thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 24,728
- Reputation
- 52,268
High-Frequency PPL Training (2 Programs)
I often deal with the issue of poor work capacity in the gym. I go hard on the earlier exercises then get tired and weak on the later exercises. This is why I prefer short workouts. When workout lengths are short, I can train with high intensity on a smaller number of sets and finish the session without getting too fatigued.
In this thread I have 2 PPL splits for gymmaxers who’re like me—lifters who prefer to train to failure, don’t have tons of stamina, and don’t like to stay in the gym for a long period of time in a single session.
Split #1 | High-Freq PPL for LooksLifters
This high-frequency PPL split is for men who train for looks and don’t care a lot about the powerlifting strength lifts.
This split is amazing for packing in higher weekly volumes without the drawback of energy-draining and time-consuming workouts. The below program has 18 sets of lats per week and just 2 lats exercises per pull workout. Short workouts, high total volume.
High frequencies also give individual lifters more liberty to swap out exercises to suit their needs without compromising minimum effective volumes. In a low-frequency split that isolates biceps and triceps each once per week, you’re stuck with these exercises because removing any would mean you lose all your biceps or triceps isolation volume. But in this program, you can replace a triceps isolation exercise with an upper chest fly movement and still have good enough volume on triceps.
Split #2 | High-Freq PPL for General Strength and Size Training
This plan mixes lower-body strength lifts into pull and push workouts.
The triceps exercise selection in this is specific to assist the strength lifts; the JM press for the bench press and the French Press for the overhead press.
@Arborist @longjohnmong @Manletmachine @Prettyboy @Fgsfds @ascension! @zharupodrugu @Tonymontana @kumquat @Anchor_Ship
I often deal with the issue of poor work capacity in the gym. I go hard on the earlier exercises then get tired and weak on the later exercises. This is why I prefer short workouts. When workout lengths are short, I can train with high intensity on a smaller number of sets and finish the session without getting too fatigued.
In this thread I have 2 PPL splits for gymmaxers who’re like me—lifters who prefer to train to failure, don’t have tons of stamina, and don’t like to stay in the gym for a long period of time in a single session.
Split #1 | High-Freq PPL for LooksLifters
This high-frequency PPL split is for men who train for looks and don’t care a lot about the powerlifting strength lifts.
This split is amazing for packing in higher weekly volumes without the drawback of energy-draining and time-consuming workouts. The below program has 18 sets of lats per week and just 2 lats exercises per pull workout. Short workouts, high total volume.
High frequencies also give individual lifters more liberty to swap out exercises to suit their needs without compromising minimum effective volumes. In a low-frequency split that isolates biceps and triceps each once per week, you’re stuck with these exercises because removing any would mean you lose all your biceps or triceps isolation volume. But in this program, you can replace a triceps isolation exercise with an upper chest fly movement and still have good enough volume on triceps.
Sunday | Push
|
Monday | Pull
|
Tuesday | Push
|
Wednesday | Pull
|
Thursday | Push
|
Friday | Pull
|
Saturday | Legs
|
Split #2 | High-Freq PPL for General Strength and Size Training
This plan mixes lower-body strength lifts into pull and push workouts.
The triceps exercise selection in this is specific to assist the strength lifts; the JM press for the bench press and the French Press for the overhead press.
Sunday | Legs
|
Monday | Push
|
Tuesday | Pull (Full-Body)
|
Wednesday | Push
|
Thursday | Pull
|
Friday | Push (Full-Body)
|
Saturday | Pull
|
@Arborist @longjohnmong @Manletmachine @Prettyboy @Fgsfds @ascension! @zharupodrugu @Tonymontana @kumquat @Anchor_Ship
Last edited: