Colonialism saved Africa.

sandcelmuttcel said:
egypt =/= sub saharan africa
are you egyptian? why are you so proud of their achievements?
Click to expand...
Many wealthy empires grew around coastal areas or large rivers that served as part of important trade routes. The kingdoms of Mali and Songhai Empiregrew along the Niger River between 1200 and 1590. Berber traders from the Sahel—a region south of the Sahara Desert—traded dates, copper, horses, weapons and cloth that they brought from north Africa in Camel trains.[5] Trade with the Berber people, and other groups, drove the growth of the Ghana empire, which traded its gold, kola nuts, and slaves. West Africans created a demand for salt, which was collected at desert oases, and which they used to preserve food as well as for seasoning it.[6]

In 1324, Mansa Musa, the king of Mali, made a historically famous Hajj (pilgrimage) to Mecca. There was an enormous group organized to undertake the Hajj with the king. It included "60,000 men, including 1200 servants" and records show that Mansa Musa gave out so much gold in Egypt, that its economy became depressed.[7]

Between 1000 and 1500, the forests of West Africa also became part of trade networks, particularly under the reigns of the Yoruba kings. Ifé was a vital trade town, along the route from the tropical forests to Djenné, a major trade centre in Sudan, near other large trade cities such as Timbuktu and Gao.[8] Ifé's location also placed it near Benin and the Atlantic Ocean. Yoruba civilization was supported by cities surrounded by farmed land, but extensive trade development made it wealthy.[9
 
hairyballscel said:
jfl don't cite a paper you haven't read, its clear you don't really understand it
Click to expand...
:feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:
It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.
Click to expand...
Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians.
Click to expand...
 
Blackeycel said:
Many wealthy empires grew around coastal areas or large rivers that served as part of important trade routes. The kingdoms of Mali and Songhai Empiregrew along the Niger River between 1200 and 1590. Berber traders from the Sahel—a region south of the Sahara Desert—traded dates, copper, horses, weapons and cloth that they brought from north Africa in Camel trains.[5] Trade with the Berber people, and other groups, drove the growth of the Ghana empire, which traded its gold, kola nuts, and slaves. West Africans created a demand for salt, which was collected at desert oases, and which they used to preserve food as well as for seasoning it.[6]

In 1324, Mansa Musa, the king of Mali, made a historically famous Hajj (pilgrimage) to Mecca. There was an enormous group organized to undertake the Hajj with the king. It included "60,000 men, including 1200 servants" and records show that Mansa Musa gave out so much gold in Egypt, that its economy became depressed.[7]

Between 1000 and 1500, the forests of West Africa also became part of trade networks, particularly under the reigns of the Yoruba kings. Ifé was a vital trade town, along the route from the tropical forests to Djenné, a major trade centre in Sudan, near other large trade cities such as Timbuktu and Gao.[8] Ifé's location also placed it near Benin and the Atlantic Ocean. Yoruba civilization was supported by cities surrounded by farmed land, but extensive trade development made it wealthy.[9
Click to expand...
so much wealth and little technological advancement
 
sandcelmuttcel said:
so much wealth and little technological advancement
Click to expand...
They Yoruba were one of the first people to get into mueller energy and created these masks before the enlightenment in Europe

8694F606 58E5 4741 BB74 88097574B808

D6BD4C6A 1405 4C34 9AF8 75CADC03D4FE
A4AB47F8 88DF 4E88 90F2 FCA41FE859A8
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel
infidel hunter said:
All the talk of imperialism and colonialism ruing Africa... before Europe got involved Africa had no electricity no technology and was essentially living In a Stone Age level of advancement(they are Bronze Age now in many communities, going backwards...). The gooks have now started colonialism in Africa because without it the continent would devolve further into madness. God damn white Europeans! Cursing us with roads and electricity and central government! Now South Africa is a shithole and the rest of the continent is essentially a warzone. The Arabs and Europeans are needed in Africa now more than ever. But whites and arabs will be blamed for all of africa’s problems even though they saved it.
Click to expand...
Black Ass Needs To Be Colonized By BWC.
077338e8ece4f0cdb60616a4cb114c56.jpg
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: volcelfatcel and sandcelmuttcel
  • JFL
Reactions: Marsiere214 and sandcelmuttcel
I saw a youtuber titled
Pharoh jamal
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel
  • +1
Reactions: volcelfatcel and sandcelmuttcel
  • JFL
Reactions: Marsiere214
Blackeycel said:
Congrats you proved my point yet again


Those ancient levent people were genetically also African keep coping
Click to expand...

i fell for the confirmation bias
the levant people we were talking were not african
the facial features you blackwashers think of as negroid is actually middle eastern
www.quora.com

What did the Natufians of the Levant look like?

