A lot of incels who have aesthetic problems have functional issues as well. Like having very recessed jaws or a fuck up bite is not healthy for you at all. Some features simply shouldn't exist so there is a good reason for foids to select against them. They just want what is best for humanity.
Almost everything is environmental/can be fixed environmentally
Holy shit joined 2018 - 5 years ago - and just gotten the first kid. You’ve actually achieved the goal. Mirin hard. I hope I never delete my account and look back on my posts in my rotten early 20s
Nah, if you marry a good looking girl your children will ascend.
Definitely, but the sad reality is that he represents 0.01% elite genetically like you said on top of their very hard work.
women don't pick good men. just look at how many violent offenders doing time in prison are incel compared to a class full of STEM graduates. we need monogamy otherwise we have dysgenics where worthless apes get the most women
Not true tbh look at Netherlands, they’re like gods amongst men just because of female selection @SurgeryEnjoyer
wdym gods? if its to do with intelligence its because of monogamy
Ok but we can’t honestly say that a completely free market for women to choose wouldn’t encourage some brain dead traits in the next generations
height and build
I think monogamy is good but strict marriage like poligamy (arabs) just for good achieving men would be even better
We can’t even sustain a single whore, how can we manage to keep multiple of them jfl
We shit on pErSoNaLiTY, but in the right scenarios knowing how to act can get you so much play. Social circle game is real. Not hard to mog if you’re surrounded by subhumans. Basically a layup
The kid isn't yours cuck.
They do pick good men. You're just mad that your definition of good (tamed subhuman nerd) and their definition of good (untamed facial features and tall height) don't match. You think you should be able to get laid because you re a good slave that contributes to society, well nope, women will never love you.
Height and facial attractiveness are correlated with intelligence. Monogamy obviously causes dumber people to reproduce.
True, don’t want to pass down manlet genes
no it's not. people on the extreme level of intelligence are usually ugly like terence tao and that's why there are no physicists who look like nick bateman
no shit they don't match and that's why man's definition of good ie. intelligent, heroic, altruistic, noble etc. is valued over what the woman thinks because who gives a shit what women think, they have never created a successful society and never will. LOL at siding with the female gender. what a shitty estrogenic response.
It could also be that people that aren't genetical failures have better shit to do than study physics to cope.
That's a slave's definition. And it also shows how pathetic you are. Basically you're saying that you'll be a good useful dog and that you should be loved in return for that. Well tough luck retard, not gonna happen.
It's not even what they think it's their subconscious biological wiring.
That's a good thing, societies are a bad thing.
I don't side with foids I side with nature. You're the estrogenic one. You sound just like a bitter subhuman foid that complains about chad not wanting her and boasts about how she's much better than the hot girls and how men are shallow,...
if you ''sided with nature'' then you would understand that you must repress female sexual selection to prevent a fisherian runaway. and since you openly admit that civilisation is an evil then why don't you fuck off to siberia instead of trying to pollute society with your ideologically regressive thinking? why are the random joined-yesterday fags the most opinionated and inane?
Highest IQ sentence Ive ever heard
Fisherian runway is how evolution theorists explain the presence of aesthetic traits in animals. But it could simply be that by nature those animals are supposed to look like that.
Too cold.
Don't try to switch roles, you're the ones that polluted me, physiologically.
Why are the guys that have been posting for 4 years still incapable of making a valid point ?
You get so mad whenever someone doesn't support the socialist truecel state that you have in mind. I wonder why. Maybe it's because you want your state mandated trad wife.
it can't be by nature if its totally dysfunctional since nature has no use for ostentatious traits. the fuck good is a peacock's feathers for in muh nature when all it is going to do is make it slower and more visible to its predators? obviously it's for sexual selection, doofus
nah retard i hate communism. i supporta sexual meritocracy, not where every dysgenic lifeform gets to reproduce.
Girls cheat all the time with make up, without makeup they’re all low tier beckys. So their DNA isn’t special either
It looks good. Creatures feel good when they look at it. (At least humans and peacocks do)
The tail is actually used to scare predators away as well apparently.
When did I say it wasn't related to sexual selection ? I simply implied that those traits didn't develop from sexual selection, that they have had them since the beginning. That females choose the males that look the way they're supposed to look. And I believe that peacocks are supposed to have such tails naturally.
ok? and why should the females select for a trait that has absolutely nothing to do with anything beyond superficial and reproductive purposes? it clearly doesn't help them give any useful edge over other species which is what happens when you allow women to do all the selecting
no they don't lol. you think a tiger is going to shit itself when it sees a peacock with its feather in display? of course not, the peacock goes and flies to a tree branch which would be difficult if its feathers are so unnecessarily large
Yeah because the only predator in nature are tigers.
"Any useful edge" How would that be possible anyway ? You think peacocks are gonna turn into lions if their females start selecting for different traits ?
in the environment of the peacock they are the most common and formidable
there is no limit to what an animal can transform into given enough time and consistent selective pressure. obviously not a lion, but they would be the most superior in their respective domain
I think that the chad peacock is the pinnacle of peacocks. Any derivation from it is degeneration. It superior in the same way a natural landscape is superior to a city skyline.
no arrow so you're the soyboy woahjack
