Everyone with an IQ Under 110 Should be Sterilized

[chaddyboi66]

It'd be for the benefit of Humanity.

East Asians are incredibly smart as a whole due to having a large amount of people with an IQ of over 120-130; this larger number of high IQ people is easy to find in a population when your average IQ is around 110.

Pushing the average IQ of the global population to above the same figure [110] would also lead to an increase in the amount of very high [120-130] IQ people within a generation or two, as the only people who will breed are those passing on the genes for high intelligence.

The next generation's society would look so much better being full of so many smart people.

 

[chaddyboi66]

The More I Look at Low IQ People the more I Despise them - How will Humanity Ever Reach Greatness?

Ethnics and/or [really just] the low IQ in general don't belong in regions of homogeneous, non-temperamental, high trust, and high IQ people as they'll inevitably just ruin these places like they always do. I say this as someone who's half "ethnic" himself. Though I mention "ethnic" here and...

looksmax.org

You guys use IQ as a cope! Having a higher IQ than a fucking nigger is NOT something to be proud of!

TLD;R: I KNOW I KNOW y'all gonna start saying: "IQ does matter its true!" YES IQ is VERY VERY important and determines jobs/life outcomes but most of you are not as smart as you think and your "IQ" is doing you NO favors! "white people have higher iqs than niggers! that makes me smart!" -uh...

looksmax.org

Members with the highest IQ

I've previously made two threads ranking forum members based on certain traits. First, I ranked the worst members of the forum, and then I ranked the most pathetic members of the forum. I've now decided to rank the members with the highest IQs. Obviously, it's hard to estimate IQ without taking...

looksmax.org

Eugenics is Good for Humanity

It only gets a bad rap because of typical one dimensional normie tier arguements that always fall back on... muh "bu- but 20th century scientific racism n shit bro" :feelswah: or muh "but like how are you even going to do that bro?" :feelsuhh: and of course muh "but that's like genocide bro!"...

looksmax.org

 

[chaddyboi66]

Increased Tinder matches in SEA isn't necessarily due to JBW

Increased Tinder matches in SEA isn't necessarily due to JBW UK has 67 million population average age in UK is 40 300,000 girls my age in UK Philippines has 113 million population average age is 25 1,000,000 girls my age in Philippines So basically, theres barely anyone in UK, and...

looksmax.org

I go cold on a girl

She made an effort to reply my text with 2 wall of texts it took me 5mins to finish reading(have to admit abit boring), and I just (y)(y) her and left her on read. She’s prob mad af rn and prob got over me, she was online an hour ago probably taking some c*** to forget about me. There’s no...

looksmax.org

Does this k-pop gook mog jordan barret???

He is giving chico vibes

looksmax.org

Smoking while raining outside is an awesome feelin

3 cigarettes atleast , a cup of hot tea , while raining heavily and then u smoke and relax yourself Sometimes happiness and relaxation is the best thing to have ... @5.5psl @BrahminBoss

looksmax.org

 

[_MVP_]

All niggers would suffice

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Try solving this.

 

[chaddyboi66]

@dimorphism Why are you not sure?

What possible benefit could come from allowing the low IQ to continue leeching off the accomplishments of the high IQ in the next generation?

There's nothing inherently wrong in preventing them from breeding nor is there any "moral" obligation for them to do so.

 

[chaddyboi66]

Try solving this.

Who?

View attachment 2548911

Second to the right

 

[chaddyboi66]

@Fiqh


Why do you disagree?

 

[ngannou]

Try solving this.

View attachment 2548911

Easy as fuck the box below moving towards left upper box towards right

 

[Deleted member 11126]

I think its more like anyone under 90 IQ. Also IQ is only one metric there are plenty of people with low inhibition that are still not low IQ.

 

[dimorphism]

@dimorphism Why are you not sure?

What possible benefit could come from allowing the low IQ to continue leeching off the accomplishments of the high IQ in the next generation?

There's nothing inherently wrong in preventing them from breeding nor is there any "moral" obligation for them to do so.

I want to bust nuts inside white women without having to prepare for math tests

 

[wsada]

Absolutely yes (my IQ is 119)

 

[Fiqh]

@Fiqh


Why do you disagree?

