Could we create like a BIG math equation for calculating how much PSL someone have ?

[Blackpilled1027]

Like i'm a shit in math but if we took a picture of one guy, then we're making stats about hopw much people rated him.

Then we need to find every variables (Like fwhr, pfl, dick lenght, frame, height, coloring, skin quality, ...)
Then we gotta find what equation it looks like with all the variable to refind the rate they gave him.

Do you think this is possible ? Mathcel it's for you i'm a big begginnerin math

 

[Blackpilled1027]

For exemple a shit like this

PSL = sqr((frame)^2*(height)^2*(dick lenght)^2*(fwhr+pfl+...)^2)

 

[Blackpilled1027]

With this tool, we could find what our real rate is AND find what's are the most attractive features

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I guess you can just check how far each trait is from the ideal and average out all the traits to find how far from the ideal you are.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

For exemple a shit like this

PSL = sqr((frame)^2*(height)^2*(dick lenght)^2*(fwhr+pfl+...)^2)

PSL is only face.

 

[Blackpilled1027]

PSL is only face.

nevermind then we can create a PSL equation then add it to a general attractivity equation

 

[Ryan]

Like i'm a shit in math but if we took a picture of one guy, then we're making stats about hopw much people rated him.

Then we need to find every variables (Like fwhr, pfl, dick lenght, frame, height, coloring, skin quality, ...)
Then we gotta find what equation it looks like with all the variable to refind the rate they gave him.

Do you think this is possible ? Mathcel it's for you i'm a big begginnerin math

dick frame height has nothing to with psl

 

[Ryan]

i will try to make one

 

[Blackpilled1027]

i will try to make one

let us know when it's out

 

[Deleted member 17791]

nevermind then we can create a PSL equation then add it to a general attractivity equation

L=lower third
M=mid third
U=upper third

I=ideal proportion
A=actual proportion

L/M/U=I*A

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8


Ideal is set at 1. The actual proportion is set as how many standard deviations away from the ideal it is. One SD should be 0.31.8 because 1-0.682 is 0.318. two SD should be 0.046.

Average is 50th percentile so we double it to 100%. Each Standard deviation is also doubled to keep things equal.


So someone with lower, mid and upper third 1 standard deviation away from the average is:

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8
=0.3180*8
=2.544

So his PSL is 2.544.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

i will try to make one

Check mine out. It's my first version.

 

[Blackpilled1027]

L=lower third
M=mid third
U=upper third

I=ideal proportion
A=actual proportion

L/M/U=I*A

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8


Ideal is set at 1. The actual proportion is set as how many standard deviations away from the ideal it is. One SD should be 0.31.8 because 1-0.682 is 0.318. two SD should be 0.046.
View attachment 1923335
Average is 50th percentile so we double it to 100%. Each Standard deviation is also doubled to keep things equal.


So someone with lower, mid and upper third 1 standard deviation away from the average is:

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8
=0.3180*8
=2.544

So his PSL is 2.544.

alright let me check this wait please

 

[Deleted member 17791]

alright let me check this wait please

okay

 

[Blackpilled1027]

L=lower third
M=mid third
U=upper third

I=ideal proportion
A=actual proportion

L/M/U=I*A

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8


Ideal is set at 1. The actual proportion is set as how many standard deviations away from the ideal it is. One SD should be 0.31.8 because 1-0.682 is 0.318. two SD should be 0.046.
View attachment 1923335
Average is 50th percentile so we double it to 100%. Each Standard deviation is also doubled to keep things equal.


So someone with lower, mid and upper third 1 standard deviation away from the average is:

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8
=0.3180*8
=2.544

So his PSL is 2.544.

But what's L M and U ? I mean how do you value them ? In what range ? float ?

Basicly like I said i'm a fucking retarded begginer so I'm not really understanding all tbh

 

[Blackpilled1027]

But what's L M and U ? I mean how do you value them ? In what range ? float ?

