K
KubiXX
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2026
- Posts
- 189
- Reputation
- 112
What are the best exercise to get abs in home no equipment only pull up rod
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ab crunches on cabelWhat are the best exercise to get abs in home no equipment only pull up rod
is 7.9%bf good?Any core strengthening exercises plus being low bf%. You can do crunches and core holds in bed easily. If you're trying to ascend with stuff like this also see if you can do forearm and shoulder work especially.
Holy shit that's low, might be bordering unhealthy tbh, but will definitely be aesthetic. I haven't done too much research on the effects of low bf% but iirc 12-16% is ideal and up to 23% is fine. I'm currently at around 17.6 but I'm working to get down to 14% by university.is 7.9%bf good?
yea ik i went from 14% to 9% in three months eaing 1500kcal but i fucked up counting and eat probably around 1800 calories a dayHoly shit that's low, might be bordering unhealthy tbh, but will definitely be aesthetic. I haven't done too much research on the effects of low bf% but iirc 12-16% is ideal and up to 23% is fine. I'm currently at around 17.6 but I'm working to get down to 14% by university.
but to answer your question you'll get visible abs pretty quickly with that.
You went from 14 to 9 intentionally? 2000kcal will probably maintain your weight rn, don't sacrifice your mind for your body if you're already thin though. At a certain point, starving yourself and being consequently dumber won't be covered by any aesthetic gains.yea ik i went from 14% to 9% in three months eaing 1500kcal but i fucked up counting and eat probably around 1800 calories a day
ik i eat whatever i want rn ,10-12% is avreage so it isnt relly that llowYou went from 14 to 9 intentionally? 2000kcal will probably maintain your weight rn, don't sacrifice your mind for your body if you're already thin though. At a certain point, starving yourself and being consequently dumber won't be covered by any aesthetic gains.
The average bf% is a lot higher than thatik i eat whatever i want rn ,10-12% is avreage so it isnt relly that llow
ur most def underestimating, if you were that bf you would not need ab exercises cuz they would be very visible already.is 7.9%bf good?
My weighing scale says that is 7.9% i dont know how accurate is it i have relly visible veins on my forearms and have a litttle six-pack and i just wanted to improve it thanks for exercises i will try it outur most def underestimating, if you were that bf you would not need ab exercises cuz they would be very visible already.
Bf is very hard to measure accurately, and that bf would only be for people who were bodybuilders to step on stage, or some elite athletes.
If you got it from a dexa then thats probably ur best bet but otherwise ur probably not even close.
I have a pullup bar and what I do at home for abs are:
- hanging leg raises
- hanging knee tucks
- I have resistance bands I bought off amazon so i can do weighted ab cruches, I also do these at the gym
Here are characteristics of 5% bf and if you relate then I'd be impressed.
Striations and Separations: Muscles, especially in areas like the arms, chest, and legs, are highly defined with clear separations between muscle groups
Visible Muscle Fibers: Individual muscle fibers are visible,
Prominent Veins: Veins, particularly in the arms, shoulders, chest, and abdominal area
Six-Pack or Eight-Pack Abs: Abdominal muscles are distinctly visible with deep cuts and high definition
Yea ur scale is not accurate, I had one that told me I was 5%My weighing scale says that is 7.9% i dont know how accurate is it i have relly visible veins on my forearms and have a litttle six-pack and i just wanted to improve it thanks for exercises i will try it out