I just believe everyone should have the right to produce offspring, regardless of their IQ, race etc.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

I think the issue isn't low IQ people its our current parastic elite. They would rather turn the world into a brown 80 IQ mess and rule over a broken destroyed people then have a decent society where their rule would be threatened.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I just believe everyone should have the right to produce offspring, regardless of their IQ, race etc.

Would you also say that right also applies to parents who willingly choose to have children all the while knowing that said child will be burdened with some genetic deformity?

There is no obligation for anyone to produce let alone those who will only burden society as a whole with a low IQ and the genes to spread it.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Who?



Second to the right

I think it's a 120IQ question.

 

[chaddyboi66]

All niggers would suffice

No, I'm only looking at IQ because low IQ people are found in all races.

Sure, there are plenty of low IQ people in their population, but I don't want any low IQ people to be able to breed and corrupt the gene pool.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I think it's a 120IQ question.

Easy as fuck the box below moving towards left upper box towards right

 

[ngannou]

why you tagging me

 

[chaddyboi66]

why you tagging me

I'm not.

I'm replying to @GuyFromSingapore's post using your words as if to also say I agree with you

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

I'm not.

I'm replying to @GuyFromSingapore's post using your words as if to also say I agree with you

Gimme a relatively hard IQ question.

 

[SeiGun]

it is far better to have more low iq people, so you can easily outperform,

 

[robtical]

Nope. More like uncivilized people who cannot adapt to modern society and mindless consumers who should be. IQ does not mean sane. Many low IQ but sane people and many high iq but insane people.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I want to bust nuts inside white women without having to prepare for math tests

White women wouldn't necessarily be guaranteed to have an IQ 110 so that doesn't really apply here, and you could also still do that even if you had a low IQ though neither of you [+ your partner] would be sterile.


Besides, there's more than just math involved so it's not limited to just that

Simple IQ tests for people under 18 involve basic pattern recognition like this:

no math.

 

[BloodClot]

I love eugenics

 

[Deleted member 27674]

IQ is not a fixed number. It can change throughout someone's life. Also, IQ can be affected by stuff like nutrition in the formative years, and pollution. For example, exposure to lead pollution has been proven to lower people's IQ. To really increase the intelligence of humanity, all these factors have to be taken into account.

 

[chaddyboi66]

it is far better to have more low iq people, so you can easily outperform,

They serve no benefit to society and having them around only to "outperform" them serves no purpose in and of itself other than to just pat yourself on the back for not being stupid.

The only argument I could ever see you making like this is for the low IQ to somehow do menial jobs, but even then you're only using them just to simply 'have them around' in the first place; it's pointless

This type of thinking only leads to laziness, which itself brings complacency and ultimately stagnation for a society's advancement.

This is how you ensure a society never amounts to greatness.

 

[chaddyboi66]

Gimme a relatively hard IQ question.

There are plenty online

 

[SeiGun]

They serve no benefit to society and having them around only to "outperform" them serves no purpose in and of itself other than to just pat yourself on the back for not being stupid.

The only argument I could ever see you making like this is for the low IQ to somehow do menial jobs, but even then you're only using them just to simply 'have them around' in the first place; it's pointless

This type of thinking only leads to laziness, which itself brings complacency and ultimately stagnation for a society's advancement.

This is how you ensure a society never amounts to greatness.

bro you post on looksmax about sterilizing people , what greatness are you talking about

 

[chaddyboi66]

Nope. More like uncivilized people who cannot adapt to modern society and mindless consumers who should be.

Sure, temperament is also important to a society as is critical thinking which itself ties into IQ.

IQ does not mean sane.

IQ means intelligence; that affects how well a person is able to learn.

Many low IQ but sane people and many high iq but insane people.

Anecdotes aside being "sane" isn't inherently tied to being high or low IQ, and whether a low IQ person is "sane" doesn't matter when they're only able contribute very little to civilization's advancement if any at all even.

"Sanity" has very little to do with that.

 

[Okulunkulu]

It'd be for the benefit of Humanity.

East Asians are incredibly smart as a whole due to having a large amount of people with an IQ of over 120-130; this larger number of high IQ people is easy to find in a population when your average IQ is around 110.

Pushing the average IQ of the global population to above the same figure [110] would also lead to an increase in the amount of very high [120-130] IQ people within a generation or two, as the only people who will breed are those passing on the genes for high intelligence.

