
flippasav
𝕯𝖝𝕯 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖜 • Charisma
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2022
- Posts
- 42,028
- Reputation
- 51,585
Goatis joined the server
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Barely
It doesn’t matter you need more citrus as you consume carbs because they have similar structures making them compete for enzymes and transporters
You can not debunk carnivore
The vast majority of this forum consists of peptide copers who are also addicted to goyslop, but then seriously suggest the natural human diet is inferior to the unnatural dysgenic modern diet.
Before you bombard me with logical fallacies, read my statement at the bottom. Failing to do so means you concede the argument!
Just think from a logical perspective: Do you really think the diet humans naturally adapted to eat for over 100.000 years is unhealthier than the modern diet causing malocclusion, narrow palates, crooked teeth and many more health problems?
The last ice age was about 110.000-10.000 years ago. 99% of plants you consume would not have been available at this time. Keep in mind most plants we consume don't exist in nature. Research supporting this:
Chapter 1:
Micro nutrients, fiber, and dangers of consuming plants.
Meat has every single essential nutrient, without any anti nutrients or poisonous plant chemicals. Plants use these anti nutrientsto defend them selves from being eaten. Humans are not adapted to eat plants. Fiber is useless, it can't be digested by the human body and leads to constipation and bloat.
"But it's good to treat constipation!"
Yet this actual scientific study isolating variables found the exact opposite:
Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms - PMC
AIM: To investigate the effect of reducing dietary fiber on patients with idiopathic constipation. METHODS: Sixty-three cases of idiopathic constipation presenting between May 2008 and May 2010 were enrolled into the study after colonoscopy excluded ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"In our recent study, patients who followed a diet with no or less dietary fiber intake showed a significant improvement, not just in their constipation, but also in their bloatedness. Patients who completely stopped consuming dietary fiber no longer suffered from abdominal bloatedness and pain"
"But plants are healthy and not poisonous, what are you talking about? They are full of essential vitamins!"
"But healthy antioxidants bro!"
Goitrogens in broccoli can negatively impact brain development:
![]()
Role of goitrogens in iodine deficiency disorders & brain development - PubMed
Although iodine deficiency has primarily been implicated in the causation of goitre, the significant role played by food goitrogens in the etiology of iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) is being increasingly recognized. Impaired brain development is the major cause of concern in IDD. Detailed...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Lectins inhibit nutrient absorption, thus leading to nutrient deficiencies:
![]()
Lectins • The Nutrition Source
Lectins, or hemagglutinins, are an “anti-nutrient” that have received much attention due to popular media and fad diet books citing lectins as a major causenutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu
Lectins in plants may contribute to autoimmune diseases:
![]()
From inflammation to immune regulation: The dual nature of dietary lectins in health and disease
Beans, vegetables, fruits, and mushrooms offer a delightful array of fragrances and an abundance of nutrients, including essential vitamins, minerals,…www.sciencedirect.com
Trypsin inhibitors in soybeans and legumes can reduce protein digestibility by up to 50% and protein quality by up to 100%:
![]()
Impact of antinutritional factors in food proteins on the digestibility of protein and the bioavailability of amino acids and on protein quality - PubMed
Dietary antinutritional factors have been reported to adversely affect the digestibility of protein, bioavailability of amino acids and protein quality of foods. Published data on these negative effects of major dietary antinutritional factors are summarized in this manuscript. Digestibility and...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Estrogenic activity of your "healthy" antioxidants:
![]()
Risks and safety of polyphenol consumption - PubMed
This article gives an overview of the potential hazards of polyphenol consumption, as reported during the round-table discussion at the 1st International Conference on Polyphenols and Health, held in Vichy, France, November 2003. Adverse effects of polyphenols have been evaluated primarily in...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
80% of kidney stones are caused by oxalates:
Strategies for preventing calcium oxalate stones - PMC
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
75% of calcium in spinach is not bioavailable due to oxalates:
Conversion of beta-carotene to vitamin A is inefficient:
![]()
The challenge to reach nutritional adequacy for vitamin A: β-carotene bioavailability and conversion—evidence in humans
β-Carotene is an important dietary source of vitamin A for humans. However, the bioavailability and vitamin A equivalency of β-carotene are highly var…www.sciencedirect.com
ALA (Plant-Based Omega-3) conversion to DHA is below 5%:
![]()
Efficiency of conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to long chain n-3 fatty acids in man - PubMed
Alpha-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) is the major n-3 (omega 3) fatty acid in the human diet. It is derived mainly from terrestrial plant consumption and it has long been thought that its major biochemical role is as the principal precursor for long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, of which...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Plant proteins have lower bioavailability and contain anti-nutrients that hinder nutrient absorption:
Protein Nutrition: Understanding Structure, Digestibility, and Bioavailability for Optimal Health - PMC
This review discusses different protein sources and their role in human nutrition, focusing on their structure, digestibility, and bioavailability. Plant-based proteins, such as those found in legumes, nuts, and seeds, may contain anti-nutritional ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Plants are missing 15 micro nutrients that are all found in meat. Some plants can contain insufficient trace amounts of a few of these nutrients, often due to bacteria or similar sources. But generally, they lack these 15 essential micro nutrients in sufficient quantities needed for optimal health and development.
