Women are incapable of being nationalists

Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

Professor-Forum User of the Year 2024
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
46,507
Reputation
122,818
This is probably water to most of you but this needs to be said. Women cannot be nationalists they aren't biologically wired that way. They always go after the winner. It doesnt matter who the winner is. They just want the winner. I see a lot of people here falling for the right wing conservative foids shilling on twitter that claim to care about their countries about keeping races pure, supporting trad values etc the reality is they don't care about any of that. They are just growing their fan base by telling you things that you want to hear. Just look back in history the number of times women have betrayed their nations just for some materialistic gain or for a lover.Women are the first to welcome invaders with open legs. A woman cannot be a part of a greater purpose or think beyond their personal benefits they just can't. The only way to keep them in check in unironically sharia law and locking them in a room there's no other way. This is the cold hard truth that you niggas need to get it through your heads.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Tabula Rasa, hypernormie, Rainman988 and 43 others
Just look back in history the number of times women have betrayed their nations just for some materialistic gain or for a lover.
Can you name a few times? Nothing is coming to mind.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: notsocommonthumb, Aladin, aDifferentPerspect and 4 others
@cobicado901 @psychomandible @Debetro @shizuku11111 @deadstock @cucklek
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb, 666PSL, Bruce Wayne78 and 3 others
@mathis @DepigmentedBrownoid @heightmaxxing
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb, mathis, 666PSL and 4 others
"During the German occupation of France, there were many women who began relationships with enemy soldiers. Many of those who wound up with Germans were young mothers whose French husbands were in POW camps. The only way they could support themselves and their children was to enter into these relationships." Not really necessarily siding with the enemy /proof they can't be nationalists because they just didn't want to die or have their kids die because they had no money.

There were many women that spied for many different countries/fought wars against actual men. Willing going into enemy territory to spy and make sure your country can win and your country will prosper seems pretty nationalistic to me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ghoulish, Futura, Sprinkles and 8 others
This is definitely true most of the time.
There are rare exceptions tho

20241227 071237

The person who started the fascist movement in Britain was a woman
(Rotha Beryl Lintorn Lintorn-Orman)
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: notsocommonthumb, Nicholas 2, sportsmogger and 8 others
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Rainman988, AverageMoroccan, notsocommonthumb and 15 others
"During the German occupation of France, there were many women who began relationships with enemy soldiers. Many of those who wound up with Germans were young mothers whose French husbands were in POW camps. The only way they could support themselves and their children was to enter into these relationships." Not really necessarily siding with the enemy /proof they can't be nationalists because they just didn't want to die or have their kids die because they had no money.
That is just a poor excuse. They could have moved with their families to Vichy France where they were given full protection and opportunities but they didn't which is why they were publicly shamed after the war ended and this isnt a singular case. It happens all the time when wars are fought.
There were many women that spied for many different countries/fought wars against actual men. Willing going into enemy territory to spy and make sure your country can win and your country will prosper seems pretty nationalistic to me.
Sure but a lot of them also betrayed their fatherland. Mata Hari is the most infamous of them. Dutch woman in France who was a double agent for germany, many such cases.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: notsocommonthumb, Bars, Jova and 1 other person
Being nationalist is retarded anyways
The government doesn't care about you
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Rainman988, AverageMoroccan, Futura and 16 others
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger, Bars, johnypvpgod and 1 other person
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Charles the Fat and Jova
It is
Being nationalist is being a dog for your country, what's your country if not the government?
Nationalism has almost always gone against the establishment in history
 
That is just a poor excuse. They could have moved with their families to Vichy France were they were given full protection and opportunities but they didn't which is why they were publicly shamed after the war ended and this isnt a single case. It happens all the time when wars are fought.

Sure but a lot of them also betrayed their fatherland. Mata Hari is the most infamous of them. Dutch woman in France who was a double agent for germany, many such cases.
I don't believe it's a poor excuse. You make it sound very easy to do that. They have a house/apartment they probably had family where they lived. Also no reason to assume Vichy wasn't going to be annexed anyway and thus, they'd end up with even less than if they just remained and kept their belongings, homes, etc.

Yes, but many men did this as well and became double agents.

If we lived in an alternate universe where the German military was just female soldiers/women did all the fighting in wars, don't you think men would've slept with the enemy for a chance at having a better standard of living?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Nationalism has almost always gone against the establishment in history
Muuhhh culture muuuh people :feelskek:
They couldn't care less if you were dead
LoL at being this retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nicholas 2, LiL 369, JohnBaza and 1 other person
This is probably water to most of you but this needs to be said. Women cannot be nationalists they aren't biologically wired that way. They always go after the winner. It doesnt matter who the winner is. They just want the winner. I see a lot of people here falling for the right wing conservative foids shilling on twitter that claim to care about their countries about keeping races pure, supporting trad values etc the reality is they don't care about any of that. They are just growing their fan base by telling you things that you want to hear. Just look back in history the number of times women have betrayed their nations just for some materialistic gain or for a lover.Women are the first welcome invaders with open legs. A woman cannot be a part of a greater purpose or think beyond their personal benefits they just can't. The only way to keep them in check in unironically sharia law and locking them in a room there's no other way. This is the cold hard truth that you niggas need to get it through your heads.
I read half cause I lowkey cbf reading it all
So apologies if you spoke about it

Women go with the status quo in general, ofc there will be exceptions. In general they will follow the status quo or even push it further. Men have always been and will always be the revolutionaries.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Whatever
Muuhhh culture muuuh people :feelskek:
They couldn't care less if you were dead
LoL at being this retarded
Ofc you wouldn't understand as a disgusting chink mutt from fucking Brazil but when you have a homogeneous culture or nation you usually have a common experience, a common idea, common ideals.

But when you live in a mutt nation as a mutt (you) you don't have any of this. in a multicultural society you don't get a common experience. I'm not going to try and change your mind as you wouldn't understand.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Rainman988, NORDEN SLAVORUM, Aladin and 4 others
Ofc you wouldn't understand as a disgusting chink mutt from fucking Brazil but when you have a homogeneous culture or nation you usually have a common experience, a common idea, common ideals.

But when you live in a mutt nation as a mutt (you) you don't have any of this. in a multicultural society you don't get a common experience. I'm not going to try and change your mind as you wouldn't understand.
Cope and more cope
You retarded ass Low iq caring about people that despise you
mochi-mochimons.gif
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiL 369 and JohnBaza
Cope and more cope
You retarded ass Low iq caring about people that despise you
mochi-mochimons.gif
Who despises me ? @Jason Voorhees what is this retarded mutt talking about
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, johnypvpgod and Jason Voorhees
Can you name a few times? Nothing is coming to mind.

Most famous one would be that aztec sloot helping Cortes annihilate her people. Pocahontas is another one.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL, Chadeep, psychomandible and 1 other person
Most famous one would be that aztec sloot helping Cortes annihilate her people. Pocahontas is another one.
These are kind of legit examples. Plenty of men sell out their country too and I can name way more men who are famous for doing it instead of random Japanese sloots dating some US men after Japan already surrendered like in this example:

Why are there only women being told they can't be nationalistic? Many men will choose to jump to jump ship and go with the enemy during war so they don't lose everything. I don't think it's a solid argument.
 
These are kind of legit examples. Plenty of men sell out their country too and I can name way more men who are famous for doing it instead of random Japanese sloots dating some US men after Japan already surrendered like in this example:


Why are there only women being told they can't be nationalistic? Many men will choose to jump to jump ship and go with the enemy during war so they don't lose everything. I don't think it's a solid argument.
SHIT honestly fair point I see this a lot blacks and indians wanting whites.

changed my opinion bro
 
  • Woah
Reactions: TechnoBoss
Being nationalist is retarded anyways
The government doesn't care about you

Men have to be nationalist, if we get invaded we are the ones massacred

Unlike women we have no choice, its not like we can sleep with the female invaders
 
  • +1
Reactions: datboijj, Bars, psychomandible and 1 other person
These are kind of legit examples. Plenty of men sell out their country too and I can name way more men who are famous for doing it instead of random Japanese sloots dating some US men after Japan already surrendered like in this example:


