Why anglos are the most superior whites, Germans are abused dogs

[byvw]

I’m not a fan of Germany. I’m glad they got wrecked. That doesn’t mean that Britain was stronger than Germany in World War 2.

UK was stronger than Germany during WW2. Your knowledge of history is lacking.

Most white Americans are mutts with some combination of British, Irish, German, French and Italian ancestry among other things. America isn’t an extension of Britain no matter how much you guys cope. Britain was one of the many European influences on America. I’m even willing to grant that it was the most important one. But that doesn’t mean you guys get to take credit for all of America’s achievements.

The United States is an Anglo-Saxon country, founded by British libertarians and inventors, with English as its language, with common law, and most similar to other Anglo-Saxon countries. The fact that it also includes Germans or Italians does not change this fact. The majority of whites are of British origin and dominantly British.

And it is the British, not Jews, Germans or other European immigrants, who are the basis of its success. The overwhelming majority of scientists, inventors, etc. are British descent. Its universities and research institutions are based on their British counterparts.

The development of North America is directly related to its British origins. Historically, there are sharp distinctions between British colonialism and continental European colonialism. The contribution of continental Europe to this development is negligible.

I am not British or of British origin, and the success of the United States is not due to Britain but to those of British origin.

The reason why Britain was once a superpower and why the US, another Anglo-Saxon country, is now a superpower is essentially the same. Libertarianism, capitalism, individualism. Anglo-saxon mind.

 

[Posh Deano]

lol

Keep coping

Ok mate relax. Anyone can date who they want here but no one is being "used like toys". If someone wants to date someone else of another race, it will almost always be a genuine and loving mutual relationship in the UK. The reason absolutely no one cares if you date interracially here in the UK, compared to the US, is because ethnics of all races in the UK of both genders are dramatically more civilized and adjusted to the host country whereas the US is just a bunch of malicious in-groups who hate each other. And it's generally trusted by everyone in the UK that regardless of what the race of your partner is, they will be a well-adjusted member of British society and make a fine partner.

Almost all ethnics who were born in the UK come from dual-parent stable households and speak the English language with the proper dialect, along with being properly educated and expressing a strong pride and loyalty for the country. We are miles ahead of any other country in the world on the multicultural question, it isn't even close. Your attempts to create division on this forum are extremely yank-like, almost all of the UK looks down on this subhuman tribal mindset of the States which is also exhibited by other countries and nation groups (Asians, continental Europeans, Africans, Hispanics, etc).

I've also noticed that basically all of your posts come from a position of extreme vindictiveness, hatred, and spite no matter what the topic is. It almost seems like you want to constantly and intentionally stir conflict and strife in this forum. This is a telltale sign of someone who's had a hard life and an extremely negative experience with the world. Hopefully you can resolve your inner demons and reach a state of peace, which usually follows a state of life satisfaction (having good mates, a stable job, and a loyal LTR with a girl you find attractive, etc).

@Hypersonic @byvw tagging you in this

A major issue with all of @PrinceLuenLeoncur 's posts is that he constantly tries to apply the vindictive and subhuman tribal mindset of American-born ethnics onto UK-born ethnics, when nearly all of them are well-adjusted, educated, and civilized sellouts to the UK that love the country and completely look down on the hateful mindset of their American counterparts.

Also last but not least, he has this very strange fantasy that native English whites cannot find partners, which is such a ridiculous notion that I wonder if it's even worth conversing with this guy. The UK is probably the only true JBW/white-worshipping country in the West, basically the entire country regardless of race looks up to and worships white Anglo people/culture as the golden standard of everything and the ultimate goal to become/achieve. Any LTN+ white with a decent personality can get any girl of any race that he wants in the UK, especially our own. White incels simply don't exist in the UK unless they are severely disabled in some way. If you suggest anything otherwise you either live in the basement or most likely aren't from here, the fact that I even had to explain this concept to a supposed UK resident is quite hilarious.

@skkrrrtcantdo felt like you'd also want to read this

 

[TwoFace]

Within white race, the most superior whites are the anglos / British.

Other Europeans are fringe elements, like Germans, poles, eastern Europeans, spanish, Russians, Portuguese french are all abused dogs.

USA ( British people ) is currently the world's superpower, most powerful Americans have Anglo / British surnames and Anglo heritage. British empire did not colonised south america and you can see just how useless it is compared to the north.

I feel like only Japanese can compete with anglos , rest other Europeans are a joke with iq of 98

Why all of India speaks English, why not Dutch, french, German ( lol )etc ?

Why nobody could challenge the British raj ?

Why Germans are abused dogs and lost all wars against anglos even lost battle of Britain?

Germans also lost in north Africa against the anglos.

Even today canada USA Australia UK etc the anglosphere is very rich and superior in everything like economy, looks, strength, military, sports etc

Why curryland doesn't speaks german or Dutch ?

aryans mog you to hell n back

 

[TwoFace]

View attachment 3242847

these are russians not anglos

 

[Posh Deano]

Good stuff overall, make sure to read my other response in this thread where I tagged you.

 

[WeiWei]

these are russians not anglos

No they're Ugandans

 

[Lovecraftscat]

Within white race, the most superior whites are the anglos / British.

Other Europeans are fringe elements, like Germans, poles, eastern Europeans, spanish, Russians, Portuguese french are all abused dogs.

USA ( British people ) is currently the world's superpower, most powerful Americans have Anglo / British surnames and Anglo heritage. British empire did not colonised south america and you can see just how useless it is compared to the north.

I feel like only Japanese can compete with anglos , rest other Europeans are a joke with iq of 98

Why all of India speaks English, why not Dutch, french, German ( lol )etc ?

Why nobody could challenge the British raj ?

Why Germans are abused dogs and lost all wars against anglos even lost battle of Britain?

Germans also lost in north Africa against the anglos.

Even today canada USA Australia UK etc the anglosphere is very rich and superior in everything like economy, looks, strength, military, sports etc

Why curryland doesn't speaks german or Dutch ?

The heritage of most white people in the US is German with 12%

 

[dragomaxxer]

Who fucking cares about that. Dutch people are richer, look better, taller etc etc than anglos lol.

yeah was caging at this whole post, op is in a looks related forum and decides to use which languages certain countries speak as his reasoning for why english people are superior lmao.

op is delusional af. also just retarded to claim superiority over germans specifically considering most germans and "anglos" have extremely common ancestry

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Ok mate relax. Anyone can date who they want here but no one is being "used like toys". If someone wants to date someone else of another race, it will almost always be a genuine and loving mutual relationship in the UK. The reason absolutely no one cares if you date interracially here in the UK, compared to the US, is because ethnics of all races in the UK of both genders are dramatically more civilized and adjusted to the host country whereas the US is just a bunch of malicious in-groups who hate each other. And it's generally trusted by everyone in the UK that regardless of what the race of your partner is, they will be a well-adjusted member of British society and make a fine partner.

Almost all ethnics who were born in the UK come from dual-parent stable households and speak the English language with the proper dialect, along with being properly educated and expressing a strong pride and loyalty for the country. We are miles ahead of any other country in the world on the multicultural question, it isn't even close. Your attempts to create division on this forum are extremely yank-like, almost all of the UK looks down on this subhuman tribal mindset of the States which is also exhibited by other countries and nation groups (Asians, continental Europeans, Africans, Hispanics, etc).

I've also noticed that basically all of your posts come from a position of extreme vindictiveness, hatred, and spite no matter what the topic is. It almost seems like you want to constantly and intentionally stir conflict and strife in this forum. This is a telltale sign of someone who's had a hard life and an extremely negative experience with the world. Hopefully you can resolve your inner demons and reach a state of peace, which usually follows a state of life satisfaction (having good mates, a stable job, and a loyal LTR with a girl you find attractive, etc).

@Hypersonic @byvw tagging you in this

A major issue with all of @PrinceLuenLeoncur 's posts is that he constantly tries to apply the vindictive and subhuman tribal mindset of American-born ethnics onto UK-born ethnics, when nearly all of them are well-adjusted, educated, and civilized sellouts to the UK that love the country and completely look down on the hateful mindset of their American counterparts.

Also last but not least, he has this very strange fantasy that native English whites cannot find partners, which is such a ridiculous notion that I wonder if it's even worth conversing with this guy. The UK is probably the only true JBW/white-worshipping country in the West, basically the entire country regardless of race looks up to and worships white Anglo people/culture as the golden standard of everything and the ultimate goal to become/achieve. Any LTN+ white with a decent personality can get any girl of any race that he wants in the UK, especially our own. White incels simply don't exist in the UK unless they are severely disabled in some way. If you suggest anything otherwise you either live in the basement or most likely aren't from here, the fact that I even had to explain this concept to a supposed UK resident is quite hilarious.

@skkrrrtcantdo felt like you'd also want to read this

Blud sent me an essay for this shit ahahah

@TechnoBoss @Gengar MODS come see this shiii

I despise the UK I’m HTM/Tyronelite yet incel due to the women wanting NT drug dealers. British women are satans children they are 100% from his left nutt. Your women ugly asf deano and they need to be lined up and shot.

I literally have to date foreign women thanks to this shithole I unfortunately was spawned in. I’d literally not be an incel in any other country on earth in the BIGGEST LOCATIONCEL ON THIS SITE AND ITS COS IM IN THE UK. I go abroad and foids are receptive to me and give me LOVE but in UK its “Tee hee you’ll die alone” fuck BRITISH WOMEN AND FUCK THE UK I HATE THIS ISLAND IMA GO CRY NOW I HATE IT SO MUCH

 

[Posh Deano]

Blud sent me an essay for this shit ahahah

@TechnoBoss @Gengar MODS come see this shiii

It’s a pretty accurate summary of your mind and rather vindictive attitude to basically everything, while addressing the original thread topics as well. I don’t understand your reaction.

Normal and well-adjusted people who are happy with their lives don’t type like you do. I’m trying to help you out and encourage some self-reflection, as well as inform you about the realities of the world.

I’m also from the UK and am very happy here. You can go through my earlier posts if you want some glimpses of my personal life. But yeah mate you sound like a very troubled and anguished person, hopefully you can turn things around for yourself in the future. Wish you the best.

 

[Lingesan Periyaandi]

I wish i was white

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

It’s a pretty accurate summary of your mind and rather vindictive attitude to basically everything, while addressing the original thread topics as well. I don’t understand your reaction.

Normal and well-adjusted people who are happy with their lives don’t type like you do. I’m trying to help you out and encourage some self-reflection, as well as inform you about the realities of the world.

I despise the UK go reload my comment I updated it


I am autistic and adhd I type funnily due to that don’t be a @MaghrebGator on me now I type sporadic for a reason

Aight I’ll read what you said but not now I’m busy playing a video game. I’m cursed I could had been born in the USA but I was born in the uk imagine my luck

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I wish i was white

I wish I was American

 

[JohnnyRamone]

UK was stronger than Germany during WW2. Your knowledge of history is lacking.

No. It wasn’t. lol. They had a stronger surface fleet and by the end of the war, their airforce was stronger too. That’s about it. Whenever they clashed with the Germans, they got a shellacking. If the Italians had stayed neutral, they would have had few victories on land.

