Why Height Is Everything

Bruh... people are larping in my country average
No way 5'10 is average where I live, more like 5'7-5'8
I am 6'1-6' and based on sources I am "15% percentile", which is like only true in clubs where no manlets go
If I walk outside theres no way 15% of people height mog me
 
  • +1
Reactions: johncruz12345 and Deleted member 5393
So which height is over?
Which height make your life significantly worse, where is the border?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel, Deleted member 7866 and Good_Little_Goy
Bruh... people are larping in my country average
No way 5'10 is average where I live, more like 5'7-5'8
I am 6'1-6' and based on sources I am "15% percentile", which is like only true in clubs where no manlets go
If I walk outside theres no way 15% of people height mog me
Same. I rarely get height mogged, and I'm 6ft 3.
 
I wish that was the case
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
Guys I'm really sad for cousin. His parents are both sub 160 (5'3) and his mom has the biggest nose I've ever seen on a woman. I think this family tree might end in this generation. He's in 8th grade but sad all the time life is cruel
Does he have big nose also?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
Does he have big nose also?
he's young so it's too early to tell
he lives in a literal nowhere anatolian town with afghan refugees i wish him the best
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel
Probaly even more important for pulling club whores as they often use somekinda heals/boots or whatever
 
I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin.

WIth that out of the way, let's start.


WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING.

Table of Contents


1st, Height Impact in Dating
2nd, Height Impact in Life
3rd, What Women Think of Short Men


Let's begin.


Height, as anyone with half a brain knows, is everything.

All credits to incel.wiki :

Stulp et al (2013) used a sample of 5782 North American speed-daters making 128,104 choices to determine preferences for partner height and how height influenced the formation of a match. They found that women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves. As a consequence, matches were most likely at an intermediate height difference (19 cm) that differed significantly from the preferred height difference of both sexes.

Their data can be further analyzed to provide data about women's height cutoffs, the benefit of each inch of height for a man, and the degree of competition each man faces based on his height.

1) Cutoffs:

Their findings demonstrated the cutoffs at which women consider a man too short or too tall:

90% of women will reject a man who is 5'4" based solely on his height.
65% of women will reject a man who is 5'7" based solely on his height.
50% of women will reject a man who is 5'8" based solely on his height.
14% of women will reject a man who is 5'10" based solely on his height.
1.5% of women will reject a man who is 6' based solely on his height.
Past 6'2", women begin to increase rejections of men for being too tall.
30% of women believe there is no such thing as a man being "too tall."
Over 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short.

Read through this. This is one of the thousand studies that prove height is everything for women.

2) Every Inch Counts:

Further analysis of their data demonstrates the importance of every inch of height for men, as two inches of height gain for a man can be found to have the following results:

A man in the 5'4-5'6" range will have more than double the potential number of female partners with 2" height gain.
A 5'4" man will have 2.3 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
A 5'7" man will have 1.86 times as many potential female partners by gaining 2" height.
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10".
Below 5'1" a 2" height gain also makes an insignificant difference, as even after 2" gain, a man at this height is still "too short" for most women to consider.

Brutal stuff.

3) Competition:

Because the few women who are willing to date a shorter men are also generally willing to date a taller man as well, the competition for women willing to date shorter men becomes extremely high. This means:

A 5' man must "beat" over 12 men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
A 5'4" man will have to "beat" over 7 other men (most of whom will be taller) to get a girl accepting of his height.
5'10 to 6'4" men have the least competition as the demand for these men outpaces their supply, and statistically overall women must compete for these men rather than vice versa.

Men who are short must endlessly jester and compete for woman, as well as being able to beat up other men.

Alright, we have analyzed this study enough. Let us continue to the next. Again, all credits to the brocels at incel.wiki.

Stulp et al. (2013) conducted another study regarding the preferences for height in a romantic partner of (N = 693) mainly ethnic Dutch and German university students. The were asked a series of questions regarding their preferences in regards to the height of a potential partner, which was broken in three categories, minimally acceptable, ideal and maximally acceptable.

There was also queried as to their current relationship status, and if they were currently in a relationship, their partners height. Finally they were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with their own height, on a 100 point scale.

It was found that an individual's height correlated significantly with preferred height in both sexes, with the taller men generally preferring much shorter women and the shorter women preferring much taller men. Shorter men and taller women both tended to prefer smaller height differences.

The researchers analyzed the data of the participants in relationships and found that women were most satisfied with their partner's heights when they were 8.24 inches (20.93 cm) taller them themselves, with men being the most satisfied with a partner 3.25 inches shorter (8.26 cm). Partner height was much more important for explaining partner satisfaction for women then men, by more then four times the variance.

It was also discovered that there was a curvilinear relation with men's heights and their self-reported satisfaction with their height, with the men that were 6' 4.5 inches tall (193.73 cm) being the most satisfied with their heights.

Thus, it was found that women and men disagreed on the 'ideal' height difference between partners in heterosexual relationships. Women desired taller men much more then men desired shorter women, women were far more restrictive with their minimum height requirements, and there existed a greater consensus among women as to the preferred height of a male partner. Lastly, it was shown that shorter women had some of the strongest preferences for very tall men, thus further limiting the partnership options for short men.

Quotes:

Men were most satisfied when their partner was slightly shorter than themselves, whereas women were most satisfied when their partner was much taller than themselves.
Women were much more restrictive in their range of acceptable heights compared to men. That is, women were more likely to rule out certain heights as completely unacceptable.
The increased satisfaction with their own height among taller men is also in line with studies indicating that tall men have higher self-esteem, display less jealousy towards other men, and display higher levels of subjective well-being.

In essence, tall is good, short is bad.

Have you taken the HeightandDatingPill?

Not yet?

TIme for the most brutal of all.

Mueller & Muzur (2001) examined survey data derived from surviving graduates of the class of 1950 of the United States Military Academy at West Point, that provided family and marriage information. These data were merged with measures of academic, career, athletic and social performance while at the academy.

In the 1950s West Point followed the practice of assigning cadets to companies according to their height; so they could present a uniform presence on the parade grounds, thus data pertaining to the cadet's heights could be discovered, with the Academy sorting cadets into 12 separate groups, depending on their heights. The 'facial dominance' of the cadets was also measured and collected, judging by yearbook photos.

It was found that taller cadets subsequently had a greater number of marriages, a younger second wife if remarried after a divorce, and an overall greater number of children. The researchers found no evidence that the cadets being subsequently married to more fertile women explained this discrepancy.

It was also found that cadet's heights had no effect on their future economic success (a finding that the researchers noted was unusual), therefore, the greater economic success that taller men generally experience didn't explain their greater reproductive success.

Other studies have also confirmed these findings (Pawlowski et al. 2000). There is also evidence that taller men are more likely to have long term mating partners and to have more partners than shorter men (Nettle, 2002).

Quotes:

Taller men had more reproductive opportunities (more marriages, younger second wives) and used them to have more children than shorter men. The chances of survival into adulthood of taller men’s children were not lower.
The positive effect of height on reproductive performance was not mediated by men’s social status, i.e., their military rank, or by the measures of academic, athletic, and military talent which helped in gaining high status.
Thus, selection seemingly follows most closely a “horse race” model, with a few winners taking most of the prize, measured in fitness differentials. Discerning no fitness disadvantage to tallness, we are left with the possibility of unconstrained directional sexual selection in favor of ever increasing male height within the observed phenotype range.

You will, in essence, never breed. All because of a few inch of height.

Now, let's begin the 2nd section - Height Impact in Life.

BodyLogicMD, a network of physician-owned medical practices, performed a survey of 1,105 Americans using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. Their goal was to explore emotional impacts of height, including implications for romantic prospects and self-esteem.

Evidence is discussed showing that increased male height provides professional advantages, including higher pay and better odds of career advancement, and an edge in matters of romance. Disadvantages of increased height are described by their review as including higher rates of medical issues like cancers and blood clots.

Primary findings of their survey on height's impact were:

Both men and women said the ideal male height is 6' tall (i.e. Taller than 82.1% of men in America).
Taller men reported they felt they were funnier, more desirable, more confident, more attractive, and more satisfied with their sex lives than shorter men.
As an example, 69.2% of taller men felt they were attractive to potential partners, compared to 51.8% of shorter men.
Short height was associated with feelings of being less masculine—48% of men under 5'5" felt less masculine due to their height.
Taller men were significantly more likely to feel they were successful in their careers and make the salaries they deserved.
In investigating perspectives on height enhancement surgeries, which are usually reserved to cases of medical deformity and carry risks of limb loss, permanent disability, and death:

60% of men overall wished they were taller.
21.1% of men under 5'9" had actively researched ways to become taller.
23.9% of men under 5'9" said they would surgically alter their height if possible to become taller.
On average, men wanting to be taller would pay 30.9% of their life savings to do so.
The study also confirmed that men were far more flexible about the heights of their potential partners than women. Women were 9.3x more likely to wish their partner was taller than to wish he was shorter. Specifically, 36.2% of women wished their partner was taller than he was, while only 3.9% of women wished their partner was shorter than he was.

To calculate your own height percentile, use the following calculator: https://tall.life/height-percentile-calculator-age-country/

Quotes:

At all heights, men were considerably less picky about the stature of their potential lovers.
More than three-quarters of short, average, and tall men said they'd give dating someone taller a try.

Started off with brutal one. This also relates to height, but it has some correlation with your life quality - it's absolutely brutal to be short. Many would rather die to be tall then live another day short, keek.

www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why/amp/


Brutality above, by a normie paper as well.

Here's some more I found :


Archived CNN article.


amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/393518/
www.livescience.com/amp/5552-taller-people-earn-money.html

All good reading. And backs my earlier point.


Now let's get to the final and most BRUTAL of all - what do women think of short men?

This is what women, and society, thinks of them.






https://mobile.twitter.com/Diamond_London/status/554752344009998337
https://mobile.twitter.com/jg9325/status/530990917986316288
https://mobile.twitter.com/Randd3rz_/status/490617087593684992
https://mobile.twitter.com/JeremyCandelas/status/491741384194273280
https://mobile.twitter.com/deathcab420/status/383763328054464513


It's over.

didnt read but yes height does matter and I'm gonna do HGH or inject to get taller, is it possible I can grow to 6'4? I will be using lifts.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
Height is not everything but if you are tall you can literally date with any sized women.. Guys that are under 6 might not have same privilege. .. You need always be little bit taller than your girlfriend. For example guy that are 175cm cannot date women that are 183-184cm.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
I did take action today and I will take action again and again to improve my pictures enough to get pics that are high quality enough to make me succeed on Tinder. I am improving the way that I pose in my pictures. In my rating thread, I looked autistic, but not anymore, now I look good. All I need to do now is replicate those same poses in better lighting with different clothes in different locations and I'll be at my best for Tinder, which will be good enough to get me enough matches to get laid at least once a month but probably more than that while I get muscular at the same time.

You should smile more.
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomuser2407 and Deleted member 7866
HAHAHAHAHA its funny that 5.8.5.9. 5.10 HAS become fucking cope........... What about people that are 5.2-5.4-5.6???
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Copeful, Deleted member 10782, Deleted member 7866 and 1 other person
Benefits become insignificant past 5'10"

LIFEFUEL
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member, HowAmIAlive123 and Deleted member 7866
short and handsome > tall and avg/under avg
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheAnomaly, HowAmIAlive123 and Deleted member 7866
You should smile more.
This is true, I noticed that too, my pictures look weird because I try to smile just a bit and that's not natural, it's like a forced smile so it looks very aspie. The trick is to either smile a lot or to not smile at all. For tinder, smiling works better in my situation.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
This is true, I noticed that too, my pictures look weird because I try to smile just a bit and that's not natural, it's like a forced smile so it looks very aspie. The trick is to either smile a lot or to not smile at all. For tinder, smiling works better in my situation.
You look autistic af, and gay, in every photo

Heightpilled again
 
  • +1
Reactions: HowAmIAlive123 and stay coping
Nothing is everything
 
  • +1
Reactions: HowAmIAlive123 and Deleted member 7866
I did take action today and I will take action again and again to improve my pictures enough to get pics that are high quality enough to make me succeed on Tinder. I am improving the way that I pose in my pictures. In my rating thread, I looked autistic, but not anymore, now I look good. All I need to do now is replicate those same poses in better lighting with different clothes in different locations and I'll be at my best for Tinder, which will be good enough to get me enough matches to get laid at least once a month but probably more than that while I get muscular at the same time.
You have autism my man. Over
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: randomuser2407 and Deleted member 7866
These studies ask questions to women when they are in a logical state of mind.
But women, as we know, sleep and have sex based on their emotions of the moment. So I don't think we could trust those studies.
If your game is tight, a woman may sleep with you in a night out in the club. It's only in the morning that she goes back to logical / rational thinking and starts analyzing your height, traits.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
These studies ask questions to women when they are in a logical state of mind.
But women, as we know, sleep and have sex based on their emotions of the moment. So I don't think we could trust those studies.
If your game is tight, a woman may sleep with you in a night out in the club. It's only in the morning that she goes back to logical / rational thinking and starts analyzing your height, traits.
Tf is "game" 😂
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy and HowAmIAlive123
face is everything
you can't be tall with below average face and slay
but you can be below average height with good face and slay

obviously it's over for even turbomanlet chad
doubt anyone with chad face would ever be a virgin though, just not a slayer

we ALL know a lanklet incel, though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy and WadlowMaxxing
Shit thread dnrd