Why are there only women being told they can't be nationalistic? Many men will choose to jump to jump ship and go with the enemy during war so they don't lose everything. I don't think it's a solid argument.
There are men who do that but there's also overwhelming number of men who would gladly die and put everything at stake for a cause that they firmly believe in.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Sprinkles, notsocommonthumb, Bars and 2 others
There are men who do that but there's also overwhelming number of men who would gladly die and put everything at stack for a cause that they firmly believe in.
But there are a huge group of women that would also die for what they believe in. It's to be expected the number would be less because women don't have high T and are less reactive and they're smaller and weaker. Biological reasons why they'd want to surrender easier but I don't think it means they can't be nationalists. Plenty of female snipers in Russia during WW2 who also shot themselves rather than be taken into German custody. Killing for your country is inherently nationalistic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb and Jason Voorhees
I don't believe it's a poor excuse. You make it sound very easy to do that. They have a house/apartment they probably had family where they lived. Also no reason to assume Vichy wasn't going to be annexed anyway and thus, they'd end up with even less than if they just remained and kept their belongings, homes, etc.

Yes, but many men did this as well and became double agents.

If we lived in an alternate universe where the German military was just female soldiers/women did all the fighting in wars, don't you think men would've slept with the enemy for a chance at having a better standard of living?
most women can easily be manipulated and made to believe something with their social groups, media etc. For them being accepted or agreeable is far more important than being correct or right.

Men aren't like this and have individual thoughts which why they have been the main characters throught out history. Women are generally hive minded individuals driven by their emotions and group think. They do what the rest of the tribe does because it's the safest bet for the survive of their offspring. Most men are also sheep stuck in the rut but a significant number of them are independent and free-thinking by nature. They tend to have stronger opinions, firmer beliefs, and greater resolve than most women.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Sprinkles, notsocommonthumb, Bars and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: Shahnameh
Women are generally hive minded individuals driven by their emotions and group think. They do what the rest of the tribe does because it's the safest bet for the survive of their offspring. Most men are also sheep stuck in the rut but a significant number of them are independent and free-thinking by nature. They tend to have stronger opinions, firmer beliefs, and greater resolve than most women.
This is a big generalization. I guarantee you if I go into a movie theater and yell "FIRE EVERYONE OUT" it's not going to be just the women that leave. EVERYONE resorts to group think for survival. Men aren't immune to this. This can be shown in more ways than the example I gave but it's just the one that came off the top of my head right off the bat.

most women can easily be manipulated and made to believe something with their social groups, media etc. For them being accepted or agreeable is far more important than being correct or right.
Being accepted or agreeable is important for everyone for the most part. I don't think this is something females exhibit more necessarily.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sprinkles, Bars, Jason Voorhees and 1 other person
This is a big generalization. I guarantee you if I go into a movie theater and yell "FIRE EVERYONE OUT" it's not going to be just the women that leave. EVERYONE resorts to group think for survival. Men aren't immune to this. This can be shown in more ways than the example I gave but it's just the one that came off the top of my head right off the bat.


