đź’€ Maxilla: Difference Between Recessed and Flat, Explained with 3D Animations

Amazing
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
flat AND recessed is brutal :feelswhy:
would you say my maxilla is flat and recessed or just flat? IMG 3636
 
  • JFL
Reactions: clearness.
View attachment 4205433

Looking at this slice through my zygos I think my maxilla is flat.
But comparing my side profile to your chart it seems not flat.

I might just be on the borderline for flat. I’m certainly recessed but it appears to be mostly in the lower maxilla as my anterior nasal spine is set back from my upper nasal bone.. I don’t see how Lefort 2 alone would be good here, it would have to be segmental 2 and 1 combined.

It also raises a question about infraorbital implants because unless you already have an exemplary “3D” maxilla, they are going to flatten it out even more. I’m not sure my face can support them at all without Lefort 2.

View attachment 4205434

Good thread.
IMG 3713 would you say my maxilla is similar in 3Dness to your ceph? i’m not sure if a high cut lf1 would do much improvement?
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser and thecel
I have a 3mm recession and it doesn't look like it.
 
so a trimax wouldn’t be a great idea to pursue?

i don’t know man please get a CT if you are really serious about this

I think you will dogmaxx with any bimax advancement, you need lefort 2 bimax. Basically your face is already balanced so you’d have to move entire midface linearly forward if that’s what you wanted. Plus probably some augmentation to the brow ridge.
 
  • +1
Reactions: clearness., Lookologist003, thecel and 1 other person
Botb
 
  • +1
Reactions: JordanFagget271
Maxillary Protrusion and Retrusion

Maxillary protrusion and retrusion is how anteriorly positioned your palate is in relation to your neurocranium.

View attachment 4199761

Whether a maxilla is recessed or not recessed depends on the relationship between the positions of the palate, eyes, and mandible. And the space in the airway.

Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling
Recessed maxilla can cause functional health issues such as tooth wear (in class III malocclusion), airway constriction (can cause sleep apnea), and speech problems.



Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

View attachment 4199878

Unlike protrusion/retrusion, 3Dness/flatness is an entirely aesthetic feature and has no bearing on health.

3Dness/flatness is closely related to the orbitomaxillary plane angle. More about that here:




Examples

View attachment 4199869

The gorilla maxilla shows the difference between forward-grownness and 3Dness. The gorilla maxilla is extremely forward-protruding, but it’s flat as fuck, literally flatter than an Asian maxilla:

View attachment 4199953

The human maxilla’s teeth are more retracted and tucked under the eyes, but the shape of the central maxilla is much less flat:

View attachment 4199961



Mew Cope

Mouth breathing and shit oral posture can make the maxilla grow improperly, but that has to do with positioning (protrusion/retrusion) only. Mewing from birth would’ve done absolutely nothing for your maxilla’s 3Dness/flatness.
whats that? whats a maxilla?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and refz75
Another beautiful banger from thecel :feelsokman:
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: \/orman and thecel
Sadly those who call every nigga recessed never gonna see this đź’”
 
Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling




Chad trait if you have them @FacialStructure404
 
  • JFL
Reactions: refz75 and thecel
View attachment 4205433

Looking at this slice through my zygos I think my maxilla is flat.
But comparing my side profile to your chart it seems not flat.

I might just be on the borderline for flat. I’m certainly recessed but it appears to be mostly in the lower maxilla as my anterior nasal spine is set back from my upper nasal bone.. I don’t see how Lefort 2 alone would be good here, it would have to be segmental 2 and 1 combined.

It also raises a question about infraorbital implants because unless you already have an exemplary “3D” maxilla, they are going to flatten it out even more. I’m not sure my face can support them at all without Lefort 2.

View attachment 4205434

Good thread.
How much was your CT scan?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
holy botb worthy
 
1000026791

I think mines recceesd and flat
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: TiktokUser, thecel and VampyrMaxx
I morphed Loli Bahia to have a semi-ideal maxilla.
Looks good bro.

It also raises a question about infraorbital implants because unless you already have an exemplary “3D” maxilla, they are going to flatten it out even more. I’m not sure my face can support them at all without Lefort 2.
The prospect of surgery gets more and more grim the more you learn. We are so much limited by our jaws. a forward grown maxilla provides a positive orbital vector by default.
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania, thecel, Foreverbrad and 1 other person
View attachment 4206732
I think mines recceesd and flat
your upper is recessed not lower. Your maxilla is one of those weird cases where I cant really tell whats going on.


 
  • Woah
Reactions: Cinnamon fan64
yes yes yes

this post is 100% for offtopic and definitely not for looksmaxxing subforum

because FUCK that subforum! Right?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
yes yes yes

this post is 100% for offtopic and definitely not for looksmaxxing subforum

because FUCK that subforum! Right?

I thought they move threads out of looksmaxing if they aren’t about ACTUALLY looksmaxing

this is theory, not advice, not someone’s real situation/plan
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
Maxillary Protrusion and Retrusion

Maxillary protrusion and retrusion is how anteriorly positioned your palate is in relation to your neurocranium.

View attachment 4199761

Whether a maxilla is recessed or not recessed depends on the relationship between the positions of the palate, eyes, and mandible. And the space in the airway.

Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling
Recessed maxilla can cause functional health issues such as tooth wear (in class III malocclusion), airway constriction (can cause sleep apnea), and speech problems.



Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

View attachment 4199878

Unlike protrusion/retrusion, 3Dness/flatness is an entirely aesthetic feature and has no bearing on health.

3Dness/flatness is closely related to the orbitomaxillary plane angle. More about that here:




Examples

View attachment 4199869

The gorilla maxilla shows the difference between forward-grownness and 3Dness. The gorilla maxilla is extremely forward-protruding, but it’s flat as fuck, literally flatter than an Asian maxilla:

View attachment 4199953

The human maxilla’s teeth are more retracted and tucked under the eyes, but the shape of the central maxilla is much less flat:

View attachment 4199961



Mew Cope

Mouth breathing and shit oral posture can make the maxilla grow improperly, but that has to do with positioning (protrusion/retrusion) only. Mewing from birth would’ve done absolutely nothing for your maxilla’s 3Dness/flatness.
Good thread but I still think there's a level of convolution here need to be clarified

If your maxilla is recessed it's going to look flat, Frankfurt plane angle as a neutral vector regardless of any prognathism.
1760431094603
1760431144844
1760431178569



-


Majority of people according to Dr. John Mew have about 2 centimeters of facial recession on average and you can even tell in your favorite mogger they could be more forward grown, so off that alone most people aren't perfectly forward grown through all 3 thirds of the face
Minute 30
1760431318861


Secondly maxillary prognathism (lower palate growth) should just be look in isolation for maxillary recession vs proper growth, upper part should be considered too

If you look at how the maxilla grows it's a 2 part thing with primary displacement as well as secondary displacement when structures like the aperture and nasomaxillary complex grows which also furthers displaces it forward/downwards again
1760431412212
1760431475604
1760431499219
1760431506298
1760431677388
1760433510269


1760433550605


Lacrimal suture allows for the maxilla to grow downwards which is a very necessary event to certain degrees for males
1760431738160
1760432365891




There's also growth rotations that can significantly affect how projected whatever growth you have looks too, angulate everything better, differently
1760433426141


Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

Flatness compress
Excellent bloody gif and it perfectly shows how literally everything has to grow forwards?

I know it's also a relative comparison but should the zygos just not project forward, why are they moving so much backward relative, so much negative displacement?

Also besides the nasal spine and nasal ridge how important is nasal aperture growth, what does a project vs recessed one look like



Few big questions that if you're pressed for time I'd love if you can answer although @thecel

backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake
Can you PLEASE post an example of what this would look like, a mogger vs subhuman please
This is like that malar hollowing deep canine fossa look
1760433734845
1760433814575
Zygomatic process of maxilla   animation01
1760433920484

Or is it something different?

Can you make one for the forehead and frontonasal area properly growing too?


1760433992025
1760434012185
1760434833194
2915309 insane proper craniofacial growth for blacks pill fixing prognathism
1760435369421

1760435560837
1760435499685
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Tomorrow, \/orman, Lookologist003 and 2 others
Maxillary Protrusion and Retrusion

Maxillary protrusion and retrusion is how anteriorly positioned your palate is in relation to your neurocranium.

View attachment 4199761

Whether a maxilla is recessed or not recessed depends on the relationship between the positions of the palate, eyes, and mandible. And the space in the airway.

Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling
Recessed maxilla can cause functional health issues such as tooth wear (in class III malocclusion), airway constriction (can cause sleep apnea), and speech problems.



Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

View attachment 4199878

Unlike protrusion/retrusion, 3Dness/flatness is an entirely aesthetic feature and has no bearing on health.

3Dness/flatness is closely related to the orbitomaxillary plane angle. More about that here:




Examples

View attachment 4199869

The gorilla maxilla shows the difference between forward-grownness and 3Dness. The gorilla maxilla is extremely forward-protruding, but it’s flat as fuck, literally flatter than an Asian maxilla:

View attachment 4199953

The human maxilla’s teeth are more retracted and tucked under the eyes, but the shape of the central maxilla is much less flat:

View attachment 4199961



Mew Cope

Mouth breathing and shit oral posture can make the maxilla grow improperly, but that has to do with positioning (protrusion/retrusion) only. Mewing from birth would’ve done absolutely nothing for your maxilla’s 3Dness/flatness.
Could you PLEASE make a thread discussing giga mogger/fogger ideal ipd, icd, ocd, esr ratios, why borderline hyperterlorism aesthetics can look so ideal on females with other aspects come along even on some males

As well features one needs harmonizing massive PFL in general on both genders and the ideal pupil/iris sizes?

Could you also make a thread discussing ear aesthetics, ear to neurocranium ratio and forehead aesthetics too?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tomorrow, VampyrMaxx, thecel and 2 others
Good thread but I still think there's a level of convolution here need to be clarified

If your maxilla is recessed it's going to look flat, Frankfurt plane angle as a neutral vector regardless of any prognathism.
View attachment 4208858View attachment 4208861View attachment 4208863


-


Majority of people according to Dr. John Mew have about 2 centimeters of facial recession on average and you can even tell in your favorite mogger they could be more forward grown, so off that alone most people aren't perfectly forward grown through all 3 thirds of the face
Minute 30
View attachment 4208866

Secondly maxillary prognathism (lower palate growth) should just be look in isolation for maxillary recession vs proper growth, upper part should be considered too

If you look at how the maxilla grows it's a 2 part thing with primary displacement as well as secondary displacement when structures like the aperture and nasomaxillary complex grows which also furthers displaces it forward/downwards again
View attachment 4208869View attachment 4208871View attachment 4208872View attachment 4208873View attachment 4208876View attachment 4208902

View attachment 4208904

Lacrimal suture allows for the maxilla to grow downwards which is a very necessary event to certain degrees for males
View attachment 4208877View attachment 4208881



There's also growth rotations that can significantly affect how projected whatever growth you have looks too, angulate everything better, differently
View attachment 4208898


Excellent bloody gif and it perfectly shows how literally everything has to grow forwards?

I know it's also a relative comparison but should the zygos just not project forward, why are they moving so much backward relative, so much negative displacement?

Also besides the nasal spine and nasal ridge how important is nasal aperture growth, what does a project vs recessed one look like



Few big questions that if you're pressed for time I'd love if you can answer although @thecel


Can you PLEASE post an example of what this would look like, a mogger vs subhuman please
This is like that malar hollowing deep canine fossa look
View attachment 4208907View attachment 4208911View attachment 4208909View attachment 4208915
Or is it something different?


