Xangsane
Election day ruined by a ninja turtle
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
- Posts
- 150,006
- Reputation
- 126,989
In response to a thread made by @HFan01
looksmax.org
I wanted to bring this up with you lads since we had a talk on whether Chads or Stacies have better lives, and most of you say that Chads have better dating lives.
I had this drafted since a couple of days ago and thought I might as well post it right now.
So @HFan01 made a theory that compares male vs female attractiveness using EyeMe percentile data and splitting up the scores as "relationship value" and "hookup value", and gave the corresponding PSL scores that correlate with the percentiles:
Which he made into this graph:
You need to know your PSL score/eyeme.io percentile range, put a finger on the y-axis of the graph (on the percentile/PSL score you're at - male PSL scores are highlighted in green) and swipe vertically upwards to get the maximum PSL of foid you can hookup with (red) and get into a relationship with (blue)
The blue line = the maximum PSL a man can LTR
The red line = the maximum PSL a man can hookup with
For those of you that still don't understand the graph, I've used some arbitrary PSL scores here to illustrate:
I strongly disagree with the above. He's focussing too much on female hypergamy, but in reality women don't always get what they want, especially for LTRs, which is what they care about the most, considering there is a large shortage of Chads compared to Stacies.
Here's why:
looksmax.org
For the LTR portion of the graph, I would alter the graph accordingly. Note that LTRs matter much more to foids than men, since that's their goal:
Taken from this thread:
looksmax.org
As a result, the blue line of the graph (relationship value) would be a lot flatter and less exponential.
Thoughts?
Male Attractiveness vs Female Attractiveness comparison Chart (OC Autism)
I was up to date on all my projects at work today so I decided to sperg out and create a graph comparing male attractiveness and female attractiveness using the eyeme percentile data as a "relationship value" score and women's OLD standards for likes as "hookup value" and then overlayed...
looksmax.org
I wanted to bring this up with you lads since we had a talk on whether Chads or Stacies have better lives, and most of you say that Chads have better dating lives.
I had this drafted since a couple of days ago and thought I might as well post it right now.
So @HFan01 made a theory that compares male vs female attractiveness using EyeMe percentile data and splitting up the scores as "relationship value" and "hookup value", and gave the corresponding PSL scores that correlate with the percentiles:
| PSL score | EyeMe percentile |
| 2 | 0.1 (10%) |
| 3 | 0.3 (30%) |
| 4 | 0.5 (50%) |
| 5 | 0.875 (87.5%) |
| 6+ | 0.999 (99.9%) |
Which he made into this graph:
You need to know your PSL score/eyeme.io percentile range, put a finger on the y-axis of the graph (on the percentile/PSL score you're at - male PSL scores are highlighted in green) and swipe vertically upwards to get the maximum PSL of foid you can hookup with (red) and get into a relationship with (blue)
The blue line = the maximum PSL a man can LTR
The red line = the maximum PSL a man can hookup with
For those of you that still don't understand the graph, I've used some arbitrary PSL scores here to illustrate:
| Your PSL score | Max PSL score of foid (hookup) | Max PSL score of foid (LTR) |
| 3 (0.3 male percentile) | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| 4 (0.5 male percentile) | 1 | 3 |
| 4.5 (0.69 male percentile) | 2.5 | 3.8 |
| 5 (0.875 male percentile) | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 6 (0.999 male percentile) | 4.6 | 5 |
I strongly disagree with the above. He's focussing too much on female hypergamy, but in reality women don't always get what they want, especially for LTRs, which is what they care about the most, considering there is a large shortage of Chads compared to Stacies.
Here's why:
- There aren't enough PSL 6+ men to go around for every PSL 5 woman. Why would a Chad settle for a random PSL 5 woman off Bumble when he has thousands of PSL 6 - 6.5 women desperately DMing him on Instagram for his attention? He can simply LTR a foid off there.
- A foid can dislike how many men she wants including those slightly above her looksmatch, and only like Chads and Chadlites, however she isn't always going to get what she wants, which is an LTR with a Chad/Chadlite, since they have too many options.
- As a result, the minimum looks level a Chad or Chadlite would usually LTR is someone who is slightly less attractive than him. A foid who is far less attractive than her oneitis Chadlite/Chad off Hinge or Bumble usually has to settle for her looksmatch, or slightly above her looksmatch.
- This would cause more trauma for a woman below PSL 4.5, because most women, including warpig, acne-riddled subhumans, are often attracted to the same 20% of men and exclusively seek them out for commitment. Remember that commitment is the foid's goal; the man's goal is to get laid.
- As a result, the minimum looks level a Chad or Chadlite would usually LTR is someone who is slightly less attractive than him. A foid who is far less attractive than her oneitis Chadlite/Chad off Hinge or Bumble usually has to settle for her looksmatch, or slightly above her looksmatch.
- There are also far more GL foids than GL men. As a result, there aren't enough GL men for every GL foid as a result, and thus some foids would be forced to settle.
- Most normies are in LTRs with other normies; very rarely have I seen a male normie LTRing a subhuman foid.
- PSL 6+ men are often in LTRs with other PSL 6+ women, usually from within the modelling/social media/showbiz industry, with a few exceptions. Most exceptionally attractive people are scouted into these industries, leaving women to fight for commitment from the small percentage of Chads who aren't in these industries. These small percentage of Chads are often well-educated and work in good jobs.
- Most PSL 6+ men on dating apps are actually LARPers/Chadfishes that scam lesser-attractive women. Hence they don't need dating apps usually; they usually have too many options from Stacies DMing them off Instagram.
- However, I agree with the hookup value numbers. I can't question that.
Out of Chads and Stacies, who lives better lives?
Let's discuss. Who has a better quality of life out of these two?
looksmax.org
For the LTR portion of the graph, I would alter the graph accordingly. Note that LTRs matter much more to foids than men, since that's their goal:
| Foid's PSL | Maximum male PSL she could LTR |
| Below 3.5 | Below 3.5 |
| 3.5 - 4.0 | 4.25 |
| 4.0 - 4.49 | 4.75 |
| 4.5 - 4.75 | 5.25 |
| 4.75 - 5.25 | 5.5 |
| 5.25 - 5.5 | 5.75 |
| 5.5 - 6.0 | 6.0 |
| 6.0 - 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 6.5 or above | 6.5+ depending on her PSL |
Taken from this thread:
What I believe is the maximum PSL of a guy that a woman of each looks level could successfully LTR.
We all know that it is almost every woman's dream, whether she's a subhuman or a Stacy, to lock down a Chad for a committed LTR. Ideally, she would marry said Chad, reproduce and die with him. We also know that it is within feminine nature to want romantic, expensive dates, leading to an LTR...
looksmax.org
As a result, the blue line of the graph (relationship value) would be a lot flatter and less exponential.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
