NPC trait: considering incest to be inherently "bad"

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Kraken
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
17,322
Reputation
24,005
Inbreeding is only detrimental to a population if the resulting offspring have poor genetic resilience to environmental factors. Some detrimental phenotypes can result from inbreeding due to the combination of recessive alleles, but that depends on the parents carrying said alleles.

Inbreeding is extremely common among most animal species and frequently results in increased offspring fitness.

Incest is shunned within societies as a means of male intrasexual competition (and is inherently gynocentric because it allows some degree of sexual mobility for females) rather than because it's inherently problematic, genetically.

Without punishments for incest among the common folk, powerful men would have more difficulty assembling virginal harems due to most females losing their virginities to a close male family member (fathers, brothers, etc) who have the easiest, immediate access. With incestuous punishments in place, common folk fathers are forced to give their daughters to another man (or else the daughters will choose for themselves) which ultimately leads a disproportionate amount of women to the most powerful or genetically optimal males within the society.

Note that laws against incest are rarely applied to the elites; many kings and princes reproduced with their female family members in addition to having harems of other men's daughters.

Currently, certain countries (most in Western Europe) have restrictions on the number of times a sperm bank can use a singular sperm sample. The argument is that, without a limit, inbreeding will become too prominent, which is detrimental to society. However, as explained before, that argument is bogus, especially considering that women are naturally inclined to reproduce with a minority of the male population.

 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: zeshama, Joe Rogancel, Deleted member 14693 and 31 others
Include me in the r/inceltears screenshot
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, KingCartierrr23, TheMaxxer333 and 27 others
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit, WeiWei, n0rthface and 2 others
Subhuman trait: Caring about opinions on incest
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, BigBoy, OGJBSLAYER and 16 others
Subhuman trait: Caring about opinions on incest
Alpha males don't think about incest and its consequences, they simply have sex with their siblings at age 14.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy, Deleted member 23391, fogdart and 8 others
  • JFL
Reactions: BigBoy, Deleted member 23391 and LampPostPrime
99% of sex in the world is done for enjoyment, not for reproduction.

so problems with reproduction aren't a legit argument against incest sex anyways. U can just do it for enjoyment.
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy, fogdart, LampPostPrime and 1 other person
tbh agreed
my half-sister is supposedly hot but I can't find any high res pictures and she has to be in mid-30s by now
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 21661, LampPostPrime and try2beme
99% of sex in the world is done for enjoyment, not for reproduction.

so problems with reproduction aren't a legit argument against incest sex anyways. U can just do it for enjoyment.
This is true as well but most laws against incest occurred prior to birth control and easy abortions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerGaston
Who tf else cares about incest?
Why do you care so much about not caring about incest? Many users here would like to discuss the topic.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Primalsplit, Deleted member 29155 and Debetro
this thread was typed by brown fingers from a hut in Pakistan
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: KingCartierrr23, Joe Rogancel, disillusioned and 10 others
Didn't expect such a good post. I don't see any flaws in your logic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit
this thread was typed by brown fingers from a hut in Pakistan
pakistanis in UK inbreeding like crazy. Inbreeding is the reason why curries and arabs are so low smv(non white arabs that are not mixed)

Even among whites its always the mixed motherfuckers that mog the racial pure onces. Mulatto theory is legit.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 29155 and Looks234
tbh agreed
my half-sister is supposedly hot but I can't find any high res pictures and she has to be in mid-30s by now
You are bottom barrel variant of human you insectueous beast
 
pakistanis in UK inbreeding like crazy. Inbreeding is the reason why curries and arabs are so low smv(non white arabs that are not mixed)

Even among whites its always the mixed motherfuckers that mog the racial pure onces. Mulatto theory is legit.
It's as if you wrote this entire comment with the explicit intention of stroking off the guy you responded to.
 
It's as if you wrote this entire comment with the explicit intention of stroking off the guy you responded to.
what you mean? Mulattos have crazy smv nigga. My cousin is half german half black and he mogs me back to führerbunker. I heightmog him but he gets more attention from women. I am catholic religious so i dont care about sex or women til marriage but i cant deny mulatto smv. Even some hapa chicks i have seen absolutely mogged pure asian skinny bitches.

