How to properly use GHK-Cu

[tyronmaxxing]

Cool and awesome thread. Now just where to find Betaine-Tartaric Acid (BetTar) based GHK-Cu solution.

 

[Pop23]

Gonna add tiny amount to my minoxidil to reap the benefits faster.

 

[xuzky]

looks like cope to me

 

[JohnDoe]

Wow how did I miss this thread... nice job I had some questions regarding copper peptides too

 

[muragoat]

just suck it up and pay the price, it was the cheapest one I found anyway.

are you still using ghk cu in PBS

 

[Neucher]

Does it say anywhere how often and how much you should inject?

 

[a55]

Does it say anywhere how often and how much you should inject?

for optimal use 2mg 5 days a week and 2 day break after then repeat

 

[Prettyboymog]

Wouldnt this darken the iris colour, as added coppe would deposit into the iris and therefore it mate darken, also is inhibits the tgf1b pathway and that would also darken the iris colour?

 

[maxmaxxer]

https://hvyresearch.com/product/bacteriostatic-water-with-pbs/
Pretty sure the risk of infection would be pretty high with a typical distilled water PBS solution. Wouldn't be able to keep it for more than a couple days once opened (without re-sterilizing). IDK though. + mayb the bac water would fucc the benefits of PBS.

No, GHK-Cu reconstituted in PBS would not be more likely to cause infections than GHK-Cu reconstituted in bacteriostatic water. In fact, the opposite is generally true.
Here's why:
* Sterility: Both bacteriostatic water and properly prepared PBS should be sterile. Sterility is the primary factor in preventing injection-related infections. If either solution is contaminated, it could lead to infection, but this is a problem with the preparation of the solution, not the solution itself.
* Bacteriostatic Water's Preservative: Bacteriostatic water contains a preservative (usually benzyl alcohol) that inhibits bacterial growth. This offers an extra layer of protection against contamination after the vial is opened and multiple uses are drawn from it. PBS does not contain such a preservative.
* PBS's Buffering Capacity: PBS is designed to maintain a stable pH. This is important for the stability of the GHK-Cu and also helps to minimize irritation at the injection site. A stable pH is less likely to create an environment conducive to bacterial growth. Fluctuations in pH can sometimes make solutions more susceptible to contamination.
* Osmolality: PBS is also formulated to be isotonic, meaning it has the same salt concentration as bodily fluids. This makes it less irritating to tissues and less likely to cause cell damage, which can sometimes create entry points for infection. Bacteriostatic water is not necessarily isotonic.
Key takeaway: The risk of infection is primarily related to the sterility of the solution and proper injection technique. Bacteriostatic water has a slight advantage after the vial is opened due to the preservative, but a properly prepared and handled PBS solution is not more likely to cause infection. In fact, its buffering capacity and isotonicity could potentially make it less irritating and therefore less likely to contribute to conditions that might make infection more likely.

 

[a55]

https://hvyresearch.com/product/bacteriostatic-water-with-pbs/
Pretty sure the risk of infection would be pretty high with a typical distilled water PBS solution. Wouldn't be able to keep it for more than a couple days once opened (without re-sterilizing). IDK though. + mayb the bac water would fucc the benefits of PBS.

No, GHK-Cu reconstituted in PBS would not be more likely to cause infections than GHK-Cu reconstituted in bacteriostatic water. In fact, the opposite is generally true.
Here's why:
* Sterility: Both bacteriostatic water and properly prepared PBS should be sterile. Sterility is the primary factor in preventing injection-related infections. If either solution is contaminated, it could lead to infection, but this is a problem with the preparation of the solution, not the solution itself.
* Bacteriostatic Water's Preservative: Bacteriostatic water contains a preservative (usually benzyl alcohol) that inhibits bacterial growth. This offers an extra layer of protection against contamination after the vial is opened and multiple uses are drawn from it. PBS does not contain such a preservative.
* PBS's Buffering Capacity: PBS is designed to maintain a stable pH. This is important for the stability of the GHK-Cu and also helps to minimize irritation at the injection site. A stable pH is less likely to create an environment conducive to bacterial growth. Fluctuations in pH can sometimes make solutions more susceptible to contamination.
* Osmolality: PBS is also formulated to be isotonic, meaning it has the same salt concentration as bodily fluids. This makes it less irritating to tissues and less likely to cause cell damage, which can sometimes create entry points for infection. Bacteriostatic water is not necessarily isotonic.
Key takeaway: The risk of infection is primarily related to the sterility of the solution and proper injection technique. Bacteriostatic water has a slight advantage after the vial is opened due to the preservative, but a properly prepared and handled PBS solution is not more likely to cause infection. In fact, its buffering capacity and isotonicity could potentially make it less irritating and therefore less likely to contribute to conditions that might make infection more likely.

No he is right, BAC water is safer than PBS. PBS fucks BAC in terms of effectiveness though.
PBS won't inhibit bacterial growth so generally after opening it won't be sterile after a while. I have no idea on the safety of it