softlysoftly
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2020
- Posts
- 3,121
- Reputation
- 4,280
- OP
- #101
Post peer reivewed evidence to refute my claims or shut the fuck upKeep coping with ur seed oil zogslop
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Post peer reivewed evidence to refute my claims or shut the fuck upKeep coping with ur seed oil zogslop
Post peer reivewed evidence to refute my claims or shut the fuck up
you: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.841282/fullPost peer reivewed evidence to refute my claims or shut the fuck up
interesting thread, ill come at this with neutral, open mind for purpose of further learning. ill agree on this tho, 3 pages of ppl just arguing from emotion, barely any studies given from themOne big problem is this attempt to connect PUFAs to heart disease, the actual outcome evidence does not support it; in fact, it like strongly supports the opposite.
Replacement of SFAs with PUFAs has a consistent protective effect on CVD.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30019767/
A systematic review of the effect of dietary saturated and polyunsaturated fat on heart disease - PubMed
Reducing saturated fat and replacing it with carbohydrate will not lower CHD events or CVD mortality although it will reduce total mortality. Replacing saturated fat with PUFA, MUFA or high-quality carbohydrate will lower CHD events.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is likely due to a few different mechanisms, the first being that SFAs reliably increase blood LDL cholesterol levels and by default Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) which is thought to be a major factor contributing to atherosclerosis and CVD (more discussion on this later). Replacement of SFAs with PUFAs (particularly omega-3 PUFAs) has been shown to have a protective effect on CVD, likely by lowering LDL, ApoB, reducing inflammation, and various other proposed mechanisms.
This even holds true in a meta-analysis of CVD risk and linoleic acid intake.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32020162/
Dietary linoleic acid and risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies - PubMed
In prospective observational studies, dietary LA intake is inversely associated with CHD risk in a dose-response manner. These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Omega 3 PUFAs do appear to reduce risk in RCTs.
The effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - PubMed
Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - PubMed
Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govN-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - PubMed
This meta-analysis suggests that dietary and non-dietary intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces overall mortality, mortality due to myocardial infarction, and sudden death in patients with coronary heart disease.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
While randomized controlled trials are the gold standard in research, we cannot neglect their limitations, especially when it comes to subject number and time duration. Compare this with the cohort studies on the effects of replacing SFA with PUFA that demonstrate quite a powerful protective effect of replacing SFA with PUFA that appears to be dose dependent.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451787/
Further, even when specifically looking at omega 6 PUFAs there is a protective effect when replacing SFA with them.
In this cohort study, those with higher blood levels of omega 6 PUFAs had a 50% lower risk of a CVD incident during a 35 year follow up.Association between Plasma N-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Levels and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-based Cohort Study - Scientific Reports
Most studies support that saturated fatty acid replacement with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and put emphasis on the effects of N-3 PUFAs. The reported relationships between N-6 PUFAs and CVD risks vary. We aimed to examine the...www.nature.com
TLDR: All of this to bring it back to the topic that saturated fat supposedly is good for you while PUFAs are bad. There is no hard evidence to back this up. People attempt to draw a mechanistic link between PUFA oxidation and CVD while ignoring the fact that saturated fat has a much STRONGER mechanistic link to CVD, which is backed up by actual outcome data in humans. Meanwhile, we not only have mechanistic data showing saturated fat can damage the arterial wall, but we also have outcome data and MR data across multiple lines of evidence showing saturated fat and LDL are most likely causal for CVD. There is no evidence that I am aware of demonstrating that PUFAs are casual for CVD, and if anything, they likely have a protective effect.
@ChristianChad @RabidRosaries @Moggable @russiancel
Nonsensical drivel, half-assed "studies".One big problem is this attempt to connect PUFAs to heart disease, the actual outcome evidence does not support it; in fact, it like strongly supports the opposite.
