
PrinceLuenLeoncur
Crusader ghazi jihadi mujahideen, YESHUA ACKBAR
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2021
- Posts
- 45,574
- Reputation
- 60,090
Yeah ima use AI to fuck you cos your annoying and low IQ all you keep doing is reinstating your position.Why would you say arguing with me isn't stimulating and then go on to say the exact same things you have already said you absolute spaz. Are you even capable of discussing this without copy and paste, holy shit this is embarrassing. You don't even know the difference between VALID AND SOUND which is like logic 101, you just keep walking in circles within your internal model. You're basically saying "rocks or ice cream don't account for logic or metaphysics therefore my account is true because it proposes a solution internally". Do you not understand that when you do this you're defining things into reality? It's like you're looking at all those things you think God would account for FIRST and then you define God in a way that fits them. This isn't how examination of reality works at all, how do you not understand this us monumentally dumb and fallacious.
I’m not doing anything you said it’s a simple if A exist therefore Y. If logic, metaphysics and ethnics exist then God exists as he’s the precondition for these concepts and things to exist in the first place for they come from HIM.
As an atheist you have NO ACCOUNT for this you can’t say what it is or where it came from all you can say is “

Essentially your saying the house just exists and I can’t say why the house exists or how it exists but that it exists, I’m saying if the house exists then it must had somebody who laid down the foundations to build the house in the first place and your response is “WE CANT KNOW THAT
You don’t even know the 3 laws of logic… you violate the 3rd rule every time and don’t get me started on the 4th rule which was added later on known as the law of principle sufficient reason which states “Everything that is is for a reason, or for all real things, there is a cause”
Your argumentation is in violation of 2 of these rules