xtremfailer
Silver
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2022
- Posts
- 687
- Reputation
- 730
Let's establish the female attributes triangle: face, body, age
Provided he has decent height (5'10+ for chad, 6'+ for HTN, 6'2+ for MTN, 6'4+ for LTN):
Chad can choose all three
HTN can choose two
MTN can choose one
LTN can choose none, he must betabuxx (6'4 minimum height required to betabuxx single moms in 2024)
Now, even chad will struggle bagging a stacy that displays the three attributes. The more attributes are simultaneously present, the worse the best outcome will be. Therefore, three simultaneous attributes most likely will correspond to a young htb with great body. Two simultaneous attributes can correspond to: htb with great body but roastie, young htb without great body or young mtb (or below) with great body. One simultaneous attribute can correspond to: roastie stacy without great body, roastie htb with great body, young mtb (or below) without great body.
All options represent the best outcome for each case. Regarding face, one is said to be able to choose face if it is at least htb.
Great body: high E body (good tits, good ass, feminine frame).
Status and money are assumed to be average for all cases.
This theory can be developed further by defining the body features in a more detailed way, and also by defining age intervals. So, for example, subtriangles can be defined: body (ass, tits, frame); age: (18-25, 25-30, +30). But this is too complex in my opinion.
Provided he has decent height (5'10+ for chad, 6'+ for HTN, 6'2+ for MTN, 6'4+ for LTN):
Chad can choose all three
HTN can choose two
MTN can choose one
LTN can choose none, he must betabuxx (6'4 minimum height required to betabuxx single moms in 2024)
Now, even chad will struggle bagging a stacy that displays the three attributes. The more attributes are simultaneously present, the worse the best outcome will be. Therefore, three simultaneous attributes most likely will correspond to a young htb with great body. Two simultaneous attributes can correspond to: htb with great body but roastie, young htb without great body or young mtb (or below) with great body. One simultaneous attribute can correspond to: roastie stacy without great body, roastie htb with great body, young mtb (or below) without great body.
All options represent the best outcome for each case. Regarding face, one is said to be able to choose face if it is at least htb.
Great body: high E body (good tits, good ass, feminine frame).
Status and money are assumed to be average for all cases.
This theory can be developed further by defining the body features in a more detailed way, and also by defining age intervals. So, for example, subtriangles can be defined: body (ass, tits, frame); age: (18-25, 25-30, +30). But this is too complex in my opinion.