Mass immigration is good

[Skara]

The only truly "white" people in every form, speech, behavior and appearance, are the native English elite and their American counterparts (WASPs). The pinnacle final form of "white excellence".

Most of the British elite and WASPs have already co-aligned with the Jewish liberal plan for an elite highly educated non-primitive high-trust upper class enclave that will rule over the unintelligent primitive and poor mixed masses.

Every other definition of white is just phenotype circlejerking, or something even more subjective. Oh but Greeks and Romans built the first empires, oh but there's plenty of blond Slavic people, yada-daba-doo. It's pointless and running in circles.

do you think i'm white if i don't belong to any ethnicity including english?

 

[Paul Allen.]

do you think i'm white if i don't belong to any ethnicity including english?

How can you not belong to an ethnicity? Are you mixed-race? That's still multiple ethnicities, genetically.

You can share your ethnicity if you feel comfortable, so I have a better idea what you mean.

 

[Skara]

How can you not belong to an ethnicity? Are you mixed-race? That's still multiple ethnicities, genetically.

ethnicity is not genetical thing so as race, but i have typical "white" features

 

[Skara]

How can you not belong to an ethnicity? Are you mixed-race? That's still multiple ethnicities, genetically.

You can share your ethnicity if you feel comfortable, so I have a better idea what you mean.

I just don't have an ethnicity... I just don't want to feel like I belong to anything

 

[Paul Allen.]

ethnicity is not genetical thing so as race, but i have typical "white" features

Are you Jewish like it says in your signature? If you are 100% Ashkenazi then you are Jewish for sure. If you are a Mizrahi or half-Euro Jew, I would still consider you a Jew if your mother was the Jewish one.

Jews are really just white-passing Levant Middle Eastern people, who due to similar features, mix really well with Europeans if they wish. Here are some famous Mizrahi or mixed Jews.

 

[Skara]

Are you Jewish like it says in your signature? If you are 100% Ashkenazi then you are Jewish for sure. If you are a Mizrahi or half-Euro Jew, I would still consider you a Jew if your mother was the Jewish one.

Jews are really just white-passing Levant Middle Eastern people, who due to similar features, mix really well with Europeans if they wish. Here are some famous Mizrahi or mixed Jews.

View attachment 3631032View attachment 3631033View attachment 3631034View attachment 3631035View attachment 3631039

people often say that i look jewish but i'm acutally not

 

[Skara]

Are you Jewish like it says in your signature? If you are 100% Ashkenazi then you are Jewish for sure. If you are a Mizrahi or half-Euro Jew, I would still consider you a Jew if your mother was the Jewish one.

Jews are really just white-passing Levant Middle Eastern people, who due to similar features, mix really well with Europeans if they wish. Here are some famous Mizrahi or mixed Jews.

View attachment 3631032View attachment 3631033View attachment 3631034View attachment 3631035View attachment 3631039

check DMs

 

[TURK-KUN]

there are not enough workers - that means they need people. That's it.

Wrong. First of all, let's establish the fact that the population decrease isn't an existential threat.

Populations go through periods of growth and shrinkage. Just like the economy goes through cyclical recessions.
There is no such thing as infinite growth, there should never have been an expectation of infinite growth to begin with.

Populations reached historical highs in the late 20th century with the baby boom. Throughout most of human history, we have had much smaller population sizes and we were just naturally returning to a smaller population.

Example:

2025 UK population: 68 million
1900 UK population: 40 million
1800 UK population: 10 million
1700 UK population: 5.2 million

Even if our population got halved, or even reduced to a quarter or less, it would remain larger than what was the historical norm. So no, numbers wise, we'd be completely fine.

Second, it is important to emphasize that we would have been fine on our own. We would find alternative ways to handle the decreased workforce, such as automation, increased wages and insentives for young people to work, etc. Japan and South Korea and faring signicantly better than Europe even though they have an even lower birth rate.

And the Nazis who shout about 'great replacement' don't even understand that it is immigrants who save their economies from degradation. Without them - less taxes, less consumption, fewer workers, higher prices. Their 'pure nation' is bankrupt.

Again, that's not true. Immigrants offer one thing: Cheap labour.

This cheap labour is good only for one demographic; Employers.

The majority of the native population does not benefit from it, since now the competitive value of their own labour goes down as there are people willing to work longer hours for less pay. Also, all the immigrants moving in, raise the demand for housing, which also raises the price.