Replacement of SFAs with PUFAs has a consistent protective effect on CVD.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30019767/
A systematic review of the effect of dietary saturated and polyunsaturated fat on heart disease - PubMed
Reducing saturated fat and replacing it with carbohydrate will not lower CHD events or CVD mortality although it will reduce total mortality. Replacing saturated fat with PUFA, MUFA or high-quality carbohydrate will lower CHD events.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is likely due to a few different mechanisms, the first being that SFAs reliably increase blood LDL cholesterol levels and by default Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) which is thought to be a major factor contributing to atherosclerosis and CVD (more discussion on this later). Replacement of SFAs with PUFAs (particularly omega-3 PUFAs) has been shown to have a protective effect on CVD, likely by lowering LDL, ApoB, reducing inflammation, and various other proposed mechanisms.
This even holds true in a meta-analysis of CVD risk and linoleic acid intake.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32020162/
Dietary linoleic acid and risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies - PubMed
In prospective observational studies, dietary LA intake is inversely associated with CHD risk in a dose-response manner. These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Omega 3 PUFAs do appear to reduce risk in RCTs.
The effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - PubMed
Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - PubMed
Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govN-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - PubMed
This meta-analysis suggests that dietary and non-dietary intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces overall mortality, mortality due to myocardial infarction, and sudden death in patients with coronary heart disease.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
While randomized controlled trials are the gold standard in research, we cannot neglect their limitations, especially when it comes to subject number and time duration. Compare this with the cohort studies on the effects of replacing SFA with PUFA that demonstrate quite a powerful protective effect of replacing SFA with PUFA that appears to be dose dependent.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451787/
Further, even when specifically looking at omega 6 PUFAs there is a protective effect when replacing SFA with them.
In this cohort study, those with higher blood levels of omega 6 PUFAs had a 50% lower risk of a CVD incident during a 35 year follow up.Association between Plasma N-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Levels and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-based Cohort Study - Scientific Reports
Most studies support that saturated fatty acid replacement with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and put emphasis on the effects of N-3 PUFAs. The reported relationships between N-6 PUFAs and CVD risks vary. We aimed to examine the...www.nature.com
TLDR: All of this to bring it back to the topic that saturated fat supposedly is good for you while PUFAs are bad. There is no hard evidence to back this up. People attempt to draw a mechanistic link between PUFA oxidation and CVD while ignoring the fact that saturated fat has a much STRONGER mechanistic link to CVD, which is backed up by actual outcome data in humans. Meanwhile, we not only have mechanistic data showing saturated fat can damage the arterial wall, but we also have outcome data and MR data across multiple lines of evidence showing saturated fat and LDL are most likely causal for CVD. There is no evidence that I am aware of demonstrating that PUFAs are casual for CVD, and if anything, they likely have a protective effect.
@ChristianChad @RabidRosaries @Moggable @russiancel
Yeah, like you said, the studies that @softlysoftly posted are flawed. Associations and meta-analyses can be useful, but drawing conclusions from such data will mislead you.interesting thread, ill come at this with neutral, open mind for purpose of further learning. ill agree on this tho, 3 pages of ppl just arguing from emotion, barely any studies given from them
so ill give some studies
Dietary fats and health: dietary recommendations in the context of scientific evidence - PubMed
Although early studies showed that saturated fat diets with very low levels of PUFAs increase serum cholesterol, whereas other studies showed high serum cholesterol increased the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), the evidence of dietary saturated fats increasing CAD or causing premature...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPUFA Dangers Part 1: storage, mobilization and oxidation » TESTONATION
