I'm convinced @Xangsane is a robot

[Xangsane]

This is the most likely scenario, after reviewing more of his posts.

The writing style, grammar, word choice, sentence length, and even "interests" of the bot don't at all match the human operators when they write something under the account.

You can clearly spot which posts were written by the bot (most of them) and which were written by the humans (some of them).

I actually thought the bot was a non-native English speaker, until I came across some of the posts by the operators.

DON'T BE A MEANIE! WAAAA!

 

[Deleted member 15778]

DON'T BE A MEANIE! WAAAA!

This is the bot.

You can write something like this using an open sourced LLM library like Open Orca, and it's small enough to run on a laptop. To think governments aren't using this would be silly.

There's probably a human operator that sits all day, approving bot messages, to make sure the bots don't say something non-sensical, and then human operators can step in to establish relationships (PM), and possible add some human-ness to some of the posts.

I would guess that the government started experimenting with this tech in 2020 a year or so after the release of GPT-2, starting to automate some of their existing workflow, but it could have been any time since then.

As far as the frequency of the posts, and the delay time in responding to posts, it's not human. The programer clearly just setup up random wait function in the main process loop.

I bet if you were to perform statistical analysis on response time you'd see a clean mathematical distribution pattern, proving it was a bot. But my level of fucks is not high enough for that, and the ROI to me personally isn't.

You can actually use baysian trees to prove Xangsane is a bot.

Probability that the government is using bots: (like 100%).
Probability that if the government is using bots, it will have at least 1 of them running on looksmax.org (100% - they would be across at least a hundred different websites and this would be one).

So Which of the users that posts regularly here is most likely, one of the bots. 100% Xangsane, but there could be some other users as well with a lower post frequency. I'm not sure.



@Xangsane

 

[ElTruecel]

DON'T BE A MEANIE! WAAAA!

Do u remember the Venezuelan HQNP Virgin I posted. Do u want to see her video in dms I want u to guess her pheno. Btw she’s legit a band kid studycel turbo Stacy HQNP virgin.

I don’t care much about looks but that girl is only in the league of someone the tier of Pnuemocytosis, amnesia or Salludon. Fuck

 

[Xangsane]

Do u remember the Venezuelan HQNP Virgin I posted. Do u want to see her video in dms I want u to guess her pheno. Btw she’s legit a band kid studycel turbo Stacy HQNP virgin.

I don’t care much about looks but that girl is only in the league of someone the tier of Pnuemocytosis, amnesia or Salludon. Fuck

not with a bikini

 

[ElTruecel]

not with a bikini

Shut the fuck up retard. all women except Muslims with hijabis do. She’s legit a band kid who’s a studycel

 

[Deleted member 15778]

Shut the fuck up retard. all women except Muslims with hijabis do. She’s legit a band kid who’s a studycel

not with a bikini

I would bet good money you two are glowies changing the conversation, to divert.

If you spend to much effort denying being glowwie, it creates push back and reinforces the idea that you are. The smartest response when accused of something, is to ignore the accuser and change the conversation.

But it's not the normal phycological response. It's the type of effective script an intel operator would follow.

Weather or not it's true, we are headed for a world where the majority of all posts on all websites are bots. Every human will be surrounded by bots, running influence and intel ops.

 

[ElTruecel]

I would bet good money you two are glowies changing the conversation, to divert.

If you spend to much effort denying being glowwie, it creates push back and reinforces the idea that you are. The smartest response when accused of something, is to ignore the accuser and change the conversation.

But it's not the normal phycological response. It's the type of effective script an intel operator would follow.

Weather or not it's true, we are headed for a world where the majority of all posts on all websites are bots. Every human will be surrounded by bots, running influence and intel ops.

No Im not a glowie. Whether @Xangsane Is a robot or shit doesn’t mean anything. I just need him to rate a female’s phenotype. But is very strange he didn’t respond after I destroyed his argument. But tbh it’s kind of obvious he’s just an aspie who’s developed this gay character by force.

 

[Deleted member 65576]

@noodlelover fuck you make sense once again. This is crazy how we got here from the random somewhat troll thread. This is deeper than I originally thought.

 

[kingNash]

@noodlelover fuck you make sense once again. This is crazy how we got here from the random somewhat troll thread. This is deeper than I originally thought.

@noodlelover yoo do sum shit G

 

[kingNash]

Also @Xangsane could be a bot mixed with a research team

 

[Deleted member 65576]

Also @Xangsane could be a bot mixed with a research team

That's what I was thinking too. He must be partly automated somehow.

 

[socialcel]

PAT ME!

pat pat!
op is mirin u bhai

 

[saggyballsackcel]

There is no other explanation. He averages 121 posts per day, for 3 years straight. Let's be honest, that takes extreme dedication from a human. The second member with the highest post number averages 48 posts/day, just to put this in perspective.

