not. Skin tone doesn't matter.
Ok and cranial dna shows that would look no different without the west Eurasian dnaBeja people are Cushites who have West Asian ancestry as well.
Papuans have no close genetic relationship with West Africans, they are literally thousands of miles away from each other. They are closer to South Indians, Korean, & Chinese than to sub-Saharan Africans. The reason why Papuans have broad facial features & kinky hair is because they evolved in a tropical environment through convergent evolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution. This is also the same reason why some East Africans can look somewhat similar to South Indians but are genetically distant as well.It does matter because genotype does not always equal phenotype
By your logic are these people related to black Africans
View attachment 1249770
View attachment 1249771
No it doesn't. There is no different DNA. Stop pulling shit out of your ass.Ok and cranial dna shows that would look no different without the west Eurasian dna
I’ve given you the source but you chose not to believe it here’s it againNo it doesn't. There is no different DNA. Stop pulling shit out of your ass.
Read it carefully, & you'll actually realize that it agrees with me:I’ve given you the source but you chose not to believe it here’s it again
View attachment 1249774
The Nubians are related to the ethnic groups I mentioned. If it’s confirmed that the Nubians would had not looked any different. The papu people also have Eurasian dna also again phenotype is determined by your environment these east Africans would not had look the same without the Eurasian element
View attachment 1249779
Did you miss the part where it said that they consider these Hal groups west Eurasian origin but these Hal groups were also present in Africa also god you can’t be this dumb broRead it carefully, & you'll actually realize that it agrees with me:
''While we
consider these haplogroups to be West Eurasian-associated given their geographic origin, they
were present in northeastern Africa (not only limited to the Nile Valley) possibly for thousands of
years before the Christian Period70-75''
These West Eurasian haplogroups entered Northeastern Africa during the Neolithic & were present by the Christian Nubian Period (Medivel Era). Papuans are fully Eurasian they are NOT African. they evolved tropical facial features in the Oceanian evironment. STOP trying to compare them to Africans with actual West Asian admixture. Stop acting dumb kid.
Read it carefully, & you'll actually realize that it agrees with me:
''While we
consider these haplogroups to be West Eurasian-associated given their geographic origin, they
were present in northeastern Africa (not only limited to the Nile Valley) possibly for thousands of
years before the Christian Period70-75''
These West Eurasian haplogroups entered Northeastern Africa during the Neolithic & were present by the Christian Nubian Period (Medivel Era). Papuans are fully Eurasian they are NOT African. they evolved tropical facial features in the Oceanian evironment. STOP trying to compare them to Africans with actual West Asian admixture. Stop acting dumb kid.
These Nubian maternal & paternal haplogroups in Africa are West Eurasian in origin in were in Northeast Africa well before the Christian period. Stop trying to reinterpret facts to deny that Nubians don't have Eurasian influence. Let's just agree to disagree.Did you miss the part where it said that they consider these Hal groups west Eurasian origin but these Hal groups were also present in Africa also god you can’t be this dumb bro
Like I said 4 of them originated in West Eurasia, the rest of them orginated in North Africa. They didn't come from SSA.View attachment 1249786
Genotype does not always equal phenotype that why I brought up the papu people. Nubians don’t not have a mix race phenotype( the average looking one doesn’t) these Eurasian markers originated in Africa first bro
Yeah but it also said these Eurasian markers were also found in North Africa thousands of years before the Cristian period. The study says phenotype wise despite the Eurasian flow their phenotype didn’t changeThese Nubian maternal & paternal haplogroups in Africa are West Eurasian in origin in were in Northeast Africa well before the Christian period. Stop trying to reinterpret facts to deny that Nubians don't have Eurasian influence. Let's just agree to disagree.
North Africans are still Africa. Before the Saharan dessert there was no such thing as sub Saharan Africa.Like I said 4 of them originated in West Eurasia, the rest of them orginated in North Africa. They didn't come from SSA.
Yes they arrived during the Neolithic when the Sahara region of Africa was still green (Neolithic/Mesolithic Era) 10K-20K years ago. The study never claimed the phenotype didn't change you just assumed that because you wanted to say that Nubians are pure when they CLEARLY are NOT. I'm done arguing.Yeah but it also said these Eurasian markers were also found in North Africa thousands of years before the Cristian period. The study says phenotype wise despite the Eurasian flow their phenotype didn’t change
The people that carried those North African origin haplogroups back-migrated into Africa from West Eurasia/Levant. They weren't the same race modern-day sub-Saharan Africans. Those Neolithic North Africans mixed with Neolithic Nilotes to create modern-day Nubians.North Africans are still Africa. Before the Saharan dessert there was no such thing as sub Saharan Africa.
they were saying the 4 Eurasian markers supposedly originated in Eurasia was already present in Africa first.View attachment 1249791
Plus since you can’t read THESE EURASIANS DID NOT EFFCT THEIR MORPHOLOGY
Bro you can’t be this stupidYes they arrived during the Neolithic when the Sahara region of Africa was still green (Neolithic/Mesolithic Era) 10K-20K years ago. The study never claimed the phenotype didn't change you just assumed that because you wanted to say that Nubians are pure when they CLEARLY are NOT. I'm done arguing.
Let's just agree to disagee.Bro you can’t be this stupid
View attachment 1249795
“However, genetic data have hover resolution than morphological data for detecting gene flow” meaning that the gene flow did not effect the morphology of the NUBAINS bro I’m done going around cycles believe what you want idc I gave evidence and facts to back up my claims.