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are fatty acids which have more than 1 double bond in their structure, whereas saturated fats have no double bonds (only single bonds). The more double bonds a fatty acid has, the more fluid it is, and the longer the saturated fatty acid chain is, the more...men-elite.comPUFA dangers Part 4: Influence on Cellular & Thyroid Function and Diabetes » TESTONATION
Polyunsaturated fat (PUFAs), when incorporated into cell membranes, make cells more fluid, which makes them chaotropic, disorderly and reduces their function (1). The increase in fluidity will allow more water, sodium, chloride, and calcium into the cell (edema), and lower intracellular...men-elite.comSearch results for query: pufa
raypeatforum.com
youve just given jew sponsored studies on pufas being good, n then saying saturated fats bad probs from other jew studies as well which have bad samples, dont consider other factors in consuming saturated fat that result negative health ramifications. bias fallacy to support ur dichotomous black white notion when much more complex irl
@BrahminBoss @7zyzz7 @Raydolf_Peatler @You thoughts? fuck idk how to tag so do like this
proof?pufa is a carcinogen, just like bpa, thats it
So if there was a peer reviewed study (which basically means that someone with power wrote something and uploaded it, the fact that you see them as absolute fact is fucking hilarious, you sheep really are the worst scum on this earth ) that told you that arsenic was good, you would consume arsenic ?Post peer reivewed evidence to refute my claims or shut the fuck up
How do mcdonalds fries and chips have saturated fats you absolute moron ? They fry the fries in canola or soybean oil. Where do the saturated fats come from ?no because highly processed and they are calorie dense with little to no micronutrient value
they just have tons of saturated fat and carbs and sodium, once in a while is fine as long as it fits your daily recommended calorie intake for you as an individual
but to eat it too much too frequently is when you get problems
ye, imo main thing for aging is reducing cortisol, inflammation, improving cellular processes as much possible. more advanced n hypothetical bit wishy washy but interesting concept as mind undoubtedly has very strong influence via placebo/nocebo, maybe inducing epigenetic changes from deep meditation/will like monkcels or crispr in future to stop telomer shortening etc.Yeah, like you said, the studies that @softlysoftly posted are flawed. Associations and meta-analyses can be useful, but drawing conclusions from such data will mislead you.
Taking an evolutionary perspective is more reliable IMO. A general trend is that the higher the percent PUFA content in animal species, the shorter the lifespan. In humans, a natural diet would have much less PUFAs because seed oils would not be consumed. People likely would eat minimal seeds through fruits but they would pass through indigested.
For mechanistic evidence, a high-PUFA tissue ages faster because they are susceptible to lipid peroxidation, which then further damages nearby structures.
Tissue PUFA content is perhaps largely genetic. The offspring of centenarians had less PUFA in their tissue. I don’t have the study and am too lazy to find it.
Also, PUFAs accumulate with aging. Generally anything that accumulates with aging is pro-aging.
PUFA content in tissues and PUFA dietary consumption are different, but the notion that lowering dietary PUFA intake is also supported (by mouse study):
Fight Aging By Replacing PUFAs With SFAs And MUFAs (Study Analysis)
High PUFA fat sources decrease lifespan compared to lard (high MUFA and high SFA) in mice on a calorie restricted diet “Life span was also increased (p < .05) in the CR lard mice compared to animals consuming either the CR fish or soybean oil diets. These results indicate that dietary lipid...looksmax.org
Another mechanistic piece of evidence against PUFAs is that prostaglandins are derived from PUFAs. Prostaglandins are inflammatory. Aspirin lowers prostaglandins and also increases median lifespan of murine models.
I will postulate that perhaps it is important that SFAs are balanced with MUFAs to prevent ferroptosis:
Jfl why the tag in this random thread thoanother theory @Umbra is that this realm is demonic, inevitable suffering. like in bible, god granted satan rule and dominion over this world. enlightenment is escaping reincarnation trap into nothingness/higher plane. what can u rlly even do in this life? its all meaningless. i keep on living, because im very curious what feeling of true sex, love, intimacy feels like with woman tho. after that ive attained it all n completed life. i dont need anything else, money, fame, rich etc is materialistic hedonic cope
sure, ill be more inactive coming times tho, unless my subforum mod application gets accepted jfl. what resources r good to further quest of enlightenment, what other important knowledge is there to consider?Jfl why the tag in this random thread tho
Regardless of how sex or anything good feels here, it will feel better in higher planes of existence. So good in fact we can’t even imagine with our limited imagination and senses.
