Lighter skin = signal of being stronger and more masculine- Darker skin = weaker and more feminine

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2507973
View attachment 2507974View attachment 2507975View attachment 2507976View attachment 2507977View attachment 2507979View attachment 2507980View attachment 2507981


I am aware that this is a obvious bait and troll, but sure, I will entertain you more, just so others don't get the wrong idea and actually think what you're saying is true...

Here's the genetic and factual truth that you and other pale light skin copers can't cope with

there are no facts in this comment saying anything about light skin being worse tho
just random reconstructions of yamnaya (who were not the ancestors of corded ware) with a conjecture on what they looked like

 

[STAMPEDE]

literally look at OP tho. u cant deny that all of the warrior races and most powerful empires are light skinned. british and mongolian

British were not good warriors, they conquered tribes with 20k population that had spears as weapons... They lost to every european nation. As for mongols, I agree, they were good warriors, but they were not light skinned. Best warriors were dark skinned as always throughout history and genetics also confirm this

 

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2507958

Remember kids, even women prefer tanned-dark brown skinned guys over pale light skinned guys, it's so over for pale light skin copers

This study doesnt exist. I dare you to find me a link to it. You cant. Fake screenshot made by coping hinducels

 

[STAMPEDE]

Pale light skin copers can't cope with the fact that their ancestors were dark skinned and conquered all of europe and raped and conquered the light skin pale cucks.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

British were not good warriors, they conquered tribes with 20k population that had spears as weapons... They lost to every european nation. As for mongols, I agree, they were good warriors, but they were not light skinned. Best warriors were dark skinned as always throughout history and genetics also confirm this

cope they literally conquered the entire world

and they did defeat europeans: they defeated spain, france, netherlands, russia



and mongolians are the lightest most north asians thats why they conquered asia

further proof that the most north, lightest people are the strongest warrior races

 

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2508018View attachment 2508020

Pale light skin copers can't cope with the fact that their ancestors were dark skinned and conquered all of europe and raped and conquered the light skin pale cucks.

yamnaya wasnt dark skinned you idiot, you havent posted any proof of that.
they were light like modern europeans

 

[STAMPEDE]

yamnaya wasnt dark skinned you idiot, you havent posted any proof of that.
they were light like modern europeans

I just posted genetic truth of how they looked like you fucking moron coper Yamnyas were dark skinned as confirmed by all studies and genetic evidence. They were like the modern sourthen europeans, but way darker. Like arabs.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

I just posted genetic truth of how they looked like you fucking moron coper Yamnyas were dark skinned as confirmed by all studies and genetic evidence. They were like the modern sourthen europeans, but way darker. Like arabs.

how do you cope knowing your skin colour is a direct representation that you are weak, feminine, unhealthy, poor, low iq, micropenis

and ur women would leave u at any chance they got for a tall, strong, porcelain white skin, blonde blue eyes north european god

 

[Deleted member 45118]

I just posted genetic truth of how they looked like you fucking moron coper Yamnyas were dark skinned as confirmed by all studies and genetic evidence. They were like the modern sourthen europeans, but way darker. Like arabs.

Where is the evidence? Explain to right now. Where. You posted ARTISTIC INTERPRETATIONS. Evidence would be posting genetic information (of which you have posted none related to pigmentation)
Not a hint of "truth" anywhere. They were nothing like south euros or arabs btw, learn how to identify facial features, idiot.

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

View attachment 2506620

all of the biggest warrior races are northern races. with lighter skin



View attachment 2506625



View attachment 2506621

all of the strongest races are lighter skinned in direct correlation of the lighter you are the stronger you are





Light skin = strong, powerful, warrior race, masculine

Dark skin = weak, cuck race, slave, feminine

Cope the lightskins were house slaves and the dark ones worked labor jobs

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

and ur women would leave u at any chance they got for a tall, strong, porcelain white skin, blonde blue eyes north european god

Poor little fellers projecting

 

[STAMPEDE]

cope they literally conquered the entire world

and they did defeat europeans: they defeated spain, france, netherlands, russia




and mongolians are the lightest most north asians thats why they conquered asia



First, british only "conquered" unknown native tribes with 20k population and didn't even "fight" them, they just brought disase to the tribes and tribes died because of weak immune system. Second, british always lost to ither europeans and never conquered any strong nation, except India, which was weak and on the verge of collapsing.
Third, this is just a cope and straight up lie from you to further fall to your delusions and copes that even you don't believe, koreans are the lightest asians and mongolians are some of the darkest asians, explains why they were so successful in conquering empires.

