No it didn't. Religion supported all of that stuff.
I have neck tattoos and
Women like men who respect them
IQ test came back negative, God is good.
who cares ? Science debunked traditional religion. Traditional religion is dying
idiot, religion gives useless answers like (embarrassingly) obviously made up stories. Science gives answers like, its impossible to determine and doesnt matter.
everyone became religious because science was yet to debunk religion and now its just the residue of pre science believers latching onto religion
Not true at all. Normies don't look into science and theories. They just follow what their peers are doing. Corporations pushed degeneracy because it makes more money and people flocked to it because nobody (including lazy american parents) was pushing proper values to stop them from acting on their sins.
No it doesn't. Sounds like redditor cope. The stories aren't made up and there's stories and evidence from other civilizations at the same timeframe that lots of things happened.
"ermm actually, there was a BIG BANG! and thats how the universe started... sure theres no reason as to how and why it happened, just trust the science!"
It's impossible to solve it in a materialist framework (aka modern science). Science only examines this universe and has no ground on anything before it. Therefore it's a purely philosophical question and a matter of your own values whether you believe in God or multiverse/etc.
For there to be a big bang, there has to be a banger. Seculars believe in the multiverse (all powerful self-created system capable of creating universes) while religious people believe in God (all powerful self-created system capable of creating universes). The difference is that one is autistically and randomly generating universes with random properties while the other fine tunes them. Both are completely plausible but it's a matter of your own values that decides which you personally choose to believe in.
Wouldnt say that they are both plausible. A "God" is implausible with the current understanding of our universe. Granted there is yet much to be discovered, but after several hundred years of scientific research, there is nothing to even remotely suggest the presence of any divinity
How is multiverse, artificial insemination, simulation theory, etc any more plausible than God? I love how you put God in quotation marks to try and sound intellectual when you have done 0 research and just regurgitate typical leftist talking points to continue their degeneracy without consequences.
its called being logical and believing in the more probable answer. No religious person would bet on their religion being correct, they believe in it for fun
dude dna sampling was invented in like 1990 and it took some time for evolution and other science to be fully proven.
The science of evolution has existed since the 1850s. Nazis literally used it as the backbone for their ideology.
I have done plenty of research. I have a scientific background. Maybe some leftist faggot says the same. But I approach all my work in a materialistic way, because that is all we know of.
So how can you use the laws of matter in this universe to try and prove what happened before it? Makes 0 sense.
Objective morality does exist. Everyone knows what's right and wrong and every society has had the same morals. When people did bad things, they knew it was bad. You basically see the same morals across every civilization across the world and if you use reason, everyone will come to the same moral values.
There are hypotesies to the origin of the universe. They agree upon the age of this universe. But I find the oscillating universe theory interesting.
The problem with this narrative is people are debunking specific testable propositions made by existing religions
No, in general. because religion people 9at the top) are stubborn. And the purpose of religion is coping, not truth
legit point.
We clearly have free-will. The Libet studies were clearly flawed and neuroscientists don't even cite it anymore.
Yes that study was flawed but there have been newer studies, that suggests no free will.
Every single study that provides evidence for no free will has another study that provides evidence for it. It's even close to "proven". You're just a typical mindless atheist who thinks you know shit when you don't.
. Explain consciousness and split brain functionality to me if you're properly trained from a materialist framework.Such as what?
But if it's scientifically impossible to figure out the mysteries of the universe from a materialist viewpoint, then how can you make a claim that science has overtaken religion?
Every single study that provides evidence for no free will has another study that provides evidence for it. It's even close to "proven". You're just a typical mindless atheist who thinks you know shit when you don't.
Properly trained in them but you don't even know what you're talking about lmfao
Tons of them. Even the Libet studies proved free will in one of the experiments.
Ok? That's the most vague answer ever. Electrochemistry somehow manages to turn a completely physical object into a sentient being. Wow bro, religion debunked
.Not true at all. They don't have 2 separate personalities, they still function exactly the same with slight changes to their overall personality and both sides of the brain were still able to interact with each other in ways that shouldn't be possible from a neuroscience standpoint.
Tons of them. Even the Libet studies proved free will in one of the experiments.
Ok? That's the most vague answer ever. Electrochemistry somehow manages to turn a completely physical object into a sentient being. Wow bro, religion debunked
Not true at all. They don't have 2 separate personalities, they still function exactly the same with slight changes to their overall personality and both sides of the brain were still able to interact with each other in ways that shouldn't be possible from a neuroscience standpoint.
You say this so authoritatively when you admit it's far from understood and no one can even begin to explain consciousness from a material standpoint. Typical reddit-tier atheist.
Memory and physical computation /= consciousness. Even people who are asleep, under anesthesia, vegetative state, etc still have some level of consciousness, just not memory.
earth 6000 years old, humans and animals came into existence as is, huge flood of the earth, moon emits light, etc
The bible never said any of that. Those are redditor atheist talking points that are entirely inaccurate.
No it doesn't. Cite any of the lines that say the Earth is 6000 years old. I will wait.
it isn't explicitly stated but it is implied with the timeline, denying this is pure cope
