D
Deleted member 65576
2026 i'm coming
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2024
- Posts
- 5,585
- Reputation
- 7,664
There is no other explanation. He averages 121 posts per day, for 3 years straight. Let's be honest, that takes extreme dedication from a human. The second member with the highest post number averages 48 posts/day, just to put this in perspective.
This data is suspicious on it's own, it seems like other users have also noticed this before me, such as @IMOGYOU
He called out the robot, but it seems like it couldn't comprehend the message. In this case, the robot usually says 'pat me', as an attempt to distract people from the topic. Now keep in mind, the robot is allegedly a married man. No sane man demands pats from users on an online forum, and if he was insane, he wouldn't have a wife.
NTpill strikes again.
If this is still not enough evidence, I made my own little experiment. I larped as being interested in his AI generated thread, then I tested 'him', following with the big question:
Obviously the software couldn't detect the hidden meaning of the message, just as expected.
As we can see, everything already said checks out. @Xangsane 's programming is basically:
1. If you reply to one of 'his' threads, he will ask 'Y'.
2. If you make statements 'his' software can comprehend, then he will like your reply and ask 'Y' again.
3. 'He' continues this pattern, until someone says something that the software can't understand. In this case, 'he' will say 'pat me'.
After this it can go 2 ways: if you obey, and you say 'pat-pat', then 'he' will heart react your reply, and it replies with 'yay! pat-pat!'
But if you say something else, he will keep demanding the pats, until you give in and say 'pat-pat'.
If this much evidence is STILL not enough, just remember, that @Xangsane never posts threads other than the AI ones. One more piece of information, pointing towards the conclusion.
What you're doing with this piece of information is up to you. I don't know if this discovery means bad or neutral. The question arises; 'Why was Xangsane made? What is it's purpose?' Sadly I can't answer to this one as of right now, but if I find out something I will make an other thread on it.
If yall take one piece of advice from me, then be cautious with Xangsane. It's better to be safe than sorry.
This data is suspicious on it's own, it seems like other users have also noticed this before me, such as @IMOGYOU
He called out the robot, but it seems like it couldn't comprehend the message. In this case, the robot usually says 'pat me', as an attempt to distract people from the topic. Now keep in mind, the robot is allegedly a married man. No sane man demands pats from users on an online forum, and if he was insane, he wouldn't have a wife.
NTpill strikes again.
If this is still not enough evidence, I made my own little experiment. I larped as being interested in his AI generated thread, then I tested 'him', following with the big question:
Obviously the software couldn't detect the hidden meaning of the message, just as expected.
As we can see, everything already said checks out. @Xangsane 's programming is basically:
1. If you reply to one of 'his' threads, he will ask 'Y'.
2. If you make statements 'his' software can comprehend, then he will like your reply and ask 'Y' again.
3. 'He' continues this pattern, until someone says something that the software can't understand. In this case, 'he' will say 'pat me'.
After this it can go 2 ways: if you obey, and you say 'pat-pat', then 'he' will heart react your reply, and it replies with 'yay! pat-pat!'
But if you say something else, he will keep demanding the pats, until you give in and say 'pat-pat'.
If this much evidence is STILL not enough, just remember, that @Xangsane never posts threads other than the AI ones. One more piece of information, pointing towards the conclusion.
What you're doing with this piece of information is up to you. I don't know if this discovery means bad or neutral. The question arises; 'Why was Xangsane made? What is it's purpose?' Sadly I can't answer to this one as of right now, but if I find out something I will make an other thread on it.
If yall take one piece of advice from me, then be cautious with Xangsane. It's better to be safe than sorry.
@Xangsane
@try2beme
@IMOGYOU
@Jova
@cromagnon
@alurmo
@Madridista
@appealmaxed
@i_love_roosters
@beefliverontop
@NorwoodAscender
@maxxedoutfyp
@ShawarmaFilth
@VisageVirtuoso√
@jinnu
@optimisticzoomer
@wsada
@Autismcel
@try2beme
@IMOGYOU
@Jova
@cromagnon
@alurmo
@Madridista
@appealmaxed
@i_love_roosters
@beefliverontop
@NorwoodAscender
@maxxedoutfyp
@ShawarmaFilth
@VisageVirtuoso√
@jinnu
@optimisticzoomer
@wsada
@Autismcel