Being accepted or agreeable is important for everyone for the most part. I don't think this is something females exhibit more necessarily.
100%
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and TechnoBoss
If you see a bunch of people running down the street and you don't know what they're running from you aren't just gonna sit there and be like "hmm should I run?" No you're gonna run away with them or in a direction away from what they're running from and ask questions later. It will not just be the women running otherwise men would've been dead/extinct for a very long time. Group think keeps us alive.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Sprinkles and Jason Voorhees
If you see a bunch of people running down the street and you don't know what they're running from you aren't just gonna sit there and be like "hmm should I run?" No you're gonna run away with them or in a direction away from what they're running from and ask questions later. It will not just be the women running otherwise men would've been dead/extinct for a very long time. Group think keeps us alive.
Those are impulsive decisions i am not talking about that. I am talking about conscious decisions that men and women take when given a choice.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss
Those are impulsive decisions i am not talking about that. I am talking about conscious decisions that men and women take when given a choice.
Well, I don't really think that's valid because it is a form of group think whether they are "impulsive" decisions like running away when you see a big group of people running away or "conscious" decisions. To be fair though I don't really know what you mean by conscious decisions can you clarify? Like what kind of decisions that are made consciously would be different if they were made by men vs women?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Well, I don't really think that's valid because it is a form of group think whether they are "impulsive" decisions like running away when you see a big group of people running away or "conscious" decisions. To be fair though I don't really know what you mean by conscious decisions can you clarify? Like what kind of decisions that are made consciously would be different if they were made by men vs women?
I can give a historical example. During the nazi occupation the French resistance was mostly consistent of men in unorganized groups that opposed German occupation and the collaborationist Vichy government. Its members engaged in guerilla warfare, intelligence and sabotage. Many of these members and their families got slaughtered by tbe nazis but they still continued the fight. Admittedly a few french women were also part of the resistance but there were more women that had accepted the german invasion than oppose it. Their efforts did not go in vain. French Resistance disrupted German operations, provided valuable intelligence for D-Day, and helped the Allied liberation of France in 1944. After the war all its members were celebrated as heroes. They could have opted for a easy life but they didn't these are the kind of decisions that men are most likely to make.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb and TechnoBoss
  • +1
Reactions: 我需要阴部 and psychomandible
He said our nation was built off commodities
is it not?

Our economy lacks diversity that's why it's so shit.

This country is no different from the UAE, qatar and stuff it's only rich because of commodities brother. We are called the lucky country because of our rich resources and this was said even in 1964.

I understand feeling patriot and to an extent I use to be like that but now my views on Australia has changed. Ruined by idiots and only successful because of natural resources. Very little hope left here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shahnameh and Jason Voorhees
I can give a historical example. During the nazi occupation the French resistance was mostly consistent of men in unorganized groups that opposed German occupation and the collaborationist Vichy government. Its members engaged in guerilla warfare, intelligence and sabotage. Many of these members and their families got slaughtered by tbe nazis but they still continued the fight. Admittedly a few frencg women were also part of the resistance but there more women that had accepted the german invasion than oppose it. Their efforts did not go in vain. French Resistance disrupted German operations, provided valuable intelligence for D-Day, and helped the Allied liberation of France in 1944. After the war all its members were celebrated as heroes. They could have opted for a easy life but they didn't these are the kind of decisions that men are most likely to make.
But the problem is a lot of French people got their families slaughtered in WW2 it wasn't unique to just those men fighting in the guerilla armies. People can take up arms for many reasons. Also, you state that they participated in intelligence as well. There were french female spies doing intelligence as well. This is a huge risk and shows a great devotion to the cause. Women are expected to not be participating in types of physical attacks on enemy forces with weapons, but that doesn't lessen the impact that the women who did fight (admittedly in their own way with acts of espionage, sabotage, and intelligence gathering) had on the war.

But there are plenty of women who do fight to the last man (or woman rather) - What about the female fighters? Plenty of documented cases of Kurdish women fighting for what they believe in. Russian women in WW2, kurdish female units, etc.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and 我需要阴部
One time, it wasn't even our best time
The gold rush brought a ton of high value and rich investors and immigrnats to australia. Australia's population became 5x in just a few decades.Melbourne and Sydney became major financial centers. Before this Australia was underdeveloped with its economy relying on agriculture and penal labor before this. Even today Australia's mostly relies on its resources.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 我需要阴部
The gold rush brought a ton of high value and rich investors and immigrnats to australia. Australia's population became 5x in just a few decades.Melbourne and Sydney became major financial centers. Before this Australia was underdeveloped with its economy relying on agriculture and penal labor before this.

stupid to say australia doesn't continue to rely heavily on natural resources.

Kid has never read any statistic on Australia's exports :lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shahnameh and Jason Voorhees

Similar threads

grungymallard97
Replies
41
Views
1K
vtribal
vtribal
MarioTheGoat
Replies
6
Views
208
zerotohero
zerotohero
yandex99
Replies
27
Views
3K
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top