The United States is an Anglo-Saxon country, founded by British libertarians and inventors, with English as its language, with common law, and most similar to other Anglo-Saxon countries. The fact that it also includes Germans or Italians does not change this fact. The majority of whites are of British origin and dominantly British.

And it is the British, not Jews, Germans or other European immigrants, who are the basis of its success. The overwhelming majority of scientists, inventors, etc. are British descent. Its universities and research institutions are based on their British counterparts.

The development of North America is directly related to its British origins. Historically, there are sharp distinctions between British colonialism and continental European colonialism. The contribution of continental Europe to this development is negligible.

I am not British or of British origin, and the success of the United States is not due to Britain but to those of British origin.

The reason why Britain was once a superpower and why the US, another Anglo-Saxon country, is now a superpower is essentially the same. Libertarianism, capitalism, individualism. Anglo-saxon mind.

The success of America is attributable to Europeans broadly. It was a melting pot of Europeans historically (with a black minority).

 

[byvw]

No. It wasn’t. lol. They had a stronger surface fleet and by the end of the war, their airforce was stronger too. That’s about it. Whenever they clashed with the Germans, they got a shellacking. If the Italians had stayed neutral, they would have had few victories on land.


The success of America is attributable to Europeans broadly. It was a melting pot of Europeans historically (with a black minority).

I have seen few posts on there more tragicomic than this one. ROFLMAO.

As I said before, your knowledge of history is very deficient. You don't know enough about the history of engineering and innovations and in the Germany-UK comparison you can only compare the navy and air force, which is very superficial.

You are not in a position to evaluate many parameters such as economy, logistics, industry, resources, history of engineering and innovation etc.

If you want to understand why the Anglo-Saxons won the war, you should read the last 300 years of Anglo-Saxon history. That will give you the answer.

 

[JohnnyRamone]

I have seen few posts on there more tragicomic than this one. ROFLMAO.

As I said before, your knowledge of history is very deficient. You don't know enough about the history of engineering and innovations and in the Germany-UK comparison you can only compare the navy and air force, which is very superficial.

You are not in a position to evaluate many parameters such as economy, logistics, industry, resources, history of engineering and innovation etc.

If you want to understand why the Anglo-Saxons won the war, you should read the last 300 years of Anglo-Saxon history. That will give you the answer.

I promise that I know more about World War 2 than you.

https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/wwii-germany-vs-united-kingdom-the-misunderstood-balance-of-power.973246/

Here’s a good thread to read for anyone that actually thinks Britain was more powerful than Germany in World War 2.

The greatest achievements of the Americans (not the Anglo-Saxons) in the war was the nuclear bomb. It was invented primarily by a bunch of Jews and Italians… many of them having left Europe to escape fascism. After that, the space race was the symbol of American dominance. Thank the Germans. Obvious Anglos contributed significantly to America’s success, but it was a group project. America wouldn’t have even been independent without the French and France heavily influenced the founding fathers.

 

[Hypersonic]

Wrong

The whole trying to say we came from Africa argument is like saying we're all Africans is nowhere close to my point

There is a massive difference between the Africa thing and the Chinese Japanese migrations, firstly the Africa thing happened thousands if not tens of thousands of years ago by hunter gatherers and caveman

The Anglo Saxon invasion of England happened literally in the medieval age where there was technology and governments with professional armies on both sides, that wasn't even that long ago and is fairly recent history and it wasn't a little bit of immigration it was an invasion and full repopulation of the current inhabitants, that is nothing like saying were all from Africa argument

He saxon invasion It's not just a theory lol it is an accepted fact by historians it occurred in recent history so there is writing and plenty of archaeological evidence of it and just evidence in general it's not in the realm of a wishy washy theory it literally happened with evidence that's like saying the Roman Empire is just a theory

And by your logic you can't claim Americans as they have been separated from Britain for quite some time now so them saving Britain in ww2 can't therefore be credited to anglos cause anglos aren't American

Your wrong about the Japanese in ww2

The Japanese absolutely could have been stopped without America and eventually though longer they would have been,
Japan didn't have the resources or manpower to invade Australia even without us help
Japan could never have conquered India
Britain definitely had the capability to stop Japan at Singapore, Britain had more troops more artillery and a great fort they could have actually defeated the Japanese right there and the war could have been shorter, but they didn't they pussied out and surrendered and the Japanese conquered way more than they should have, Japan never had the resources to win, unlike Germany who had a very slim chance of winning

Japan ran a train through Britain at Singapore and there was a way around it but they pussied out, and that was against gooks

Britain is barely the master race, and if they want to claim that they have to share it with Germans Scandinavians Americans Australians etc

Japan Would Have Conquered Australia Without U.S. Involvement in WWII

Without the United States' involvement, Japan would have had the strategic advantage to invade and conquer Australia, despite its resource limitations. The collapse of British power in the Pacific, combined with logistical challenges for the Allies, would have given Japan the upper hand.

British Weakness in the Pacific: After the fall of Singapore, Britain had neither the manpower nor resources to mount an effective defense of Australia. The bulk of British forces were committed to the European theater, leaving Australia with inadequate defenses against Japan’s advances. Without the U.S. Pacific fleet and reinforcements, Australia was exposed.

Japanese Strategic Momentum: Japan had already shown its ability to outmaneuver and overwhelm Allied forces. The British military's defeat at Singapore demonstrated their inability to adapt to Japan's tactics, and there was no indication that they could have stopped Japan from advancing further south.