Wadlow or death
1590 1513113460
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy
Reading this thread as a 5'6" manlet is absolute suifuel. Seriously making me consider LL even with the costs and risks involved. Fuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful and Deleted member 7866
Reading this thread as a 5'6" manlet is absolute suifuel. Seriously making me consider LL even with the costs and risks involved. Fuck.
ngl its not worth it unless you are very unsuccessful with women due to your height
 
ngl its not worth it unless you are very unsuccessful with women due to your height

I can get sex reliably if I lower my standards a bit, but I kinda feel I will never be truly loved and primally desired due to my height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
I can get sex reliably if I lower my standards a bit, but I kinda feel I will never be truly loved and primally desired due to my height.
It helps a ton, but it's your decision imo
 
Indeed, manlet chad will have no friends but girls will still like him tbh, but read the post
Not to be bluepilled but I'm a turbo manlet (5'5) and Ive had plenty of friends in my life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BasedSpinelet257 and Deleted member 7866
Not to be bluepilled but I'm a turbo manlet (5'5) and Ive had plenty of friends in my life.
were u the group loser/shoved around a lot?
 
Not to be bluepilled but I'm a turbo manlet (5'5) and Ive had plenty of friends in my life.
i am generally hated by every single person i meet, despite being a genuinely kind, respectful person. i used to blame this on my height but I've realised its probably more my face
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Curlbrahhh
Noooooooooooo FACE IS EVERYTHING :feelsahh:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 11019 and Deleted member 7866
face ≥ height
 
  • +1
Reactions: Curlbrahhh and Deleted member 7866
I can get sex reliably if I lower my standards a bit, but I kinda feel I will never be truly loved and primally desired due to my height.
Hows your face? Despite what this forum says, I feel if youre a Chadlet you could get girls (obviously shorter than you) but RESPECT from men is a differnt story
were u the group loser/shoved around a lot?
In my first years of high school ..yup.I also had glasses lol ( which is a huge failo that doesnt get talked about enough in this forum).What helped with respect from men later in life was being gymmaxxed .Thats why I laugh at all the faggots who want LL surgery and cry about being 5'10.
were u the group loser/shoved around a lot?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
Hows your face? Despite what this forum says, I feel if youre a Chadlet you could get girls (obviously shorter than you) but RESPECT from men is a differnt story
In my first years of high school ..yup.I also had glasses lol ( which is a huge failo that doesnt get talked about enough in this forum).What helped with respect from men later in life was being gymmaxxed .Thats why I laugh at all the faggots who want LL surgery and cry about being 5'10.
ohh shit i was kinda right

dw about me

Height = strength but gymmax = more strength

this is why i said friends is related to height, because strength is the main thing that wins you respect and friends
 
  • +1
Reactions: Curlbrahhh
Hows your face? Despite what this forum says, I feel if youre a Chadlet you could get girls (obviously shorter than you) but RESPECT from men is a differnt story

Normie face. Body is decent too
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
No height for my face & brain
 
Thank God you are wrong.
 
i'm 5'11 and fraud to 6'1 and there is a slight difference with how girls treat me with that ngl, every inch seems to halo you a bit
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 7866 and Deleted member 9003
i'm 5'11 and fraud to 6'1 and there is a slight difference with how girls treat me with that ngl, every inch seems to halo you a bit
Give some examples
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7866
Give some examples
my math tutor never called me tall until i frauded and when i frauded she asked for me to grab something she couldn’t reach xD they’re generally more submissive when i fraud
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 7866 and Deleted member 9003
Is 5’9 considered short?

In your thread, you said 50% of women would reject a man for being 5’8 but I’m 5’9 so what would the percentage be?

I measured myself and I’m 5’9
 
Last edited:
Is 5’9 considered short?

In your thread, you said 50% of women would reject a man for being 5’8 but I’m 5’9 so what would the percentage be?

I measured myself and I’m 5’9
No, and jfl if u believe those stats.
 
So much truth. The thing I have most issues coping with is only been 178 cm (179 in the morning). I would 100% get surgery to 183 if I could.
 
no ones respects a 5'7 guy man, trust me

even frame is cope on that height, manlet with muscles or skinny manlet doesnt matter, manlet is manlet
i was told gymmaxxed manlets were respected though
 

Similar threads

vrift
Replies
15
Views
502
pinkcel
pinkcel
STAMPEDE
Replies
4
Views
454
truecelitover
truecelitover
lifted
Replies
7
Views
319
aryan mogger
A
Tallooksmaxxer
Replies
6
Views
193
Julian23
J
BlackpilledPlatypus
Replies
22
Views
843
BlackpilledPlatypus
BlackpilledPlatypus

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top