Women love racemaxxing for a reason. Mother nature programmed it into their dna to ensure offspring is better off
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit and Deleted member 29155
what you mean? Mulattos have crazy smv nigga. My cousin is half german half black and he mogs me back to führerbunker. I heightmog him but he gets more attention from women. I am catholic religious so i dont care about sex or women til marriage but i cant deny mulatto smv. Even some hapa chicks i have seen absolutely mogged pure asian skinny bitches.

Women love racemaxxing for a reason. Mother nature programmed it into their dna to ensure offspring is better off
I've already made a thread on this.

But my comment was replying to the fact that your comment was basically:
>non-black ethnics subhuman
>whites okay but not great
>mulattos on top

Which is basically just trying to make @looksmaxxer234 bust.
 
Last edited:
Inbreeding is only detrimental to a population if the resulting offspring have poor genetic resilience to environmental factors. Some detrimental phenotypes can result from inbreeding due to the combination of recessive alleles, but that depends on the parents carrying said alleles.

Inbreeding is extremely common among most animal species and frequently results in increased offspring fitness.

Incest is shunned within societies as a means of male intrasexual competition (and is inherently gynocentric because it allows some degree of sexual mobility for females) rather than because it's inherently problematic, genetically.

Without punishments for incest among the common folk, powerful men would have more difficulty assembling virginal harems due to most females losing their virginities to a close male family member (fathers, brothers, etc) who have the easiest, immediate access. With incestuous punishments in place, common folk fathers are forced to give their daughters to another man (or else the daughters will choose for themselves) which ultimately leads a disproportionate amount of women to the most powerful or genetically optimal males within the society.

Note that laws against incest are rarely applied to the elites; many kings and princes reproduced with their female family members in addition to having harems of other men's daughters.

Currently, certain countries (most in Western Europe) have restrictions on the number of times a sperm bank can use a singular sperm sample. The argument is that, without a limit, inbreeding will become too prominent, which is detrimental to society. However, as explained before, that argument is bogus, especially considering that women are naturally inclined to reproduce with a minority of the male population.

Wheezed at the title

My mother was next to me and invitingly said, "what so funny?"

"you wouldn't get it"
 
Narcy cope you have the same reputation in this forum as @disillusioned.
Firstly, I don't engage in prostate stimulation and complain about working at a pizza parlor.

Secondly, he's a well-respected and iconic user.

Thirdly, you're really observant for someone who's only been here for less than a month.
 
I've already made a thread on this.

But my comment was replying to the fact that your comment was basically:
>non-black ethnics subhuman
>white okay but not great
>mulattos on top

Which is basically just trying to make @looksmaxxer234 bust.
nah i dont completely agree with that hierachy.

my hierachy based on my individual experiments. Nordics and bbc's and mulattos do the best in my opinion but i dont put one pheno on the absolute top. With certain locations nordic might mog bbc or mulatto and at certain locations bbc might mog. I put them in general tiers. Every tier is in my opinion almost same smv

My hierachy:

God tier: Nordic germanic pheno, Dark skin bbc, Mulatto

demi god tier: Med, north atlantid, latino

human level: arab, light skin curry

subhuman level: curry, asian


never began level: every guy with major deformity + abo pheno
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: fogdart, Deleted member 29155, Kamui and 1 other person
Wheezed at the title

My mother was next to me and invitingly said, "what so funny?"

"you wouldn't get it"

zv1212

I am indian. But my cock is black.​

 
  • JFL
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER and Gaygymmaxx
this thread was typed by brown fingers from a hut in Pakistan
Tango Down


0C6C8DCA 07EB 43B1 96E2 A42344F0C050
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 29155 and Looks234
nah i dont completely agree with that hierachy.

my hierachy based on my individual experiments. Nordics and bbc's and mulattos do the best in my opinion but i dont put one pheno on the absolute top. With certain locations nordic might mog bbc or mulatto and at certain locations bbc might mog. I would general tiers. Every tier is in my opinion almost same smv

My hierachy:

God tier: Nordic germanic pheno, Dark skin bbc, Mulatto

demi god tier: Med, north atlantic, latino

human level: arab, light skin curry

subhuman level: curry, asian


never began level: every guy with major deformity + abo pheno
Let's ask @PrinceLuenLeoncur for his opinion.
 
sibling attraction I find gross tbh, I’d fuck a hot cousin no problem tho
 
Inbreeding is only detrimental to a population if the resulting offspring have poor genetic resilience to environmental factors. Some detrimental phenotypes can result from inbreeding due to the combination of recessive alleles, but that depends on the parents carrying said alleles.