Chapter 2: Gluconeogenesis, the natural energy source
Watch this video on the Randle cycle, no need to type it out and make this thread longer than it already is. He explains it well:
Basically: Your body creates enough carbs to thrive on its own trough gluconeogenesis. Humans have lived on gluconeogenesis for decamillennia. Gymcels read the statement below.
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randle_cycle
Eating the natural carnivore diet will prevent cancer and diabetes, as your blood glucose level won't be chronically elevated:
"But I go to the gym, I need carbs!"
You don't need to do 5 sets of 20 of squats, just do low volume high intensity. If you still feel the need for carbs after fixing your sleep schedule and a few weeks of ketosis, go ahead and eat some fruit for carbs. You don't need to do everything perfect or 100% similar to our ancestors. My point is, that even imitating the most natural diet as close as possible for your life circumstances is superior to goyslop.
Common logical fallacies: "Raw meat won't ascend you!"— Yes, it won't. It's still the healthiest "diet". I never claimed it would magically triple your PSL.
"Bro listens to Goatis, what a retard!"— I don't. Goatis did not invent the natural human diet. I disagree with a lot of stuff he says.
Go after the logical reasoning and actual arguments if you disagree. Trying to use ad hominem or a straw man won't work here. Be better. Let's see how many "people" still bring make use of these.
Of course, there is much more to this, but I think this is a great start.
![]()
Why would you only eat RAW MEAT and completely neglecting any other type of food?@bp_framepill78 Come on, debunk it. You said it's easy, right? Go on![]()
Address my arguments, I already answered your question.Why would you only eat RAW MEAT and completely neglecting any other type of food?
Since we are only talking to a. Health standpoint, i've already said that meat is a great food, that i think is better that plant based ones. But only eating meat, especially RAW, can lead to digestive issues and compromised gut bacteria health. You should have a balanced diet. You should also include carbs and some plants, atleast in an health standpoint (wich is what we are talking about)
Ii already said that a balanced diet with consistent exercise is clearly better just with common sense and knowledge about nutrientsAddress my arguments, I already answered your question.
Provide proof for your claims.
YOU JUST DNR MY THREAD OR IGNORED IT, ABSOLUTE INSANITY![]()
You are genuinely the most retarded subhuman on this entire site.Ii already said that a balanced diet with consistent exercise is clearly better just with common sense and knowledge about nutrientsBut yeah overdose on meat and neglect every other aliment, see how far you'll go in 10-15 years
![]()
No arguments addressed. No proof, no logical reasoning. Nothing. Refute my arguments or accept that you're a subhuman that can't even converse properly.Ii already said that a balanced diet with consistent exercise is clearly better just with common sense and knowledge about nutrientsBut yeah overdose on meat and neglect every other aliment, see how far you'll go in 10-15 years
![]()
You can not debunk carnivore
The vast majority of this forum consists of peptide copers who are also addicted to goyslop, but then seriously suggest the natural human diet is inferior to the unnatural dysgenic modern diet.
Before you bombard me with logical fallacies, read my statement at the bottom. Failing to do so means you concede the argument!
Just think from a logical perspective: Do you really think the diet humans naturally adapted to eat for over 100.000 years is unhealthier than the modern diet causing malocclusion, narrow palates, crooked teeth and many more health problems?
The last ice age was about 110.000-10.000 years ago. 99% of plants you consume would not have been available at this time. Keep in mind most plants we consume don't exist in nature. Research supporting this:
Chapter 1:
Micro nutrients, fiber, and dangers of consuming plants.
Meat has every single essential nutrient, without any anti nutrients or poisonous plant chemicals. Plants use these anti nutrientsto defend them selves from being eaten. Humans are not adapted to eat plants. Fiber is useless, it can't be digested by the human body and leads to constipation and bloat.
"But it's good to treat constipation!"
Yet this actual scientific study isolating variables found the exact opposite:
Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms - PMC
AIM: To investigate the effect of reducing dietary fiber on patients with idiopathic constipation. METHODS: Sixty-three cases of idiopathic constipation presenting between May 2008 and May 2010 were enrolled into the study after colonoscopy excluded ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"In our recent study, patients who followed a diet with no or less dietary fiber intake showed a significant improvement, not just in their constipation, but also in their bloatedness. Patients who completely stopped consuming dietary fiber no longer suffered from abdominal bloatedness and pain"
"But plants are healthy and not poisonous, what are you talking about? They are full of essential vitamins!"
"But healthy antioxidants bro!"
Goitrogens in broccoli can negatively impact brain development:
![]()
Role of goitrogens in iodine deficiency disorders & brain development - PubMed
Although iodine deficiency has primarily been implicated in the causation of goitre, the significant role played by food goitrogens in the etiology of iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) is being increasingly recognized. Impaired brain development is the major cause of concern in IDD. Detailed...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Lectins inhibit nutrient absorption, thus leading to nutrient deficiencies:
![]()
Lectins • The Nutrition Source
Lectins, or hemagglutinins, are an “anti-nutrient” that have received much attention due to popular media and fad diet books citing lectins as a major causenutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu
Lectins in plants may contribute to autoimmune diseases:
![]()
From inflammation to immune regulation: The dual nature of dietary lectins in health and disease
Beans, vegetables, fruits, and mushrooms offer a delightful array of fragrances and an abundance of nutrients, including essential vitamins, minerals,…www.sciencedirect.com
Trypsin inhibitors in soybeans and legumes can reduce protein digestibility by up to 50% and protein quality by up to 100%:
![]()
Impact of antinutritional factors in food proteins on the digestibility of protein and the bioavailability of amino acids and on protein quality - PubMed
Dietary antinutritional factors have been reported to adversely affect the digestibility of protein, bioavailability of amino acids and protein quality of foods. Published data on these negative effects of major dietary antinutritional factors are summarized in this manuscript. Digestibility and...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Estrogenic activity of your "healthy" antioxidants:
![]()
Risks and safety of polyphenol consumption - PubMed
This article gives an overview of the potential hazards of polyphenol consumption, as reported during the round-table discussion at the 1st International Conference on Polyphenols and Health, held in Vichy, France, November 2003. Adverse effects of polyphenols have been evaluated primarily in...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
80% of kidney stones are caused by oxalates:
Strategies for preventing calcium oxalate stones - PMC
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
75% of calcium in spinach is not bioavailable due to oxalates:
Conversion of beta-carotene to vitamin A is inefficient:
![]()
The challenge to reach nutritional adequacy for vitamin A: β-carotene bioavailability and conversion—evidence in humans
β-Carotene is an important dietary source of vitamin A for humans. However, the bioavailability and vitamin A equivalency of β-carotene are highly var…www.sciencedirect.com
ALA (Plant-Based Omega-3) conversion to DHA is below 5%:
![]()
Efficiency of conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to long chain n-3 fatty acids in man - PubMed
Alpha-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) is the major n-3 (omega 3) fatty acid in the human diet. It is derived mainly from terrestrial plant consumption and it has long been thought that its major biochemical role is as the principal precursor for long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, of which...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Plant proteins have lower bioavailability and contain anti-nutrients that hinder nutrient absorption:
Protein Nutrition: Understanding Structure, Digestibility, and Bioavailability for Optimal Health - PMC
This review discusses different protein sources and their role in human nutrition, focusing on their structure, digestibility, and bioavailability. Plant-based proteins, such as those found in legumes, nuts, and seeds, may contain anti-nutritional ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Plants are missing 15 micro nutrients that are all found in meat. Some plants can contain insufficient trace amounts of a few of these nutrients, often due to bacteria or similar sources. But generally, they lack these 15 essential micro nutrients in sufficient quantities needed for optimal health and development.