Australian Vulnerability: Australia, with its vast coastline and sparse population, lacked the military capacity to repel a full-scale Japanese invasion. Japan’s plan to isolate Australia by cutting off supply routes and ports would have succeeded without the U.S. Navy's ability to secure sea lanes and provide reinforcements.

No Alternative Allied Support: Britain and other Commonwealth nations were too stretched across multiple fronts to send significant aid to Australia. Indian forces were preoccupied with their own defense, and no other major power could have intervened effectively in the Pacific without American involvement.


In summary, without the U.S., Japan would have dominated the Pacific, including Australia. The British military lacked the capability to stop Japan, and Australian forces were not equipped to handle a large-scale invasion on their own. U.S. intervention was essential to shifting the balance of power in the Pacific and preventing Australia from falling into Jap
anese hands.



---

1. Anglo-Saxons and Germans Are Culturally Distinct Today

While the Anglo-Saxons originally descended from Germanic tribes that migrated to England (such as the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes), modern Anglo and German identities are vastly different. The two nations have evolved independently for more than a millennium, developing separate languages, political systems, customs, and ideologies.

Language Difference: English is a Germanic language, but it has been heavily influenced by Latin and French over centuries, diverging significantly from modern German. German speakers do not naturally understand English, and cultural communication between the two is not seamless.

Historical Rivalries: Britain and Germany have fought each other in major conflicts like the Napoleonic Wars, World War I, and World War II. These wars solidified deep political, military, and social divisions between the two nations.

Political Ideologies: Modern Germany emphasizes federalism, neutrality, and EU integration, while Britain has maintained a more sovereign and independent stance, demonstrated by Brexit. Culturally, Britain leans toward Anglo traditions such as constitutional monarchy, whereas Germany abolished its monarchy long ago and became a federal republic.


While the Anglo-Saxon migration brought Germanic elements to Britain, these influences have since merged into an entirely new Anglo-British identity that is far removed from German culture today.


---

2. Anglos Are British, Not German

Even though some early Germanic tribes contributed to Britain’s foundation, Anglos are now fully British and not German in any meaningful sense. This distinction is reflected in the cultural, historical, and political developments unique to Britain.

Distinct National Identity: The English, Scots, Welsh, and Irish form the core of British identity, shaped over centuries through wars, alliances, and a shared monarchy. Germany has never been part of this cultural matrix.

Historical Divergence: After the Norman Conquest (1066), Britain integrated more French and Latin elements, evolving beyond its Anglo-Saxon roots. German influence in Britain faded after this period, and modern British identity is much closer to the traditions of the British Isles than to anything Germanic.

Genetic and Cultural Differences: Modern British populations, especially in England, Wales, and Scotland, show genetic diversity from multiple influences—Celtic, Roman, Viking, and Norman. This genetic complexity is distinct from Germans, whose ancestry reflects more centralized Germanic roots.


While the Anglo-Saxon period laid some groundwork, today's British identity has no real connection to modern German identity beyond ancient history. The British Empire, constitutional monarchy, and parliamentary democracy are all distinctly British developments, not German.


---

3. The USA Is an Anglo-Derived Nation

Although the U.S. is a multicultural country today, Anglo influence dominates its historical, cultural, and political foundations. America was primarily founded by English colonists, and their values shaped the core principles of the nation.

Legal and Government Traditions: The American legal system, including common law and the concept of individual rights, is rooted in English law. The U.S. Constitution draws heavily from the political ideas of English Enlightenment thinkers, such as John Locke.

Language: English is the primary language in the U.S., and American culture still reflects many Anglo customs—from holidays like Thanksgiving (originally celebrated by English Puritans) to government practices.

Colonial Roots: The original 13 colonies were all established by English settlers, and their political institutions mirrored those of Britain, including local assemblies and elected representatives.




While the U.S. is now multicultural, Anglo-American traditions continue to influence everything from its language to its political values and institutions. The foundational identity of the U.S. is unmistakably rooted in Anglo culture



---

5. Anglo Identity and the "Master Race" Concept

While you noted that Britain might claim superiority, the concept of a "master race" is outdated and discredited. Modern British identity is more about shared cultural heritage and contributions across fields like science, literature, and politics.

If Britain were to claim cultural influence, it would not be an isolated achievement but rather a legacy shared with other English-speaking nations such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These nations all trace their roots to Anglo culture but have developed their own distinct identities, tho all are British settlers or have British heritage

In contrast, Germany's association with the "master race" ideology during the Nazi era caused a fundamental break from any shared Anglo-Germanic identity. Modern Britain and Germany are culturally, politically, and ideologically distinct.


---

Conclusion

In summary, modern Anglos are fully British, not German, with a cultural identity distinct from that of Germany. The USA remains deeply influenced by Anglo traditions, despite its multicultural evolution. While Japan's military successes in World War II exposed British weaknesses, American intervention accelerated the war’s conclusion. The idea of a "master race" is outdated, and Britain's cultural legacy is shared across English-speaking nations, not with Germany.

This analysis shows that Anglos and Germans have evolved into entirely separate identities with little in common today
, and the USA’s identity remains fundamentally rooted in Anglo-American traditions.
@byvw

 

[Part-Time Chad]

I would include the Dutch as well.

 

[byvw]

I promise that I know more about World War 2 than you.

https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/wwii-germany-vs-united-kingdom-the-misunderstood-balance-of-power.973246/

Here’s a good thread to read for anyone that actually thinks Britain was more powerful than Germany in World War 2.

