WishIwasChico
Kraken
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2022
- Posts
- 18,588
- Reputation
- 26,502
A common theme I’ve noticed recently is people on this site being divided: Gymcel is legit/ Gymcel is cope.
The ones that argue ‘Gymcel is cope’ often use examples of 2/10s with gymmaxed bodies and say ‘no gym for face’ or use examples of chico or loox and say ‘he doesn’t need gym!’ It’s pretty obvious to see how their argument is a falio already. They draw their arguments on outliers or extremes i.e. 2-3s (extreme low scale facially) or 8-10s (extremely high facially). Of course, face matters and at these extremes as they are so low or high, nobody will save, height, or anything. It is the same for women. A 2/10 facially woman who suddenly goes from having a flat chest/ass to a big ass and tits is still no going to be hot as her face is repulsively that that is all you can see. But what about most people? What about the people who fall into the normal range? For guys this means your face isn’t repulsive but not enough striking enough to stand out. For women, this means most guys would fuck but high-value men etc. are not staying.
Before we go back to that let’s remember that sex appeal and objectively being attractive are two totally different things. That’s why the most popular pornstars are not objectively beautiful but have giga good bodies like Mia Khalifa etc. or a perfect one is Abella Danger. She is legit objectively no higher than MTB but has insane sex appeal due to her butt.
If she wasn't a PAWG she would literally have so much less sex appeal it would be insane.
To put this into perspective take these two examples:
Sex appeal but not objectively stunning
Vs objectively beautiful:
Ask yourself: which one would you fuck?
Being PSL god is overrated and most autists here do not recognise it. You DO NOT need to be a PSL god to be successful with women. The only benefits of being a PSL god or supermodel tier are to become just that… A SUPERMODEL.
Some people are good to look at and some people you want to fuck – there is a difference. Loox for example, a lot of girls would admit he is good looking but would they want to fuck him right there and then?
A perfect example is below imo:
This girl is facially average and anyone saying otherwise is a complete simp tbh but regardless. Imagine for a second she A) Had no butt whatsoever B) was giga overweight And C) was giga thin
It’s pretty obvious to see how this would affect her mating opportunities. Her ass skyrockets her sex appeal.
I’ve used women for examples as it’s easy to demonstrate considering this site is male-dominated but women as everyone here is aware are just as much visual as men. Just look at all the stories online of men who were fat and got into shape or giga thin and got ripped and how women treated them differently.
A quick one on males just to cover this also:
This is a supermodel and has a top 1% objective face. VS a MTN-HTN who is ripped:
Lucky blue smith (supermodel) mogs the ripped guy facially to death but I promise you that the ripped guy would hook up with way more chicks than him as his sex appeal is much higher.
Like ask yourself: does that frail supermodel look like the type of man that women get wet for? The type of man who she fantasises about picking her up and throwing her around in the bedroom and submitting to? No it does not. The other guy does however.
If you want hookups then improving your sex appeal mogs autistic PSL. End of.
The ones that argue ‘Gymcel is cope’ often use examples of 2/10s with gymmaxed bodies and say ‘no gym for face’ or use examples of chico or loox and say ‘he doesn’t need gym!’ It’s pretty obvious to see how their argument is a falio already. They draw their arguments on outliers or extremes i.e. 2-3s (extreme low scale facially) or 8-10s (extremely high facially). Of course, face matters and at these extremes as they are so low or high, nobody will save, height, or anything. It is the same for women. A 2/10 facially woman who suddenly goes from having a flat chest/ass to a big ass and tits is still no going to be hot as her face is repulsively that that is all you can see. But what about most people? What about the people who fall into the normal range? For guys this means your face isn’t repulsive but not enough striking enough to stand out. For women, this means most guys would fuck but high-value men etc. are not staying.
Before we go back to that let’s remember that sex appeal and objectively being attractive are two totally different things. That’s why the most popular pornstars are not objectively beautiful but have giga good bodies like Mia Khalifa etc. or a perfect one is Abella Danger. She is legit objectively no higher than MTB but has insane sex appeal due to her butt.
If she wasn't a PAWG she would literally have so much less sex appeal it would be insane.
To put this into perspective take these two examples:
Sex appeal but not objectively stunning
Vs objectively beautiful:
Ask yourself: which one would you fuck?
Being PSL god is overrated and most autists here do not recognise it. You DO NOT need to be a PSL god to be successful with women. The only benefits of being a PSL god or supermodel tier are to become just that… A SUPERMODEL.
Some people are good to look at and some people you want to fuck – there is a difference. Loox for example, a lot of girls would admit he is good looking but would they want to fuck him right there and then?
A perfect example is below imo:
This girl is facially average and anyone saying otherwise is a complete simp tbh but regardless. Imagine for a second she A) Had no butt whatsoever B) was giga overweight And C) was giga thin
It’s pretty obvious to see how this would affect her mating opportunities. Her ass skyrockets her sex appeal.
I’ve used women for examples as it’s easy to demonstrate considering this site is male-dominated but women as everyone here is aware are just as much visual as men. Just look at all the stories online of men who were fat and got into shape or giga thin and got ripped and how women treated them differently.
A quick one on males just to cover this also:
This is a supermodel and has a top 1% objective face. VS a MTN-HTN who is ripped:
Lucky blue smith (supermodel) mogs the ripped guy facially to death but I promise you that the ripped guy would hook up with way more chicks than him as his sex appeal is much higher.
Like ask yourself: does that frail supermodel look like the type of man that women get wet for? The type of man who she fantasises about picking her up and throwing her around in the bedroom and submitting to? No it does not. The other guy does however.
If you want hookups then improving your sex appeal mogs autistic PSL. End of.
Attachments
Last edited:
