Characterisation of different looks levels (MEGA THREAD)

[Deleted member 19957]

Low facial harmony
Low dimorphism
Not lean
Not soft maxxed

Lmao

Sightings: public toilets

Theory: ugly asf

Thank you

 

[Thebuffdon]

the max someone can ascend to by softmaxxing is chadlite and thats only if they were high htn base previously. any bigger ascencsion would need surgeries etc.

its more realisitc and helpfull imo to be able to tell how you are progressing up the normietiers as you looksmax.

The halo at starts at around 7-7.5 though so it makes sense to start it at that range.

And I disagree if you have a good base over a few years you can get to an 8 or even more than that

 

[Thebuffdon]

@Zeta

 

[Thebuffdon]

@Jason Voorhees @ambi @ChadOrDeath @DonaldJTrump

 

[F36]

Characterisation of different looks levels - theory
By @thebuffdon690

---

Introduction

I have no idea how to start this lol so decided I have had enough of making schizo threads in off topic so it’s time to turn over a new leaf on this website which is currently dying, I’m only gonna make high iq beneficial threads from now on, mostly related to looks theory.

My last proper thread triggered the entire forum and caused massive controversy lmao (you all know what I’m referring to) so I’m gonna straw away from apologetics for a while and focus on looks theory/looksmaxxing, because frankly I cba to have the same pointless debate over and over again about whether god exists or whether Muhammad was a true prophet (and frankly I don’t give a shit anymore either) my goal is to help myself and everyone here who wants it. This is practical information.

So welcome to my first thread out of many, I will be talking about stuff I’m interested in and which can help everyone here like I mentioned before. I will start with characteristics of different looks level (facially) where they can be sighted and the theory behind it, so that on your looksmaxxing journey you can eventually place yourselves into one of these categories so you know exactly where you stand, without some autistic LTN saying you’re a 6/10 when you’re actually an 8/10 lmao in real life/appeal wise (for example).

This is based on an upcoming project of mine where I am creating the most objectively accurate facial calculator of all time, which includes every factor possible used to assess someone’s facial attractiveness and will be releasing at some point in the next few months. If you want some insight on how this can help you or be involved you can PM me for sure.

This will help most of you massively and you can accurately rate yourselves objectively rather than asking the retarded users on this forum, who will just gaslight you anyway. Btw I’m not including PSL here just the normal 1-10 scale as it’s too much to get into and I’ll probably make a separate collaborative thread on that in the near future. So let’s start:

Note: all the ratings are done based on my own facial attractiveness calculator, so it is extremely accurate.

Note: This is also my submission for the lifetime VIP competition @Master

---

7.5/10 (roughly Chadlite)

Example: Jacob Elordi
View attachment 2964604
1. Characterisation:

• Good facial harmony
• (60 - 75%)
• High dimorphism
• Good facial leanness
• Above 75% softmax score (this is based on taking into account all of your miscellaneous features that go into assessing your facial attractiveness that can be "soft maxxed" to improve your score, so for example things like skin texture and smoothness, hair texture, eyebrow density etc).

2. Sightings: Uni/college campuses, bars or pubs and clubs, football events, concerts / festivals, low level modelling and Hollywood. Easy to find online.


3. Rarity: roughly 1 in 701 people, top 1% looks <4 million alive.

Uncommon

4. Theory: not extremely uncommon to find but not common either so lands somewhere in the middle in terms of rarity. This is usually the most attractive person in any given local area and can act and low level model in this range. Most women will still find you attractive at this level because it is relatively rarer than most people on average who are sighted on a day to day basis.

This means that in terms of attractiveness you objectively possess features which make you desirable and you stand out relative to most men that women see on a day to day basis, so you definitely have a good chance with most women you may have an interest in.

---

8/10 (Low chad):

Example: Theo James
View attachment 2964597
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony
• (70 - 80%) In case of Theo James he has 100% side profile harmony
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 80% soft max score (Usually comes from things like great skin texture and colouring, good hair texture and eyebrow density as well as great eye colouring and/or great lips and teeth as well)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 12,000 people <250000 alive

Reasonably rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a Uni/college campus, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms, mid level modelling and easy to find in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. Occasionally will be spotted out in public although this is still very rare. Case quote I’ve only seen around 3 true 8/10's in public my whole life and that was at the gym only.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc). Because this is the level where people are more likely to be recognised for their looks and therefore results in sprouting different niches of this rating across social media.

Intuitively this makes sense as ratings higher than an 8.5 are almost purely recognised for their looks and this means that its likely to be less of a "niche". For example, Ronaldo fits into the football niche but he is not recognised purely for his looks, because he is not at that level yet (he was around 8.25 in his prime based on my calculator) so people focus more on his football skills as a result.


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a town or university campus and will largely be known for their looks. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest.

