Technologies in the future may soon be utilized to guarantee us chad children.

[reptiles]

Before delving into this topic, it's important to present a clear and cogent argument. So, the question arises: what is the role of women in society? The common view is that women are vital for procreation, and are often seen as sexual partners. However, it's worth noting that the purpose of sex is to transfer genetic material, and this process can sometimes result in gene recombination, leading to variations in physical appearance and traits.

Asexual reproduction, on the other hand, does not pose this risk. By reproducing asexually, outside the traditional means of sexual contact, we eliminate the need for gene editing technology such as CRISPR. Moreover, the lab environment allows for complete control over the child's growth, hormone exposure, and other factors that can affect physical appearance and traits.

Another advantage of asexually reproduced beings is that they lack sexual variation, meaning that an offspring created from the genetic material of oneself and someone like Henry Cavill would be an exact replica of both parties. This renders women somewhat redundant in the process of increasing one's genetic value.

Interestingly, a study was recently conducted that used stem cells to create a child by extracting a Y chromosome from a male and injecting it into a mouse embryo, effectively removing the X chromosome. This is a promising step towards a positive future. However, it's worth noting that this technology may face resistance from those who fear the possibility of a society of genetically identical, dominant individuals.

Researchers Create Mice From Two Fathers | Trending | Labroots

www-labroots-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@enchanted_elixir

@Artemis


Any 1 else that might possible be interested

 

[5.5psl]

Ig when you have schizo breakdowns you decide to post on .org ??

 

[Struggler03]

Thank you for this amazing looksmaxing advice

 

[reptiles]

Thank you for this amazing looksmaxing advice

This piece of information is essentially the only truth that matters if one is concerned with the fundamental purpose of improving one's genetic makeup. It is important to note that this is not advice, but rather a speculation drawn from the available data.

 

[Deleted member 27472]

This kind of stuff and the way the worlds heading really makes me second guess if I even want children

 

[reptiles]

This kind of stuff and the way the worlds heading really makes me second guess if I even want children

In light of recent technological advancements, one may begin to question whether having children is truly something they desire. While such innovations offer benefits to homosexual couples, it also provides the opportunity for asexual reproduction, which eliminates genetic variation and therefore limits the potential for unattractive offspring.

In the case of splicing DNA with another person, such as with Henry Cavill, a child produced through this process would be an exact genetic replica of both individuals rather than a blend of their traits. While this child would not technically be a clone, as they would possess half of their genetic material from another source, they would still possess nearly identical genetic makeup to their parents.

It's important to note that these advancements in reproduction are rooted in scientific discovery rather than any political agenda or social movement

 

[2d v2]

This piece of information is essentially the only truth that matters if one is concerned with the fundamental purpose of improving one's genetic makeup. It is important to note that this is not advice, but rather a speculation drawn from the available data.

no it isnt, you dont understand genetics
you can switch certain high power testosterone dna on by taking ice baths
you can increase your fists size by punching, epigenetics will make your offspring have stronger hands
you can derma stamp lines out of your face, which will also pass down
you can turn off myostatin receptors with follistatin and literally make your muscle growth unlimited(with severe risk of organ shutdown)

What this dna shit will do is promise to build you chad kids, but then they will be born as weak little pea heads with no strength.

 

[reptiles]

no it isnt, you dont understand genetics
you can switch certain high power testosterone dna on by taking ice baths
you can increase your fists size by punching, epigenetics will make your offspring have stronger hands
you can derma stamp lines out of your face, which will also pass down
you can turn off myostatin receptors with follistatin and literally make your muscle growth unlimited(with severe risk of organ shutdown)

What this dna shit will do is promise to build you chad kids, but then they will be born as weak little pea heads with no strength.

While the concept of epigenetics is widely recognized, the discussion at hand pertains to the replacement of women in the reproductive process altogether, rendering their genetic contribution obsolete. The practice of using follistatin injections to inhibit myostatin receptors, while possible, is not relevant to this scenario of asexual reproduction. In such a case, the offspring produced would undoubtedly bear the exact genetic makeup of the parent, resulting in the creation of a replica of the Chad individual in question, rather than a genetically diverse offspring