Basicly like I said i'm a fucking retarded begginer so I'm not really understanding all tbh

And are you evaluating PSL on everage ?
I mean are you really sure PSL can change in function of the global attractiveness ?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

But what's L M and U ? I mean how do you value them ? In what range ? float ?

Basicly like I said i'm a fucking retarded begginer so I'm not really understanding all tbh

Each third includes everything within it.


So the mid third includes eyes, nose, zygos etc. You'll use the same SD method on each individual trait as well.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

And are you evaluating PSL on everage ?
I mean are you really sure PSL can change in function of the global attractiveness ?

What do you mean? Obviously the ideal looks would change from place to place.

 

[Blackpilled1027]

What do you mean? Obviously the ideal looks would change from place to place.

I mean if I understand well, you're trying to make an equation with Gauss function but are you really sure it's how PSL is meant to be ?

 

[Blackpilled1027]

nevermind, let high IQ user debate with you i'm too retarded for this

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I mean if I understand well, you're trying to make an equation with Gauss function but are you really sure it's how PSL is meant to be ?

I mean PSL is just a checklist of how many ideal features you have and how many bad features you have.

Hunter eyes, high set zygos, strong chin etc. recessed jaw, hooked nose etc. it's basically just adding good features and subtracting bad features.

It's not fundamentally changing what PSL is, it's still using the same variables.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

nevermind, let high IQ user debate with you i'm too retarded for this

You can use the less objective features as a multiplier to calculate SMV. 8*the best possible phenotype(1.25)=10.

Or you could add that multiplier into the PSL calculation if you consider nordic, prettyboy, jock, etc to be part of PSL which I don't.

 

[sergeant blackpill]

Incel Calculator V2 by VantaBlackpill

Are you an incel? Take this test to find out!

vantablackpill.itch.io

i have developed this incel calculator that can mathematically determine if you are incel or not

 

[coolguy1]

L=lower third
M=mid third
U=upper third

I=ideal proportion
A=actual proportion

L/M/U=I*A

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8


Ideal is set at 1. The actual proportion is set as how many standard deviations away from the ideal it is. One SD should be 0.31.8 because 1-0.682 is 0.318. two SD should be 0.046.
View attachment 1923335
Average is 50th percentile so we double it to 100%. Each Standard deviation is also doubled to keep things equal.


So someone with lower, mid and upper third 1 standard deviation away from the average is:

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8
=0.3180*8
=2.544

So his PSL is 2.544.

Without taking harmony into account it means nothing

 

[Deleted member 20631]

L=lower third
M=mid third
U=upper third

I=ideal proportion
A=actual proportion

L/M/U=I*A

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8


Ideal is set at 1. The actual proportion is set as how many standard deviations away from the ideal it is. One SD should be 0.31.8 because 1-0.682 is 0.318. two SD should be 0.046.
View attachment 1923335
Average is 50th percentile so we double it to 100%. Each Standard deviation is also doubled to keep things equal.


So someone with lower, mid and upper third 1 standard deviation away from the average is:

PSL=(L+M+U)/3*8
=0.3180*8
=2.544

So his PSL is 2.544.

IQ Mogger

 

[Deleted member 17791]

IQ Mogger

Thank you

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Like i'm a shit in math but if we took a picture of one guy, then we're making stats about hopw much people rated him.

Then we need to find every variables (Like fwhr, pfl, dick lenght, frame, height, coloring, skin quality, ...)
Then we gotta find what equation it looks like with all the variable to refind the rate they gave him.

Do you think this is possible ? Mathcel it's for you i'm a big begginnerin math

Looks are mostly objective but the subjectivity in looks I think are too wide to have a sturdy equation that is sufficiently reliable.
You could try, but if you did, you'd need to analyze 100K+ faces and analyze mathematical patterns and then map it out.

 

[Copeful]

i think @thecel tried something liek this already

 

[thecel]

Manually formulating such an equation is a waste of effort.

Use a neural network.