The next generation's society would look so much better being full of so many smart people.

as someone who is 109 iq i feel like a detriment to society, it would be better for me to marry a down syndrome autist, at least then i would have my iq match.

 

[chaddyboi66]

bro you post on looksmax about sterilizing people , what greatness are you talking about

I see you didn't read past the title when you made your first post and only just now bothered reading the rest.

Sterilization of the low IQ will leave society with only the brightest, most capable, and well-natured people Humanity has to offer.

This will then enable them to flourish and thrive in a society composed of other intelligent people just like them.

The "greatness" I refer to is how a society advances both scientifically and technologically [I say both because they go hand in hand] which comes from high IQ people pioneering it.

 

[chaddyboi66]

as someone who is 109 iq i feel like a detriment to society, it would be better for me to marry a down syndrome autist, at least then i would have my iq match.

You shouldn't feel as bad tbh since there are plenty of others far below you, and you probably have the potential to contribute more than they ever will.

However, even with that said you still shouldn't procreate as doing so runs the risk of spreading you genetics, which in turn may cause your descendants in the next generation to also be low IQ.

 

[robtical]

Sure, temperament is also important to a society as is critical thinking which itself ties into IQ.

Yep but hard working ppl like my parents would be punished. If they have to be "sterilized" for betterment of society. Not every high iq person is cold and willing to sacrifice everything for "society". Maybe if you said high iq ppl are able to keep their "low iq" family members, then sure.

IQ means intelligence; that affects how well a person is able to learn.

IQ alone means problem solving and pattern recognition which is part of intelligence. There can be low iq creative ppl.

Anecdotes aside being "sane" isn't inherently tied to being high or low IQ, and whether a low IQ person is "sane" doesn't matter when they're only able contribute very little to civilization's advancement if any at all even.

"Sanity" has very little to do with that.

Why not just kill humanity and replace it all with self learning AI machines?

 

[chaddyboi66]

I love eugenics

As do I as we both should.

Eugenics ultimately comes from a place of good and doesn't have to be seen in such a negative light due to the ignorance of the masses.

Sterilization of the low IQ would be a net positive for society.

 

[chaddyboi66]

Yep but hard working ppl like my parents would be punished. If they have to be "sterilized" for betterment of society. Not every high iq person is cold and willing to sacrifice everything for "society".

By "sterilization" I only mean birth control [as in a vasectomy or tubal ligation/salpingectomy] for the next generation of breedable aged people with an IQ of under 110.

I'm not referring to the euthanizing or removal of any people from society at all in case that wasn't already clear enough.

Your parents would already be too old and wouldn't qualify, but even if they were [and did qualify] they'd only be prevented from having children.

It's not "cold-hearted" so much as it is simply pragmatic and ultimately coming from a place of good.

Maybe if you said high iq ppl are able to keep their "low iq" family members, then sure.

What I offer here is similar in that your family members will be exempt from whatever you think is going to happen to them simply because they're either too old to breed and/or just prevented from having children if they're low IQ.

I haven't referred to the euthanasia of low IQ people in anything I've said.

IQ alone means problem solving and pattern recognition which is part of intelligence.

IQ involves a lot more than just that.

The reason why it's such a good indicator of someone's intelligence is simply due to being so well rounded in its approach...

First and most important of all perhaps- critical thinking and reasoning ability are both directly accounted for when measuring IQ. These two are probably the best overall measure of one's intelligence.

IQ also involves verbal fluency which itself is an indicator of your communication skills and ability to articulate complex concepts.

Yes, it also involves basic math abilities which itself does play a role in your analytical, reasoning, pattern recognition, and predictive abilities like you mentioned.

Not to mention, it also measures basic memory and visual-spatial processing speed(s) as well which measure your brains "raw power" so to speak, which is important as it's the foundation for how you both retain and recall information. I don't think I need to mention how having a poor memory would be detrimental to one's overall abilities.

IQ is everything.

There can be low iq creative ppl.

Look, I get where you're coming from, and I also don't deny that [there are creative low IQ people too], but IQ itself is directly related to creativity.

Why not just kill humanity and replace it all with self learning AI machines?

1. I unironically can't even tell if you're only saying that because you genuinely think it fits into this conversation, or if you're just saying that to purposefully make me out to be some rambling "cold-hearted" technocratic/transhumanist psychopath.