 

[Deleted member 45118]

^this is also cope
koreans are not the lightest asians but some of the darkest, together with the japanese
Chinese and mongol people are the lightest asians, mongols have indo aryan admixture and light features

 

[STAMPEDE]

cope they literally conquered the entire world

and they did defeat europeans: they defeated spain, france, netherlands, russia



and mongolians are the lightest most north asians thats why they conquered asia

further proof that the most north, lightest people are the strongest warrior races

First, british only "conquered" unknown native tribes with 20k population and didn't even "fight" them, they just brought disase to the tribes and tribes died because of weak immune system. Second, british always lost to other europeans and never conquered any strong nation, except India, which was weak and on the verge of collapsing.
Third, this is just a cope and straight up lie from you to further fall to your delusions and copes that even you don't believe, koreans are the lightest asians and mongolians are some of the darkest asians, explains why they were so successful in conquering empires.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

First, british only "conquered" unknown native tribes with 20k population and didn't even "fight" them, they just brought disase to the tribes and tribes died because of weak immune system. Second, british always lost to other europeans and never conquered any strong nation, except India, which was weak and on the verge of collapsing.
Third, this is just a cope and straight up lie from you to further fall to your delusions and copes that even you don't believe, koreans are the lightest asians and mongolians are some of the darkest asians, explains why they were so successful in conquering empires.

what language are u speaking right now bro? british conquered you. and the entire world. and still rule today.

Third, this is just a cope and straight up lie from you to further fall to your delusions and copes that even you don't believe, koreans are the lightest asians and mongolians are some of the darkest asians, explains why they were so successful in conquering empires.

koreans are brown people.

the lightest asians are the most north. aka north east chinese and mongolians

^this is also cope
koreans are not the lightest asians but some of the darkest, together with the japanese
Chinese and mongol people are the lightest asians, mongols have indo aryan admixture and light features

 

[STAMPEDE]

^this is also cope
koreans are not the lightest asians but some of the darkest, together with the japanese
Chinese and mongol people are the lightest asians, mongols have indo aryan admixture and light features

Your cope is way way too fucking strong. I can't argue with copers that actually believe in their own delusions now matter how much facts and evidence you bring them...

 

[STAMPEDE]

what language are u speaking right now bro? british conquered you. and the entire world. and still rule today.

All lands ever conquered by british^^
They only conquered tribe cavemen with spears and lost against every strong nation they fought against. As you can see the only strong nation they conquered was India which was on the verge of collapsing, and was basically like Ukraine is today. British were always cucked throughout history by the french who are darker skinned. Keep coping, All facts and genetic evidence disproves what you have to say

 

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2508043

Your cope is way way too fucking strong. I can't argue with copers that actually believe in their own delusions now matter how much facts and evidence you bring them...

?
nothing on this map shows mongols being darker, and its not even evidence. where is the actual data being presented here? its a fucking drawing

you seem to not know what a fact actually is

some facts:
Mongols have indo iranian admixture, and exhibit light eyes and hair sometimes

Koreans and japs lack derived SLC24A5 so they cant have pale skin

Mongols dont lack it, however.

The japanese are measured to be darker than the chinese in a study (something you have never posted). South japanese = koreans
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248400904032?via=ihub

Im still waiting for you to post a fact though. Let me know when you do.

 

[STAMPEDE]

what language are u speaking right now bro? british conquered you. and the entire world. and still rule today.


koreans are brown people.

the lightest asians are the most north. aka north east chinese and mongolians

All lands ever conquered by british^^
They only conquered tribe cavemen with spears and lost against every strong nation they fought against. As you can see the only strong nation they conquered was India which was on the verge of collapsing, and was basically like Ukraine is today. British were always cucked throughout history by the french who are darker skinned. Keep coping, All facts and genetic evidence disproves what you have to say

 

[flippasav]

View attachment 2506620

all of the biggest warrior races are northern races. with lighter skin



View attachment 2506625



View attachment 2506621

all of the strongest races are lighter skinned in direct correlation of the lighter you are the stronger you are





Light skin = strong, powerful, warrior race, masculine

Dark skin = weak, cuck race, slave, feminine

Is Azerbaijan white?

