Do CBCT scans suffice for design? @Realsurgerymax

O

oganthropologist

Iron
Joined
Jul 1, 2025
Posts
36
Reputation
17
Getting cheek implants and Pagnoni mentioned medical grade CT scans are preferred over CBCT scans in order for his designer (presumably Giant @RealSurgerymax ) to design.

Will it ruin the design and, potentially, my face if I opt for the inferior CBCT scan instead?

I know this sounds high inhibition, but my family has a sensitivity to cancer so I'd like to avoid high bouts of unnecessary radiation if possible. If CBCT scans can yield the same results I'll get this done today.
 
  • +1
Reactions: billyxxx
A CT scan is not gonna give you cancer. You need to get referred by a surgeon and that surgeon will tell the imaging clinic what scans you need, so you first need to find a surgeon who is down to just plan with a CBCT, which is technically possible if the fov is high enough.
 
  • Full head CT Scans have slightly less than a 1 in 2,000 risk of causing a cancer later in life. Chest CTs are the highest risk area being over 1 in 2,000.
  • That means in the hundreds of patients I have worked with, probably none of them will get cancer (forms the scan) but about 50-100 will develop cancer naturally when they get older.
  • Your lifetime cancer risk is already quite high, the CT scan adds a tiny amount.
  • That's still not a small risk and CT scans should be done only when needed. In the case of custom plates, guides and implants, its usually needed.

  • SOME CBCT scans have a large enough Field of View to contain the whole face/head. most dont.
  • SOME CBCT scans are high enough resolution quality but about 75% are not. NEVER use the low-dose quick scan settings.
  • Considering most CBCTs are incapable on one or both criteria (Scan resolution and field of view size), a CT is usually preferred

  • Ionizing radiation from the CT scan is what causes the DNA damage which leads to delayed cancers.
  • Glutathione and Vitamin C IV Infusion can be done before (or during) the CT Scan to theoretically reduce the amount of damage.
  • Most places in USA or Europe will not accommodate this. However, its possible in Bangkok, and I can arrange it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tallooksmaxxer, billyxxx and Quncho
Getting cheek implants and Pagnoni mentioned medical grade CT scans are preferred over CBCT scans in order for his designer (presumably Giant @RealSurgerymax ) to design.

Will it ruin the design and, potentially, my face if I opt for the inferior CBCT scan instead?

I know this sounds high inhibition, but my family has a sensitivity to cancer so I'd like to avoid high bouts of unnecessary radiation if possible. If CBCT scans can yield the same results I'll get this done today.
I had this exact question in my head the other day
 
  • Full head CT Scans have slightly less than a 1 in 2,000 risk of causing a cancer later in life. Chest CTs are the highest risk area being over 1 in 2,000.
  • That means in the hundreds of patients I have worked with, probably none of them will get cancer (forms the scan) but about 50-100 will develop cancer naturally when they get older.
  • Your lifetime cancer risk is already quite high, the CT scan adds a tiny amount.
  • That's still not a small risk and CT scans should be done only when needed. In the case of custom plates, guides and implants, its usually needed.

  • SOME CBCT scans have a large enough Field of View to contain the whole face/head. most dont.
  • SOME CBCT scans are high enough resolution quality but about 75% are not. NEVER use the low-dose quick scan settings.
  • Considering most CBCTs are incapable on one or both criteria (Scan resolution and field of view size), a CT is usually preferred

  • Ionizing radiation from the CT scan is what causes the DNA damage which leads to delayed cancers.
  • Glutathione and Vitamin C IV Infusion can be done before (or during) the CT Scan to theoretically reduce the amount of damage.
  • Most places in USA or Europe will not accommodate this. However, its possible in Bangkok, and I can arrange it.
I guess you are supposed to get into these machines with no metal on you but what about tianium implants?
Do they damage the scan or possess a medical risk?
 
I guess you are supposed to get into these machines with no metal on you but what about tianium implants?
Do they damage the scan or possess a medical risk?
You are thinking of MRI.

Titanium is technically MRI because it isn't magnetic.

Titanium is fine for CT but produces some artifact/scatter
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tallooksmaxxer
  • Full head CT Scans have slightly less than a 1 in 2,000 risk of causing a cancer later in life. Chest CTs are the highest risk area being over 1 in 2,000.
  • That means in the hundreds of patients I have worked with, probably none of them will get cancer (forms the scan) but about 50-100 will develop cancer naturally when they get older.
  • Your lifetime cancer risk is already quite high, the CT scan adds a tiny amount.
  • That's still not a small risk and CT scans should be done only when needed. In the case of custom plates, guides and implants, its usually needed.

  • SOME CBCT scans have a large enough Field of View to contain the whole face/head. most dont.
  • SOME CBCT scans are high enough resolution quality but about 75% are not. NEVER use the low-dose quick scan settings.
  • Considering most CBCTs are incapable on one or both criteria (Scan resolution and field of view size), a CT is usually preferred

  • Ionizing radiation from the CT scan is what causes the DNA damage which leads to delayed cancers.
  • Glutathione and Vitamin C IV Infusion can be done before (or during) the CT Scan to theoretically reduce the amount of damage.
  • Most places in USA or Europe will not accommodate this. However, its possible in Bangkok, and I can arrange it.
Informative response thank you. Are there specific instructions or a prescription I can provide the CBCT scan specialists to check if they adhere to? Example what precise field of view, voxel resolution, etc? That would be great.

For example, I was referred to a specialist that can do full 90% of face (up to hairline) field of view, with 0.3mm / 300 µm voxel size.
 
  • +1
Reactions: billyxxx
Informative response thank you. Are there specific instructions or a prescription I can provide the CBCT scan specialists to check if they adhere to? Example what precise field of view, voxel resolution, etc? That would be great.

For example, I was referred to a specialist that can do full 90% of face (up to hairline) field of view, with 0.3mm / 300 µm voxel size.
@RealSurgerymax
 
  • +1
Reactions: billyxxx

Similar threads

P
Replies
362
Views
30K
heterochromia
heterochromia
D
Replies
29
Views
16K
clover
clover
D
Replies
23
Views
13K
Nihonz9
Nihonz9
D
Replies
61
Views
4K
ApacheMaxx
ApacheMaxx
D
Replies
71
Views
19K
germanguy69
germanguy69

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top