2. Regardless, you sound like some normie complaining with another typical regurgitated strawman response of muh "but that's like eugenics n shit bro!" as if to try to say muh "bu- but like you want to genocide all the stupid people?!?!"


3. I never mentioned anything of the sort and you're going off on a very distant and unrelated topic.

In what way does that have anything to do with what I'm talking about?


4. That wouldn't even be Humanity anymore and I only seek to help our species become the best version of itself possible to achieve greatness.

 

[chaddyboi66]

IQ is not a fixed number. It can change throughout someone's life. Also, IQ can be affected by stuff like nutrition in the formative years, and pollution. For example, exposure to lead pollution has been proven to lower people's IQ. To really increase the intelligence of humanity, all these factors have to be taken into account.

Sure, IQ isn't necessarily completely "set in stone" but that "change" you refer to won't actually shift [or rather increase as you're suggesting] by that much.

All the factors you listed would be taken into account eventually, but I'm primarily referring to a population free of said factors [like the West or East Asia for example] as any difference in IQ would just be genetic.

 

[robtical]

By "sterilization" I only mean birth control [as in a vasectomy or tubal ligation/salpingectomy] for the next generation of breedable aged people with an IQ of under 110.

I'm not referring to the euthanizing or removal of any people from society at all in case that wasn't already clear enough.

Your parents would already be too old and wouldn't qualify, but even if they were [and did qualify] they'd only be prevented from having children.

It's not "cold-hearted" so much as it is simply pragmatic and ultimately coming from a place of good.


What I offer here is similar in that your family members will be exempt from whatever you think is going to happen to them simply because they're either too old to breed and/or just prevented from having children if they're low IQ.

I haven't referred to the euthanasia of low IQ people in anything I've said.

Yep, then agreed.

IQ involves a lot more than just that.

The reason why it's such a good indicator of someone's intelligence is simply due to being so well rounded in its approach...

First and most important of all perhaps- critical thinking and reasoning ability are both directly accounted for when measuring IQ. These two are probably the best overall measure of one's intelligence.

IQ also involves verbal fluency which itself is an indicator of your communication skills and ability to articulate complex concepts.

Yes, it also involves basic math abilities which itself does play a role in your analytical, reasoning, pattern recognition, and predictive abilities like you mentioned.

Not to mention, it also measures basic memory and visual-spatial processing speed(s) as well which measure your brains "raw power" so to speak, which is important as it's the foundation for how you both retain and recall information. I don't think I need to mention how having a poor memory would be detrimental to one's overall abilities.

IQ is everything.

That is different type of IQ.

Are you saying 110+ on ALL?

I disagree that critical thinking is accounted for when measuring IQ. I know have seen way too many gooks (i live in east asia), they are high IQ but definitely in learning capability n being able to copy. They lack critical thinking and creativity. Same with verbal IQ. Its mostly low IQ ppl i have seen that have v v good verbal iq. There are cases of high iq ppl with high verbal iq but this has not been the norm in my experience. I know many intelligent ppl but their verbal iq is low but they are deffo high iq because of things they can fix/learn fast/have good thought process, just not v good at presenting it.

Look, I get where you're coming from, and I also don't deny that [there are creative low IQ people too], but IQ itself is directly related to creativity.


1. I unironically can't even tell if you're only saying that because you genuinely think it fits into this conversation, or if you're just saying that to purposefully make me out to be some rambling "cold-hearted" technocratic/transhumanist psychopath.


2. Regardless, you sound like some normie complaining with another typical regurgitated strawman response of muh "but that's like eugenics n shit bro!" as if to try to say muh "bu- but like you want to genocide all the stupid people?!?!"


3. I never mentioned anything of the sort and you're going off on a very distant and unrelated topic.

In what way does that have anything to do with what I'm talking about?


4. That wouldn't even be Humanity anymore and I only seek to help our species become the best version of itself possible to achieve greatness.

I thought u meant to kill off ppl under 110 but that has been cleared so np. I support eugenics, just not killing ppl. I have seen many hard working well-meaning ppl but they are not bright. That is why it triggered me because i thought u meant genocide. But you didn't so nvm the post.