Can you make one for the forehead and frontonasal area properly growing too?


View attachment 4208918View attachment 4208919View attachment 4208933View attachment 4208938View attachment 4208940
View attachment 4208957View attachment 4208951

yep the frontonasal area is the reason why some end up dogmaxxed with advancement surgeries, heavily underrated with most normies
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and AscendingHero
Just because it's not horribly recessed or there is some lower prognathism doesn't mean they're not recessed, they have little superficial bone growth on the maxila (nasorbital aspects but body is still heavily recessed despite the prognathism)

Even on the asian examples (including the models), the maxilla just isn't displaced away from the face like that. The body of the maxilla itself let alone the other aspects, profile wouldn't look as flat.

Sure they have solid growth for their pheno but they'd probably benefit from more maxillary body displacement
1760436118595
1760436127380


These asian women with some naso projection aren't recessed but could still have more growth and they're top percentile foggers
1760436210989
1760436885911
1760436899763


The added facial depth would do wonders for their features and contours irrespective of individual bone growth untop of the body of the maxilla, not just how much the face is displaced from the rest which is a feminine trait but facial depth in general. Posterior and anterior, forehead, neurocranium, the angle of it, parts that are higher (cranial top, occipital bun vs lower and much more)
1760438106412


1760436987241
1760438083219
1760438299877
Screenshot 2025 10 14 034126



Notice how naturally wide and short the face is like that Mew photo of the ideal woman, facial growth is so complex and nuanced but when there is more growth like that there is more tissue to stretch, areas for hollows to form and flaws less mitigated because everything is aesthetically displaced like wet strokes on a broad canvas

4C34EEC1 2664 445E 8236 3D78CD9917D8

Here is how I separate and categorize facial depth.

Certain landmarks are constant and can’t be changed like the external auditory meatus, tragus, anterior/posterior positioning of the eyes, neck and to some extent the hyoid bone. These are the constant reference marks. Everything else can be moved forward with the properly modified surgeries.

It’s my opinion that the most overlooked subcategory of facial depth is anterior facial depth which is projection or retrusion in the LeFort 2 region. It’s probably the area which sets apart average people from beautiful people the most.

Anterior Facial Depth
(The projection of the central midface off the posterior midface and is enhanced through LeFort 2 Osteotomy)
643C637E AD14 456B 93CD 5437A44CDA49

B5A30B58 9EC2 4906 A4EB BE25C8485E84


Posterior Facial Depth
The projection of the entire face as a unit from the rest of the skull and corrected by a LeFort 3 Advancement or implants informed by the LeFort 3 Concept.
8886AE5A ED18 4309 BD8C 6C99A6A3C60E

387A35A4 4FA3 4F77 81ED 30AED8CA05D3


When all of the subcategories of facial depth are sufficiently projecting the face fits into a square shape:

1F8ECB59 1BCE 4C4D 9BB7 38B5F9C3A815

206AB7D1 F314 4779 AAEB 1383251F65AC
801E270D 99D9 4204 A8CD F5255F92FF13
63CFCEAD 1C5B 4FD1 91BA 6E8C77ECE7CC
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx, Lookologist003, thecel and 1 other person
yep the frontonasal area is the reason why some end up dogmaxxed with advancement surgeries, heavily underrated with most normies
Too underrated man and with enough ramii (good Mandibular plane angle) + frontonasal area and an aesthetic frontal bone you can look pretty aesthetic even without too much raw facial growth/midfacial displacement, see it on caucasoids all the time

Some even without a good lower third/ramii (Ben Affleck, Christian Bale) or a perfect frontal bone with facial recession/viscrercocranium but decent nasofrontal area (Pattison)

Overall cranial depth/skull to heigh ratio too underrated as well, people don't take facial aesthetics for what it is which is a milisecond total estimation of your features and entire skull
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: VampyrMaxx, \/orman, thecel and 1 other person
Maxillary Protrusion and Retrusion

Maxillary protrusion and retrusion is how anteriorly positioned your palate is in relation to your neurocranium.

View attachment 4199761

Whether a maxilla is recessed or not recessed depends on the relationship between the positions of the palate, eyes, and mandible. And the space in the airway.

Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling
Recessed maxilla can cause functional health issues such as tooth wear (in class III malocclusion), airway constriction (can cause sleep apnea), and speech problems.



Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

View attachment 4199878

Unlike protrusion/retrusion, 3Dness/flatness is an entirely aesthetic feature and has no bearing on health.

3Dness/flatness is closely related to the orbitomaxillary plane angle. More about that here:




Examples

View attachment 4199869

The gorilla maxilla shows the difference between forward-grownness and 3Dness. The gorilla maxilla is extremely forward-protruding, but it’s flat as fuck, literally flatter than an Asian maxilla:

View attachment 4199953

The human maxilla’s teeth are more retracted and tucked under the eyes, but the shape of the central maxilla is much less flat:

View attachment 4199961



Mew Cope

Mouth breathing and shit oral posture can make the maxilla grow improperly, but that has to do with positioning (protrusion/retrusion) only. Mewing from birth would’ve done absolutely nothing for your maxilla’s 3Dness/flatness.
so can someone have both recession and flat maxilla at the same time?

my maxilla is likely just less anteriorly rotated
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Too underrated man and with enough ramii (good Mandibular plane angle) + frontonasal area and an aesthetic frontal bone you can look pretty aesthetic even without too much raw facial growth/midfacial displacement, see it on caucasoids all the time

Some even without a good lower third/ramii (Ben Affleck, Christian Bale) or a perfect frontal bone with facial recession/viscrercocranium but decent nasofrontal area (Pattison)

Overall cranial depth/skull to heigh ratio too underrated as well, people don't take facial aesthetics for what it is which is a milisecond total estimation of your features and entire skull
Like in this thread, from years ago OGcels kinda touched upon the basics of this:
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and yussimania
1000005753
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx, thecel, yussimania and 1 other person
so can someone have both recession and flat maxilla at the same time?

my maxilla is likely just less anteriorly rotated
Yes of course and many-most are recessed lol to relative degrees
1760438998281


Thread mostly seem focused on anterior facial depth, not enough on posterior depth and overall length of the face which matter a lot

If you are recessed you likely have a flat maxilla and prognathism and lower maxilla displacement alone doesn't change that, also recession and profile flatness vs projection the frontonasal region needs to be taken account for here

Total facial convexity
1760439055156
1760439070281
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Lookologist003, VampyrMaxx, thecel and 3 others
Been sayin ts

flat does not mean recessed

that word get thrown around too much imo
It usually does though lol and "recessed" is a broad term it needs context

If you have nasal guttering yes your mid maxilla/nasal area is recessed but does it entirely mean you have deficient idk let's say palatal-lefort 1 area recession?

Too nuanced and we need more CT scans and actual well taken profile pics in Frankfurt to deduce with racial variations taken into consideration
 
  • +1
Reactions: \/orman and thecel
the fuck are you talking about fr
 
bro always drops the most enlightening threads
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx and \/orman
Majority of people according to Dr. John Mew have about 2 centimeters of facial recession
How did he define facial recession with measurements? Because two centimeters is precise. How did he even measure that group of people. He didn't really explain it...
He was like, "Yeah, um, yeah most people are recessed by 20mm bro, now look at this sexy woman that I paid a rule34 artist on Twitter to draw.

I appreciate your deference to a source, but it's needs to a scientific study and not just bros word on it. If we try to be objective, I mean.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx, AscendingHero and thecel
Sean o aspie never fails
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Maxillary Protrusion and Retrusion

Maxillary protrusion and retrusion is how anteriorly positioned your palate is in relation to your neurocranium.

View attachment 4199761

Whether a maxilla is recessed or not recessed depends on the relationship between the positions of the palate, eyes, and mandible. And the space in the airway.

Recessed maxilla indicators:
  • Negative orbital vector
  • Nasolabial folds
  • Retrognathic profile
  • Underbite (class III malocclusion)
  • Teeth look inwardly set when smiling
Recessed maxilla can cause functional health issues such as tooth wear (in class III malocclusion), airway constriction (can cause sleep apnea), and speech problems.



Maxillary 3Dness and Flatness

Maxillary “3D”ness is an aesthetic look that comes from:
  • anterior projection of the paranasal area, nasal sill, anterior nasal spine, and pyriform aperture
  • backwardly-angled zygomatic processes of the maxilla (the “connecting wings” that border the zygos) making the midface look fox-like as opposed to pancake

View attachment 4199878

Unlike protrusion/retrusion, 3Dness/flatness is an entirely aesthetic feature and has no bearing on health.

3Dness/flatness is closely related to the orbitomaxillary plane angle. More about that here:




Examples

View attachment 4199869

The gorilla maxilla shows the difference between forward-grownness and 3Dness. The gorilla maxilla is extremely forward-protruding, but it’s flat as fuck, literally flatter than an Asian maxilla:

View attachment 4199953

The human maxilla’s teeth are more retracted and tucked under the eyes, but the shape of the central maxilla is much less flat:

View attachment 4199961



Mew Cope

Mouth breathing and shit oral posture can make the maxilla grow improperly, but that has to do with positioning (protrusion/retrusion) only. Mewing from birth would’ve done absolutely nothing for your maxilla’s 3Dness/flatness.

Looks quite flat but having good cheekbones literally works against you for this.
is it possible to have negative orbital vector on one side and a positive on the other? Like for my case


Here is my eye area

1760500551681

1760500598392
Right Side profile
1760500649378
Left Side profile
 
is my mandible recessed or i just protruded lip?
 
is his maxilla flat?
Dbb7ff177097f45ddcc585845ff71b86
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and \/orman
How did he define facial recession with measurements? Because two centimeters is precise. How did he even measure that group of people. He didn't really explain it...
He was like, "Yeah, um, yeah most people are recessed by 20mm bro, now look at this sexy woman that I paid a rule34 artist on Twitter to draw.

I appreciate your deference to a source, but it's needs to a scientific study and not just bros word on it. If we try to be objective, I mean.
Steiners angle and general observation from the people he work with, at well as palatal size, room for wisdom teeth and airway size
Screenshot 2025 10 14 034143
1760503198604
1760503303445


You can also get some CTs and observe cranial base angles, this stuff is pretty objective and easy to see when you start observing patterns, need to look into my data archives to find ideal ranges but even that we don't have enough CTs of moggers/foggers in general which would help so much
1760504070038

I'll look into

I mean you can even look at older skulls, facial depth which , skulls is general have gotten far smaller and shorter than what they were of yesteryear

There's also his indicator line he likes to use which is flawed I mean that's just one way you can use to evaluate these things, there's also kidn

Good twitter account on this that rebuilds skulls, Ancestral Whispers: https://x.com/Sulkalmakh, some stuff of forums the apricity and more niche sites you can find stuff too


For example look at the posterior depth of this skull, you don't see that nowadays, let alone getting into the anterior portion in some skulls
1760503412843


Look at the general length of this female skull

Compare the two + flatter profile due to recessed nasal bones of the asian + recessed nasofrontal region comparatively, look anterior depth wise look at the orbital vector for one and the malar cheek angles
1760503615742
1760503697916
1760503713289


It's relative recession AND profile flatness AND the upper third is recessed relatively too

There's obviously a soft tissue element which needs to be taken into consideration here but the premise still applies
1760504245878
1760504263656
1760504278458


