Ideal facial ratios and proportions

[VampyrMaxx]

so blue eyes are unideal?

Blue eyes arent inherently striking

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

where have you gotten this from?

i know they are ideal but he said striking features are unideal or something

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Blue eyes arent inherently striking

alright

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

View attachment 4715432

oops

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Blue eyes arent inherently striking

i guess i meant to say A10 with a limbal ring which is kinda striking to me

 

[VampyrMaxx]

i guess i meant to say A10 with a limbal ring which is kinda striking to me

Not inherently striking also unless the limbal ring is really thick

 

[starvemaxxkingkong]

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148798
View attachment 148799
View attachment 148805

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148808
View attachment 148812
View attachment 148813
View attachment 148814
View attachment 148815
View attachment 148816
View attachment 148817
View attachment 148818

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148822

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148825

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148829

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148849

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148904

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148857

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148917

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148876

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148878
View attachment 148880

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148907

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148915
View attachment 148948

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148947

is this still accurate

 

[starvemaxxkingkong]

@clearness. This is the thread that convinced people compact midface is ideal, because on what planet is 1.1 mfr attractive.

For example JB has 1.07 mfr, he is attractive despite it, not because of it

so this thread isn´t ideal?

 

[VampyrMaxx]

so this thread isn´t ideal?

Yes at most one to one midface is ideal

 

[htnandltbslayer]

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148798
View attachment 148799
View attachment 148805

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148808
View attachment 148812
View attachment 148813
View attachment 148814
View attachment 148815
View attachment 148816
View attachment 148817
View attachment 148818

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148822

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148825

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148829

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148849

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148904

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148857

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148917

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148876

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148878
View attachment 148880

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148907

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148915
View attachment 148948

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.

Spoiler: measurement examples

View attachment 148947

Fuck my brutal lower third

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Not inherently striking also unless the limbal ring is really thick

yes thick limbal ring extremely light blue eyes all of that is what i meant instead of just blue eyes

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Yes at most one to one midface is ideal

do you have a thread that is ideal

 

[VampyrMaxx]

do you have a thread that is ideal

yes i do but you wont understand it like 99 percent of org wont

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

yes i do but you wont understand it like 99 percent of org wont

can i see ill try my best to understand

 

[Marse_t]

can i see ill try my best to understand

yes i do but you wont understand it like 99 percent of org wont

I want to see it aswell, since I'm saving up for surgery I want to know what I'm doing when I'll change some of the ratios

 

[sergiutare]

what soft can I use to measure those ratios?

 

[changfrommumbai]

what soft can I use to measure those ratios?

https://zygolabs.github.io/zygolabss/ this one is free and amazing

 

[AgonizingAgent]

what device do u use

Iphone and mac

 

[K34]

to be honest i would prefer to be ''uncanny'' and mog but i never will achieve this sadly

 

[SempakletCel]

all of this are useless because im 5'6 and ND

 

[pfl]

to be honest i would prefer to be ''uncanny'' and mog but i never will achieve this sadly

Is this ugly faggot supposed to mog?

 

[Fridx]

Is this ugly faggot supposed to mog?

0 misc 0 harmony 0 anything
Only angular

 

[Fridx]

.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

I want to see it aswell, since I'm saving up for surgery I want to know what I'm doing when I'll change some of the ratios

can i see ill try my best to understand

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

https://looksmax.org/threads/ratios-debunked-gtfih-beauty-explained.1596385/post-23272811

 

[K34]

Is this ugly faggot supposed to mog?

Keep coping no one mogs the Devil

 

[K34]

all of this are useless because im 5'6 and ND

same

 

[pfl]

Keep coping no one mogs the Devil

Joined Feb 26, 2026

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Iphone and mac

get “Angle Meter” and “PhotoMeasure” on phone and change any settings in the app if u need to and then just calculate the ratios with a calculator

 

[K34]

Joined Feb 26, 2026

so what? doesnt change the fact i get treated like shit because of my looks

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

RATIOS DEBUNKED GTFIH; BEAUTY EXPLAINED

In this thread I will prove that ratios do not matter for attractiveness, and that only features/measurements matter for attractiveness. Some people might say water is wet, but a decent proportion of Looksmax doesn't understand these concepts. If anybody can logically disprove the logic within...

looksmax.org

https://looksmax.org/threads/ratios-debunked-gtfih-beauty-explained.1596385/post-23272811

oh yeah i remember that one

 

[OverSince08]

Foids dont need all these calcs to reject me pure human intuition

 

[Volksstaffel]

Get this thread outta here

 

[iblamexyz]

Get this thread outta here

over

 

[stev]

Blue eyes arent inherently striking

relative to brown eyes they are