 

[robtical]

IQ is not a fixed number. It can change throughout someone's life. Also, IQ can be affected by stuff like nutrition in the formative years, and pollution. For example, exposure to lead pollution has been proven to lower people's IQ. To really increase the intelligence of humanity, all these factors have to be taken into account.

The change is due to "performance". Not the raw intelligence increase. Its like someone awake for 2 days or under influence of alcohol taking IQ test vs same person taking the test with proper sleep and sober

 

[chaddyboi66]

I think its more like anyone under 90 IQ. Also IQ is only one metric there are plenty of people with low inhibition that are still not low IQ.

That would be a good start but I want the next generation to start off where East Asian countries already do by default. Think 100 million people where the lowest IQ among all of them would just be 110 and plenty would well past it.

It'd be like building a civilization but already starting out as smart as the Japanese/Koreans or something, but even the IQ of the least intelligent would never dip under 110 and everyone from simple labourers to businessmen would be intelligent.

IQ is probably the most important metric; "inhibition" matters very little compared to it as intelligence is what drives a society forward.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I think the issue isn't low IQ people its our current parastic elite. They would rather turn the world into a brown 80 IQ mess and rule over a broken destroyed people then have a decent society where their rule would be threatened.

A stupid society is easier to manipulate and control after all.

 

[try2beme]

Imagine valuing iq to this extent

This is severe autism to link such meaningless cope to euthanizing humans

Who will even do the low class jobs . You should be the one killed for such a take

 

[Pale God]

Most East Asians aren't that much smarter than the average European. They're just forced to study and experience more pressure.

IQ tests are extremely flawed. So the whole concept of IQ is too.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Most East Asians aren't that much smarter than the average European. They're just forced to study and experience more pressure.

IQ tests are extremely flawed. So the whole concept of IQ is too.

I think the difference is Whites are more variable then Asians. There are more stupid White people and more genius Whites.

 

[Pale God]

I think the difference is Whites are more variable then Asians. There are more stupid White people and more genius Whites.

Sounds about right.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Sounds about right.

I've met whites that are real white trash and then geniuses with Asians even the Ivy League ones its like they are all pretty smart but none of them seem super insightful. Maybe its something else but they just don't seem as creative maybe with the exception of Japanese

 

[chaddyboi66]

Imagine valuing iq to this extent

...

This is severe autism to link such meaningless cope to euthanizing humans

Valuing IQ to this extent is how you know the difference between "euthanasia" and 'sterilization'

Eu·tha·na·sia

---

The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. The practice is illegal in most countries.
"she wants the laws around euthanasia to be changed"

Ster·i·li·za·tion

---

Surgery to make a person or animal unable to produce offspring.
"she had three children and had undergone sterilization"

You should be the one killed for such a take

Speak for yourself.

You can't even tell who's more autistic for having such a shit take yourself...

Who will even do the low class jobs .

Jfl is that really all you value them for?

Imagine pretending to give [so little of] a shit about low IQ people that the best argument you can bother coming up with for why they ought to exist is just so they can clean the shit from your toilet.

Bruh this shit writes itself holy fuck.

 

[Deleted member 31497]

It'd be for the benefit of Humanity.

East Asians are incredibly smart as a whole due to having a large amount of people with an IQ of over 120-130; this larger number of high IQ people is easy to find in a population when your average IQ is around 110.

Pushing the average IQ of the global population to above the same figure [110] would also lead to an increase in the amount of very high [120-130] IQ people within a generation or two, as the only people who will breed are those passing on the genes for high intelligence.

The next generation's society would look so much better being full of so many smart people.

Cope short and ugly people should be gassed and exterminated instead

 

[5'7 zoomer]

Stop thinking so much boi it's making you slower and dumber

 

[try2beme]

...


Valuing IQ to this extent is how you know the difference between "euthanasia" and 'sterilization'





Speak for yourself.

You can't even tell who's more autistic for having such a shit take yourself...


Jfl is that really all you value them for?

Imagine pretending to give [so little of] a shit about low IQ people that the best argument you can bother coming up with for why they ought to exist is just so they can clean the shit from your toilet.

Bruh this shit writes itself holy fuck.

I thought its synonym

Im arguing for low iq people cuz iq doesnt matter unless youre mentally crippled

The real word is too practical for this incel cope and mental masturbation