The greatest achievements of the Americans (not the Anglo-Saxons) in the war was the nuclear bomb. It was invented primarily by a bunch of Jews and Italians… many of them having left Europe to escape fascism. After that, the space race was the symbol of American dominance. Thank the Germans. Obvious Anglos contributed significantly to America’s success, but it was a group project. America wouldn’t have even been independent without the French and France heavily influenced the founding fathers.

It is also ironic to use a ridiculous forum discussion as a source. I would write here in detail why the UK was stronger than Germany in wartime, but I would waste too much time and energy for a looksmaxxing forum. You can go on thinking your own wrong ideas as right.

Moreover, you are an ignoramus who thinks that the greatest war achievement of the Americans is the atomic bomb. LMAO. Jewish scientists were not the reason for the development of the atomic bomb. The fact that a Jew headed the project team is not the direct cause. If the Americans made 100 scientific breakthroughs during the second world war, 96-97 of them were made thanks to the British. It is tragicomic that you only bring up the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb is of no importance. The war would have been won without it.

If you read 19th century American engineering and innovation history, what I said will be more understandable.

Winning the space race also had nothing to do with the Germans. As I said, since the US was founded, the overwhelming majority of the total scientific progress in this country has been made by people of British origin.

America is not a group project. It is an Anglo-Saxon country that gained its independence from the Crown. Yes, it is true that the French sent help in gaining their independence, but that has nothing to do with their superpower status or development. Moreover, the French population in the country is very small.

 

[byvw]

I promise that I know more about World War 2 than you.

https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/wwii-germany-vs-united-kingdom-the-misunderstood-balance-of-power.973246/

Here’s a good thread to read for anyone that actually thinks Britain was more powerful than Germany in World War 2.

The greatest achievements of the Americans (not the Anglo-Saxons) in the war was the nuclear bomb. It was invented primarily by a bunch of Jews and Italians… many of them having left Europe to escape fascism. After that, the space race was the symbol of American dominance. Thank the Germans. Obvious Anglos contributed significantly to America’s success, but it was a group project. America wouldn’t have even been independent without the French and France heavily influenced the founding fathers.

Category:American inventions - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The British on the mainland alone, let alone the British in America, have contributed more to the development of the world than the Germans.

It is United States that has contributed most to the development of the postmodern world, and the British in this country have done so. Next comes the United Kingdom.

 

[JohnBaza]

yeah was caging at this whole post, op is in a looks related forum and decides to use which languages certain countries speak as his reasoning for why english people are superior lmao.

op is delusional af. also just retarded to claim superiority over germans specifically considering most germans and "anglos" have extremely common ancestry

View attachment 3245279

Yeah anglos are saxons

 

[Gengar]

Blud sent me an essay for this shit ahahah

@TechnoBoss @Gengar MODS come see this shiii

I despise the UK I’m HTM/Tyronelite yet incel due to the women wanting NT drug dealers. British women are satans children they are 100% from his left nutt. Your women ugly asf deano and they need to be lined up and shot.

I literally have to date foreign women thanks to this shithole I unfortunately was spawned in. I’d literally not be an incel in any other country on earth in the BIGGEST LOCATIONCEL ON THIS SITE AND ITS COS IM IN THE UK. I go abroad and foids are receptive to me and give me LOVE but in UK its “Tee hee you’ll die alone” fuck BRITISH WOMEN AND FUCK THE UK I HATE THIS ISLAND IMA GO CRY NOW I HATE IT SO MUCH

That bhenchod has literally everyone on ignore. jfl.

 

[JohnnyRamone]

It is also ironic to use a ridiculous forum discussion as a source. I would write here in detail why the UK was stronger than Germany in wartime, but I would waste too much time and energy for a looksmaxxing forum. You can go on thinking your own wrong ideas as right.

Moreover, you are an ignoramus who thinks that the greatest war achievement of the Americans is the atomic bomb. LMAO. Jewish scientists were not the reason for the development of the atomic bomb. The fact that a Jew headed the project team is not the direct cause. If the Americans made 100 scientific breakthroughs during the second world war, 96-97 of them were made thanks to the British. It is tragicomic that you only bring up the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb is of no importance. The war would have been won without it.

If you read 19th century American engineering and innovation history, what I said will be more understandable.

Winning the space race also had nothing to do with the Germans. As I said, since the US was founded, the overwhelming majority of the total scientific progress in this country has been made by people of British origin.

America is not a group project. It is an Anglo-Saxon country that gained its independence from the Crown. Yes, it is true that the French sent help in gaining their independence, but that has nothing to do with their superpower status or development. Moreover, the French population in the country is very small.

Respectfully, you don’t know what you’re talking about. I posted the forum, because it would take too long to explain it to you. They have references. It’s not just random making statements. To put things in perspective, this is how the major economies compared during World War 2. Note where Germany and the USSR is relative to the UK.

It wasn’t just headed by a Jew. Oppenheimer, Fermi, Segre, Szilard, Frisch, Bohr, Franck, Fuchs, Bloch, Bethe, von Neumann etc.

Their superpower status is attributable to the fact that they had no land borders with major powers, unlike France and Germany. France didn’t just help either. They were the primary reason for America’s independence.

 

[JohnnyRamone]

Category:American inventions - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The British on the mainland alone, let alone the British in America, have contributed more to the development of the world than the Germans.

It is United States that has contributed most to the development of the postmodern world, and the British in this country have done so. Next comes the United Kingdom.

I picked an invention at random. It wa invented by three guys. One British and two Germans.

 

[crushing sluts@100%]

Japan Would Have Conquered Australia Without U.S. Involvement in WWII

Australia was too big, they probably could have succssefully pressured Australia cut its trade bend its will but not invade, remember that most of the Japanese troops were away in garrison of the rest of their conquered territories and their weren't enough troops to spare for an invasion of that size plus people forget how heavily involved china was in fighting japan, they literally did more heavy lifting in that war than the us even though the us was better quality than china

Without the United States' involvement, Japan would have had the strategic advantage to invade and conquer Australia, despite its resource limitations. The collapse of British power in the Pacific, combined with logistical challenges for the Allies, would have given Japan the upper hand.

British power didn't need to collapse in the pacific it wasn't necessarily inevitable, even though it did.
If Australia wanted it could have stayed neutral if the us wasn't going to get involved, remember it was Australia who declared war on Japan not the other way around

Japan would have liked a neutral Australia, as it would be less of a thorn in their side

Although Australia's military was very small Australia could be used as a staging location for the Americans and British, so it was nothing but a resource drain for japan

British Weakness in the Pacific: After the fall of Singapore, Britain had neither the manpower nor resources to mount an effective defense of Australia. The bulk of British forces were committed to the European theater, leaving Australia with inadequate defenses against Japan’s advances. Without the U.S. Pacific fleet and reinforcements, Australia was exposed.

Obviously the us played a giant part in the war but to say it saved Australia is misleading you could say China saved Australia cause they diverted resources away from Australia inadvertently could say the dutch saved Australia even though they lost cause they still killed some japs, so if those japs were alive there would be more that could threaten Australia.
The list goes on

And Singapore didn't need to fall the fall was not inevitable, it was winnable by the british

Japanese Strategic Momentum: Japan had already shown its ability to outmaneuver and overwhelm Allied forces. The British military's defeat at Singapore demonstrated their inability to adapt to Japan's tactics, and there was no indication that they could have stopped Japan from advancing further south.

They could have stopped Japan north of Singapore in jungles and rural areas of Malaysia
In fact the Australians actually briefly halted and stopped them during the Singapore battle jfl

Also simply by not surrendering at Singapore could have been disastrous for japan
Japan had run out of artillery and very close to running out of ammunition, if britain didn't surrender the Japanese would not have been able to sustain an offensive or even a seige
Britain didn't know that though they thought japan was going still going strong with alot in the tank

Weather japan could of had a second attempt at Singapore is unlikely but possible as Singapore would boost them further south

Australian Vulnerability: Australia, with its vast coastline and sparse population, lacked the military capacity to repel a full-scale Japanese invasion. Japan’s plan to isolate Australia by cutting off supply routes and ports would have succeeded without the U.S. Navy's ability to secure sea lanes and provide reinforcements.

All the navy cutting of and ruining Australia's trade would have succeeded but not a full scale invasion
It was discussed by the Japanese that invading Australia according to their Intel would require more than 10 divisions, which japan didn't have

Well I mean they had over 10 divisions but they were busy garrison conquered territories and fighting china and fighting guerrilla war in there conquered territories

So they didn't have the free troops to spare so to speak

No Alternative Allied Support: Britain and other Commonwealth nations were too stretched across multiple fronts to send significant aid to Australia. Indian forces were preoccupied with their own defense, and no other major power could have intervened effectively in the Pacific without American involvement.

That's right though I would say that japan would have conquered what it did and stayed with the territory it had for possibly years but eventually their war with china would have grinded them down and the Japanese empire may not have aged like fine wine

In summary, without the U.S., Japan would have dominated the Pacific, including Australia. The British military lacked the capability to stop Japan, and Australian forces were not equipped to handle a large-scale invasion on their own. U.S. intervention was essential to shifting the balance of power in the Pacific and preventing Australia from falling into Jap
anese hands.

Well Australian and British are anglos too

---

1. Anglo-Saxons and Germans Are Culturally Distinct Today

While the Anglo-Saxons originally descended from Germanic tribes that migrated to England (such as the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes), modern Anglo and German identities are vastly different. The two nations have evolved independently for more than a millennium, developing separate languages, political systems, customs, and ideologies.

Yea but if your claiming a eugenics genetiscsim superiority you have to look at lineage, and lineage is hugely important and you can't say it doesn't matter no matter how long ago it happened

On the other hand if your just saying one country is better than the other than you can ignore all that genes lineage stuff in favour of culture

Language Difference: English is a Germanic language, but it has been heavily influenced by Latin and French over centuries, diverging significantly from modern German. German speakers do not naturally understand English, and cultural communication between the two is not seamless.

Yea so other races had their influence

Historical Rivalries: Britain and Germany have fought each other in major conflicts like the Napoleonic Wars, World War I, and World War II. These wars solidified deep political, military, and social divisions between the two nations.

What Germany has mostly been allies with Britian, only in ww1 and ww2 were they enemies
They were allies with Britain during the Napoleonic wars look at the prussians and the handover massive allies of Britain

Both Americans and British hired troops from Hanover as mercenaries as they were good quality

Political Ideologies: Modern Germany emphasizes federalism, neutrality, and EU integration, while Britain has maintained a more sovereign and independent stance, demonstrated by Brexit. Culturally, Britain leans toward Anglo traditions such as constitutional monarchy, whereas Germany abolished its monarchy long ago and became a federal republic.

Well yea modern Germany is a cuck

But that's only cause they lost ww2 not in a bad way though as they were very successful in fighting most of the world
And when they lost they got turned into an economic social cuck state by the US

But old Germany was Caddy

Germany would of kept its monarchy but was forced to get rid of it at treaty of Versailles and replace it with a cuck Government, however the germans proved that the new cuck Government of the 1920s just did not suit Germany at all both culturally and traditionally which was why they were so fast to replace it with a chaddier dictatorship in the form of Hitler's nationalist socialist party

In summary Germany proved that it did not suit a cuck government and forcing Germany to get rid of their monarchy went against the fibre of Germany's being
Germany is just as much liked its monarchy

Modern Germany though is continually made cucked through American influence, whom are the actual cucks

While the Anglo-Saxon migration brought Germanic elements to Britain, these influences have since merged into an entirely new Anglo-British identity that is far removed from German culture today.


