
longjohnmong
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2022
- Posts
- 10,613
- Reputation
- 11,786
it is definitely not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
it is definitely not
copeYeah but big muscles are a sign of masculinity, right?
That is why niggas gotta slave away for years to "get big."
Totally natural and representative of androgenic tone, right?
But rolling out of bed with a big cock is not androgenic, no.
Those big muscles that took years to get are more accurate symbols LMAO
If muscles were androgenic status then every androgenic guy should look like Phil Heath or Ronnie Coleman naturally with no effort, but it takes abuse and drugs and gymslaving to build those faggy big water muscles but big dick takes virtually no serious effort, if any at all.
Honest symbols are those you cannot fake easily. Muscles and the most easiest thing to change if you become an autist gymcel but cock won't change no matter how much you jerk your 4 inches, clown.
How long does it take to grow a big dick you already have?
Niggas gym to become freaks, meanwhile only freaky thing on me is dick and I don't gotta do shit for it.
Keep dreaming, incels. Dick is king, big muscles are cope.
What's the point, I'm obese and acne ridden dick is only relevant once you have girls dtfimpressive, please to be dickmogging sir
you’re bragging about having an above average sized dick on an incel forum to impress a bunch of autistic retards. You aren’t manly nor will you ever be. Shut up faggot.A bigger dick = more androgenic/masc plain and simple. Muh muscles, muh jawline, etc. DICK is very dimorphic, closest women come to it is tiny clits.
So dick a MUCH more dimorphic than watery big muscles, or chin height, or wide clavicles, all of which are found in women much more than BIG DICKS.
SO if women can have strong jaws, wide shoulders and still have small clits, then DICK IS WHAT IS MOST DIMORPHIC/ANDROGENIC, NOT MUSCLES OR JAW.
So having a good sized dick indicates inherently HIGHER androgenic/androgen status INNATELY, not muh roiding douches who have micro pennes.
SUIFUEL for Asians, Indians, and any guy in general with one under 7 inches too. LOW ANDROGEN STATUS, GYMCELLING WILL NEVER MAKE YOUR SHRIMP GROW. YOUR LOW ANDROGEN STATUS WAS MARKED BY GENES, EPIGENETICS, ENVIRONMENT, OR SOMETHING THAT CURSED YOU.
GO TO GYM ALL YOU WANT, GET ALL SURGERIES, IF YOU'RE UNDER 7 INCHES BPEL DICK THEN YOU HAVE LOWER INNATE ANDROGENS/LESS ANDROGENIC THAN ME.
Calm down you only have a 7 inches with nothing else going for you , 7 inches isn't even big acting as if jacked guys have a 2 incherEverybody talking about muh muscles = dimorphic, manly, yet they got 2 inch cocks with 16 inch biceps while I got 7+ inch with 14 inch bcieps. What is more androgenic, a dick used to fuck and mate that's very important, or some water-filled sacks of estrogen from autistic gym/diet? You stressing tf out yourself for muscles when cock is king?
Same with jaw, "Look at my jaw bro!" Women can have big jaws too and many do, it's NOT A DIMORPHIC TRAIT as much as dick size is. So many cope with gym and surgery for their ugly face, but the reality is the answer to how masculine/androgenic you naturally are is in your pants. Default stats define true manhood, not inflated/altered ones throughout time.
I'm getting more and more convinced that most gymcels/roiders are innately low androgen dudes. They roid or lift to feel more manly because they have sub 7 inchers sadly.
They cope with the muscles and surgeries and blah blah, but at the end of the day? Smaller dick = less androgenic, period. No healthy girl picks puffy muscles over big cock.
A bigger dick = more androgenic/masc plain and simple. Muh muscles, muh jawline, etc. DICK is very dimorphic, closest women come to it is tiny clits.
So dick a MUCH more dimorphic than watery big muscles, or chin height, or wide clavicles, all of which are found in women much more than BIG DICKS.
SO if women can have strong jaws, wide shoulders and still have small clits, then DICK IS WHAT IS MOST DIMORPHIC/ANDROGENIC, NOT MUSCLES OR JAW.