There is also a bias here in terms of this is where the theory of compounding attractiveness occurs, whereby someone at this level may realise that they are an 8 and therefore they aim to improve upon their various factors which can ascend them to a higher rating of an 8.25-8.5, this creates a higher concentration of people in the bell curve in the 8-8.5 range as ascending past an 8.5 becomes very hard and requires exponential effort to get past.

View attachment 2964848
(Scale I use, as well as the graphical distribution, part of my system)

---

8.25/10 (Mid chad):

Example: prime Ronaldo
View attachment 2964646
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony - (70-80+%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 85% soft max score

(Mostly everything is maxed out however they may be lacking a few points in certain areas, but it’s nothing crazy)


2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 33,000 people <90000 alive

Rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a City, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms although unlikely, mid -higher level modelling and common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see one every few years/decade or so.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc fit this level more). Same as before pretty much. This is also the average looks level of a Hollywood actor (taking the average of all popular Hollywood actors from around a 7 to a 9).


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a city and will be known for their looks at this level. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest again.

At this level women will be very direct with their signals and it’ll be obvious if they are into you. There is also a massive halo in terms of how they treat you and it becomes apparent at this level.

---

8.5/10 (High chad):

Example: prime Leonardo DiCaprio
View attachment 2964653
1. Characterisation:

• Very good harmony score (usually model level and close to the top percentiles) - (75-85%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 90% soft max score - (everything is mostly maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 148,000 people <20000 alive

Very rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a country, festivals sometime, airports, gyms (highly unlikely however), mid - top level modelling and more common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed.

This is also the minimum looks level it takes to become a top level model (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator and taking the lower bound of that average).

As an example I have only seen one true 8.5/10 in my entire life and that was at my local gym. The dude looked like a crazy version of Tarzan (he was extremely GL didn’t even look real tbh) and it was just awe inspiring watching all of the reactions people had as he walked through the gym lol.

Even guys literally turned their heads to look at him as he walked past. That is an example of the halo an 8.5 would get IRL.

4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a country. So for example Akash Kumar is roughly an 8.5 based on my calculation in his prime so he would be the most attractive person in India, same with Delon who would be the most attractive person in France during his prime.

BTW don't think an 8.5 is a low score this is incredibly rare and above celebrity level ,most people across history will never score this high. So it makes sense to rank someone like Alain Delon as an 8.5, as he does lack features to push him up to a 9 (but I will get into this in another thread).

This is where the true looks halo starts and you will be largely idolised for your looks and benefit from it. E.g. DiCaprio is largely considered as the most successful actor of the past few decades or so and he scores an 8.5 in his absolute prime. Women will be all over you and will simp for you, it will be totally obvious that they are into you.

This is largely considered a true 10/10 IRL by most people as pre popularity of the internet these were the people who were idolised and made known for their looks etc, as we weren't as aware of people who ranked above an 8.5. Subjectivity also plays a massive role at this level and upward. This is where you will start to get attention everywhere you go and it should be obvious whether you fall into this rating or not.

75% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.25) to fit into this bracket.

---

8.75/10 (Gigachad)

Example: Brian Whittaker
View attachment 2964680
1. Characterisation:

• Incredible harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (80-90%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 95% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 738,000 people <4000 alive

Incredibly rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a continent, top level modelling and Hollywood and very high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed and very unlikely.

This is also the average looks level of the top level models of all time (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator).


4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a continent. Everything above is essentially the same as here, the only difference here is you can get special privileges (such as Whittaker dating Zara Larson, a top level singer in terms of popularity, purely based off your looks). Most women will consider themselves out of your league and will be intimidated by you/scared to approach you and send you signals out of fear of rejection etc. I would say this level is where you get diminishing returns in terms of women, so dating the highest level women in terms of looks and popularity will be better for you.

80% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.5) to fit into this bracket.

---

9/10 (Icon)

Example: prime Vasilly Stepanov
View attachment 2964697
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 4,000,000 people <750 alive

Extremely rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people in the world, highest level modelling and only seen in the most famous/popular movies only. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Contrary to popular belief not everything is perfect and there are large diminishing returns at this level (take example of Vasilly as a good example of this). Most women will not date you out of insecurity, however you should be famous for your looks. IRL you will never see someone who looks like this because they are probably locked off from the general public. However they can be found somewhat easily online as they will obviously be famous for their looks around the world.

This is a good example of scarcity paradox, where something rare becomes more sought after precisely because of its rarity, making it more common in terms of its desirability or attention. This seems counterintuitive but its not, because the halo is too great at this level that it makes it perceivably more common than it otherwise would seem if someone was to experience it for themselves.

85% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.6) to fit into this bracket.

---

9.5/10 (Terrachad)

Example: Hexum
View attachment 2964713
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 173,000,000 people <20 alive

Close to extinction level rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people of all time, only seen online. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life again.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Same as before pretty much in terms of how people treat you and diminishing returns etc, but a whole level above. Just watch the movie making of a male model with Hexum and you should get an idea of how it is to live as a 9.5. Still very hard to find online as most people don't know they exist and wont know where to look for them for the most part.

The reason this is close to extinction level rare is because they are dwindling by the day and nature may stop producing them at any point or maybe god will decide to stop creating them. Take Hexum as an example, we probably only know of the existence of 9.5's based on him however he offed himself and now that's 1 less. Only modern day ones are Matt Bomer (mostly based on harmony though) and debatably Del Rio.

90% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.7) to fit into this bracket.

Anyways thanks for reading, let me know what other threads you want me to make give me some ideas, got a few lined up for the next few months anyway. Let me know your thoughts on this one as well and hopefully you found it an interesting read and it helped in some way

---

TAGS:

@ggg.tv🤫 @greycel @coisbhai @yeeyeeslayer @moreroidsmoredates @Darktriad16 @Clavicular @Vermilioncore @Zenis @<6PSLcel @hopecel @0steotomy @blknswag @Charisma @BrahminBoss @Korea @Lynxress @plukee @noodlelover @optimisticzoomer @RaidenJTR @silencio @slavicpsycho @NorwoodAscender @n9wiff @Michael Myers @The Grinch @Xangsane @shieldzz @PseudoMaxxer @lestoa @King Solomon @ilovetakis @i_love_roosters

Let me know if you want me to add or remove you from tags

W

 

[ggg.tv🤫]

Read every atom good thread

 

[PsychoDsk]

nigga i looked at him, he smirked, started laughing,
then i stopped looking, my palms were sweaty the entire 40 minute ride, and i only looked forward.

Why does this make me horny

 

[Thebuffdon]

Read every atom good thread

Atom thanks Bhai

 

[Thebuffdon]

Why does this make me horny

Go wank dude

 

[PsychoDsk]

good thread g
Wish ppl looked at me in awe

 

[Thebuffdon]

good thread g
Wish ppl looked at me in awe

I look at you in awe

 

[PsychoDsk]

I look at you in awe

Come here boi

 

[Thebuffdon]

Come here boi

LMAOOOOO

gladly boi

 

[Zeta]

@Zeta

Good thread but not really useful, also some bad Chad examples in my opinion. Mirin the effort tho

 

[Thebuffdon]

Good thread but not really useful, also some bad Chad examples in my opinion. Mirin the effort tho

It’s more for looksmaxxing motivation tbh and also looks theory not meant to be that useful. But thx

 

[JohnBaza]

Characterisation of different looks levels - theory
By @thebuffdon690

---

Introduction

I have no idea how to start this lol so decided I have had enough of making schizo threads in off topic so it’s time to turn over a new leaf on this website which is currently dying, I’m only gonna make high iq beneficial threads from now on, mostly related to looks theory.

My last proper thread triggered the entire forum and caused massive controversy lmao (you all know what I’m referring to) so I’m gonna straw away from apologetics for a while and focus on looks theory/looksmaxxing, because frankly I cba to have the same pointless debate over and over again about whether god exists or whether Muhammad was a true prophet (and frankly I don’t give a shit anymore either) my goal is to help myself and everyone here who wants it. This is practical information.

So welcome to my first thread out of many, I will be talking about stuff I’m interested in and which can help everyone here like I mentioned before. I will start with characteristics of different looks level (facially) where they can be sighted and the theory behind it, so that on your looksmaxxing journey you can eventually place yourselves into one of these categories so you know exactly where you stand, without some autistic LTN saying you’re a 6/10 when you’re actually an 8/10 lmao in real life/appeal wise (for example).

This is based on an upcoming project of mine where I am creating the most objectively accurate facial calculator of all time, which includes every factor possible used to assess someone’s facial attractiveness and will be releasing at some point in the next few months. If you want some insight on how this can help you or be involved you can PM me for sure.

This will help most of you massively and you can accurately rate yourselves objectively rather than asking the retarded users on this forum, who will just gaslight you anyway. Btw I’m not including PSL here just the normal 1-10 scale as it’s too much to get into and I’ll probably make a separate collaborative thread on that in the near future. So let’s start:

Note: all the ratings are done based on my own facial attractiveness calculator, so it is extremely accurate.

Note: This is also my submission for the lifetime VIP competition @Master

---

7.5/10 (roughly Chadlite)

Example: Jacob Elordi
View attachment 2964604
1. Characterisation:

• Good facial harmony
• (60 - 75%)
• High dimorphism
• Good facial leanness
• Above 75% softmax score (this is based on taking into account all of your miscellaneous features that go into assessing your facial attractiveness that can be "soft maxxed" to improve your score, so for example things like skin texture and smoothness, hair texture, eyebrow density etc).

