Why is the rating system such a low bar here?

[stimmaxxing]

To be HTN is to be universally attractive, and I see people who barely are not even attractive to mumbai dwellers get placed HTN. I'm in looksmaxxing servers where there are actual chadlites (1 in 50,000) who have 100K+ followers on tiktok. You guys would rate them HTN along with some random weirdly shaped goon.

I live in a really rich neighborhood (attractiveness tax), which might be some of it but the "average" person at my school would be easily rated HTN on this standard.

It's apparent this place is a jerk-circle for social rejects, but atleast be reasonable with your ratings considering you guys claim to be "looksmaxxing experts".

 

[Deleted member 45760]

found the hamza watcher

 

[stimmaxxing]

found the hamza enjoyer

found the hamza watcher

says the one with the hamza ass bluepill ascension plan

 

[Deleted member 45760]

says the one with the hamza ass bluepill ascension plan

had to go through my posts, plus surgery is cope

 

[stimmaxxing]

had to go through my posts, plus surgery is cope

Yeah. Eating bananas and blueberries will give you 4mm of bone growth at 17 and 3 inches of height

 

[Deleted member 45760]

Yeah. Eating bananas and blueberries will give you 4mm of bone growth at 17 and 3 inches of height

when did i ever say eating bananas and blueberries will make me taller

 

[chadintraining]

To be HTN is to be universally attractive, and I see people who barely are not even attractive to mumbai dwellers get placed HTN. I'm in looksmaxxing servers where there are actual chadlites (1 in 50,000) who have 100K+ followers on tiktok. You guys would rate them HTN along with some random weirdly shaped goon.

I live in a really rich neighborhood (attractiveness tax), which might be some of it but the "average" person at my school would be easily rated HTN on this standard.

It's apparent this place is a jerk-circle for social rejects, but atleast be reasonable with your ratings considering you guys claim to be "looksmaxxing experts".

An actual htn facially is like 1 in 5 minimum in my school (I am in a fairly wealthy private school, so it could easily be 1 in 6/7 for people in their teens and 20s)

There are only 4-5 people who would be considered 5.5 PSL+ (solid-strong chadlite+) that I know

 

[Deleted member 32366]

Yeah. Eating bananas and blueberries will give you 4mm of bone growth at 17 and 3 inches of height

Yes, it’s very possible.

 

[Matheus]

1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion

 

[NattyMikeO]

1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion

I agree, its okay to have a rating system for very rare and attractive individuals, but at the end of the day it has no bearing on day to day life. To me I see it as follow:

subhumans : repulsive to all (30th percentile)
LTN: no appeal, repulsive to some (31th - 49th percentile)
MTN: no appeal, repulsive to almost none, attractive to few. ( 50th-75th percentile)
HTN: some appeal, repulsive to very few, somewhat attractive to most, very attractive to some.(76th-90th percentile)
chadlite: high appeal, very attractive to most(91th-99th percentile).
Chads: very high appeal, very attractive to almost everyone(99th+ percentile, 1/100)

Yeah sure there are 1 / 100 000 guys like Cavil, and they mog the shit out of the top 1%, but at the end of the day these guys are so rare they have no impact on the dating market.

 

[Matheus]

I agree, its okay to have a rating system for very rare and attractive individuals, but at the end of the day it has no bearing on day to day life. To me I see it as follow:

subhumans : repulsive to all (30th percentile)
LTN: no appeal, repulsive to some (31th - 49th percentile)
MTN: no appeal, repulsive to almost none, attractive to few. ( 50th-75th percentile)
HTN: some appeal, repulsive to very few, somewhat attractive to most, very attractive to some.(76th-90th percentile)
chadlite: high appeal, very attractive to most(91th-99th percentile).
Chads: very high appeal, very attractive to almost everyone(99th+ percentile, 1/100)

Yeah sure there are 1 / 100 000 guys like Cavil, and they mog the shit out of the top 1%, but at the end of the day these guys are so rare they have no impact on the dating market.

I mostly agree, although I would make it more of a normal distribution, I think subhuman realistically is bottom 5% or so. You don't see really repulsive all that often. Bottom 5-20 is LTN, MTN is 20-80 or something like that.

 

[NattyMikeO]

I mostly agree, although I would make it more of a normal distribution, I think subhuman realistically is bottom 5% or so. You don't see really repulsive all that often. Bottom 5-20 is LTN, MTN is 20-80 or something like that.

true, but subhuman is not repulsive to everyone, like I am never truly repulsed by another dude. But for a women the same age it happens much more often. There are at least 3 guys out of 10 who would be repulsive to most women in the sense that they would never entertain the idea of fucking/dating them.

Also you can't be mid tier normie if you mog 80% of guys or get mogged by 80% lol.

 

[Matheus]

true, but subhuman is not repulsive to everyone, like I am never truly repulsed by another dude. But for a women the same age it happens much more often. There are at least 3 guys out of 10 who would be repulsive to most women in the sense that they would never entertain the idea of fucking/dating them.

Also you can't be mid tier normie if you mog 80% of guys or get mogged by 80% lol.

Yeah if that's what you mean then ltn is already mostly repulsive to most women in that sense.
Top and bottom 20% are respectively htn and ltn

 

[Cheat_Win]

This forum consists of teenagers without a credit history that don’t even have a part time job, I wouldn’t take any advise or ratings from these kids. You should get rated or given advice by users like me who been here since 2018 and have successfully looksmaxed

 

[stimmaxxing]

1 in 50,000 thousand jfl chadlite+ is statistically and by definition 5% of the population. Even gigachad is .1% which is 1 in 1000. Even at this point facial attractiveness is already mostly subjective, after that it's status, money, etc

Also jfl at this greycel who thinks it's logical that he hangs out with 1 in 50,000 top people and also posts on here. Massive delusion

I made a severe and continuous lapse in my judgement, and I don’t expect to be forgiven. I’m simply here to apologize.

.