Inbreeding is extremely common among most animal species and frequently results in increased offspring fitness.

Incest is shunned within societies as a means of male intrasexual competition (and is inherently gynocentric because it allows some degree of sexual mobility for females) rather than because it's inherently problematic, genetically.

Without punishments for incest among the common folk, powerful men would have more difficulty assembling virginal harems due to most females losing their virginities to a close male family member (fathers, brothers, etc) who have the easiest, immediate access. With incestuous punishments in place, common folk fathers are forced to give their daughters to another man (or else the daughters will choose for themselves) which ultimately leads a disproportionate amount of women to the most powerful or genetically optimal males within the society.

Note that laws against incest are rarely applied to the elites; many kings and princes reproduced with their female family members in addition to having harems of other men's daughters.

Currently, certain countries (most in Western Europe) have restrictions on the number of times a sperm bank can use a singular sperm sample. The argument is that, without a limit, inbreeding will become too prominent, which is detrimental to society. However, as explained before, that argument is bogus, especially considering that women are naturally inclined to reproduce with a minority of the male population.

Inbreeding is bad but it's fine to date your sister daughter or cousins
 
It's not inherently bad but serious people don't look at the genetic component of incest when determining if it is morally wrong or not, you usually proceed to argue about the topic assuming it isn't even possible to produce offspring or that the offspring will be healthy. Point is, there are so many arguments to consider regarding the topic, offspring is just the surface of the discussion.
 
It's not inherently bad but serious people don't look at the genetic component of incest when determining if it is morally wrong or not, you usually proceed to argue about the topic assuming it isn't even possible to produce offspring or that the offspring will be healthy. Point is, there are so many arguments to consider regarding the topic, offspring is just the surface of the discussion.
Any form of breeding is bad but I was observing why normies think that incest, specifically, is bad when the reality is that it isn't fundamentally "better" than non-incestuous breeding.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29155
Inbreeding is only detrimental to a population if the resulting offspring have poor genetic resilience to environmental factors. Some detrimental phenotypes can result from inbreeding due to the combination of recessive alleles, but that depends on the parents carrying said alleles.

Inbreeding is extremely common among most animal species and frequently results in increased offspring fitness.

Incest is shunned within societies as a means of male intrasexual competition (and is inherently gynocentric because it allows some degree of sexual mobility for females) rather than because it's inherently problematic, genetically.

Without punishments for incest among the common folk, powerful men would have more difficulty assembling virginal harems due to most females losing their virginities to a close male family member (fathers, brothers, etc) who have the easiest, immediate access. With incestuous punishments in place, common folk fathers are forced to give their daughters to another man (or else the daughters will choose for themselves) which ultimately leads a disproportionate amount of women to the most powerful or genetically optimal males within the society.

Note that laws against incest are rarely applied to the elites; many kings and princes reproduced with their female family members in addition to having harems of other men's daughters.

Currently, certain countries (most in Western Europe) have restrictions on the number of times a sperm bank can use a singular sperm sample. The argument is that, without a limit, inbreeding will become too prominent, which is detrimental to society. However, as explained before, that argument is bogus, especially considering that women are naturally inclined to reproduce with a minority of the male population.

Reproducing with a family member who's below your 3rd cousin is maladaptive.
 
Any form of breeding is bad but I was just observing why normies think that incest, specifically, is bad, when the reality is that it isn't fundamentally "better" than non-incestuous breeding.

Yeah, but consider, I don't think the law is playing into it, these people are growing up together in small spaces. I think in those conditions, they should naturally build up a level of disgust that prevents sexual intercourse from happening. Put simply, can you even imagine fucking your own mother? Unless you are porn fucked, that idea shouldn't even cross your mind. But why? It isn't the law. It think it's disgust plus a bond that is primarily built on things that aren't related to sex, the expectation of support from that person, a reliance on that person.

