Why do mods of this forum feel the urge to delete my threads making moral justifications of pedophila (or hebophilia), but never flat earth threads?

[Aladin]

By the mods logic, all that is “obvious bullshit”. So why differentiate what is 2+2=5.

Unless some people in this world think 2+2=5.

 

[Chowdog]

By the mods logic, all that is “obvious bullshit. So why differentiate what is 2+2=5.

Unless some people in this world think 2+2=5.

this op

 

[Aladin]

Everyone dodged the question. Such pussies. If you were truly blackpilled you would answer it.

 

[Deleted member 41390]

By the mods logic, all that is “obvious bullshit”. So why differentiate what is 2+2=5.

Unless some people in this world think 2+2=5.

Flat earth isn’t encouraging people to harm children.

 

[Lulleko]

That's the case all over the internet, the simple answer is that allowing such discussions to take place would invite questionable individuals and get the site on a watchlist (if not already).

 

[Deleted member 61895]

By the mods logic, all that is “obvious bullshit”. So why differentiate what is 2+2=5.

Unless some people in this world think 2+2=5.

 

[Deleted member 61895]

Everyone dodged the question. Such pussies. If you were truly blackpilled you would answer it.

At the soonest I would allow age of consent would be 14 but it would only be normal if only 14-18 can be with them.
Anyone above 19 with a 14 year old is a concern.
Back three hundred years ago? Fine whatever, people were healthy and were more mature at a younger age.
Now?? No, its disgusting. I wouldn't even want to be with someone 40 or below because they act like childern.

age gaps are only normal if its a logical gap.
The last thing I want is a man in his 20 s with a teen.

 

[Aladin]

That's the case all over the internet, the simple answer is that allowing such discussions to take place would invite questionable individuals and get the site on a watchlist (if not already).

That’s not why.

 

[Lulleko]

That’s not why.

elaborate on your reasoning.