2. Sightings: Uni/college campuses, bars or pubs and clubs, football events, concerts / festivals, low level modelling and Hollywood. Easy to find online.


3. Rarity: roughly 1 in 701 people, top 1% looks <4 million alive.

Uncommon

4. Theory: not extremely uncommon to find but not common either so lands somewhere in the middle in terms of rarity. This is usually the most attractive person in any given local area and can act and low level model in this range. Most women will still find you attractive at this level because it is relatively rarer than most people on average who are sighted on a day to day basis.

This means that in terms of attractiveness you objectively possess features which make you desirable and you stand out relative to most men that women see on a day to day basis, so you definitely have a good chance with most women you may have an interest in.

---

8/10 (Low chad):

Example: Theo James
View attachment 2964597
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony
• (70 - 80%) In case of Theo James he has 100% side profile harmony
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 80% soft max score (Usually comes from things like great skin texture and colouring, good hair texture and eyebrow density as well as great eye colouring and/or great lips and teeth as well)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 12,000 people <250000 alive

Reasonably rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a Uni/college campus, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms, mid level modelling and easy to find in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. Occasionally will be spotted out in public although this is still very rare. Case quote I’ve only seen around 3 true 8/10's in public my whole life and that was at the gym only.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc). Because this is the level where people are more likely to be recognised for their looks and therefore results in sprouting different niches of this rating across social media.

Intuitively this makes sense as ratings higher than an 8.5 are almost purely recognised for their looks and this means that its likely to be less of a "niche". For example, Ronaldo fits into the football niche but he is not recognised purely for his looks, because he is not at that level yet (he was around 8.25 in his prime based on my calculator) so people focus more on his football skills as a result.


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a town or university campus and will largely be known for their looks. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest.

There is also a bias here in terms of this is where the theory of compounding attractiveness occurs, whereby someone at this level may realise that they are an 8 and therefore they aim to improve upon their various factors which can ascend them to a higher rating of an 8.25-8.5, this creates a higher concentration of people in the bell curve in the 8-8.5 range as ascending past an 8.5 becomes very hard and requires exponential effort to get past.

View attachment 2964848
(Scale I use, as well as the graphical distribution, part of my system)

---

8.25/10 (Mid chad):

Example: prime Ronaldo
View attachment 2964646
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony - (70-80+%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 85% soft max score

(Mostly everything is maxed out however they may be lacking a few points in certain areas, but it’s nothing crazy)


2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 33,000 people <90000 alive

Rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a City, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms although unlikely, mid -higher level modelling and common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see one every few years/decade or so.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc fit this level more). Same as before pretty much. This is also the average looks level of a Hollywood actor (taking the average of all popular Hollywood actors from around a 7 to a 9).


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a city and will be known for their looks at this level. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest again.

At this level women will be very direct with their signals and it’ll be obvious if they are into you. There is also a massive halo in terms of how they treat you and it becomes apparent at this level.

---

8.5/10 (High chad):

Example: prime Leonardo DiCaprio
View attachment 2964653
1. Characterisation:

• Very good harmony score (usually model level and close to the top percentiles) - (75-85%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 90% soft max score - (everything is mostly maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 148,000 people <20000 alive

Very rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a country, festivals sometime, airports, gyms (highly unlikely however), mid - top level modelling and more common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed.

This is also the minimum looks level it takes to become a top level model (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator and taking the lower bound of that average).

As an example I have only seen one true 8.5/10 in my entire life and that was at my local gym. The dude looked like a crazy version of Tarzan (he was extremely GL didn’t even look real tbh) and it was just awe inspiring watching all of the reactions people had as he walked through the gym lol.

Even guys literally turned their heads to look at him as he walked past. That is an example of the halo an 8.5 would get IRL.

4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a country. So for example Akash Kumar is roughly an 8.5 based on my calculation in his prime so he would be the most attractive person in India, same with Delon who would be the most attractive person in France during his prime.

BTW don't think an 8.5 is a low score this is incredibly rare and above celebrity level ,most people across history will never score this high. So it makes sense to rank someone like Alain Delon as an 8.5, as he does lack features to push him up to a 9 (but I will get into this in another thread).

This is where the true looks halo starts and you will be largely idolised for your looks and benefit from it. E.g. DiCaprio is largely considered as the most successful actor of the past few decades or so and he scores an 8.5 in his absolute prime. Women will be all over you and will simp for you, it will be totally obvious that they are into you.

This is largely considered a true 10/10 IRL by most people as pre popularity of the internet these were the people who were idolised and made known for their looks etc, as we weren't as aware of people who ranked above an 8.5. Subjectivity also plays a massive role at this level and upward. This is where you will start to get attention everywhere you go and it should be obvious whether you fall into this rating or not.

75% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.25) to fit into this bracket.

---

8.75/10 (Gigachad)

Example: Brian Whittaker
View attachment 2964680
1. Characterisation:

• Incredible harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (80-90%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 95% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 738,000 people <4000 alive

Incredibly rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a continent, top level modelling and Hollywood and very high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed and very unlikely.

This is also the average looks level of the top level models of all time (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator).


4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a continent. Everything above is essentially the same as here, the only difference here is you can get special privileges (such as Whittaker dating Zara Larson, a top level singer in terms of popularity, purely based off your looks). Most women will consider themselves out of your league and will be intimidated by you/scared to approach you and send you signals out of fear of rejection etc. I would say this level is where you get diminishing returns in terms of women, so dating the highest level women in terms of looks and popularity will be better for you.

80% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.5) to fit into this bracket.

---

9/10 (Icon)

Example: prime Vasilly Stepanov
View attachment 2964697
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 4,000,000 people <750 alive

Extremely rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people in the world, highest level modelling and only seen in the most famous/popular movies only. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Contrary to popular belief not everything is perfect and there are large diminishing returns at this level (take example of Vasilly as a good example of this). Most women will not date you out of insecurity, however you should be famous for your looks. IRL you will never see someone who looks like this because they are probably locked off from the general public. However they can be found somewhat easily online as they will obviously be famous for their looks around the world.

This is a good example of scarcity paradox, where something rare becomes more sought after precisely because of its rarity, making it more common in terms of its desirability or attention. This seems counterintuitive but its not, because the halo is too great at this level that it makes it perceivably more common than it otherwise would seem if someone was to experience it for themselves.

85% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.6) to fit into this bracket.

---

9.5/10 (Terrachad)

Example: Hexum
View attachment 2964713
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 173,000,000 people <20 alive

Close to extinction level rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people of all time, only seen online. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life again.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Same as before pretty much in terms of how people treat you and diminishing returns etc, but a whole level above. Just watch the movie making of a male model with Hexum and you should get an idea of how it is to live as a 9.5. Still very hard to find online as most people don't know they exist and wont know where to look for them for the most part.

The reason this is close to extinction level rare is because they are dwindling by the day and nature may stop producing them at any point or maybe god will decide to stop creating them. Take Hexum as an example, we probably only know of the existence of 9.5's based on him however he offed himself and now that's 1 less. Only modern day ones are Matt Bomer (mostly based on harmony though) and debatably Del Rio.

90% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.7) to fit into this bracket.

Anyways thanks for reading, let me know what other threads you want me to make give me some ideas, got a few lined up for the next few months anyway. Let me know your thoughts on this one as well and hopefully you found it an interesting read and it helped in some way

---

TAGS:

@ggg.tv🤫 @greycel @coisbhai @yeeyeeslayer @moreroidsmoredates @Darktriad16 @Clavicular @Vermilioncore @Zenis @<6PSLcel @hopecel @0steotomy @blknswag @Charisma @BrahminBoss @Korea @Lynxress @plukee @noodlelover @optimisticzoomer @RaidenJTR @silencio @slavicpsycho @NorwoodAscender @n9wiff @Michael Myers @The Grinch @Xangsane @shieldzz @PseudoMaxxer @lestoa @King Solomon @ilovetakis @i_love_roosters

Let me know if you want me to add or remove you from tags

where is my tag so dnrd

 

[Thebuffdon]

where is my tag so dnrd

I’ll add you next time lol

 

[PsychoDsk]

where is my tag so dnrd

 

[Thebuffdon]

View attachment 2965171

BRUH

 

[F36]

where is my tag so dnrd

 

[JohnBaza]

View attachment 2965190

 

[F36]

View attachment 2965225View attachment 2965226

Ironic seeing you joined after me

 

[JohnBaza]

Ironic seeing you joined after me

Shit you got me thinking on what to say to you ngl. I wanted to say somethin like ''I am still not a greycel'' but that shit is lame to say. We are october buds so I will let you off the hook today

 

[ChadL1te]

Not a bad thread but why make this? This is the first thing everyone here knows lol

 

[Thebuffdon]

Not a bad thread but why make this? This is the first thing everyone here knows lol

So I can win lifetime vip

 

[ChadL1te]

So I can win lifetime vip

you arent winning, he said it has to be a thread on something unique

 

[Thebuffdon]

you arent winning, he said it has to be a thread on something unique

Yeh it is unique lol no one has done anything like that yet

 

[ChadL1te]

Yeh it is unique lol no one has done anything like that yet

...

 

[user123456]

How rare am i can pm you for pics i very curious

 

[Thebuffdon]

How rare am i can pm you for pics i very curious

Sure

 

[Thebuffdon]

...