 

[Deleted member 26859]

1. Hundred Years' War (1337-1453): France won. The conflict ended with the formal expulsion of the English from most of France, except for Calais.
2. Nine Years' War (1688-1697) and War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714): The wars ended with the signing of various treaties, including the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. While the outcomes were complex and involved multiple parties, the treaties resulted in a significant shift of territories. Britain gained several territories and trading rights, marking a diplomatic victory.
3. Seven Years' War (1756-1763): Britain won. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 resulted in significant territorial gains for Britain, including control of Canada and various territories in India and the Caribbean, at the expense of France.
4. French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815): The Napoleonic Wars ended with the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Britain was a leading member of the coalition forces that defeated Napoleon, marking a victory for the British and their allies.
5. Crimean War (1853-1856): The war ended inconclusively. The Treaty of Paris in 1856, which ended the conflict, did not result in significant territorial changes but marked a diplomatic victory for the allies, including Britain and France, against Russia.

@STAMPEDE are you projecting or something. britain defeated france in literally every war


and deafeated a lot of other european nations. and conquered the entire rest of the world



where are you from? i bet you didnt win a single war. hence why you are speaking our language lol. typical brown skinned cuck

 

[STAMPEDE]

1. Hundred Years' War (1337-1453): France won. The conflict ended with the formal expulsion of the English from most of France, except for Calais.
2. Nine Years' War (1688-1697) and War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714): The wars ended with the signing of various treaties, including the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. While the outcomes were complex and involved multiple parties, the treaties resulted in a significant shift of territories. Britain gained several territories and trading rights, marking a diplomatic victory.
3. Seven Years' War (1756-1763): Britain won. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 resulted in significant territorial gains for Britain, including control of Canada and various territories in India and the Caribbean, at the expense of France.
4. French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815): The Napoleonic Wars ended with the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Britain was a leading member of the coalition forces that defeated Napoleon, marking a victory for the British and their allies.
5. Crimean War (1853-1856): The war ended inconclusively. The Treaty of Paris in 1856, which ended the conflict, did not result in significant territorial changes but marked a diplomatic victory for the allies, including Britain and France, against Russia.

@STAMPEDE are you projecting or something. britain defeated france in literally every war


and deafeated a lot of other european nations. and conquered the entire rest of the world



where are you from? i bet you didnt win a single war. hence why you are speaking our language lol. typical brown skinned cuck

All lands ever conquered by british^^
They only conquered tribe cavemen with spears and lost against every strong nation they fought against. As you can see the only strong nation they conquered was India which was on the verge of collapsing, and was basically like Ukraine is today. British were always cucked throughout history by the french who are darker skinned. Keep coping, All facts and genetic evidence disproves what you have to say

 

[flippasav]

1. Hundred Years' War (1337-1453): France won. The conflict ended with the formal expulsion of the English from most of France, except for Calais.
2. Nine Years' War (1688-1697) and War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714): The wars ended with the signing of various treaties, including the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. While the outcomes were complex and involved multiple parties, the treaties resulted in a significant shift of territories. Britain gained several territories and trading rights, marking a diplomatic victory.
3. Seven Years' War (1756-1763): Britain won. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 resulted in significant territorial gains for Britain, including control of Canada and various territories in India and the Caribbean, at the expense of France.
4. French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815): The Napoleonic Wars ended with the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Britain was a leading member of the coalition forces that defeated Napoleon, marking a victory for the British and their allies.
5. Crimean War (1853-1856): The war ended inconclusively. The Treaty of Paris in 1856, which ended the conflict, did not result in significant territorial changes but marked a diplomatic victory for the allies, including Britain and France, against Russia.

@STAMPEDE are you projecting or something. britain defeated france in literally every war


and deafeated a lot of other european nations. and conquered the entire rest of the world



where are you from? i bet you didnt win a single war. hence why you are speaking our language lol. typical brown skinned cuck

He told me he’s Tatar

 

[flippasav]

View attachment 2508092

All lands ever conquered by british^^
They only conquered tribe cavemen with spears and lost against every steong nation they fought against. As you can see the only strong nation they conquered was India which was on the verge of collapsing, and was basically like Ukraine is today. British were always cucked throughout history by the french who are darker skinned. Keep coping, All facts and genetic evidence disproves what you have to say

In fact they lost the fist round of Battle of Islawanda

 

[STAMPEDE]

1. Hundred Years' War (1337-1453): France won. The conflict ended with the formal expulsion of the English from most of France, except for Calais.
2. Nine Years' War (1688-1697) and War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714): The wars ended with the signing of various treaties, including the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. While the outcomes were complex and involved multiple parties, the treaties resulted in a significant shift of territories. Britain gained several territories and trading rights, marking a diplomatic victory.
3. Seven Years' War (1756-1763): Britain won. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 resulted in significant territorial gains for Britain, including control of Canada and various territories in India and the Caribbean, at the expense of France.
4. French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815): The Napoleonic Wars ended with the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Britain was a leading member of the coalition forces that defeated Napoleon, marking a victory for the British and their allies.
5. Crimean War (1853-1856): The war ended inconclusively. The Treaty of Paris in 1856, which ended the conflict, did not result in significant territorial changes but marked a diplomatic victory for the allies, including Britain and France, against Russia.

