LonelyGrey214
Iron
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2024
- Posts
- 25
- Reputation
- 5
is it possible to lose bone mass instead of gain when osteoclasts are greater than osteoblasts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
wtfis it possible to lose bone mass instead of gain when osteoclasts are greater than osteoblasts?
but if osteoclasts activity surpasses osteoblast, doesnt that mean bonesmashing will speed up bone losswtf
basic osteogenesis - if osteoclast activity surpasses osteoblast activity, net bone loss occurs.
nothing to do with bonesmashing
Reverse oppositebut if osteoclasts activity surpasses osteoblast, doesnt that mean bonesmashing will speed up bone loss
RetardNo as bonesmashing has no effect at all, you're just hurting yourself because you lack common sense.
Wolfs law
You're so dumb that winning an argument against you wouldn't make me feel any different.Retard
Because u die dumbYou're so dumb that winning an argument against you wouldn't make me feel any different.
Give an argument why it doesn’t workYou're so dumb that winning an argument against you wouldn't make me feel any different.
Woolfs law,as much as I know, was tested for muskels and not bonesGive an argument why it doesn’t work
Yeah that why you’re retardedWoolfs law,as much as I know, was tested for muskels and not bones