? I mean in the sense of the exact same thing obviously looks theory has been done b4 I assumed he was referring to unique like no one has done that exact thing

 

[halloweed]

? I mean in the sense of the exact same thing obviously looks theory has been done b4 I assumed he was referring to unique like no one has done that exact thing

Where will Elias de poot, chico.sean o pry and Tyson beckford sit?

 

[Thebuffdon]

Where will Elias de poot, chico.sean o pry and Tyson beckford sit?

Not sure about de poot and beckford cuz I haven’t analysed them yet but o pry is an 8.5 based on my calculator.

De poot is probably around an 8 and beckford probably an 8.25 - 8.5 as well

 

[Thebuffdon]

@sub5pslathlete @John Doe @JohnDoe

 

[halloweed]

Not sure about de poot and beckford cuz I haven’t analysed them yet but o pry is an 8.5 based on my calculator.

De poot is probably around an 8 and beckford probably an 8.25 - 8.5 as well

So you’ve seen people on this looks level irl? If you did, what was your reaction ?

 

[Kelly Oubre Jr]

mirin effort will read tomorrow

 

[sub5pslathlete]

@sub5pslathlete @John Doe @JohnDoe

yes this threads good

 

[Thebuffdon]

So you’ve seen people on this looks level irl? If you did, what was your reaction ?

I’ve seen one guy who was an 8.5 irl, I talk about it in the thread @8.5

 

[ChadL1te]

? I mean in the sense of the exact same thing obviously looks theory has been done b4 I assumed he was referring to unique like no one has done that exact thing

no this same thread has been made in pretty similar ways. sure maybe not the EXACT same but the OG PSL chart thread was similar

 

[Thebuffdon]

no this same thread has been made in pretty similar ways. sure maybe not the EXACT same but the OG PSL chart thread was similar

Link it

 

[klamus]

Jesus christ this is giga autism.

 

[Thebuffdon]

Jesus christ this is giga autism.

Welcome to org

 

[wsada]

Ronaldo is in terrachad territory but good thread tho

 

[Thebuffdon]

Ronaldo is in terrachad territory but good thread tho

Appreciate it, 8.25 is basically IRL terrachad anyway so Yh

 

[Deleted member 67655]

Characterisation of different looks levels - theory
By @thebuffdon690

---

Introduction

I have no idea how to start this lol so decided I have had enough of making schizo threads in off topic so it’s time to turn over a new leaf on this website which is currently dying, I’m only gonna make high iq beneficial threads from now on, mostly related to looks theory.

My last proper thread triggered the entire forum and caused massive controversy lmao (you all know what I’m referring to) so I’m gonna straw away from apologetics for a while and focus on looks theory/looksmaxxing, because frankly I cba to have the same pointless debate over and over again about whether god exists or whether Muhammad was a true prophet (and frankly I don’t give a shit anymore either) my goal is to help myself and everyone here who wants it. This is practical information.

So welcome to my first thread out of many, I will be talking about stuff I’m interested in and which can help everyone here like I mentioned before. I will start with characteristics of different looks level (facially) where they can be sighted and the theory behind it, so that on your looksmaxxing journey you can eventually place yourselves into one of these categories so you know exactly where you stand, without some autistic LTN saying you’re a 6/10 when you’re actually an 8/10 lmao in real life/appeal wise (for example).

This is based on an upcoming project of mine where I am creating the most objectively accurate facial calculator of all time, which includes every factor possible used to assess someone’s facial attractiveness and will be releasing at some point in the next few months. If you want some insight on how this can help you or be involved you can PM me for sure.

This will help most of you massively and you can accurately rate yourselves objectively rather than asking the retarded users on this forum, who will just gaslight you anyway. Btw I’m not including PSL here just the normal 1-10 scale as it’s too much to get into and I’ll probably make a separate collaborative thread on that in the near future. So let’s start:

Note: all the ratings are done based on my own facial attractiveness calculator, so it is extremely accurate.

Note: This is also my submission for the lifetime VIP competition @Master

---

7.5/10 (roughly Chadlite)

Example: Jacob Elordi
View attachment 2964604
1. Characterisation:

• Good facial harmony
• (60 - 75%)
• High dimorphism
• Good facial leanness
• Above 75% softmax score (this is based on taking into account all of your miscellaneous features that go into assessing your facial attractiveness that can be "soft maxxed" to improve your score, so for example things like skin texture and smoothness, hair texture, eyebrow density etc).

2. Sightings: Uni/college campuses, bars or pubs and clubs, football events, concerts / festivals, low level modelling and Hollywood. Easy to find online.


3. Rarity: roughly 1 in 701 people, top 1% looks <4 million alive.

Uncommon

4. Theory: not extremely uncommon to find but not common either so lands somewhere in the middle in terms of rarity. This is usually the most attractive person in any given local area and can act and low level model in this range. Most women will still find you attractive at this level because it is relatively rarer than most people on average who are sighted on a day to day basis.