@STAMPEDE are you projecting or something. britain defeated france in literally every war


and deafeated a lot of other european nations. and conquered the entire rest of the world



where are you from? i bet you didnt win a single war. hence why you are speaking our language lol. typical brown skinned cuck

ironically only english people to achieve anything are french/norman genetically, the cope can't end... French cucked british all of history and won hundred years war... Only british who achieved anything had french mediterranean dna.

 

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2508093

ironically only english people to achieve anything are french/norman genetically, the cope can't end... French cucked british all of history and won hundred years war... Only british who achieved anything had french mediterranean dna.

Normans got their strength from viking nordic warrior genes.

 

[flippasav]

Keep coping while Turks take it like real men conquer advanced/civilised territories that threaten them the most instead of barbarically bombarding every innocent defenceless tribes that would have no reason to be conquered. Keep stealing useless lands

 

[iammoh]

This Is valid for 6'8" the Mountain not some gracile manlet lol the strongest Person i've armwrestled was a moroccan, the current armwrestling champion Is brown

Hopepill for me (im moroccan)

 

[Deleted member 45118]

Keep coping while Turks take it like real men conquer advanced/civilised territories that threaten them the most instead of barbarically bombarding every innocent defenceless tribes that would have no reason to be conquered. Keep stealing useless lands




View attachment 2508110View attachment 2508111

Turks originate from nordic indo iranian men mating with asian women tho, they cucked the darker greeks. Light men triumph again

 

[standardcel]

The British Empire is more spread out throughout continents, but less impressive overall. The Mongol Empire stretched from East Asia to Central Europe. Unmoggable.

They were mostly wastelands that were conquered

 

[STAMPEDE]

1. Hundred Years' War (1337-1453): France won. The conflict ended with the formal expulsion of the English from most of France, except for Calais.
2. Nine Years' War (1688-1697) and War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714): The wars ended with the signing of various treaties, including the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. While the outcomes were complex and involved multiple parties, the treaties resulted in a significant shift of territories. Britain gained several territories and trading rights, marking a diplomatic victory.
3. Seven Years' War (1756-1763): Britain won. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 resulted in significant territorial gains for Britain, including control of Canada and various territories in India and the Caribbean, at the expense of France.
4. French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815): The Napoleonic Wars ended with the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Britain was a leading member of the coalition forces that defeated Napoleon, marking a victory for the British and their allies.
5. Crimean War (1853-1856): The war ended inconclusively. The Treaty of Paris in 1856, which ended the conflict, did not result in significant territorial changes but marked a diplomatic victory for the allies, including Britain and France, against Russia.

@STAMPEDE are you projecting or something. britain defeated france in literally every war


and deafeated a lot of other european nations. and conquered the entire rest of the world



where are you from? i bet you didnt win a single war. hence why you are speaking our language lol. typical brown skinned cuck

Cope more, pale light skin cuck. France won more wars and was the most successful european nation militarily. British lost all of their "colonies" with tribe cavemen and lost against all european nations in wars and now is a shithole who has indians and pakistanis as leaders. As for language, USA played a far bigger role in influencing worldwide than british ever did.

 

[flippasav]

Turks originate from nordic indo iranian men mating with asian women tho, they cucked the darker greeks. Light men triumph again

Turks are rape babies of Arab niggers. The men belong to J haplogroup whereas the women are majority H. If mixing never happened Turks would have looked Balkan.
(When Arabs conquered Anatolia they left their women behind) - Same goes for Turks who left the Steppe

@Manchild somebody pinch me

 

[Deleted member 45118]

Turks are rape babies of Arab niggers. The men belong to J haplogroup whereas the women are majority H. If mixing never happened Turks would have looked Balkan.
(When Arabs conquered Anatolia they left their women behind) - Same goes for Turks who left the Steppe

The original turks were of indo iranian paternal descent and the ottoman ruling class was also. Some indo iranians were also J.

 

[flippasav]

The original turks were of indo iranian paternal descent and the ottoman ruling class was also. Some indo iranians were also J.

At least we can day both Anatolians and Iranian peoples are turkified.

