D
Deleted member 72710
Iron
- Joined
- May 9, 2024
- Posts
- 121
- Reputation
- 83
I think 6’7that dude is not 6’10![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think 6’7that dude is not 6’10![]()
Mogged by 5'9 Alian Delone. Over.
That is not a lanklet, you are just insecurewho is that guy? still a lanklet
who is that guy?
no, it does not entirely depend on your frame. I can tell you have no idea on this topic.Tall doesn't equal lanky, it entirely depends on your frame, look at Elordi, he would have a better physique even without the gym than most 6' guys
Deontay Wilder, former boxing championwho is that guy?
he is roided + elite geneticsDeontay Wilder, former boxing champion
you are so insecure but its ok, what country do you live in?6'1 barefoot mogs tho
being physically imposing is total male gaze lol, you don't have to be the most physically imposing dude for women to fuck you, by that logic some fat 6'6 dude is top slayer.@NitoRump since you've posted this topic atleast 6 times that ive seen, let me guess you fall into that height range, if this was indisputably true you wouldn't have to fight so hard to prove it to others just so you can feel good about your height.
while definitely harder to build a physique at that height in the end they will 100% look better and more physically imposing than a buff sub 6ft guy or lower 6ft. by default taller people will have larger frames, even if they have bad clavicles for their height it will still mog 6fters
They are roided + have elite geneticstaller people, although harder can still have good physiques, just think boxers like deontay wilder(minus his chicken legs) and anthony joshua
this is true.obviously not all girls will feel the same way, people on here want a clear cut blueprint to follow that works 100%, e.g. hunter eyes. but not even all guys like the same kind of girls, infact its so varied especially on .org you will
agree tbhhave people meatriding brooke shields whilst i don't think shes anything crazy
has nothing to with insecurity, the guy above said 6'1 with lifts mogs, I said 6'1 barefoot mogs.you are so insecure but its ok, what country do you live in?
Im 6'3 so I know what Im talking about, I am a lanket myself and I know its harder to put on muscle in general as a tall guy.no, it does not entirely depend on your frame. I can tell you have no idea on this topic.
Tall people have a higher proportion of long muscle fibers compared to short individuals, which can make it harder to build muscle mass. They also have typically have longer limbs and a larger frame, which means they have a greater surface area to cover with muscle tissue.
Elordi is a huge lanklet idk what you are talking about
I looked at different pictures of his physique now, and while I will agree he is not a complete lanklet, he still looks skinnyIm 6'3 so I know what Im talking about, I am a lanket myself and I know its harder to put on muscle in general as a tall guy.
If you consider Elordi a lanket you have serious body image issues from staring at roided guys online all day, hes larger than 99% of the male population, he might look skinny but if you put him next to an avarage guy he will look much more robust, also no woman on earth would say he is skinny.
What a moron jflJFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.
cope you'd pick 6'6 over 6'2 anydayJFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.
Sure but if you disregard the increased likelihood of being skinny and assume all heights will have same physique then 6'4 will be way more ideal than 6'1JFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.
Shaq looks pretty big. He's also a bit taller than 6'4.JFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.
Holy shit, his coping is off The charts.Blud is basically swimming in copium
View attachment 2936868
Probably has a 6’5 dad or brother and she’s the shorter one in the family and comes here to discount his cope frustrations
Holy CopeJFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.
JFL at the people thinking 6'5 is ideal height.
Its one of the most male gaze things I have seen on this forum.
At that height its impossible to build an respectable physique with good muscle mass and leanness.
And physique is totally non-negotiable in terms of imposing lust on women aka sex appeal. Its the same as hourglass body on women.
Show me a respectable natural physique at 6'4+ and we will see how ideal that height is
Jon Skywalker, real 6'4, one of the fitness OGs has blasted all sorts of shit for 10+ years and looks like a natty 6'0 lifter.
Height after 6 foot is really male gaze.
You want to be decently tall but also strong, athletic, fast, agile, have great stamina ALL in one.
That is peak female gaze and it ties into evolutionary biology.
"Just on roids bro"
Even with roids you need elite genetics to build a respectable physique at 6'4+. Also good luck being 22 and looking 35. So much for all the "looksmaxxing".
At any height genetics come into play, like frame, muscle insertions, bone density, androgen senstivity etc. but the sweet spot is between 6'0 - 6'2.
Even with top top muscle building genetics at 6'5 you will still look a bit lanky and have won't completely fill your frame.
Most actors and models who are considered the full package and have max sex appeal fall between those ranges as well.