Chapter 2: Gluconeogenesis, the natural energy source
Watch this video on the Randle cycle, no need to type it out and make this thread longer than it already is. He explains it well:
Basically: Your body creates enough carbs to thrive on its own trough gluconeogenesis. Humans have lived on gluconeogenesis for decamillennia. Gymcels read the statement below.
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randle_cycle
Eating the natural carnivore diet will prevent cancer and diabetes, as your blood glucose level won't be chronically elevated:
"But I go to the gym, I need carbs!"
You don't need to do 5 sets of 20 of squats, just do low volume high intensity. If you still feel the need for carbs after fixing your sleep schedule and a few weeks of ketosis, go ahead and eat some fruit for carbs. You don't need to do everything perfect or 100% similar to our ancestors. My point is, that even imitating the most natural diet as close as possible for your life circumstances is superior to goyslop.
Common logical fallacies: "Raw meat won't ascend you!"— Yes, it won't. It's still the healthiest "diet". I never claimed it would magically triple your PSL.
"Bro listens to Goatis, what a retard!"— I don't. Goatis did not invent the natural human diet. I disagree with a lot of stuff he says.
Go after the logical reasoning and actual arguments if you disagree. Trying to use ad hominem or a straw man won't work here. Be better. Let's see how many "people" still bring make use of these.
Of course, there is much more to this, but I think this is a great start.
![]()
@Ogionth Is scared to enter this thread and argue against my points. He knows he can't, so he's just wasting my time with arguments I already addressed, while not deboonking mine.bookmarked
Lol, anyone that reads the argument on the other thread will know show massively stupid you are.@Ogionth Is scared to enter this thread and argue against my points. He knows he can't, so he's just wasting my time with arguments I already addressed, while not deboonking mine.
The irony. I addressed all of your arguments either here or in the conversation, except MeR because you won't type it out. I literally said you can eat carbs and be a carnivore at the same time multiple times, yet you BLATANTLY ignore that. Now address all my arguments here, and if you want to bring your own counterargument, then also address my response if that arguments has already been made.Lol, anyone that reads the argument on the other thread will know show massively stupid you are.
You addressed none of the arguments
![]()
Can anyone link me to any personal anecdotes or studies on the longevity in consuming raw animal products?
I've been recommended by a couple users to add more meat into my diet, which i agree with. Another user on here told me how cooking the meat removes nutrients, so it's more efficient to eat it raw. I understand all of this but I was wondering if I could read more about it and see how it has...looksmax.org
For everyone
You have not aggressed even one of the arguments.The irony. I addressed all of your arguments either here or in the conversation, except MeR because you won't type it out. I literally said you can eat carbs and be a carnivore at the same time multiple times, yet you BLATANTLY ignore that. Now address all my arguments here, and if you want to bring your own counterargument, then also address my response if that arguments has already been made.
You fail to address my arguments and ignore my responses, thus you throw in the towel.
Fruits* maybe some starchAnd on one argument, you just said *Oh you can eat plants then it's okay"
No logical reasoning. I made around 10 posts about epidemiology with logical reasoning. This is not an argument but a baseless claim.You infact couldnt even comprehend the studies
I did. Even some in this thread, which you DID. NOT. READ.You have not aggressed even one of the arguments.
I told you to go here multple times, but you keep bringing up arguments I already wrote pages about in this thread.And stop writing yaps in multiple threads, just make points in the actual thread, not write like 10 replies each containing the same thing.
Fruits are plants tooFruits* maybe some starch
Logical reasoning in question :No logical reasoning. I made around 10 posts about epidemiology with logical reasoning. This is not an argument but a baseless claim.
I did. Even some in this thread, which you DID. NOT. READ.
Why would I come here if the argument had already started?I told you to go here multple times, but you keep bringing up arguments I already wrote pages about in this thread.![]()
Maybe because you wrote a whole lot of slop without getting to the actual point?And when I mention "read my thread, already addressed" you just don't and say I didn't address your argument.
No, fruits are the structure of a plant that contains seed. Vegetables are the plant itself. Besides, I actively distinguished between the two.Fruits are plants too
No proven mechanism. Yes, I deny that correlation between modern humans eating processed, cooked meat in a modern unhealthy diet means you shouldn't eat raw, unprocessed meat. Carbohydrates are also linked to diabetes. So we should stop eating carbohydrates and meat now? Every food is related to some type of illness. Tell me, what should we eat? Show me one study that proofs raw meat from a healthy animal causes cancer. You can't.Logical reasoning in question :
*Denies that a positive correlation and mechanistic evidence is enough for advocating not eating high heme iron*
Searching for it doesn't come up with anything related to this. I asked you multiple times just write out the abbreviation, which you refuse. HOW do you have the audacity to claim I'm refusing to address it, when you don't tell me what this means.*Refuses to address MeR*
No, you lack reading comprehension. I said you should test out ketosis for a few weeks, as it takes a few weeks to settle in.*Agrees with what I say about max MUR but partially because "after a few weeks"*
Show me proof healthy (grass fed, enough space, no medication) raw meat causes disease. It's physically impossible to get disease from a healthy animal.*Denies foodbourne disease risks*
So I don't have to repeat myself. Over and over and over again. It literally took more than 5 reminders for you until you acknowledged I don't advocate for a 100% only meat diet.Why would I come here if the argument had already started?
Calling my entire thread based on studies (actually scientific, not just correlation) and logical reasoning "slop" is unfortunately not an argument.Maybe because you wrote a whole lot of slop without getting to the actual point?
Fruits are plants.No, fruits are the structure of a plant that contains seed. Vegetables are the plant itself. Besides, I actively distinguished between the two.
N-nitroso formation is proven, just because the entire mechanism is not proven doesn't mean there's no plausible mechanistic evidenceNo proven mechanism.
Except that the studies were on heme iron.Yes, I deny that correlation between modern humans eating processed, cooked meat in a modern unhealthy diet means you shouldn't eat raw, unprocessed meat.
Excessive intakeCarbohydrates are also linked to diabetes.
So we should stop eating carbohydrates and meat now?
"Proof"Every food is related to some type of illness. Tell me, what should we eat? Show me one study that proofs raw meat from a healthy animal causes cancer. You can't.
If you're uneducated that's not my fault.Searching for it doesn't come up with anything related to this. I asked you multiple times just write out the abbreviation, which you refuse. HOW do you have the audacity to claim I'm refusing to address it, when you don't tell me what this means.![]()
So? why should you test out when it is already scientifically confirmed that u cant hit max MUR without intake of carbsNo, you lack reading comprehension. I said you should test out ketosis for a few weeks, as it takes a few weeks to settle in.
Also, I said this before we argued. You didn't read it. Why are you acting as if I was back paddling? (asking the 2nd time now.)
"Show me proof that we currently live in 30000 with enough technology to make all that happen"Show me proof healthy (grass fed, enough space, no medication) raw meat causes disease. It's physically impossible to get disease from a healthy animal.![]()
Except that you didnt logically answer anythingYou don't even address the logical reasoning. When I call that out, you just make fun of it by saying "the logical reasoning in question" instead of debunking it.
No because you haven't answered any of my points and you dont know shit about science because u just tried to deny a study despite plausible mechanistic evidence and significant positive correlation.@Ogionth we could do a live debate if you want. This way there is more accountability, misunderstandings could be cleared up instantly, it would be more dynamic etc.
They just aren't. They are the part of a plant that contains the seeds.Fruits are plants.
use a voice changerObviously Im not gonna show my face/voice jfl
+ YOU just fucking dnr'ed two of my responses in the other thread that provided answers for whatever you asked and you're asking to migrate here.Fruits are plants.
Tomatoes are plants.
N-nitroso formation is proven, just because the entire mechanism is not proven doesn't mean there's no plausible mechanistic evidence
Except that the studies were on heme iron.
Excessive intake
And you do advocate of excessive intake of meat lol
"Proof"
science doesnt provide proof, it provides evidence.
and as for evidence, i already stated a significant positive correlation + plausible mechanistic evidence
and even provided instances in historyto prove that the study still applies
If you're uneducated that's not my fault.
Search Methionine restriction and Longevity on pubmed and it surely will come up
So? why should you test out when it is already scientifically confirmed that u cant hit max MUR without intake of carbs
"Show me proof that we currently live in 30000 with enough technology to make all that happen"
Retard + they still contain microbes but i guess your ideal world even excludes that somehow
Except that you didnt logically answer anything
1..MUR (agreed with me)
2..Foodbourne diseases (agreed that it has)
3. MeR (has no idea what it is)
4. Cancer risk etc (tries to deny it but cant)
Embarrassing![]()
I will respond, but I prefer a live debate.+ YOU just fucking dnr'ed two of my responses in the other thread that provided answers for whatever you asked and you're asking to migrate here.
Absolutely not
you started it here, so you can end it and go there.
if u DNR my responses on that thread, just copy paste them here and reply to it and if u dont do that thn u are not interested in defending your position
Tomatoes are fruits.They just aren't. They are the part of a plant that contains the seeds.
View attachment 4088468
Add me on discord, user in PMs
We will live debate rn dipshit
Idk how to use one correctly + you can know one's country etc by their voice and im not tryna dox myself, or connect this forum in any way to my real lifeuse a voice changer![]()
You respond and stop making 10 repliesI will respond, but I prefer a live debate.
You ignored my entire thread anyway too, don't act as if I'm the one ignoring here. As I said, I will respond, or do I have to respond within 5 minutes, LOL.Tomatoes are fruits.
And tomatoes are plants.
+ Why did you just provide ai evidence
as if I cant View attachment 4088479
"Live debate live debate" you just dnred two of my responses that i spent 10 mins on
You ignored my entire thread and all my responses to your arguments. When I respond you just say; LOL you deny my argument!! Emberassing! "You literally agree with me!" Acting as if I back paddled, when my position was clear from the start, you were just too stupid to read.Idk how to use one correctly + you can know one's country etc by their voice and im not tryna dox myself, or connect this forum in any way to my real life
And regardless, a live debate or an oral one doesn't matter or a textual because you literally failed to reply to any of my arguments and you dont even know what MeR is![]()
Stop making so many replies and address the pointYou ignored my entire thread anyway too, don't act as if I'm the one ignoring here. As I said, I will respond, or do I have to respond within 5 minutes, LOL.
I can take my time.![]()
Not dodging, blatantly denying.So you are dodging the live debate?
Because majority of your thread is slop, I prefer actual points.You ignored my entire thread
You didn't respond to any of them logically and we all saw that.and all my responses to your arguments. When I respond you just say; LOL you deny my argument!! Emberassing!
How is it back paddling when you literally agreed on the carb point partially but was wrong about the "just go to ketosis for a few weeks and then see bro""You literally agree with me!" Acting as if I back paddled, when my position was clear from the start, you were just too stupid to read.![]()
You do realize mods have your IP anyway and know what country you're from? Okay I will address your arguments now. But then you will have to address mine, because you ignored my entire thread. Now give me some timeStop making so many replies and address the point
Not dodging, blatantly denying.
I've often previously stated in this forum that I refuse to connect anything to my real life from it since that's the smartest decision.
I swear by God, I would have done it. Had there not been the risk of connection to any of my real life.
And it doesn't matter whether it's a live debate or a textual because clearly you seem like you have more interesT in making 10 replies irrelevant to the argument than actially addressing it
Alright, so you just call my thread slop and DNR it, but then expect me to refute your arguments? You even DNR my responses.Because majority of your thread is slop, I prefer actual points.
And thats what u are doing here rn too literally sent like 10 replies on the 2 threads like for fucks sake
You didn't respond to any of them logically and we all saw that.
How is it back paddling when you literally agreed on the carb point partially but was wrong about the "just go to ketosis for a few weeks and then see bro"
Except that they wont leak itYou do realize mods have your IP anyway and know what country you're from?
Your arguments against exactly what?Okay I will address your arguments now. But then you will have to address mine,
Make sure to not deflect again from each point.because you ignored my entire thread. Now give me some time![]()
Because there's no point in your thread aboutAlright, so you just call my thread slop and DNR it
I didnt dnr any of your responses on that thread and told you to continue there but you were so fixated on coming here that you probably missed my replies to those., but then expect me to refute your arguments? You even DNR my responses.
Against not eating mostly meat (carnivore). My entire thread, which I linked 10 times. Also, you ignore most of my points. This isn't going anywhere, you obviously don't want to admit the truth. Can you please answer my question how much meat/fruit/vegetables/dairy we should eat in % (roughly) while I respodn to your original takes that you want me to address? Thank youYour arguments against exactly what?