Male
1760503835116
1760503939362


1760503891902
1760503896981
 

Attachments

  • 1760503383258.png
    1760503383258.png
    956.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 1760503493237.png
    1760503493237.png
    430.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Lookologist003, thecel, VampyrMaxx and 1 other person
Too underrated man and with enough ramii (good Mandibular plane angle) + frontonasal area and an aesthetic frontal bone you can look pretty aesthetic even without too much raw facial growth/midfacial displacement, see it on caucasoids all the time

Some even without a good lower third/ramii (Ben Affleck, Christian Bale) or a perfect frontal bone with facial recession/viscrercocranium but decent nasofrontal area (Pattison)

Overall cranial depth/skull to heigh ratio too underrated as well, people don't take facial aesthetics for what it is which is a milisecond total estimation of your features and entire skull
Damn so many typos

"
Some even without a great lower third/ramii (Ben Affleck, Christian Bale) but a damn near perfect frontal bone with good profile angles

Or some with facial recession/viscerocranium issues but decent nasofrontal area with decent skull length (Pattison)
1760508425681
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and VampyrMaxx
Steiners angle and general observation from the people he work with, at well as palatal size, room for wisdom teeth and airway size
View attachment 4211494View attachment 4211495View attachment 4211498

You can also get some CTs and observe cranial base angles, this stuff is pretty objective and easy to see when you start observing patterns, need to look into my data archives to find ideal ranges but even that we don't have enough CTs of moggers/foggers in general which would help so much
View attachment 4211532
I'll look into

I mean you can even look at older skulls, facial depth which , skulls is general have gotten far smaller and shorter than what they were of yesteryear

There's also his indicator line he likes to use which is flawed I mean that's just one way you can use to evaluate these things, there's also kidn

Good twitter account on this that rebuilds skulls, Ancestral Whispers: https://x.com/Sulkalmakh, some stuff of forums the apricity and more niche sites you can find stuff too


For example look at the posterior depth of this skull, you don't see that nowadays, let alone getting into the anterior portion in some skulls
View attachment 4211503

Look at the general length of this female skull

Compare the two + flatter profile due to recessed nasal bones of the asian + recessed nasofrontal region comparatively, look anterior depth wise look at the orbital vector for one and the malar cheek angles
View attachment 4211513View attachment 4211517View attachment 4211518

It's relative recession AND profile flatness AND the upper third is recessed relatively too

There's obviously a soft tissue element which needs to be taken into consideration here but the premise still applies
View attachment 4211536View attachment 4211537View attachment 4211538

Male
View attachment 4211521View attachment 4211529

View attachment 4211525View attachment 4211526
what about a thug with my skull?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
so what is wrong with my side? flat maxilla and recessed infras?

your maxilla looks good

not recessed, not flat

your issue might be with soft tissue
 
your maxilla looks good

not recessed, not flat

your issue might be with soft tissue
i think your spot on cause my dentist also claimed- Uneven buccal fat specifically right side, when i asked her.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Any real life human depictions? Soft tissue and everything apparent

This is for showcasing the zygomatic process of the maxilla area, ri?

And why do sometimes some zygos just appear archless even though on the CT they have an arch and even on some moggers, noticed this especially asian/black influenced one, it can just look like a round mound from the side (projected sure but not peak aesthetic)

See Mads here and here's a mogger
Screenshot 2025 10 15 203114
Screenshot 2025 10 15 203056


Noticed these others


I have an idea already just want to hear your thoughts
1760642596506
1760642629734
1760642677178


Why does the arch area look so small and punctured in relative to the malar, obviously soft tissue element vs
1760642791543


1760642708482
1760642743106
1760642752802


1760642810613
1760642840535


Ideal malar vs zygomatic arch height in your opinion for peak aesthetics?

Golf ball look is meme
1760642890146

-
1760642907433
vs
1760642996923


Having tiny zygomas and being malar less isn't good either though

@thecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

Coffeebackwards
Replies
11
Views
657
Hunter
Hunter
Aryan Incel
Replies
153
Views
16K
volgaTz
volgaTz
greycelfaliio
Replies
70
Views
11K
jeoyw9192
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top