Answer (1 of 7): I’ve read that they have a bit of sub-saharan african features but genetically are not closer to them than any other Eurasian during that time. It is also said that body proportion-wise, they were closer to other west Eurasian than to Sub-saharan Africa because of the colder clim...
www.quora.com
they don't need to have european facial structure inorder to not be black
that's the way these(middle eastern) people look
there might be more similarities between them and africans in comparison to whites but that deosn't make them african
the video is a joke
 
sandcelmuttcel said:
i fell for the confirmation bias
the levant people we were talking were not african
the facial features you blackwashers think of as negroid is actually middle eastern
www.quora.com

What did the Natufians of the Levant look like?

Answer (1 of 7): I’ve read that they have a bit of sub-saharan african features but genetically are not closer to them than any other Eurasian during that time. It is also said that body proportion-wise, they were closer to other west Eurasian than to Sub-saharan Africa because of the colder clim...
www.quora.com
they don't need to have european facial structure inorder to not be black
that's the way these(middle eastern) people look
there might be more similarities between them and africans in comparison to whites but that deosn't make them african
the video is a joke
Click to expand...
But genetically they are 30 plus sub Saharan African and 30 plus North African making them African :lul:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel
sandcelmuttcel said:
why are you contradicting yourself?
Click to expand...
Because like the Nubians the Egyptians had their origins in east Africa. Nubians are 46 percent Nilotic and the other Eurasian
 
Blackeycel said:
Where does it say that exactly?
Click to expand...
nvm i read more carefully
but it says
The
Natufian sample from Israel is also problematic because it is so
small, being constituted of three males and one female from the
Late Pleistocene Epipalaeolithic (34) of Israel, and there was no
usable Neolithic sample for the Near East.
Click to expand...
When the samples used in Fig. 1 are compared by the use of
canonical variate plots as in Fig. 2, the separateness of the
Niger-Congo speakers is again quite clear. Interestingly enough,
however, the small Natufian sample falls between the Niger-
Congo group and the other samples used. Fig. 2 shows the plot
produced by the first two canonical variates, but the same thing
happens when canonical variates 1 and 3 (not shown here) are
used. This placement suggests that there may have been a
Sub-Saharan African element in the make-up of the Natufians
(the putative ancestors of the subsequent Neolithic), although in
this particular test there is no such evident presence in the North
African or Egyptian samples. As shown in Fig. 1, the Somalis and
the Egyptian Bronze Age sample from Naqada may also have a
hint of a Sub-Saharan African component. That was not borne
out in the canonical variate plot (Fig. 2), and there was no
evidence of such an involvement in the Algerian Neolithic
(Gambetta) sample.
Click to expand...
 
@Blackeycel
bro just give up
even the studies you linked disagree with you
 
also i am not sure if they are referring to the e1b1 as subsaharan
which haplogroup they are referring to?
 
sandcelmuttcel said:
also i am not sure if they are referring to the e1b1 as subsaharan
which haplogroup they are referring to?
Click to expand...
Here’s another study to clear that up
www.researchgate.net

(PDF) Re-analysis of Whole Genome Sequence Data From 279 Ancient Eurasians Reveals Substantial Ancestral Heterogeneity

PDF | Supervised clustering or projection analysis is a staple technique in population genetic analysis. The utility of this technique depends... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net
 
sandcelmuttcel said:
also i am not sure if they are referring to the e1b1 as subsaharan
which haplogroup they are referring to?
Click to expand...
www.researchgate.net

(PDF) Ancient genomes from North Africa evidence prehistoric migrations to the Maghreb from both the Levant and Europe

PDF | The extent to which prehistoric migrations of farmers influenced the genetic pool of western North Africans remains unclear. Archaeological... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net
06E709FE 874A 4744 954C 060B01978C6B

3B08C75E C87B 42F8 8F0D 5E657C730CDF

Reread the new study again
 
Last edited:
@Blackeycel
they believe the (disproven) theory of e1b1 originating in east africa so they count it as subsaharan
 
i'm going to read the studies later
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Blackpill Compilation of Blackpill (Megathread)
2 3
Replies
106
Views
28K
illusivespirits
illusivespirits
CFW432
PROOF THAT CAUCASOID FEATURES AND LIGHTER SKIN WERE DESIRABLE BEFORE COLONIALISM.
2
Replies
83
Views
6K
CFW432
CFW432
redhandsbluehands
china
Replies
34
Views
6K
Stuttercel
Stuttercel

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top