Well what exactly do u mean because thats what we are doing, my arguments are against your 70% meat and 20% more carnivore (if u include dairy) so total 90?Against not eating mostly meat (carnivore).
I didnt ignore a single of ur point on that thread, stop lying so blatantly lolMy entire thread, which I linked 10 times. Also, you ignore most of my points. This isn't going anywhere, you obviously don't want to admit the truth
I answered this in the original thread.. Can you please answer my question how much meat/fruit/vegetables/dairy we should eat in % (roughly) while I respodn to your original takes that you want me to address? Thank you
You still didn't explain what mer is after I asked you multiple times. I think it took 3 times questioning until you asked. Saying "uneducated, not my fault" is just not an argument, ad hominem. It's quite easy to jsut tell me the first time I ask. And then you also act as if I purposefully ignore your point, which isn't true. You still didn't answer my 3 questions as to why you act like I back paddle on fruits, when that was my original position anyway. You just did not read my thread for way too long, which makes you lose all your credibility.I didnt ignore a single of ur point on that thread, stop lying so blatantly lol
I didnt ignore a single of ur point on that thread, stop lying so blatantly lol
An "ad hominem" is when the insult is used as an argument to dismiss somethingYou still didn't explain what mer is after I asked you multiple times. I think it took 3 times questioning until you asked. Saying "uneducated, not my fault" is just not an argument, ad hominem.
it's a long topic, you need to read it on ur ownIt's quite easy to jsut tell me the first time I ask
it's true you ignored alot of my points on that thread. And then you also act as if I purposefully ignore your point, which isn't true.
Why did I say you backpaddled? I just said we agreedYou still didn't answer my 3 questions as to why you act like I back paddle on fruits, when that was my original position anyway.
You just did not read my thread for way too long, which makes you lose all your credibility.
i didnt read those because those are not necessarily against me, my position currently is against 90% carnivore thats itIgnored anti nutrients, fiber, meat containing all nutrients, ignored dangers of plants (vegetables),
i answered it that experimenting on a few weeks of keto, it still will NOT suffice for max MUR in most casesignored the randle cycle,
Arguing "tomatoes are plants" is just semantic cope. Nobody is denying tomatoes grow on plantsFruits are plants.
Tomatoes are plants.
N-nitroso formation is proven, just because the entire mechanism is not proven doesn't mean there's no plausible mechanistic evidence
Except that the studies were on heme iron.
Excessive intake
And you do advocate of excessive intake of meat lol
"Proof"
science doesnt provide proof, it provides evidence.
and as for evidence, i already stated a significant positive correlation + plausible mechanistic evidence
and even provided instances in historyto prove that the study still applies
If you're uneducated that's not my fault.
Search Methionine restriction and Longevity on pubmed and it surely will come up
So? why should you test out when it is already scientifically confirmed that u cant hit max MUR without intake of carbs
"Show me proof that we currently live in 30000 with enough technology to make all that happen"
Retard + they still contain microbes but i guess your ideal world even excludes that somehow
Except that you didnt logically answer anything
1..MUR (agreed with me)
2..Foodbourne diseases (agreed that it has)
3. MeR (has no idea what it is)
4. Cancer risk etc (tries to deny it but cant)
Embarrassing![]()
Wat u are arguing is semantic cope too.Arguing "tomatoes are plants" is just semantic cope. Nobody is denying tomatoes grow on plants, the distinction was about plant parts fruit vs. leaves/stalk That has zero bearing on whether the diet I advocate for is superior.
You're embarrassingYou're dodging.
You keep saying "heme --> cancer" as if that’s settled. It isn’t. Yes, nitrosation can occur in theory, but the body also has defenses: antioxidants, gut microbiota, bile regulation. Lab conditions =/= real-world human metabolism.
except that they found a significant correlation with HEME IRON SPECIFICALLY.Most of those meat–cancer studies are observational with massive confounders (smoking, seed oils, refined carbs, obesity, low activity). People who eat more meat in the modern Western diet also tend to eat fewer micronutrients, and more junk. That’s not a test of raw, unprocessed, grass fed meat.
No it is carcionigenity lol, the heme iron doesn't come from pathogens.Again, you admit the point, that pathogens are the risk. That’s a food safety/handling issue, not a proof of long term carcinogenicity.
