SARMs vs Synthetic androgens for facial development

MongolTurk

MongolTurk

6’1cel
Joined
Nov 19, 2022
Posts
1,669
Reputation
1,720
I’ve heard SARMs were specifically designed not only to have superior tissue selectivity for muscle growth, but also for bone growth(I assume density wise); however, I was wondering if anybody could lend me some advice as to whether or not they will do a better job at improving facial development in a late stage sub5. I understand that this is mostly cope and I won’t end up seeing any results facially but I might aswell try.
 
Only high doses of GH combined with androgens will help you once past 20 tbh
 
Only high doses of GH combined with androgens will help you once past 20 tbh
I’m 17, what’re the chances I see improvement? I’m currently taking cjc1295(w/DAC), would that be enough to enhance the potential effects from adrogens? And by “androgens,” do you strictly mean anabolic steroids or would androgenic SARMs like RAD140 be sufficient
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaestheticMaso
I’m 17, what’re the chances I see improvement? I’m currently taking cjc1295(w/DAC), would that be enough to enhance the potential effects from adrogens? And by “androgens,” do you strictly mean anabolic steroids or would androgenic SARMs like RAD140 be sufficient
Ah
 

Similar threads

betty
Replies
64
Views
6K
DamonHx
DamonHx
n9wiff
Replies
9
Views
1K
darkromantica
darkromantica
Rigged
Replies
64
Views
3K
Rigged
Rigged

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top