💀 The 3 Most Important Craniofacial Plane Angles for Aesthetics [3D Morphs]

Mandibular Plane Angle

Mandibular 1
Mandibular 2


Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon





Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

Orbital 1
Orbital 2


Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward





Temporal Plane Angle

Temporal 1
Temporal 2


Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º


 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Ashoimex, Deathninja328, GynoGladiator and 111 others
it becomes elongated with vertical growth. resulting in a long midface and large nose
how would u even reverse that IF it really comes with everyone having downward growth
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ostri99 and thecel
Good thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Joaquin
Do people with ideal mandibular plane angle always tend to have proportionate midfaces?I think so right? Because the maxilla is well rotated therefore creating a more compact look.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and ostri99
My mandibular plane angle has changed noticably in 2 years but its still unideal causing my philtrum to be long:feelswhy:
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
how would u even reverse that IF it really comes with everyone having downward growth
idk but many possibilities. Won Moon N2 Implant studies show that it can be corrected with protraction at certain angles with certain anchorage points.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LEFORT17
Do people with ideal mandibular plane angle always tend to have proportionate midfaces?I think so right? Because the maxilla is well rotated therefore creating a more compact look.
Not really I have a slightly longer midface but my mandibular plane is still ideal
 
idk but many possibilities. Won Moon N2 Implant studies show that it can be corrected with protraction at certain angles with certain anchorage points.
mental masturbation.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: mvp2v1
Mandibular Plane Angle

View attachment 4054612 View attachment 4054616

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon





Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

View attachment 4054618 View attachment 4054620

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward





Temporal Plane Angle

View attachment 4054621 View attachment 4054622

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º


This explains it far better then the stupid video ever could
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Mandibular Plane Angle

View attachment 4054612 View attachment 4054616

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon





Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

View attachment 4054618 View attachment 4054620

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward





Temporal Plane Angle

View attachment 4054621 View attachment 4054622

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º


I love that all of mine are ideal 😍
 
  • Love it
Reactions: ostri99 and thecel
Mandibular Plane Angle

View attachment 4054612 View attachment 4054616

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon





Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

View attachment 4054618 View attachment 4054620

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward





Temporal Plane Angle

View attachment 4054621 View attachment 4054622

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º


I got all of these (except for the last 1) ideal but I'm still sub 5
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and ostri99
I got all of these (except for the last 1) ideal but I'm still sub 5
it can happen. this guy is decent in all of 3 angles yet still looks bad, way too compact looking @thecel
 

Attachments

  • 1756854409234.png
    1756854409234.png
    626 KB · Views: 0
  • 1756854385199.png
    1756854385199.png
    692.9 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, Tomer Solomon and mandiblade
Nonsense. Human skull is way more complex than that all plane, degree, ratio stuff. Otherwise there would be only one ideal skull-orbital design and all attractive people would suit this type.

All guys below are chads but what do they have in common? Their skulls, orbitals, angles etc. stuff differs. As you can see there is no such thing as "ideal degree/ratio"

All these faces have something that you cant explain but see. Genetic jackpot or whatever you say.

1000005547
1000005505
1000005368
1000001730
1000001698
1000001733
1000001713
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Nonsense. Human skull is way more complex than that all plane, degree, ratio stuff. Otherwise there would be only one ideal skull-orbital design and all attractive people would suit this type.

All guys below are chads but what do they have in common? Their skulls, orbitals, angles etc. stuff differs. As you can see there is no such thing as "ideal degree/ratio"

All these faces have something that you cant explain but see. Genetic jackpot or whatever you say.

View attachment 4077671View attachment 4077678View attachment 4077679View attachment 4077683View attachment 4077689View attachment 4077696View attachment 4077702

They all have the 3 plane angles near ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Djimo, Lookologist003 and mandiblade
Hey, you made it @thecel

Congrats on BTOB.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel and mandiblade
Besides everything else you mentioned any other underrated or significant hall makers for facial aesthetics
Broadly those things I mentioned I believe can capture the 3-D shape of the head and its scale well. If you measure well in the majority of those I guess that you are attractive.

There is one more part to this idea ITT which I will elaborate on soon.

But at this state of the science, the rudiments are blossoming, so much so that a subhuman student could read a few important threads and have attained the knowledge he needs to understand if his situation with women can improve by consultation with a surgeon.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel and mandiblade
wide but surely this can be easily frauded by shaping the hair?
If you have hair. Easily frauded? If the winds are not blowing or you stay indoors. Those hairdos look weird on guys who aren't young.

Very interesting thread and nice illustrations. I never realized how important your temporals are.
In the dark ages of four months ago, we thought that it was because of eye spacing.

The orbitomaxillary plane is the one that giga fucks you and can’t be fixed without some insane combination of OBO, LF2 and forehead and cheekbone implants.
Asians are the group that suffer under low orbitomaxillary plane angles the most. I pour one out for all sub5 Asians having made this realisation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • lowiqvepex
  • NickIsOver
  • Trueadamjewslyer911
  • AG!
  • duromaxxing
  • IDontBlameAnybody
  • Dombh
  • Htobrother
  • dnavictim
  • hardstuckltnlarper
Back
Top