The net-effect of immigration is: Higher housing prices and lower wages.

So in exchange for cheaper labour for some company owners, the majority of the population, especially young people, struggle to get jobs, when they go get jobs they aren't getting paid as much, and they have a much harder time buying a home and are forced to rent.

This shitty situation for young people, makes them delay having children to later stages in their lives, since most westerners wait until they have a steady job and own a home before they consider starting a family. When they delay having children, they also end up having less kids.

Immigration is simply a logical response to economic and demographic demands, and not a "Jewish attacking against the white race"

Immigration is one of many solutions to one problem alone: Worker shortages.

There are many ways you can handle worker shortages without replacing your own people with the third world.

Why did Europe decide to go with mass immigration? Because when they were considering their options, the people who cared about the ethnic integrity of their nation were labeled racists. Because the current political system didn't allow Europeans to care about the ethnic composition of their nation.

In Japan they don't have this problem. The average person in Japan understands that it is Japanese people that make Japan, well, Japan. It is not even a little bit controversial in Japan for people to voice their concerns about being replaced by foreigners. They openly care about the ethnic composition of their country and aren't politically repressed for it.

Why is it different in the west? How did we arrive at this political status-who that demonizes nationalism?

The answer is: The Aftermath of world war 2 and jewish propaganda.

Why do European countries accept "refugees"? Because an international law got passed after WW2 that we have to, because of the jews that died after being rejected asylum. Why do nationalists get treated so badly? Because of Hitler. Why is hitler the worst guy ever? Because of the holocaust, because of what he did to the jews....

Jews in power hate nationalism because they fear it. Because nationalistic, tribalistic Europeans have persecuted jews throughout history.
So after the last great war, when they won it, they used all of their power to exaggerate narratives and turn themselves into the ultimate victim and they have been exploiting this status ever since.... to fill Europe with migrants and destroy its ethno-cultural integrity and also to subvert western countries into supporting israel even against their own interests.

>B-but muh they destroy out culture

look at you... happy that our culture is being destroyed. Classic jew.

the culture doesn't belong to you, it's not your personal thing, and therefore why are you protecting it?

Of course it belongs to us you fucking retard.

Our ancestors are native to this land, they fought for and built this beautiful civilization for us to enjoy, not for us to go extinct and be replaced by Africans and Indians. Also, I want to live in a nice country. What makes European countries nice, is Europeans themselves! The most important factor that makes a country look like what it does, is its people!

Africa is a shithole because of Africans! India is a shithole because of Indians! The middle east and Latin America are So-so because of the people that live in it. East Asia is organized and developed because of east asians who are also high iq.

Europe belongs to Europeans. Europeans are white. Europe belongs to the white race.

If Europe is no longer white, Europe is no longer Europe.

 

[PsychoH]

ok what if i don't admit to belonging to any race? the fact that i was born in europe doesn't mean anything

The Germans, in the well-known majority, arose as some side of the Slavs, then the Romans mixed in - and that was already a mixture - the same Hungarians - and they are not Indo-Europeans at all - and the result was a hodgepodge, a mixture of tribes and small peoples of different origins, often having nothing in common with each other, for the most part, losers of different wars. . There has never been any German people. And if now everyone who calls themselves Germans dies out - the German people will not perish. This allows you to launch ANY things and promise that the German people will not perish.

Anyone from Europe besides what I mentioned is white. @psychomandible thoughts on this attempt of the guy?

 

[Skara]

Wrong. First of all, let's establish the fact that the population decrease isn't an existential threat.

Populations go through periods of growth and shrinkage. Just like the economy goes through cyclical recessions.
There is no such thing as infinite growth, there should never have been an expectation of infinite growth to begin with.

Populations reached historical highs in the late 20th century with the baby boom. Throughout most of human history, we have had much smaller population sizes and we were just naturally returning to a smaller population.

Example:

2025 UK population: 68 million
1900 UK population: 40 million
1800 UK population: 10 million
1700 UK population: 5.2 million

Even if our population got halved, or even reduced to a quarter or less, it would remain larger than what was the historical norm. So no, numbers wise, we'd be completely fine.

Second, it is important to emphasize that we would have been fine on our own. We would find alternative ways to handle the decreased workforce, such as automation, increased wages and insentives for young people to work, etc. Japan and South Korea and faring signicantly better than Europe even though they have an even lower birth rate.



Again, that's not true. Immigrants offer one thing: Cheap labour.

This cheap labour is good only for one demographic; Employers.

The majority of the native population does not benefit from it, since now the competitive value of their own labour goes down as there are people willing to work longer hours for less pay. Also, all the immigrants moving in, raise the demand for housing, which also raises the price.

The net-effect of immigration is: Higher housing prices and lower wages.

So in exchange for cheaper labour for some company owners, the majority of the population, especially young people, struggle to get jobs, when they go get jobs they aren't getting paid as much, and they have a much harder time buying a home and are forced to rent.

This shitty situation for young people, makes them delay having children to later stages in their lives, since most westerners wait until they have a steady job and own a home before they consider starting a family. When they delay having children, they also end up having less kids.



Immigration is one of many solutions to one problem alone: Worker shortages.

There are many ways you can handle worker shortages without replacing your own people with the third world.

Why did Europe decide to go with mass immigration? Because when they were considering their options, the people who cared about the ethnic integrity of their nation were labeled racists. Because the current political system didn't allow Europeans to care about the ethnic composition of their nation.

In Japan they don't have this problem. The average person in Japan understands that it is Japanese people that make Japan, well, Japan. It is not even a little bit controversial in Japan for people to voice their concerns about being replaced by foreigners. They openly care about the ethnic composition of their country and aren't politically repressed for it.

Why is it different in the west? How did we arrive at this political status-who that demonizes nationalism?

The answer is: The Aftermath of world war 2 and jewish propaganda.

Why do European countries accept "refugees"? Because an international law got passed after WW2 that we have to, because of the jews that died after being rejected asylum. Why do nationalists get treated so badly? Because of Hitler. Why is hitler the worst guy ever? Because of the holocaust, because of what he did to the jews....

Jews in power hate nationalism because they fear it. Because nationalistic, tribalistic Europeans have persecuted jews throughout history.
So after the last great war, when they won it, they used all of their power to exaggerate narratives and turn themselves into the ultimate victim and they have been exploiting this status ever since.... to fill Europe with migrants and destroy its ethno-cultural integrity and also to subvert western countries into supporting israel even against their own interests.


look at you... happy that our culture is being destroyed. Classic jew.

Of course it belongs to us you fucking retard.

Our ancestors are native to this land, they fought for and built this beautiful civilization for us to enjoy, not for us to go extinct and be replaced by Africans and Indians. Also, I want to live in a nice country. What makes European countries nice, is Europeans themselves! The most important factor that makes a country look like what it does, is its people!

Africa is a shithole because of Africans! India is a shithole because of Indians! The middle east and Latin America are So-so because of the people that live in it. East Asia is organized and developed because of east asians who are also high iq.

Europe belongs to Europeans. Europeans are white. Europe belongs to the white race.

If Europe is no longer white, Europe is no longer Europe.

what a dogshit essay
muh muh da joos muh europe belongs to us muh muh

 

[Skara]

Anyone from Europe besides what I mentioned is white. @psychomandible thoughts on this attempt of the guy?

once again, just because I was born in a certain territory doesn't mean that I can be labeled that way

 

[TURK-KUN]

what a dogshit essay

great arguement dog

muh muh da joos muh europe belongs to us muh muh

who the fuck else would europe belong to if not to europeans?
Doesn't Japan belong to the japanese?
Doesn't india belong to indians?

What about israel, jew? does israel not belong to jews? what if the entire third world moved to israel and jews became 20%? would it still be israel?

 

[psychomandible]

Anyone from Europe besides what I mentioned is white. @psychomandible thoughts on this attempt of the guy?

It's actually exciting finally seeing a globohomo liberal, he has said everything I expected. He did say though that ethnicity is not genetic ?!

 

[PsychoH]

once again, just because I was born in a certain territory doesn't mean that I can be labeled that way

true.

 

[Skara]

great arguement dog

it's not even an argument since we don't debate, this is the fact

who the fuck else would europe belong to if not to europeans?
Doesn't Japan belong to the japanese?
Doesn't india belong to indians?

What about israel, jew? does israel not belong to jews? what if the entire third world moved to israel and jews became 20%? would it still be israel?

yeah exactly, until you are the leader of the country, it does not belong to you and therefore there is no point in defending it

 

[TiktokUser]

still a retard

couldnt debunk a single thing I said

doesn't know the difference between per capita gdp and gdp. Which is why they thought it was fine when it was stagnant

actual braindead autism retard

 

[acertyxx_]

there are not enough workers - that means they need people. That's it. No magic. And the Nazis who shout about 'great replacement' don't even understand that it is immigrants who save their economies from degradation. Without them - less taxes, less consumption, fewer workers, higher prices. Their 'pure nation' is bankrupt.
Immigration is simply a logical response to economic and demographic demands, and not a "Jewish attacking against the white race"
>B-but muh they destroy out culture
the culture doesn't belong to you, it's not your personal thing, and therefore why are you protecting it?

Ah ah ah nigga almost got me until I read your sig. Keep rage farming the .org retards my beloved.

 

[Skara]

still a retard

couldnt debunk a single thing I said

because you said nothing more than "muh muh retarcd miuh mjh kys mu mhy dont know defference muh muh"

 

[TiktokUser]

because you said nothing more than "muh muh retarcd miuh mjh kys mu mhy dont know defference muh muh"

I’m still waiting on you to debunk a single study I linked. Oh wait, you can’t. Logic and reasoning is too hard for you to grasp. Honestly stunning if you even wipe your fucking ass you subhuman. No wonder your banner and profile picture is animated porn

Migration is not a solution by itself. The issue isn’t migration; it’s the lack of infrastructure to handle it properly. unregulated immigration, without the proper investments in housing, healthcare, and other public services creates more strain than it solves. You don’t just throw more people into a broken system and call it a solution. I shower you economic data for this and your subhuman self is just “muh it’s wrong”

Debunk it then you stupid fag. Hang yourself. Nobody will miss you

competition within the context of scarcity creates a race to the bottomz Economic development happens when resources are actually made available to everyone not when they’re hoarded by the few Jews at top. More people competing for fewer resources doesn’t magically make the pie bigger, basic middle school and you still can’t grasp in your minuscule brain. Actual retardation Your argument is completely ignoring the reality of what happens when the system fails to meet demand, and you’re blaming the workers for it

If there’s no investment in housing or infrastructure, simply adding people to the system doesn’t create the required supply to meet that demand. You keep ignoring that. Migration doesn’t automatically cause the economy to expand, it just creates more pressure on a system that’s already struggling. The data you didn’t even bother reading proves this. You’re just so retarded to even understand it

You couldn’t debunk this lil bro

You still won’t also admit you don’t know the difference between GDP and GDP per capita.

You were called out by others

Clown you are

 

[Skara]

You couldn’t debunk this lil bro

what exactly i can't debunk? i only see some dogshit essay with your ramblings.

You still won’t also admit you don’t know the difference between GDP and GDP per capita.

You were called out by others

Clown you are

Why do you think I don't understand the difference? You repeat the same false thing millions of times.
Although GDP by PPP per capita is the most accurate parameter. Also I don't really consider you as human creature because you don't understand the simplest things. Literally subhuman LMFAO.

 

[Skara]

You couldn’t debunk this lil bro

You still won’t also admit you don’t know the difference between GDP and GDP per capita.

You were called out by others

Clown you are

no nigger you won't make a world revolution. There will never be any communism, untermenschen like you have already failed with your USSR, no more cocksuckerstate will come out. JFL at you commies.

 

[TiktokUser]

what exactly i can't debunk? i only see some dogshit essay with your ramblings.



Why do you think I don't understand the difference? You repeat the same false thing millions of times.
Although GDP by PPP per capita is the most accurate parameter. Also I don't really consider you as human creature because you don't understand the simplest things. Literally subhuman LMFAO.

Because you literally confused GDP growth with GDP per capita decline earlier. You admitted GDP per capita dropped, yet still claimed migration was a success. Lmfao retarded fag

GDP rising + GDP per capita falling = population outpacing growth.

“GDP by PPP per capita is the most accurate parameter “

You’re trying to shift goalposts now by mentioning PPP because you brutally lost

GDP per capita PPP just adjusts for cost of living, which still shows stagnation or decline in many high migration countries. It’s not some magic fix. You still haven’t refuted the studies showing GDP per capita declining post immigration booms.

OECD data, 2023 – GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations

Migration doesn’t solve anything by itself. Without housing, public transit, hospitals, schools, you just overload an already strained system.

IMore people + no new resources = worse quality of life.

You keep dodging this like the fag you are

CMHC, 2024 – Housing shortages worsen with high unplanned migration

 

[TiktokUser]

Wrong. First of all, let's establish the fact that the population decrease isn't an existential threat.

Populations go through periods of growth and shrinkage. Just like the economy goes through cyclical recessions.
There is no such thing as infinite growth, there should never have been an expectation of infinite growth to begin with.

Populations reached historical highs in the late 20th century with the baby boom. Throughout most of human history, we have had much smaller population sizes and we were just naturally returning to a smaller population.

Example:

2025 UK population: 68 million
1900 UK population: 40 million
1800 UK population: 10 million
1700 UK population: 5.2 million

Even if our population got halved, or even reduced to a quarter or less, it would remain larger than what was the historical norm. So no, numbers wise, we'd be completely fine.

Second, it is important to emphasize that we would have been fine on our own. We would find alternative ways to handle the decreased workforce, such as automation, increased wages and insentives for young people to work, etc. Japan and South Korea and faring signicantly better than Europe even though they have an even lower birth rate.



Again, that's not true. Immigrants offer one thing: Cheap labour.

This cheap labour is good only for one demographic; Employers.

The majority of the native population does not benefit from it, since now the competitive value of their own labour goes down as there are people willing to work longer hours for less pay. Also, all the immigrants moving in, raise the demand for housing, which also raises the price.

The net-effect of immigration is: Higher housing prices and lower wages.

So in exchange for cheaper labour for some company owners, the majority of the population, especially young people, struggle to get jobs, when they go get jobs they aren't getting paid as much, and they have a much harder time buying a home and are forced to rent.

This shitty situation for young people, makes them delay having children to later stages in their lives, since most westerners wait until they have a steady job and own a home before they consider starting a family. When they delay having children, they also end up having less kids.



Immigration is one of many solutions to one problem alone: Worker shortages.

There are many ways you can handle worker shortages without replacing your own people with the third world.

Why did Europe decide to go with mass immigration? Because when they were considering their options, the people who cared about the ethnic integrity of their nation were labeled racists. Because the current political system didn't allow Europeans to care about the ethnic composition of their nation.

In Japan they don't have this problem. The average person in Japan understands that it is Japanese people that make Japan, well, Japan. It is not even a little bit controversial in Japan for people to voice their concerns about being replaced by foreigners. They openly care about the ethnic composition of their country and aren't politically repressed for it.

Why is it different in the west? How did we arrive at this political status-who that demonizes nationalism?

The answer is: The Aftermath of world war 2 and jewish propaganda.

Why do European countries accept "refugees"? Because an international law got passed after WW2 that we have to, because of the jews that died after being rejected asylum. Why do nationalists get treated so badly? Because of Hitler. Why is hitler the worst guy ever? Because of the holocaust, because of what he did to the jews....

Jews in power hate nationalism because they fear it. Because nationalistic, tribalistic Europeans have persecuted jews throughout history.
So after the last great war, when they won it, they used all of their power to exaggerate narratives and turn themselves into the ultimate victim and they have been exploiting this status ever since.... to fill Europe with migrants and destroy its ethno-cultural integrity and also to subvert western countries into supporting israel even against their own interests.


look at you... happy that our culture is being destroyed. Classic jew.

Of course it belongs to us you fucking retard.

Our ancestors are native to this land, they fought for and built this beautiful civilization for us to enjoy, not for us to go extinct and be replaced by Africans and Indians. Also, I want to live in a nice country. What makes European countries nice, is Europeans themselves! The most important factor that makes a country look like what it does, is its people!

Africa is a shithole because of Africans! India is a shithole because of Indians! The middle east and Latin America are So-so because of the people that live in it. East Asia is organized and developed because of east asians who are also high iq.

Europe belongs to Europeans. Europeans are white. Europe belongs to the white race.

If Europe is no longer white, Europe is no longer Europe.

Skara is just retarded

Autism, mental illness, femboy, kike all in one. He can’t understand simple economic data, even if it meant he could no longer jack off to furry porn

He should blow his cum stained walls with blood as well

 

[Skara]

Because you literally confused GDP growth with GDP per capita decline earlier. You admitted GDP per capita dropped, yet still claimed migration was a success. Lmfao retarded fag

where? also yeah migration was a success it's true

GDP rising + GDP per capita falling = population outpacing growth.

so what? you explain thing i already know

“GDP by PPP per capita is the most accurate parameter “

yes

You’re trying to shift goalposts now by mentioning PPP because you brutally lost

you're just trying to make yourself look smart by talking about gdp per capita, which in reality means little you nigger.
you didn't debunked my take on GDP per capita in PPP, you just made a false assumption why I'm saying this

GDP per capita PPP just adjusts for cost of living, which still shows stagnation or decline in many high migration countries. It’s not some magic fix. You still haven’t refuted the studies showing GDP per capita declining post immigration booms.

so you yourself said that it remains at the same level, and does not decline. But well, even if it declines, without migration it would have decline much more

OECD data, 2023 – GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations

Migration doesn’t solve anything by itself. Without housing, public transit, hospitals, schools, you just overload an already strained system.

Where did I say otherwise?

IMore people + no new resources = worse quality of life.

ask your government chosen by your chosen race why don't they invest in housing, public transit, hospitals, schools (even though they do, idiot.) It's not immigration problem

You keep dodging this like the fag you are

CMHC, 2024 – Housing shortages worsen with high unplanned migration

0 arguments commie

 

[Skara]

Skara is just retarded

Autism, mental illness, femboy, kike all in one. He can’t understand simple economic data, even if it meant he could no longer jack off to furry porn

He should blow his cum stained walls with blood as well

me: giving logical arguments, analyzing
you and @TURK-KUN : muh muh da joos muh mhh europe save europe muh muh europe for europeans

 

[TiktokUser]

Where did I say otherwise?

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, the economy would’ve collapsed.”
“Competition for resources promotes development.”


Debunk the studies already you gremlin. You continue to deny things you have said when it’s right in these threads.

Absolute retarded subhuman blow your brains out

 

[Skara]

Because you literally confused GDP growth with GDP per capita decline earlier. You admitted GDP per capita dropped, yet still claimed migration was a success. Lmfao retarded fag

GDP rising + GDP per capita falling = population outpacing growth.

“GDP by PPP per capita is the most accurate parameter “

You’re trying to shift goalposts now by mentioning PPP because you brutally lost

GDP per capita PPP just adjusts for cost of living, which still shows stagnation or decline in many high migration countries. It’s not some magic fix. You still haven’t refuted the studies showing GDP per capita declining post immigration booms.

OECD data, 2023 – GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations

Migration doesn’t solve anything by itself. Without housing, public transit, hospitals, schools, you just overload an already strained system.

IMore people + no new resources = worse quality of life.

You keep dodging this like the fag you are

CMHC, 2024 – Housing shortages worsen with high unplanned migration

also jfl at keep debating while you already lost nigger

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”

yes, at least it is needed to solve issues. if something goes wrong because of your government's mistakes, it is not a migration problem

“Without migrants, the economy would’ve collapsed.”

true

“Competition for resources promotes development.”

true

Debunk the studies already you gremlin. You continue to deny things you have said when it’s right in your face.

what studies? And why I need to debunk them?

Absolute retarded subhuman blow your brains out

0 arguments a lot of noise

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, the economy would’ve collapsed.”
“Competition for resources promotes development.”


Debunk the studies already you gremlin. You continue to deny things you have said when it’s right in these threads.

Absolute retarded subhuman blow your brains out

you don't debunk shit while you blame me for your own sins

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, the economy would’ve collapsed.”
“Competition for resources promotes development.”


Debunk the studies already you gremlin. You continue to deny things you have said when it’s right in these threads.

Absolute retarded subhuman blow your brains out

"ugh" is your last argument JFL.

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, the economy would’ve collapsed.”
“Competition for resources promotes development.”


Debunk the studies already you gremlin. You continue to deny things you have said when it’s right in these threads.

Absolute retarded subhuman blow your brains out

@afroheadluke JFL if you believe this nigger

 

[TiktokUser]

@afroheadluke JFL if you believe this nigger

Debunk a study I linked already

OECD data, 2023 – GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations

“Muh how is this related “

 

[afroheadluke]

@afroheadluke JFL if you believe this nigger

you title yourself as a jewish femboy and expect me to take you seriously

 

[Skara]

Debunk a study I linked already

OECD data, 2023 – GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations

“Muh how is this related “

why the hell should I deny this? did I ever say that it is NOT stagnating?

>GDP per capita stagnation across high-immigration nations
No, the statement about “GDP per capita stagnating in high-immigration countries” is not entirely accurate or universal. The impact of immigration on economic growth depends on many factors, including the structure of the economy, the skills of migrants, integration policies, and demographic trends.

1. Different countries - different results
USA, Canada, Australia - high-immigration countries where GDP per capita continues to grow, although the rate may slow down due to population growth.

European countries (Germany, France, Sweden) - in some cases, there is a decrease in the rate of growth of GDP per capita, but this is not only due to migration, but also to other factors (aging population, low productivity).

Gulf countries (Qatar, UAE) - GDP per capita may fall because migrants (often low-skilled) increase the population, but do not always contribute proportionally to the economy.

2. Why might it seem that there is stagnation?
The difference between total GDP and GDP per capita - if immigrants are mostly in low-paid positions, their contribution to the economy increases, but per capita growth may be slower.

Short period of analysis - if you look only at the last 5-10 years, in some countries there is indeed a slowdown, but in the long term, immigration often helps the economy.

Demographic effect - in aging countries (Germany, Japan), migrants support the labor force, which helps avoid a sharp drop in GDP per capita.

3. Conclusion
There is no clear rule that "high immigration = stagnant GDP per capita". In some cases, migration really hinders growth (if migrants do not integrate into the economy), but in others it supports it (like in the US or Canada). It all depends on the country's policies and the structure of migration flows.

If you have specific countries or data that you are interested in, I can give a more detailed analysis.
that's what AI says

 

[Healthymaxxer]

another way is to force people to breed more

 

[Skara]

another way is to force people to breed more

forcing is bad

 

[TiktokUser]

why the hell should I deny this? did I ever say that it is NOT stagnating?

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, you wouldn’t have low growth, you’d have a full-blown recession.”
“You just made my point — there IS growth.”
“Competition for limited resources PROMOTES economic development.”

Once again another contradiction

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”

yes, at least it is needed to solve issues. if something goes wrong because of your government's mistakes, it is not a migration problem

“Without migrants, you wouldn’t have low growth, you’d have a full-blown recession.”

yes it's true

“You just made my point — there IS growth.”

yes there is

“Competition for limited resources PROMOTES economic development.”

yes it does

Once again another contradiction

where's contradiction? you did not debunked shit as well you subhuman

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without migrants, you wouldn’t have low growth, you’d have a full-blown recession.”
“You just made my point — there IS growth.”
“Competition for limited resources PROMOTES economic development.”

Once again another contradiction

meanwhile your arguments:
"muh muh jews want to destroy us and therefore they let poverty in"
"muh muh it's immigration problem It's all the migrants' fault!"
"muh muh it's the government fault now not jews They are deliberately creating a burden on the infrastructure"
so your arguments are not contradictory?

 

[TiktokUser]

yes, at least it is needed to solve issues. if something goes wrong because of your government's mistakes, it is not a migration problem

yes it's true

yes there is

yes it does

where's contradiction? you did not debunked shit as well you subhuman

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without immigrants, [GDP] would have fallen very sharply in 16 years.”
“Competition for limited resources promotes economic development.”
“Then blame your superior white race that they don’t tell the government through democracy why they don’t give necessary corresponding investments.”

first claimed that migration solves the issue, implying it’s inherently beneficial, while later admitting that GDP per capita has stagnated in high immigration countries, and blaming the government for not matching that influx with the necessary infrastructure.

You sold migration as a fix, then turned around and blamed systemic failure when the data showed stagnation.


Mind blowing retardation

 

[Skara]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without immigrants, [GDP] would have fallen very sharply in 16 years.”
“Competition for limited resources promotes economic development.”
“Then blame your superior white race that they don’t tell the government through democracy why they don’t give necessary corresponding investments.”

first claimed that migration solves the issue, implying it’s inherently beneficial, while later admitting that GDP per capita has stagnated in high immigration countries, and blaming the government for not matching that influx with the necessary infrastructure.

You sold migration as a fix, then turned around and blamed systemic failure when the data showed stagnation.


Mind blowing retardation

bullshit again.