So in an environment where families are being raised in private households, building those bonds, I see it as disastrous to society to introduce incest legally, you have power dynamics, and so many other things at play that can become destroyed through sexual relations, and this will bleed onto society, outside of the house.

But I would say, it's probably possible to avoid most serious negatives in an environment that was heavily community oriented, so everyone raising other children.
 
Yeah, but consider, I don't think the law is playing into it, these people are growing up together in small spaces. I think in those conditions, they should naturally build up a level of disgust that prevents sexual intercourse from happening. Put simply, can you even imagine fucking your own mother? Unless you are porn fucked, that idea shouldn't even cross your mind. But why? It isn't the law. It think it's disgust plus a bond that is primarily built on things that aren't related to sex, the expectation of support from that person, a reliance on that person.

So in an environment where families are being raised in private households, building those bonds, I see it as disastrous to society to introduce incest legally, you have power dynamics, and so many other things at play that can become destroyed through sexual relations, and this will bleed onto society, outside of the house.

But I would say, it's probably possible to avoid most serious negatives in an environment that was heavily community oriented, so everyone raising other children.
Strawman. Males are less likely to have an interest in having sex with their mothers due to the mothers being older and stretched out. The OP was specifically referring to pubescent females.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22627
Strawman. Males are less likely to have an interest in having sex with their mothers due to the mothers being older and stretched out. The OP was specifically referring to pubescent females.

There is no strawman, I'm speaking to:

why normies think that incest, specifically, is bad

Are you saying they think it's bad because of law? If so, I'm saying no. Law can influence behavior and morality, but there is no understanding of this law by minors, and I would be surprised if most adults even consider the law, the idea of incest yeah, but it being legal or not, doubtful, most people can't even cite their rights.
 
There is no strawman, I'm speaking to
You brought it up as a point of dismissing incest as a viable reproductive strategy.

There is no strawman, I'm speaking to:



Are you saying they think it's bad because of law? If so, I'm saying no. Law can influence behavior and morality, but there is no understanding of this law by minors, and I would be surprised if most adults even consider the law, the idea of incest yeah, but it being legal or not, doubtful, most people can't even cite their rights.
Social stigmas against incest convince normies that incest is bad. Laws are essentially just documented social stigmas. Children are convinced by their parents to not have sex with their siblings and those parents were convinced to enforce that due to social stigmas against incest. Parents are also convinced to not have sex with their offspring due to fear of punishment by the power establishment.
 
You brought it up as a point of dismissing incest.

I'm not dismissing incest. LOL Bro, I care about reaching the truth, but I also have moral principles, if incest was advantageous to my current objective regarding wellbeing, I would take the position. That's the odd thing, simple people take every statement as an attack on them and a representation of my position. I actually never gave my position on incest, I'm just analyzing why people would be against incest. I'm just working with the idea, I'm not even really challenging you because I can see you are just working with motivated reasoning, a true NPC trait. I just rarely get to work with the idea of "incest" because I don't want to be associated with talking about it anywhere else. :lul:

Social stigmas against incest convince normies that incest is bad. Laws are essentially just documented social stigmas. Children are convinced by their parents to not have sex with their siblings and those parents were convinced to enforce that due to social stigmas against incest. Parents are also convinced to not have sex with their offspring due to fear of punishment by the power establishment.

On this, agreed. Now where do the social stigmas come from? lol Lets go deeper and deeper, the the origin of the issue, the human mind. That's the answer, not law, law is represented by the mind, social stigmas represented by the mind. I'm trying to save time here, we need to figure out why people are seemingly shying away from incest naturally. Consider, not every family is bound by law and social stigmas, why aren't they fucking?
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall
tbh agreed
my half-sister is supposedly hot but I can't find any high res pictures and she has to be in mid-30s by now
I would coom in and have already fapped to 2 of my cousins
 
  • Woah
Reactions: ranierean

Similar threads

Giorgio
Replies
1
Views
258
SubhumanForever
SubhumanForever
Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
Gmogger
Replies
274
Views
6K
Gmogger
Gmogger
enchanted_elixir
Replies
189
Views
5K
enchanted_elixir
enchanted_elixir

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top