So having a good sized dick indicates inherently HIGHER androgenic/androgen status INNATELY, not muh roiding douches who have micro pennes.
SUIFUEL for Asians, Indians, and any guy in general with one under 7 inches too. LOW ANDROGEN STATUS, GYMCELLING WILL NEVER MAKE YOUR SHRIMP GROW. YOUR LOW ANDROGEN STATUS WAS MARKED BY GENES, EPIGENETICS, ENVIRONMENT, OR SOMETHING THAT CURSED YOU.
GO TO GYM ALL YOU WANT, GET ALL SURGERIES, IF YOU'RE UNDER 7 INCHES BPEL DICK THEN YOU HAVE LOWER INNATE ANDROGENS/LESS ANDROGENIC THAN ME.
Who wants to bet OP has a micropenisA bigger dick = more androgenic/masc plain and simple. Muh muscles, muh jawline, etc. DICK is very dimorphic, closest women come to it is tiny clits.
So dick a MUCH more dimorphic than watery big muscles, or chin height, or wide clavicles, all of which are found in women much more than BIG DICKS.
SO if women can have strong jaws, wide shoulders and still have small clits, then DICK IS WHAT IS MOST DIMORPHIC/ANDROGENIC, NOT MUSCLES OR JAW.
So having a good sized dick indicates inherently HIGHER androgenic/androgen status INNATELY, not muh roiding douches who have micro pennes.
SUIFUEL for Asians, Indians, and any guy in general with one under 7 inches too. LOW ANDROGEN STATUS, GYMCELLING WILL NEVER MAKE YOUR SHRIMP GROW. YOUR LOW ANDROGEN STATUS WAS MARKED BY GENES, EPIGENETICS, ENVIRONMENT, OR SOMETHING THAT CURSED YOU.
GO TO GYM ALL YOU WANT, GET ALL SURGERIES, IF YOU'RE UNDER 7 INCHES BPEL DICK THEN YOU HAVE LOWER INNATE ANDROGENS/LESS ANDROGENIC THAN ME.
Yes because there is literally a disease that makes men un reactive to testosteroneBy your logic dick size > height
they are evolved for a high intra species competence environment, meaning they have more androgen receptors in his dickExplain all the fags and twinks with big dicks
bro knows nothing about sexual dimorphism in relation to the penis. pure cope for my small D fellows. don't listen to this bsA bigger dick = more androgenic/masc plain and simple. Muh muscles, muh jawline, etc. DICK is very dimorphic, closest women come to it is tiny clits.
So dick a MUCH more dimorphic than watery big muscles, or chin height, or wide clavicles, all of which are found in women much more than BIG DICKS.
SO if women can have strong jaws, wide shoulders and still have small clits, then DICK IS WHAT IS MOST DIMORPHIC/ANDROGENIC, NOT MUSCLES OR JAW.
So having a good sized dick indicates inherently HIGHER androgenic/androgen status INNATELY, not muh roiding douches who have micro pennes.
SUIFUEL for Asians, Indians, and any guy in general with one under 7 inches too. LOW ANDROGEN STATUS, GYMCELLING WILL NEVER MAKE YOUR SHRIMP GROW. YOUR LOW ANDROGEN STATUS WAS MARKED BY GENES, EPIGENETICS, ENVIRONMENT, OR SOMETHING THAT CURSED YOU.
GO TO GYM ALL YOU WANT, GET ALL SURGERIES, IF YOU'RE UNDER 7 INCHES BPEL DICK THEN YOU HAVE LOWER INNATE ANDROGENS/LESS ANDROGENIC THAN ME.
jacked guys are more likely to be hungCalm down you only have a 7 inches with nothing else going for you , 7 inches isn't even big acting as if jacked guys have a 2 incher
how do you measure bpl correctly it seems very straightforwardOnly like 19 guys have 7+ inches on this forum, the rest LARP or measure wrongly.
The fact that most men lie about dick size shows HOW ANDROGENIC it is; how important it is in the face of being a man.
More guys lie about having big cocks than big muscles on the net, and always have which means cock > muscles, all else equal.
SO I think this paints a clear picture on how dick size alone is the single most biggest factor in how masculine/androgenic you innately are.