
Metalmonstewe
Iron
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Posts
- 31
- Reputation
- 38
Cope, Face> height> muscles, an example below, a muscular manlet looks like a turtle

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Cope tbh.Being 6'3 is one thing, but having an actual decent frame at that height is a different thing, since majority of people don't have genes which are fit to this height and are just random mutations (usually the only ones this tall in their family)
I very rarely meet people who are this tall and don't have either a fucked up frame (skeleton frame) or shit face,
there is a reason why 99% of this forum is 6'1+
after 6' there is barely any benefit, and its much better 6' with a good frame then a 6'5 with a shit frame
6'3 with good frame > 5'10 and muscles
6'3 with good frame < 5'10 good face and muscles
6'3 with shit frame < 5'10 with muscles
in my opinion at least
The total equation of looks is this, imo. Everything is under a curve, where when you lack in 1 of these features alot, it's INSTANT GAME OVER. Because each factor, has an entrance bar level, and if you don't make the netrance bar level, than it's imediately game over.Muscles > Height. Thoughts?
I didn’t say anything about a manlet. Strong reading comprehension. I’m taking average height with 99th percentile body vs 6’3 with average bodyCope, Face> height> muscles, an example below, a muscular manlet looks like a turtleView attachment 728315
That’s why I said 5’10. 5’10 is not manlet.
AVERAGE height with good body >good height with AVERAGE body
Very well could beNo - because height indicates good genetics, and is sought after trait. Having a good body is great - yet obtainable by anyone. For height this is not and will never be the case.
I am actually around 5' 10 and have many tall friends, and the reality is that average height and good body just lets you be on a somewhat similar level of attractiveness to a tall person with an average DYEL body.
5’7 is a bad height. You would have to give the 6’3 guy a bad body to compare equally.Bad example. You would be correct if ripped 5'7 mogged 6'3 but in our reality it doesnt
Muscles win over height for sure
tall isnt rare, but if you have a nice body u really stand out because all guys have shit bodies in 2020
but ideal is tall + muscular
nah I fraud to 6'1 from 5'11 its nice but I still type hereCope tbh.
cope copedy cope a actually genetic mesomorph good body scream athleticism while lanklet screams im a pussyNo - because height indicates good genetics, and is sought after trait. Having a good body is great - yet obtainable by anyone. For height this is not and will never be the case.
I am actually around 5' 10 and have many tall friends, and the reality is that average height and good body just lets you be on a somewhat similar level of attractiveness to a tall person with an average DYEL body.
cope copedy cope a actually genetic mesomorph good body scream athleticism while lanklet screams im a pussy
A really good body is not obtainable for 90 percent of people, they lack the insertions required. Theres so much more than just v taper
most people dont have 8 packs, really long muscle insertions, arm and back separation etc. In fact, most people look like absolut shit compared with people with actual aesthetic insertions imoA lot of girls LOVE tall lanky white dudes, go look at people like Pete Davidson.
You certainly are correct about people having bad inserts, but 90%? lol, maybe we are from very different places, but most people where I live don't have fucked up inserts. Also there's more (after) v-taper, but if you don't have a v-taper, it never began for your body
FACEI'm over 6 feet and ripped, very muscular with ideal proportions.
My lay count at age of 40 is 3.
Draw your own conclusions.
is shitFACE
It’s all about the proportions bro. Symmetry and harmony.I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.
a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build
yes or nah
5’7 is a bad height. You would have to give the 6’3 guy a bad body to compare equally.
A 5’7 ripped guy can do better than a 6’3 fat guy
these guys were posted on reddit, first guy is 5’7 and second is 6’3. Ignoring face, who do you think women like more?
View attachment 729623View attachment 729624
So that’s face, not just height. You can’t add other variablesnext thread: personality > face. Thoughts?
I'm 5'10 with muscles and a visible abs, guess what 6'3 guy dyel with a better face stole my oneitis
Yeah, I don’t know what everybody here thinks I’m talking about really short guys. I said average, like 5’10above 5’9 i might agree. but there are lots of other factors in this comparison.
height or even frame is still more important than musclesSo that’s face, not just height. You can’t add other variables