DelonLover1999
Minmaxing
- Joined
- May 12, 2023
- Posts
- 7,379
- Reputation
- 15,185
A 0.95 midface will only result in a long face look if other ratios are contributing (i.e. IAA angle and FWHR).
Since you had 0.46 ESR and 0.95 mfr, I think its safe to assume your fwhr was on the lower end, even if your brows were low set. So that was indeed the case.
Theoretically you could've gotten away with just hardmaxxing the lower third as much as possible, which would offset the midface harmony problems and bring attention elsewhere. But nevertheless props for going through with this.
Also hope you didn't lose that much facial identity, since you were rated mtn before, which isn't really that bad. I think most people would ideally want to look like a morphed version of themselves rather than a whole new different person, which is tricky to achieve when you alter key ratios like ESR, ICD and FWHR.
Since you had 0.46 ESR and 0.95 mfr, I think its safe to assume your fwhr was on the lower end, even if your brows were low set. So that was indeed the case.
Theoretically you could've gotten away with just hardmaxxing the lower third as much as possible, which would offset the midface harmony problems and bring attention elsewhere. But nevertheless props for going through with this.
Also hope you didn't lose that much facial identity, since you were rated mtn before, which isn't really that bad. I think most people would ideally want to look like a morphed version of themselves rather than a whole new different person, which is tricky to achieve when you alter key ratios like ESR, ICD and FWHR.