R
robert3
Bronze
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
- Posts
- 368
- Reputation
- 213
Does anyone have links to studies supporting the full body split as the most optimal split?
lots of people saying fullbody is the best and better than U/L
main argument is that the first set yields the most hypertrophy, and the following sets yield greatly diminishing returns
im talking with a multi record powerlifter running U/L and he is worried about the validity of the studies supporting this as am I.
I Cannot find a link to the study and cannot find it in pubmed
I need to know the rest times between sets in the study(assuming 3-5 atm)
he also says that it takes 72 hours from your workout to fully replete your glycogen stores in the muscle which i believe,
but if your only doing 1 set per muscle with 0-1 rir will that deplete the glycogen stores enough to warrant the 72 hour rest?
lots of people saying fullbody is the best and better than U/L
main argument is that the first set yields the most hypertrophy, and the following sets yield greatly diminishing returns
im talking with a multi record powerlifter running U/L and he is worried about the validity of the studies supporting this as am I.
I Cannot find a link to the study and cannot find it in pubmed
I need to know the rest times between sets in the study(assuming 3-5 atm)
he also says that it takes 72 hours from your workout to fully replete your glycogen stores in the muscle which i believe,
but if your only doing 1 set per muscle with 0-1 rir will that deplete the glycogen stores enough to warrant the 72 hour rest?