Those Neolithic farmers also all had a sub Saharan genes in themThe people that carried those North African origin haplogroups back-migrated into Africa from West Eurasia/Levant. They weren't the same race modern-day sub-Saharan Africans. Those Neolithic North Africans mixed with Neolithic Nilotes to create modern-day Nubians.
Ok fine but again there’s not sub Saharan race the Nubians you see today are not a result of mixing due to the fact that genetically and carnally their phenotype did not changeLet's just agree to disagee.
Those Neolithic farmers also all had a sub Saharan genes in them View attachment 1249796
West Eurasian doesn’t mean Europeans Caucasian is not a race. South Sudanese people are not mixed yet the Caucasian phenotype is seen within themAlmost all attractive ''black'' women have Caucasian/Caucasoid facial features. Almost every sub-Saharan African female that's extremely attractive has some degree of West Eurasian (European, MENA, or South Asian ancestry) admixture in their DNA which increases her phenotypic characteristics which may include (high nose bridges, deep-set eyes, light-colored eyes, soft wavy, curly, straight, soft-kinky hair, & even lighter skin). #ChocolateCaucasoid #WhiteWomenDippedInChocolate. @looksmaxxer234 @africancel @Preston
?????????South Sudanese people are not mixed yet the Caucasian phenotype is seen within them
West Eurasian means someone who is from West Eurasia, this includes Europeans, Arabs, Central Asians, South Asians, & North Africans since they all have West Eurasian ancestry to varying degrees. South Sudanese people would look better if they had lighter skin, higher angular/sharp nose bridges, light-colored eyes, & softer hair. All West Eurasians are Caucasian/Caucasoid.West Eurasian doesn’t mean Europeans Caucasian is not a race. South Sudanese people are not mixed yet the Caucasian phenotype is seen within them
Yes OP recognises this too often when he says African women he usually mentions horn africans and women of the sahel in west Africa, which is a minority of Africa's population and both have external ad mixture, but when you tell him this he copes by saying that the Eurasians were Africans too, kinda strange.Almost all attractive ''black'' women have Caucasian/Caucasoid facial features. Almost every sub-Saharan African female that's extremely attractive has some degree of West Eurasian (European, MENA, or South Asian ancestry) admixture in their DNA which increases her phenotypic characteristics which may include (high nose bridges, deep-set eyes, light-colored eyes, soft wavy, curly, straight, soft-kinky hair, & even lighter skin). #ChocolateCaucasoid #WhiteWomenDippedInChocolate. @looksmaxxer234 @africancel @Preston
Not really Europeans are genetically distinct from indo Iranians and those two have similar phenotypes. Nubians have Eurasian mixture but it didn’t effect their phenotype. Explain to me why does the Masai looo completely different from black Americans who themselves are 25 percent whiteWest Eurasian means someone who is from West Eurasia, this includes Europeans, Arabs, Central Asians, South Asians, & North Africans since they all have West Eurasian ancestry to varying degrees. South Sudanese people would look better if they had lighter skin, higher angular/sharp nose bridges, light-colored eyes, & softer hair. All West Eurasians are Caucasian/Caucasoid.
Not really people like him use Eurasian to take the diversity out of Africa even west Africans have Eurasian dnaYes OP recognises this too often when he says African women he usually mentions horn africans and women of the sahel in west Africa, which is a minority of Africa's population and both have external ad mixture, but when you tell him this he copes by saying that the Eurasians were Africans too, kinda strange.
I know, instead of just admitting the truth, he clings onto delusions. Even though most Horners, Sahelians, North Africans, & New World Blacks are mixed to varying degrees.Yes OP recognises this too often when he says African women he usually mentions horn africans and women of the sahel in west Africa, which is a minority of Africa's population and both have external ad mixture, but when you tell him this he copes by saying that the Eurasians were Africans too, kinda strange.
Yes OP recognises this too often when he says African women he usually mentions horn africans and women of the sahel in west Africa, which is a minority of Africa's population and both have external ad mixture, but when you tell him this he copes by saying that the Eurasians were Africans too, kinda strange.
Europeans are also mixed my guyI know, instead of just admitting the truth, he clings onto delusions. Even though most Horners, Sahelians, North Africans, & New World Blacks are mixed to varying degrees.
West Eurasian: someone who is from the West Eurasian side of the Eurasian supercontinent (mainly refering to Caucasians). Nubians & Maasais are mixed with West Eurasians boyo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maasai_people#Genetics. Just admit the truth, every black woman you find attractive is mixed & not full-blooded SSA.Not really Europeans are genetically distinct from indo Iranians and those two have similar phenotypes. Nubians have Eurasian mixture but it didn’t effect their phenotype. Explain to me why does the Masai looo completely different from black Americans who themselves are 25 percent white
Don't divert. All Europeans have archaic admixture just like everyone else from ancient times. You are a hypocrite. You admit that Europeans are mixed, but will never accept the fact that almost every black woman you post or find attractive is mixed with Europeans, MENAs, or South Asians.Europeans are also mixed my guy
That’s cope Maasai are only mixed with 18 percent Eurasian dna vs the 25 percent European dna of black Americans. Who do black Americans look like west Africans still? Stop copingWest Eurasian: someone who is from the West Eurasian side of the Eurasian supercontinent (mainly refering to Caucasians). Nubians & Maasais are mixed with West Eurasians boyo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maasai_people#Genetics. Just admit the truth, every black woman you find attractive is mixed & not full-blooded SSA.