Wrong, the cancer risk is the sameWith healthy animals, hygienic slaughter, the risks is basically non existent.
You can’t fathom the difference between factory meat and properly sourced raw meat, jfl.
Science doesnt operate on proof, it operates on evidence.nd you can't just say methionine. That's not a valid argument. Explain. When I searched this up I found that it increases life span in other animals with comepletely different digestion and gut microbiomes. Not in humans. Show me the proof.
study says otherwiseLmaooo
There is no cancer risk with healthy animals.
WrongWe have eaten mostly meat for over 100.000 years with cancer only showing after we switched up on our natural diet (agricultural revolution).
No you did lol, you did advise to go Keto for a few weeks as if that would work for anybodyYOU agreed with ME on MUR. I never claimed you don't need carbs for optimal MUR. You didn't understand it until I told you multiple times.
Indeed you areEmbarrassing![]()
Tbh i can't debunk carnivore because it really works, just not better than vegan or just eating raw foodView attachment 4061063
I partially disagree. This is not gospel. I don't have to take the word of this guy.
View attachment 4061091
I agree personal anecdotes and YouTube are not scientific whatsoever, but correlation does not prove causation. Likewise, I could go and make a meta analysis of how going outside with an umbrella is highly linked to it raining later.
It still holds up. You can not debunk carnivore. None of these studies are against the carnivore diet in comparison.
I agree actually! Eating vegetables and fruits in a "balanced" diet is more healthy than consuming the lowest level of processed goyslop!
Sadly, that wasn't my argument.
You're wrong about the ad hominem. I asked you what MER is, and you didn't answer. Then when I pressed for clarification, you called me uneducated. That's exactly using an insult to avoid answering the question. Stop trying to act like it's something else.An "ad hominem" is when the insult is used as an argument to dismiss something
Says who? Maybe don't use abbreviations if you don't care to just type one word.it's a long topic, you need to read it on ur own
You ignored my entire thread to begin with. Stop trying to twist it as if you are addressing all my arguments. I am catching up, you are still not addressing all arguments in my original thread.it's true you ignored alot of my points on that thread
It does seem like it, because you bring it up right before saying it would be embarrassing.Why did I say you backpaddled? I just said we agreed
I did now, but you purposefully did not explain it at first.AND I ANSWERED THIS IN A PREVIOUS REPLY HERE IN THIS THREAD IF U Had BOTHERed tO READ
1: Not everyone needs max MUR all the time, some already built a decent physique, for example.I only added that experimenting keto for weeks is still not useless because there's no case where randle cycle would suffice for max mur lol
Stop using terms you dont know the meaning of![]()
Carnivore does not mean animal based, it means meat. But that's besides the point, I get what you mean. Let me read up on what you recommend in % in a minutei didnt read those because those are not necessarily against me, my position currently is against 90% carnivore thats it
Takes weeks until ketosis fully sets in, so it's worth to try and test it out. Just a misunderstanding on your part, but that can happen in a heated debate.i answered it that experimenting on a few weeks of keto, it still will NOT suffice for max MUR in most cases
LOL, no logical reasoning.Wat u are arguing is semantic cope too.
Clearly not, as plants are toxic and not hydrating. I showed proof in my thread, but you DNR, JFL.Wat u are arguing is semantic cope too.
Either way carbs = from plant sources.
thats it
You're embarrassing
View attachment 4088564
peer reviewed journal.
as i provided multiple examplés from history smoking lung cancer, asbestos
you dont need a causal exact evidence
I am responding right now. You clearly ignored all my points, my entire thread even. But now you just say "you ignore my points" in response. What point did I ignore? I will answer. But now you answer my thread please.Wat u are arguing is semantic cope too.
Either way carbs = from plant sources.
thats it
You're embarrassing
View attachment 4088564
peer reviewed journal.
as i provided multiple examplés from history smoking lung cancer, asbestos
you dont need a causal exact evidence
theres enough plausible mechanistic evidence and strong positive correlation, thats enough
except that they found a significant correlation with HEME IRON SPECIFICALLY.
whether raw or processed or not, there was a correlation and plasuinle mechanistic evidence
View attachment 4088566
Stop dodging it, and repeating your points, we already went all over this in the other thread to which u didnt resond but replied nonsense about 10 times here.