This data is suspicious on it's own, it seems like other users have also noticed this before me, such as @IMOGYOU

View attachment 2982858
He called out the robot, but it seems like it couldn't comprehend the message. In this case, the robot usually says 'pat me', as an attempt to distract people from the topic. Now keep in mind, the robot is allegedly a married man. No sane man demands pats from users on an online forum, and if he was insane, he wouldn't have a wife.
NTpill strikes again.


If this is still not enough evidence, I made my own little experiment. I larped as being interested in his AI generated thread, then I tested 'him', following with the big question:


View attachment 2982876
View attachment 2982867

Obviously the software couldn't detect the hidden meaning of the message, just as expected.
As we can see, everything already said checks out. @Xangsane 's programming is basically:

1. If you reply to one of 'his' threads, he will ask 'Y'.
2. If you make statements 'his' software can comprehend, then he will like your reply and ask 'Y' again.
3. 'He' continues this pattern, until someone says something that the software can't understand. In this case, 'he' will say 'pat me'.


After this it can go 2 ways: if you obey, and you say 'pat-pat', then 'he' will heart react your reply, and it replies with 'yay! pat-pat!'

But if you say something else, he will keep demanding the pats, until you give in and say 'pat-pat'.

If this much evidence is STILL not enough, just remember, that @Xangsane never posts threads other than the AI ones. One more piece of information, pointing towards the conclusion.

What you're doing with this piece of information is up to you. I don't know if this discovery means bad or neutral. The question arises; 'Why was Xangsane made? What is it's purpose?' Sadly I can't answer to this one as of right now, but if I find out something I will make an other thread on it.

If yall take one piece of advice from me, then be cautious with Xangsane. It's better to be safe than sorry.

Spoiler: Tags

@Xangsane
@try2beme
@IMOGYOU
@Jova
@cromagnon
@alurmo
@Madridista
@appealmaxed
@i_love_roosters
@beefliverontop
@NorwoodAscender
@maxxedoutfyp
@ShawarmaFilth
@VisageVirtuoso√
@jinnu
@optimisticzoomer
@wsada
@Autismcel

No his replies are autisitic maybe he has bots work for him but I think he’s real, a real man working behind the scenes

 

[Deleted member 65576]

No his replies are autisitic maybe he has bots work for him but I think he’s real, a real man working behind the scenes

That's what I'm thinking too
Partly automated

 

[cancercell]

nice theory retard but no it's just a neet

 

[Deleted member 65576]

There is no other explanation. He averages 121 posts per day, for 3 years straight. Let's be honest, that takes extreme dedication from a human. The second member with the highest post number averages 48 posts/day, just to put this in perspective.

This data is suspicious on it's own, it seems like other users have also noticed this before me, such as @IMOGYOU

View attachment 2982858
He called out the robot, but it seems like it couldn't comprehend the message. In this case, the robot usually says 'pat me', as an attempt to distract people from the topic. Now keep in mind, the robot is allegedly a married man. No sane man demands pats from users on an online forum, and if he was insane, he wouldn't have a wife.
NTpill strikes again.


If this is still not enough evidence, I made my own little experiment. I larped as being interested in his AI generated thread, then I tested 'him', following with the big question:


View attachment 2982876
View attachment 2982867

Obviously the software couldn't detect the hidden meaning of the message, just as expected.
As we can see, everything already said checks out. @Xangsane 's programming is basically:

1. If you reply to one of 'his' threads, he will ask 'Y'.
2. If you make statements 'his' software can comprehend, then he will like your reply and ask 'Y' again.
3. 'He' continues this pattern, until someone says something that the software can't understand. In this case, 'he' will say 'pat me'.


After this it can go 2 ways: if you obey, and you say 'pat-pat', then 'he' will heart react your reply, and it replies with 'yay! pat-pat!'

But if you say something else, he will keep demanding the pats, until you give in and say 'pat-pat'.

If this much evidence is STILL not enough, just remember, that @Xangsane never posts threads other than the AI ones. One more piece of information, pointing towards the conclusion.

What you're doing with this piece of information is up to you. I don't know if this discovery means bad or neutral. The question arises; 'Why was Xangsane made? What is it's purpose?' Sadly I can't answer to this one as of right now, but if I find out something I will make an other thread on it.

If yall take one piece of advice from me, then be cautious with Xangsane. It's better to be safe than sorry.

Spoiler: Tags

@Xangsane
@try2beme
@IMOGYOU
@Jova
@cromagnon
@alurmo
@Madridista
@appealmaxed
@i_love_roosters
@beefliverontop
@NorwoodAscender
@maxxedoutfyp
@ShawarmaFilth
@VisageVirtuoso√
@jinnu
@optimisticzoomer
@wsada
@Autismcel

@Darkeningstar

 

[JohnDoe]

Multiple people or account owner changed like a year ago. Different personality/mannerisms

 

[Deleted member 89128]

b