---

2. Anglos Are British, Not German

Even though some early Germanic tribes contributed to Britain’s foundation, Anglos are now fully British and not German in any meaningful sense. This distinction is reflected in the cultural, historical, and political developments unique to Britain.

Distinct National Identity: The English, Scots, Welsh, and Irish form the core of British identity, shaped over centuries through wars, alliances, and a shared monarchy. Germany has never been part of this cultural matrix.

Historical Divergence: After the Norman Conquest (1066), Britain integrated more French and Latin elements, evolving beyond its Anglo-Saxon roots. German influence in Britain faded after this period, and modern British identity is much closer to the traditions of the British Isles than to anything Germanic.

Genetic and Cultural Differences: Modern British populations, especially in England, Wales, and Scotland, show genetic diversity from multiple influences—Celtic, Roman, Viking, and Norman. This genetic complexity is distinct from Germans, whose ancestry reflects more centralized Germanic roots.


While the Anglo-Saxon period laid some groundwork, today's British identity has no real connection to modern German identity beyond ancient history. The British Empire, constitutional monarchy, and parliamentary democracy are all distinctly British developments, not German.

Is it eugenics or culture cause you can't claim superiority in both

---

3. The USA Is an Anglo-Derived Nation

Although the U.S. is a multicultural country today, Anglo influence dominates its historical, cultural, and political foundations. America was primarily founded by English colonists, and their values shaped the core principles of the nation.

Legal and Government Traditions: The American legal system, including common law and the concept of individual rights, is rooted in English law. The U.S. Constitution draws heavily from the political ideas of English Enlightenment thinkers, such as John Locke.

Language: English is the primary language in the U.S., and American culture still reflects many Anglo customs—from holidays like Thanksgiving (originally celebrated by English Puritans) to government practices.

Colonial Roots: The original 13 colonies were all established by English settlers, and their political institutions mirrored those of Britain, including local assemblies and elected representatives.




While the U.S. is now multicultural, Anglo-American traditions continue to influence everything from its language to its political values and institutions. The foundational identity of the U.S. is unmistakably rooted in Anglo culture



---

5. Anglo Identity and the "Master Race" Concept

While you noted that Britain might claim superiority, the concept of a "master race" is outdated and discredited. Modern British identity is more about shared cultural heritage and contributions across fields like science, literature, and politics.

If Britain were to claim cultural influence, it would not be an isolated achievement but rather a legacy shared with other English-speaking nations such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These nations all trace their roots to Anglo culture but have developed their own distinct identities, tho all are British settlers or have British heritage

I agree with that I thought you were claiming eugenics

Yea I agree with the shared achievement across Anglo nations
Similar to how the ancient greeks influenced the romans the romans then spread that culture through its conquests

Similarly British culture in America cause it was once a colony, the us now spreads that culture and its achievements globally along with new Zealand Australia canada etc

but remember the british could colonise these areas thanks to their good geography

In contrast, Germany's association with the "master race" ideology during the Nazi era caused a fundamental break from any shared Anglo-Germanic identity. Modern Britain and Germany are culturally, politically, and ideologically distinct.


---

Conclusion

In summary, modern Anglos are fully British, not German, with a cultural identity distinct from that of Germany. The USA remains deeply influenced by Anglo traditions, despite its multicultural evolution. While Japan's military successes in World War II exposed British weaknesses, American intervention accelerated the war’s conclusion. The idea of a "master race" is outdated, and Britain's cultural legacy is shared across English-speaking nations, not with Germany.

This analysis shows that Anglos and Germans have evolved into entirely separate identities with little in common today
, and the USA’s identity remains fundamentally rooted in Anglo-American traditions.
@byvw

I thought you were claiming a genetic superiority

I think Britain had only a geographic superiority which led to superiority in other areas such as military colonialism and other achievements
But it's only cause geographic superiority

 

[byvw]

I picked an invention at random. It wa invented by three guys. One British and two Germans.

Then don't just pick one check them all nigger.

 

[byvw]

Respectfully, you don’t know what you’re talking about. I posted the forum, because it would take too long to explain it to you. They have references. It’s not just random making statements. To put things in perspective, this is how the major economies compared during World War 2. Note where Germany and the USSR is relative to the UK.

Again, you prove to me that you are ignorant of the history of Europe and America during the Second World War and the interwar period. Again, as I said, if there were to be a ranking of scientific advances, innovations, logistical competence, military strength, abundance of resources, both before and during the war, it would be as follows:

US>UK>Germany>USSR

It wasn’t just headed by a Jew. Oppenheimer, Fermi, Segre, Szilard, Frisch, Bohr, Franck, Fuchs, Bloch, Bethe, von Neumann etc.

The atomic bomb was an advance that was of little importance in the course of the war. Most of the scientific production and innovation in US was done by people of British origin. Both before, during and after the war.

Read the history of American scientific production and innovation and pay attention to the names of scientists and inventors and their ethnic origins.

France didn’t just help either. They were the primary reason for America’s independence.

What a comedy there! Read history I'm not your teacher.

I'm no more answering this thread. I am tired of you coping with reality.

