God either knows only himself,or he is a dependant being and not The absolute

[yandex99]

the pythagoreans were right,if X knows A,he is dependant on A to have a certain type of knowledge or a knowing,and thus is dependant on A in a sense,and thus his essence is not perfect and self-inherent.

thus any 'God'that interacts with anything outside of himself cannot be a 'God'.

now the monad is different.

 

[AlexBrown84]

shutup you don’t know anything you small brained individual

how could a peasant brain like yourself expect to comprehend God

 

[yandex99]

shutup you don’t know anything you small brained individual

how could a peasant brain like yourself expect to comprehend God

On the Necessity of God’s Knowledge being Knowledge-by-Presence [al-ilm al-hudhurī]

Knowledge can be classified as: [a] Knowledge-by-Correspondence [al-ilm al-husulī], and; [b] Knowledge-by-Presence [al-ilm al-hudhurī]. Knowledge-by-Correspondence involves the apprehension of the …

sadrianphilosophy.wordpress.com

 

[AlexBrown84]

be glad your thread was even given an audience with me,

now good day

 

[yandex99]

be glad your thread was even given an audience with me,

now good day

God believers are dumb like you

 

[AlexBrown84]

God believers are dumb like you

so what I have a confirmed iq of 72?

mogs midwits like yourself to the stratosphere

 

[yandex99]

so what I have a confirmed iq of 72?

mogs midwits like yourself to the stratosphere

Yawn,who tf are you?I'm not gonna waste my time on a irrelevant retard

 

[yandex99]

muh christ

muh allah

 

[AromaOfLucifer]

the pythagoreans were right,if X knows A,he is dependant on A to have a certain type of knowledge or a knowing,and thus is dependant on A in a sense,and thus his essence is not perfect and self-inherent.

thus any 'God'that interacts with anything outside of himself cannot be a 'God'.

now the monad is different.

Knowledge based on a object being contingent on the object doesnt mean whatever possesses that knowledge necessitates the object they have knowledge on. Just cause u lose one chocolate chip from a chocolate chip cookie doesnt mean you dont have a chocolate chip what the hell are u talking about

 

[Deleted member 67900]

this is the most vague shit ever it reminds me of when i read obsolete philosophy like phenomenal conservatism which was like if S has no positive grounds to doubt p then believe p or something

 

[yandex99]

Knowledge based on a object being contingent on the object doesnt mean whatever possesses that knowledge necessitates the object they have knowledge on. Just cause u lose one chocolate chip from a chocolate chip cookie doesnt mean you dont have a chocolate chip what the hell are u talking about

it's the opposite.

 

[yandex99]

this is the most vague shit ever it reminds me of when i read obsolete philosophy like phenomenal conservatism which was like if S has no positive grounds to doubt p then believe p or something

a 9 year old can understand it.it takes alot of dimwittedness to believe in allah or yhwh

 

[Deleted member 67900]

a 9 year old can understand it.it takes alot of dimwittedness to believe in allah or yhwh

bullshit

 

[yandex99]

bullshit

theistcel rage itt lol

 

[Deleted member 67900]

theistcel rage itt lol

shitskin

 

[yandex99]

shitskin

it's golden not pasty like yours

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

the pythagoreans were right,if X knows A,he is dependant on A to have a certain type of knowledge or a knowing,and thus is dependant on A in a sense,and thus his essence is not perfect and self-inherent.

thus any 'God'that interacts with anything outside of himself cannot be a 'God'.

now the monad is different.

so youre not muslim anymore

 

[Deleted member 67900]

it's golden not pasty like yours

still you are brown and you are not white so rope

 

[yandex99]

still you are brown and you are not white so rope

why?I mog all white guys on this earth as does any handsome northern american indian.we have better coloring too.

 

[Lulleko]

God is everything and anything, why? because I said so.

 

[yandex99]

God is everything and anything, why? because I said so.

so he's not self sufficient?he feels hunger?he is composed?

 

[Lulleko]

so he's not self sufficient?he feels hunger?he is composed?

Not sure how you drew that conclusion.

 

[yandex99]

Not sure how you drew that conclusion.

anything made up of parts is dependant on those parts.if there are mutliple gods,then they are composed of peculiarity and shared nature.

 

[Lulleko]

anything made up of parts is dependant on those parts.if there are mutliple gods,then they are composed of peculiarity and shared nature.

I didn't state that the universe constructs God, rather that the universe is derived from God if he was to exist. Now you may argue that this goes ways but in my opinion the issue of composition is built on semantics.

 

[Deleted member 67900]

why?I mog all white guys on this earth as does any handsome northern american indian.we have better coloring too.

statistics say otherwise