This is something to know:

The Iranian origin of the Azerbaijanis defines a link between present-day Azerbaijanis and their pre-Turkification Iranian past and mostly applies to Iranian Azerbaijanis. Although the Azeri people are known to be Turkic, their ancestors roots back in Indo-Iranian tribes and ethnic groups.

 

[Deleted member 45118]

At least we can day both Anatolians and Iranian peoples are turkified.

This is something to know:

The Iranian origin of the Azerbaijanis defines a link between present-day Azerbaijanis and their pre-Turkification Iranian past and mostly applies to Iranian Azerbaijanis. Although the Azeri people are known to be Turkic, their ancestors roots back in Indo-Iranian tribes and ethnic groups.

The original indo iranians were way different from modern ones. It was the turks who got iranified and got r1a ydna

 

[flippasav]

The original indo iranians were way different from modern ones. It was the turks who got iranified and got r1a ydna

Lucky for them

Mogs my R1b (R1b is black, asian and white at the same time)

 

[st.hamudi but 6‘5]

This Is valid for 6'8" the Mountain not some gracile manlet lol the strongest Person i've armwrestled was a moroccan, the current armwrestling champion Is brown

he’s from caucasus

 

[Deleted member 45118]

Lucky for them

Mogs my R1b (R1b is black, asian and white at the same time)

No its not, asians got it from white rape

 

[flippasav]

No its not, asians got it from white rape

What so it’s purely white?

 

[st.hamudi but 6‘5]

they're the tallest people in the world

no dinaric alp people are taller

 

[Deleted member 45118]

What so it’s purely white?

Ofc, anywhere where you see r1b it came there with some kind of steppe/european mixing with local women

 

[flippasav]

Ofc, anywhere where you see r1b it came there with some kind of steppe/european mixing with local women

Makes sense
I wonder why niggers from Cameroon or central africa have it jfl

 

[STAMPEDE]

no dinaric alp people are taller

Yeah, and dinaric alps are darker than nordic cucks yet taller, kinda ironic considering this post

 

[STAMPEDE]

Keep coping while Turks take it like real men conquer advanced/civilised territories that threaten them the most instead of barbarically bombarding every innocent defenceless tribes that would have no reason to be conquered. Keep stealing useless lands




View attachment 2508110View attachment 2508111

Turkics were far more impressive than british cucks, considering they conquered nearly all the strongest empires of their time and huns a turkic tribe conquered germanic tribes and cucked them. British only conquered tribe cavemen with a 10k population that had spears as weapons.

 

[flippasav]

View attachment 2508153

Turkics were far more impressive than british cucks, considering they conquered nearly all the strongest empires of their time and huns a turkic tribe conquered germanic tribes and cucked them. British only conquered tribe cavemen with a 10k population that had spears as weapons.

Ain’t no way Mughal Empire (What Britain conquered) was Turkic with proper civilisation many think Indians were like zulus living in hut houses. The Turkic world is impressive.

The top 3 gunpowder empires Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empire

 

[Deleted member 45118]

Yeah, and dinaric alps are darker than nordic cucks yet taller, kinda ironic considering this post

cope, the lightest balkanites (bosnians, highest slav admixture 66%) are the tallest, greeks who are the darkest and least slav are the shortest

 

[Aladin]

The British Empire is more spread out throughout continents, but less impressive overall. The Mongol Empire stretched from East Asia to Central Europe. Unmoggable.

Stop deflecting darkie.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I'm just here to post this video

 

[STAMPEDE]

cope, the lightest balkanites (bosnians, highest slav admixture 66%) are the tallest, greeks who are the darkest and least slav are the shortest

Again, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong. Greeks are 179cm , which is very tall and far from shortest in balkans. Bosnians also aren't the lightest in balkans, they are one or the darkest. Montegrins who are also very dark and have a dinaric pheno,(bosnians also) are tallest in balkans. Tallest people in balkans which are dinaric people are very dark.

 

[Deleted member 45118]

View attachment 2508228

Again, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong. Greeks are 179cm , which is very tall and far from shortest in balkans. Bosnians also aren't the lightest in balkans, they are one or the darkest. Montegrins who are also very dark and have a dinaric pheno,(bosnians also) are tallest in balkans. Tallest people in balkans(dinarics) are very dark.

But youve been wrong about everything youve said so far and provided 0 proof for anything?

High slavic areas are the tallest, more slavic = lighter
Darker albos, bulgarians and macedonians are shorter than lighter, more slavic dinarics
Slavic (northern, pale) admixture is correlated with height in the balkans.