 

[JohnnyRamone]

Again, you prove to me that you are ignorant of the history of Europe and America during the Second World War and the interwar period. Again, as I said, if there were to be a ranking of scientific advances, innovations, logistical competence, military strength, abundance of resources, both before and during the war, it would be as follows:

US>UK>Germany>USSR

The atomic bomb was an advance that was of little importance in the course of the war. Most of the scientific production and innovation in US was done by people of British origin. Both before, during and after the war.

Read the history of American scientific production and innovation and pay attention to the names of scientists and inventors and their ethnic origins.

What a comedy there! Read history I'm not your teacher.

I'm no more answering this thread. I am tired of you coping with reality.

Utter delusion. Churchill himself admitted that Britain was relatively weak compared to the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Germany almost produced as much naval tonnage as the Brits while focusing on their army. You don’t know what you’re talking about. I never said the atomic boom ended the war. I said it was America’s greatest technical achievement. The nuclear reactor ushered in the atomic age and changed the world forever. This goes back to Fermi, Szilard and Oppenheimer. Read a book.

 

[byvw]

I said it was America’s greatest technical achievement

LMAO. Dude really thinks this was the greatest achievement.

I bet you never heard about proximity fuze.

JFL.

 

[JohnnyRamone]

LMAO. Dude really thinks this was the greatest achievement.

I bet you never heard about proximity fuze.

JFL.

Of course I have. Did that usher in a proximity fuse age?

Atomic Age - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Putin]

UK was stronger than Germany during WW2. Your knowledge of history is lacking.

The United States is an Anglo-Saxon country, founded by British libertarians and inventors, with English as its language, with common law, and most similar to other Anglo-Saxon countries. The fact that it also includes Germans or Italians does not change this fact. The majority of whites are of British origin and dominantly British.

And it is the British, not Jews, Germans or other European immigrants, who are the basis of its success. The overwhelming majority of scientists, inventors, etc. are British descent. Its universities and research institutions are based on their British counterparts.

The development of North America is directly related to its British origins. Historically, there are sharp distinctions between British colonialism and continental European colonialism. The contribution of continental Europe to this development is negligible.

I am not British or of British origin, and the success of the United States is not due to Britain but to those of British origin.

The reason why Britain was once a superpower and why the US, another Anglo-Saxon country, is now a superpower is essentially the same. Libertarianism, capitalism, individualism. Anglo-saxon mind.

The English nation has made and enlightened the world beyond anyone's dreams. In particular, having taken the Latin alphabet from the Roman empire, they created some semblance of culture, the technical and industrial revolution first came to Great Britain, capitalism was introduced — the best economic model available, the exploitation of man by man, the science of Eugenics was born, which led to fascism and many other ideologies, there was a huge empire — the British Empire, which was declining like the Roman Empire, and many other inventions that made life easier for humanity, such as the steam locomotive (created by the Cherepanov brothers in Russia), the incandescent lamp (invented by the Russian engineer Lodygin), the airplane (Zhukovsky's theory of aeronautics), the computer (before the PC era in the USSR there were many computers), the Internet (the obvious development of the telegraph connections) and the like.



This is despite the fact that there are only 100 million of them. For example, the same Russians about 150 million, or the Germans together with the French 120 lam. But unlike the British, these nations have achieved more success than the Anglo-Saxons. For example, the Russians defeated Hitler in World War II, put the first man into space, built the largest power grid, and large uranium enrichment facilities that the Anglo-Saxons do not have. Which seems to confirm the theory that there are always fewer smart people and they reproduce very little, unlike representatives of a weakened intellectual force.

 

[PsychoH]

Nordic mogs all.

 

[Putin]

Of course I have. Did that usher in a proximity fuse age?

Atomic Age - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I've been arguing with this jerk for days, he won't let up, he'll deny the facts, even the most obvious facts that contradict his idiotic ideology (the superiority of the British). It is obvious to everyone that the Russians defeated Germany, and poor countries like Britain and the United States did not even participate in the war (they entered the war when Germany was already defeated by Russia)

 

[JohnnyRamone]

I've been arguing with this jerk for days, he won't let up, he'll deny the facts, even the most obvious facts that contradict his idiotic ideology (the superiority of the British). It is obvious to everyone that the Russians defeated Germany, and poor countries like Britain and the United States did not even participate in the war (they entered the war when Germany was already defeated by Russia)

To be fair, they did participate in the war and contributed heavily in the air and at sea, but World War 2 was primarily a land war and Russia did by far the most to win it.

 

[Putin]

To be fair, they did participate in the war and contributed heavily in the air and at sea, but World War 2 was primarily a land war and Russia did by far the most to win it.

The US and Britain opened the western front when Russia was almost victorious. Moreover, Germany sent its weakest troops to the western front. The war of Germany against the United States in Africa is generally a laugh, the same weakest German troops forced the US troops to flee from there.
Moreover, Germany completely bombed London, that this guy is generally in the head, like the British army, if their capital was turned to dust.

This nigga is not even Anglo-saxon, just imagine this shit, he is a cuck. How can anyone possibly like these people? Almost everything they invented was actually stolen from someone (from other European nations), or invented by Jews who simply lived in Britain/USA.

The British colonized half the world at one time, spreading and introducing everywhere the following: their simplified truncated and limited language convenient for trade, a poor culture that they gathered from all over the world, people and civilization in general in general, destroying along the way all sorts of savages by fascist methods, through genocide, who stood in the way. Due to its rudimentary nature (only Esperanto is easier), their language is the most popular, and their technologies are the most consumer-friendly and do not require brain strain

 

[Razeb]

lol bullshit. Germans at least tried. Meanwhile British girls get either groomed or grinded into kebab meat jfl

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

America is more British than German. Stop your fucking cope.

These young niggas don't know history