This world regardless of looks/wealth is just a meaningless fake copy of something bigger
Dm me if u want to talk more in private
Its alr bro, I don’t rot on this forum myself so i’m not 24/7 onlinesure, ill be more inactive coming times tho, unless my subforum mod application gets accepted jfl. what resources r good to further quest of enlightenment, what other important knowledge is there to consider?
or is knowledge of soul trap sufficient enough already
I do something where I focus my intent on ageing slower, sometimes alongside meditative breathing. Whether or not it directly helps through some sophisticated complex mechanisms, focusing my intent will lead to results because it induces myself to go in that path.ye, imo main thing for aging is reducing cortisol, inflammation, improving cellular processes as much possible. more advanced n hypothetical bit wishy washy but interesting concept as mind undoubtedly has very strong influence via placebo/nocebo, maybe inducing epigenetic changes from deep meditation/will like monkcels or crispr in future to stop telomer shortening etc.
Ray peat diet is a good diet, but yeah not optimal for longevity based on the rate of living theory of aging. I’m also not too big of a fan of high galactose and fructose in an anti aging diet.do u know hans amato? his page n yt channel has alot of good articles info imo https://men-elite.com/ , he supports ray peat ideology, imo ray peat with some modifications could be among one of best diets. a common trope n dilemma with anti aging is compromise of energy, mood, physical capabilities etc alongside it, i may be wrong but i think current main consesus on anti aging rn is slowing metabolic processes thru heavy caloric restriction etc. preserving youth long possible is the key to look at than extending lifespan imo, like stopping aging after 25 somehow. how u can do all inflammatory etc shit at young n be fine unlike older age where that would have carcinogenic etc effect. @@enchanted_elixir has good knowledge on this i think, like genes that aid in early cancer detection and destruction before it goes uncontrolled, enhanced DNA repair, robust tumor-suppressing genes, or more efficient cell death pathways that eliminate damaged or potentially cancerous cells.
ye i agree on fructose, i have very little of that tbh. main carbs source is rice, potatoes, glucose syrup for meI do something where I focus my intent on ageing slower, sometimes alongside meditative breathing. Whether or not it directly helps through some sophisticated complex mechanisms, focusing my intent will lead to results because it induces myself to go in that path.
Sometimes, I also just picture myself as young and picture the damage that occurred during that day being fixed.
Ray peat diet is a good diet, but yeah not optimal for longevity based on the rate of living theory of aging. I’m also not too big of a fan of high galactose and fructose in an anti aging diet.
I don’t think caloric restriction is feasible. Yeah obviously don’t get fat but it’s too hard to restrict calories for any long period. Periodic fasting is good though, and caloric restriction mimetics are better than CR imo. Essential amino acid restriction is sort similar to caloric restriction for anti aging probably.
Another problem with caloric restriction is that you would have reduced micronutrient supply.
I eat a moderate amount of fructose from fruits, which isn’t ideal but i think fructose is probably not as bad as some people think. Fruits are good ideally low fructose though. Galactose is why I don’t drink milk. It’s also more reactive than glucose.ye i agree on fructose, i have very little of that tbh. main carbs source is rice, potatoes, glucose syrup for me
Man this guy is really based. Thx for introducing his website to me, I’ll read more.
Another potential thing they have in common is good mineral supply. I can send you the Dead Doctors Don’t Lie book On discord.tbh idrk, all this shit is too complex jfl, trying to micromanage all this just raises cortisol. you see centenarians of varying backgrounds, mediterrean, okinawa etc diets, common tenet however i think is their low cortisol, stress, inflammation.
sure, ye pm ur discord. esp ill probs use this site lot less soonI eat a moderate amount of fructose from fruits, which isn’t ideal but i think fructose is probably not as bad as some people think. Fruits are good ideally low fructose though. Galactose is why I don’t drink milk. It’s also more reactive than glucose.
Man this guy is really based. Thx for introducing his website to me, I’ll read more.
Another potential thing they have in common is good mineral supply. I can send you the Dead Doctors Don’t Lie book On discord.