Reckless Turtle
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
- Posts
- 17,322
- Reputation
- 24,006
I have made separate threads on individual points before:
Many users here (arguably at least half, from my observation) cope on at least one of the aforementioned points (due to their own inadequacies—manletism, for example). It's like saying that "dadbods" are optimal male physiques because certain women claim "preferences" for them.
The exact height of a female isn't import for the purpose of "heightfogging;" female heights under 170 cm rarely yield optimal leg proportions.
"A significant % of European DNA" would probably mean at least 25–50% on an ancestry test.
Which of these body categorizations would be able to extract the most money from men?
Open this thread in another tab, look at the two body categorizations, and then use them to answer this poll: https://looksmax.org/threads/which-of-these-front-body-profiles-would-you-prefer-your-ideal-girlfriend-to-have.505684/
looksmax.org
Many users here (arguably at least half, from my observation) cope on at least one of the aforementioned points (due to their own inadequacies—manletism, for example). It's like saying that "dadbods" are optimal male physiques because certain women claim "preferences" for them.
The exact height of a female isn't import for the purpose of "heightfogging;" female heights under 170 cm rarely yield optimal leg proportions.
"A significant % of European DNA" would probably mean at least 25–50% on an ancestry test.
Last edited: