Jason Voorhees
๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ โข ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ
- Joined
- May 15, 2020
- Posts
- 88,623
- Reputation
- 265,832
Lets put this to rest since there was a lot of copemaxxing going on in the thread. I have compiled al the data from DWP, OBR, and Family Resources Survey and there's concrete evidence that backs this up with zero spin. I'll give you drink links and quotes latest releases up to June 2025 / April 2026 stats and all offical gov.uk links and direct quotes so you can verify every number yourself.
looksmax.org
Total welfare bill is for ยฃ333.7 billion forecast for social security in 2025/26 (DWP + tax credits + Child Benefit + NI). Working-age + children spending alone. ยฃ145 billion.Disability/health benefits are the massive and growing chunk.
Universal Credit. 7.9 million people on UC as of the stats available to us from last year June 2025. Households with children = 50% of all paying households. Single parent households are massively over represented: 54% of households hit by the now-scrapped two child limit were single-parent families (251,830 out of 469,780 in April 2025 data). Lone parents are only ~15% of all UK families but dominate the highcost, long-term caseload.
And these were explicitly White British families as mentioned above
And as benefit cap proof. 68-69% of all capped households are single-parent families. They've consistently been the majority since 2020. Single parents = the core repeat customers for the uncapped, high-payout setups.
Now here's the real kicker. 40% of two child limit affected households (189,480) had at least one health/disability claim (DLA, PIP, UC health element, or disabled child element). Specifically: 24% had a child on DLA (112,760 households) and 14% had a claimant on PIP. These stack extra UC elements, full housing top-ups, exemptions from the benefit cap, and Carer's Allowance (ยฃ83.30+/ week). One "special needs" claim turns a standard payout into a ยฃ40k-ยฃ60k+ tax-free annual package. This is the real Allowance jackpot
Real world cash example. A found an article talking about this. A real world example. A single out-of-work mum
with 3 kids + disability claims (UC + housing+ PIP/DLA + Carer's) pulls ยฃ43,000/year.Add more kids + stacked claims and it hits ยฃ46k+ for a family with health benefits. In high-rent areas the housing top-up alone pushes it higher. This is legal, documented, and common
www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk
Immigrants for comparison. 83.6% of UC claimants are UK/Ireland/Right of Abode (99.8% UK citizens). Foreign nationals = ~16%. ยฃ10.6bn to unemployed migrant households over 18 months in 2025. A lot of money yes but spare change compared to native lone-parent + disability machine
There's no argument to be had. You can click on those links and verify every sentence that I typed out yourself. So if you are disagree with this and want to hold onto your narrative, you are essentially disagreeing with your own UK government official stats.
The people who put the most strain on British welfare is not immigrants
A Britishcel once told me about this and I found it very interesting The biggest burden aren't even Immigrants. They make a tiny portion of it which barely matters. The heaviest hitters are actually British single moms. UK welfare is around ยฃ300bn+, with massive chunks on Universal Credit...
looksmax.org
Total welfare bill is for ยฃ333.7 billion forecast for social security in 2025/26 (DWP + tax credits + Child Benefit + NI). Working-age + children spending alone. ยฃ145 billion.Disability/health benefits are the massive and growing chunk.
Universal Credit. 7.9 million people on UC as of the stats available to us from last year June 2025. Households with children = 50% of all paying households. Single parent households are massively over represented: 54% of households hit by the now-scrapped two child limit were single-parent families (251,830 out of 469,780 in April 2025 data). Lone parents are only ~15% of all UK families but dominate the highcost, long-term caseload.
And these were explicitly White British families as mentioned above
And as benefit cap proof. 68-69% of all capped households are single-parent families. They've consistently been the majority since 2020. Single parents = the core repeat customers for the uncapped, high-payout setups.
Now here's the real kicker. 40% of two child limit affected households (189,480) had at least one health/disability claim (DLA, PIP, UC health element, or disabled child element). Specifically: 24% had a child on DLA (112,760 households) and 14% had a claimant on PIP. These stack extra UC elements, full housing top-ups, exemptions from the benefit cap, and Carer's Allowance (ยฃ83.30+/ week). One "special needs" claim turns a standard payout into a ยฃ40k-ยฃ60k+ tax-free annual package. This is the real Allowance jackpot
Real world cash example. A found an article talking about this. A real world example. A single out-of-work mum
with 3 kids + disability claims (UC + housing+ PIP/DLA + Carer's) pulls ยฃ43,000/year.Add more kids + stacked claims and it hits ยฃ46k+ for a family with health benefits. In high-rent areas the housing top-up alone pushes it higher. This is legal, documented, and common
Three-child family in work needs ยฃ71,000 a year before tax to match equivalent jobless family โ post Budget research - The Centre for Social Justice
Jobless families on combined benefits will now take home ยฃ18,000 more per year than the post-tax wages of a working family, following the abolition of the two
www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk
Immigrants for comparison. 83.6% of UC claimants are UK/Ireland/Right of Abode (99.8% UK citizens). Foreign nationals = ~16%. ยฃ10.6bn to unemployed migrant households over 18 months in 2025. A lot of money yes but spare change compared to native lone-parent + disability machine
There's no argument to be had. You can click on those links and verify every sentence that I typed out yourself. So if you are disagree with this and want to hold onto your narrative, you are essentially disagreeing with your own UK government official stats.
Last edited:
I have gotten myself into a hole I cannot manoeuvre out of