>first claimed that migration solves the issue, implying it’s inherently beneficial, while later admitting that GDP per capita has stagnated in high immigration countries, and blaming the government for not matching that influx with the necessary infrastructure.

so where is the contradiction, stupid degenerate? I didn't mention GDP per capita, you are the one who constantly talks about this nonsense (and besides, this parameter means little) and besides, without migration there would not be stagnation, but a decline. Again, the government is to blame for the mistakes, and not the migration itself. Where do you see a contradiction here, idiot?

 

[FiendFiend]

there are not enough workers - that means they need people. That's it. No magic. And the Nazis who shout about 'great replacement' don't even understand that it is immigrants who save their economies from degradation. Without them - less taxes, less consumption, fewer workers, higher prices. Their 'pure nation' is bankrupt.
Immigration is simply a logical response to economic and demographic demands, and not a "Jewish attacking against the white race"
>B-but muh they destroy out culture
the culture doesn't belong to you, it's not your personal thing, and therefore why are you protecting it?

If there are not enough workers how is society functioning then with like 20% of 16-25 being neets and unemployment rates rising.

Dude the big companies import foreign workers so they can pay them cheaper. Blue collar jobs used to pay very very good and be able to sustain your living very easily a couple decades ago. Its a self fuffiling prophecy bro.

companies say "Guys we dont have enough workers!!!" (when they do have enough native people but just dont wanna hire them cuz they actually want fair wage prices) so bring in some negro from india who will work for pennies.

They actually are detrimental for the economy, drive up house prices too, and make property just an asset you buy to rent out to others. Do you think big companies would be buying houses if migration wasnt guranteed? no they fucking wouldnt bro

 

[FiendFiend]

“Migration solves the issue, it doesn’t create it.”
“Without immigrants, [GDP] would have fallen very sharply in 16 years.”
“Competition for limited resources promotes economic development.”
“Then blame your superior white race that they don’t tell the government through democracy why they don’t give necessary corresponding investments.”

first claimed that migration solves the issue, implying it’s inherently beneficial, while later admitting that GDP per capita has stagnated in high immigration countries, and blaming the government for not matching that influx with the necessary infrastructure.

You sold migration as a fix, then turned around and blamed systemic failure when the data showed stagnation.


Mind blowing retardation

yeah this is what u call a self fuffilling prophecy

 

[FiendFiend]

Then let Europe go bankrupt, let us go extinct if we want. We still don't want Israel shipping millions of immigrants to Europe, you can live your Greater Israel dreams after all Europe is dead from low birthrates (won't happen)

dudes still believing that jews are fully behind the whole mass migration to europe in the big 25 im dying bro

 

[FiendFiend]

We don’t need more fucking workers, we need better pay, better living conditions, and controls on our current overlords

yeah exactly. If there was SOOO little workers, then why is it fucking impossible to get a job at mcdonalds

 

[Skara]

If there are not enough workers how is society functioning then with like 20% of 16-25 being neets and unemployment rates rising.

Dude the big companies import foreign workers so they can pay them cheaper. Blue collar jobs used to pay very very good and be able to sustain your living very easily a couple decades ago. Its a self fuffiling prophecy bro.

companies say "Guys we dont have enough workers!!!" (when they do have enough native people but just dont wanna hire them cuz they actually want fair wage prices) so bring in some negro from india who will work for pennies.

They actually are detrimental for the economy, drive up house prices too, and make property just an asset you buy to rent out to others. Do you think big companies would be buying houses if migration wasnt guranteed? no they fucking wouldnt bro

so the positive consequences outweigh the negative ones in any case, otherwise immigration would have been stopped already

 

[FiendFiend]

so the positive consequences outweigh the negative ones in any case, otherwise immigration would have been stopped already

no... There are positive consequences for the 1% , the rich and elite. And negative effects for the 99%.

 

[Skara]

no... There are positive consequences for the 1% , the rich and elite. And negative effects for the 99%.

I would say only for low-skilled workers and young people who are now competing with migrants for jobs and housing, for everyone else it is more profitable than not

 

[TiktokUser]

no... There are positive consequences for the 1% , the rich and elite. And negative effects for the 99%.

He is genuinely too retarded to understand this. He’ll respond with some cope

 

[FiendFiend]

I would say only for low-skilled workers and young people who are now competing with migrants for jobs and housing, for everyone else it is more profitable than not

No. Cuz not everyone owns their property. Also most people work till 60. So you could say in theory the people who "benefit" are boomers who own their houses. Even then they have kids and grandkids who they want to be successful and fucking work and live normal lives.