Why is the rating system such a low bar here?

stimmaxxing

stimmaxxing

Silver
Joined
Oct 11, 2023
Posts
551
Reputation
655
To be HTN is to be universally attractive, and I see people who barely are not even attractive to mumbai dwellers get placed HTN. I'm in looksmaxxing servers where there are actual chadlites (1 in 50,000) who have 100K+ followers on tiktok. You guys would rate them HTN along with some random weirdly shaped goon.

I live in a really rich neighborhood (attractiveness tax), which might be some of it but the "average" person at my school would be easily rated HTN on this standard.

It's apparent this place is a jerk-circle for social rejects, but atleast be reasonable with your ratings considering you guys claim to be "looksmaxxing experts".
 
  • +1
Reactions: reaper2 and chadintraining
found the hamza watcher
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 49130, GabachoCopium, reaper2 and 4 others
Yeah. Eating bananas and blueberries will give you 4mm of bone growth at 17 and 3 inches of height
when did i ever say eating bananas and blueberries will make me taller
 
To be HTN is to be universally attractive, and I see people who barely are not even attractive to mumbai dwellers get placed HTN. I'm in looksmaxxing servers where there are actual chadlites (1 in 50,000) who have 100K+ followers on tiktok. You guys would rate them HTN along with some random weirdly shaped goon.

I live in a really rich neighborhood (attractiveness tax), which might be some of it but the "average" person at my school would be easily rated HTN on this standard.

It's apparent this place is a jerk-circle for social rejects, but atleast be reasonable with your ratings considering you guys claim to be "looksmaxxing experts".
An actual htn facially is like 1 in 5 minimum in my school (I am in a fairly wealthy private school, so it could easily be 1 in 6/7 for people in their teens and 20s)

There are only 4-5 people who would be considered 5.5 PSL+ (solid-strong chadlite+) that I know
 
1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30573, It'snotover and DoII
1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion
I agree, its okay to have a rating system for very rare and attractive individuals, but at the end of the day it has no bearing on day to day life. To me I see it as follow:

subhumans : repulsive to all (30th percentile)
LTN: no appeal, repulsive to some (31th - 49th percentile)
MTN: no appeal, repulsive to almost none, attractive to few. ( 50th-75th percentile)
HTN: some appeal, repulsive to very few, somewhat attractive to most, very attractive to some.(76th-90th percentile)
chadlite: high appeal, very attractive to most(91th-99th percentile).
Chads: very high appeal, very attractive to almost everyone(99th+ percentile, 1/100)

Yeah sure there are 1 / 100 000 guys like Cavil, and they mog the shit out of the top 1%, but at the end of the day these guys are so rare they have no impact on the dating market.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 49130 and Matheus
I agree, its okay to have a rating system for very rare and attractive individuals, but at the end of the day it has no bearing on day to day life. To me I see it as follow:

subhumans : repulsive to all (30th percentile)
LTN: no appeal, repulsive to some (31th - 49th percentile)
MTN: no appeal, repulsive to almost none, attractive to few. ( 50th-75th percentile)
HTN: some appeal, repulsive to very few, somewhat attractive to most, very attractive to some.(76th-90th percentile)
chadlite: high appeal, very attractive to most(91th-99th percentile).
Chads: very high appeal, very attractive to almost everyone(99th+ percentile, 1/100)

Yeah sure there are 1 / 100 000 guys like Cavil, and they mog the shit out of the top 1%, but at the end of the day these guys are so rare they have no impact on the dating market.
I mostly agree, although I would make it more of a normal distribution, I think subhuman realistically is bottom 5% or so. You don't see really repulsive all that often. Bottom 5-20 is LTN, MTN is 20-80 or something like that.
 
I mostly agree, although I would make it more of a normal distribution, I think subhuman realistically is bottom 5% or so. You don't see really repulsive all that often. Bottom 5-20 is LTN, MTN is 20-80 or something like that.
true, but subhuman is not repulsive to everyone, like I am never truly repulsed by another dude. But for a women the same age it happens much more often. There are at least 3 guys out of 10 who would be repulsive to most women in the sense that they would never entertain the idea of fucking/dating them.

Also you can't be mid tier normie if you mog 80% of guys or get mogged by 80% lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Matheus
true, but subhuman is not repulsive to everyone, like I am never truly repulsed by another dude. But for a women the same age it happens much more often. There are at least 3 guys out of 10 who would be repulsive to most women in the sense that they would never entertain the idea of fucking/dating them.

Also you can't be mid tier normie if you mog 80% of guys or get mogged by 80% lol.
Yeah if that's what you mean then ltn is already mostly repulsive to most women in that sense.
Top and bottom 20% are respectively htn and ltn
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30573
This forum consists of teenagers without a credit history that don’t even have a part time job, I wouldn’t take any advise or ratings from these kids. You should get rated or given advice by users like me who been here since 2018 and have successfully looksmaxed
 
1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion
I made a severe and continuous lapse in my judgement, and I don’t expect to be forgiven. I’m simply here to apologize.
1704494526076

.
 

Similar threads

greycel726194
Replies
3
Views
15
rockstarr
rockstarr
aac21
Replies
3
Views
21
aac21
aac21
Schlüsselbein
Replies
6
Views
83
recessed_00
recessed_00
Subhuman.444
Replies
10
Views
58
why continue??
W
AmazighMaxx
Replies
7
Views
93
fattofat
fattofat

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top