This means that in terms of attractiveness you objectively possess features which make you desirable and you stand out relative to most men that women see on a day to day basis, so you definitely have a good chance with most women you may have an interest in.

---

8/10 (Low chad):

Example: Theo James
View attachment 2964597
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony
• (70 - 80%) In case of Theo James he has 100% side profile harmony
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 80% soft max score (Usually comes from things like great skin texture and colouring, good hair texture and eyebrow density as well as great eye colouring and/or great lips and teeth as well)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 12,000 people <250000 alive

Reasonably rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a Uni/college campus, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms, mid level modelling and easy to find in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. Occasionally will be spotted out in public although this is still very rare. Case quote I’ve only seen around 3 true 8/10's in public my whole life and that was at the gym only.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc). Because this is the level where people are more likely to be recognised for their looks and therefore results in sprouting different niches of this rating across social media.

Intuitively this makes sense as ratings higher than an 8.5 are almost purely recognised for their looks and this means that its likely to be less of a "niche". For example, Ronaldo fits into the football niche but he is not recognised purely for his looks, because he is not at that level yet (he was around 8.25 in his prime based on my calculator) so people focus more on his football skills as a result.


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a town or university campus and will largely be known for their looks. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest.

There is also a bias here in terms of this is where the theory of compounding attractiveness occurs, whereby someone at this level may realise that they are an 8 and therefore they aim to improve upon their various factors which can ascend them to a higher rating of an 8.25-8.5, this creates a higher concentration of people in the bell curve in the 8-8.5 range as ascending past an 8.5 becomes very hard and requires exponential effort to get past.

View attachment 2964848
(Scale I use, as well as the graphical distribution, part of my system)

---

8.25/10 (Mid chad):

Example: prime Ronaldo
View attachment 2964646
1. Characterisation:

• Very good facial harmony - (70-80+%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness
• Above 85% soft max score

(Mostly everything is maxed out however they may be lacking a few points in certain areas, but it’s nothing crazy)


2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 33,000 people <90000 alive

Rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a City, bars or pubs sometimes and clubs although less likely, football events, concerts / festivals sometime, gyms although unlikely, mid -higher level modelling and common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see one every few years/decade or so.

Easy to find online due to a higher concentration of 8’s which are attracted to various niches across social media (looksmaxxing, tiktokers etc fit this level more). Same as before pretty much. This is also the average looks level of a Hollywood actor (taking the average of all popular Hollywood actors from around a 7 to a 9).


4. Theory: usually the most attractive person in a city and will be known for their looks at this level. Most women will find you attractive unless it’s outside of their particular niche of interest again.

At this level women will be very direct with their signals and it’ll be obvious if they are into you. There is also a massive halo in terms of how they treat you and it becomes apparent at this level.

---

8.5/10 (High chad):

Example: prime Leonardo DiCaprio
View attachment 2964653
1. Characterisation:

• Very good harmony score (usually model level and close to the top percentiles) - (75-85%)
• High dimorphism
• Amazing facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 90% soft max score - (everything is mostly maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 148,000 people <20000 alive

Very rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a country, festivals sometime, airports, gyms (highly unlikely however), mid - top level modelling and more common in Hollywood and high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed.

This is also the minimum looks level it takes to become a top level model (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator and taking the lower bound of that average).

As an example I have only seen one true 8.5/10 in my entire life and that was at my local gym. The dude looked like a crazy version of Tarzan (he was extremely GL didn’t even look real tbh) and it was just awe inspiring watching all of the reactions people had as he walked through the gym lol.

Even guys literally turned their heads to look at him as he walked past. That is an example of the halo an 8.5 would get IRL.

4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a country. So for example Akash Kumar is roughly an 8.5 based on my calculation in his prime so he would be the most attractive person in India, same with Delon who would be the most attractive person in France during his prime.

BTW don't think an 8.5 is a low score this is incredibly rare and above celebrity level ,most people across history will never score this high. So it makes sense to rank someone like Alain Delon as an 8.5, as he does lack features to push him up to a 9 (but I will get into this in another thread).

This is where the true looks halo starts and you will be largely idolised for your looks and benefit from it. E.g. DiCaprio is largely considered as the most successful actor of the past few decades or so and he scores an 8.5 in his absolute prime. Women will be all over you and will simp for you, it will be totally obvious that they are into you.

This is largely considered a true 10/10 IRL by most people as pre popularity of the internet these were the people who were idolised and made known for their looks etc, as we weren't as aware of people who ranked above an 8.5. Subjectivity also plays a massive role at this level and upward. This is where you will start to get attention everywhere you go and it should be obvious whether you fall into this rating or not.

75% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.25) to fit into this bracket.

---

8.75/10 (Gigachad)

Example: Brian Whittaker
View attachment 2964680
1. Characterisation:

• Incredible harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (80-90%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 95% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 738,000 people <4000 alive

Incredibly rare


3. Sightings: usually the best looking person in a continent, top level modelling and Hollywood and very high end exclusive events. On average you will see someone who fits this bracket once in a lifetime, however this is not guaranteed and very unlikely.

This is also the average looks level of the top level models of all time (calculated by taking the average rating of all top models in the industry based on my facial calculator).


4. Theory: Usually the most attractive person in a continent. Everything above is essentially the same as here, the only difference here is you can get special privileges (such as Whittaker dating Zara Larson, a top level singer in terms of popularity, purely based off your looks). Most women will consider themselves out of your league and will be intimidated by you/scared to approach you and send you signals out of fear of rejection etc. I would say this level is where you get diminishing returns in terms of women, so dating the highest level women in terms of looks and popularity will be better for you.

80% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.5) to fit into this bracket.

---

9/10 (Icon)

Example: prime Vasilly Stepanov
View attachment 2964697
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 4,000,000 people <750 alive

Extremely rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people in the world, highest level modelling and only seen in the most famous/popular movies only. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Contrary to popular belief not everything is perfect and there are large diminishing returns at this level (take example of Vasilly as a good example of this). Most women will not date you out of insecurity, however you should be famous for your looks. IRL you will never see someone who looks like this because they are probably locked off from the general public. However they can be found somewhat easily online as they will obviously be famous for their looks around the world.

This is a good example of scarcity paradox, where something rare becomes more sought after precisely because of its rarity, making it more common in terms of its desirability or attention. This seems counterintuitive but its not, because the halo is too great at this level that it makes it perceivably more common than it otherwise would seem if someone was to experience it for themselves.

85% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.6) to fit into this bracket.

---

9.5/10 (Terrachad)

Example: Hexum
View attachment 2964713
1. Characterisation:

• Outlier harmony score (top model level and top percentiles) - (85-95%)
• Very high dimorphism
• Outstanding facial leanness and body fat factors
• Above 98% soft max score - (everything is maxxed out, exceptional colouring, skin texture and smoothness, eye colouring and contrasting, great brow density and additional features such as lips, lashes etc)

2. Rarity: roughly 1 in 173,000,000 people <20 alive

Close to extinction level rare


3. Sightings: Among the best looking people of all time, only seen online. On average you will never see someone who fits this bracket in real life again.


4. Theory: Among the best looking people in the world, and of all time. Same as before pretty much in terms of how people treat you and diminishing returns etc, but a whole level above. Just watch the movie making of a male model with Hexum and you should get an idea of how it is to live as a 9.5. Still very hard to find online as most people don't know they exist and wont know where to look for them for the most part.

The reason this is close to extinction level rare is because they are dwindling by the day and nature may stop producing them at any point or maybe god will decide to stop creating them. Take Hexum as an example, we probably only know of the existence of 9.5's based on him however he offed himself and now that's 1 less. Only modern day ones are Matt Bomer (mostly based on harmony though) and debatably Del Rio.

90% harmony score is the lowest harmony score you could get away with (while having all the other factors above an 8.7) to fit into this bracket.

Anyways thanks for reading, let me know what other threads you want me to make give me some ideas, got a few lined up for the next few months anyway. Let me know your thoughts on this one as well and hopefully you found it an interesting read and it helped in some way

---

TAGS:

@ggg.tv🤫 @greycel @coisbhai @yeeyeeslayer @moreroidsmoredates @Darktriad16 @Clavicular @Vermilioncore @Zenis @<6PSLcel @hopecel @0steotomy @blknswag @Charisma @BrahminBoss @Korea @Lynxress @plukee @noodlelover @optimisticzoomer @RaidenJTR @silencio @slavicpsycho @NorwoodAscender @n9wiff @Michael Myers @The Grinch @Xangsane @shieldzz @PseudoMaxxer @lestoa @King Solomon @ilovetakis @i_love_roosters

Let me know if you want me to add or remove you from tags

DID READ , GOOD THREAD BHAI

 

[Clavicular]

Example: Theo James

Low chad? My g is his cyclops ipd doesnt allow him to be above 6 psl

 

[Haseeb]

I’m paki bro

Me too lmao. Where from

 

[Thebuffdon]

Me too lmao. Where from

Karachi living in England

 

[Thebuffdon]

Low chad? My g is his cyclops ipd doesnt allow him to be above 6 psl

Tell that to all the women who simp over him and tell me what they say lol

 

[Thebuffdon]

Low chad? My g is his cyclops ipd doesnt allow him to be above 6 psl

Also I said this has nothing to do with PSL if you actually bothered reading it clav