Harold O'brien
they/them
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2021
- Posts
- 4,647
- Reputation
- 5,559
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
noI solved it, do you believe me?
i made itDid you solve it?
will all the bitches in the world help you solve problems? getting laid is such a copeThis wont get you bitches
Solveing puzzles doesnt garuntee you have high iq, if so then its pointlesswill all the bitches in the world help you solve problems? getting laid is such a cope
iq is fake, it's a load of bsSolveing puzzles doesnt garuntee you have high iq, if so then its pointless
u are defo below avarage, ignored.Solveing puzzles doesnt garuntee you have high iq, if so then its pointless
This doesnt even make sense, so it pointless. This shit wont make me a billionaireiq is fake, it's a load of bs
but solving puzzles means you have 'it'. impossible to be mogged harder than when you cant solve something that someone else can
Ok smarty pants make me a millionaireu are defo below avarage, ignored.
ok? so leave the thread, nobody is forcing you to attempt this, lmaoThis doesnt even make sense, so it pointless. This shit wont make me a billionaire
People who don’t “believe” in IQ are low IQ.iq is fake, it's a load of bs
but solving puzzles means you have it (not iq: it). impossible to be mogged harder than when you cant solve something that someone else can
why would i believe in iq? i bet you cant even define what iq is jflPeople who don’t “believe” in IQ are low IQ.
the color choices are intentionalDid u meant to draw the black line?
Honestly your right, let idiot beileve that theyre smartok? so leave the thread, nobody is forcing you to attempt this, lmao
Intelligence quotient, its a number that measures for g, general intelligence, it is the most valid psychometric examination every created. Saying you don’t believe in IQ is like saying you don’t believe distance exists. I’m guessing you got a low score on an examination and now try to cope with having low IQ by making your own definition of intelligence.why would i believe in iq? i bet you cant even define what iq is jfl
what's the answer (don't give me any "find it out yourself" bullshit tell me)I solved it, do you believe me?
wtf MVP himself doesn't know, we're so fuckedThere isno pAttern in it
There isno pAttern in it
wtf MVP himself doesn't know, we're so fucked
surface level response.Intelligence quotient, its a number that measures for g, general intelligence, it is the most valid psychometric examination every created. Saying you don’t believe in IQ is like saying you don’t believe distance exists. I’m guessing you got a low score on an examination and now try to cope with having low IQ by making your own definition of intelligence.
there is a genuine pattern, whether you believe me or notIt's a fake troll post, there's no pattern, he's probably sat there laughing his ass off
There is a pattern in the first boxIt's a fake troll post, there's no pattern, he's probably sat there laughing his ass off
maybe the second is just empty? that tends to happenThere is a pattern in the first box
Idk about the second
find it out yourselfwhat's the answer (don't give me any "find it out yourself" bullshit tell me)
What do you mean first box.There is a pattern in the first box
Idk about the second
@LooksThinker still learning multiplication at school@LooksThinker what are your thots on dis one
he meant first empty boxWhat do you mean first box.
The patters is in all boxes thats how this shit works
Oh I thought thats is supposed to be empty.he meant first empty box
no it means his pattern is wrongmaybe the second is just empty? that tends to happen
but then it makes no sense
so what are you even solving then?Oh I thought thats is supposed to be empty.
the one on the bottom right.so what are you even solving then?
i´m not sure@LooksThinker what are your thots on dis one
inb4 op making random lines in boxesi´m not sure
View attachment 2772226
two blue lines up+one red line horizontally= 1 blue line which makes mix between vertical and horizontal black line.
first horizontal line: 2blue lines up + one red horizontally= one black mix line
in the second line it's probably: 2blue mix lines= one vertical line. Vertical line + small red mix line= some fucking black mix line which exact pattern i can't for sure know.
Last line is just impossible to count up because there is too little amount of patterns to use
@Tai Lung
Ill help explain it to you.surface level response.
what is general intelligence? it's the prinicipal component of the results of a battery of tests. i.e. correlations that 'psychometrists' (jfl) reify and pretend are meaningfully descriptive of the world around us
your #1 argument is that an iq test validates itself. jfl at going to the length to write this essay when the central premise is plainly circular logicIll help explain it to you.
First you need to recognize that there is such a thing as intelligence, that is, is everybody equally intelligent? Or are some people more intelligent than others? If you deny the existence of intelligence alltogether, you're probably retarded. Anyways. Ok now that we've established the existence of intelligence, we can assign an abstract theoretical value to it, lets call this value g, or general intelligence.
Then the question arises of how many sub-components there are to general intelligence. In psychometry, you can derive subcomponents by running a large number of participants through a set of long tests that include random questions that can objectively be graded as correct and incorrect based on participant response, then you can group questions together by how often participants consistently failed or succeeded in this cluster of questions (adjusted for difficulty). These would then be the subcomponents of g or general intelligence.
I don't remember off the top of my head what these ended up being but I believe they were something like, verbal intelligence, linguistic intelligence, spatial reasoning, etc (no emotional intelligence was not on this that shits a meme JFL). Now as it turns out, the components of intelligence are incredibly correlate to eachother, (>95%), that is if you're at the 70th percentile of verbal intelligence, odds are you're around the 70th percentile in all other intelligences, so you can very accurately use a single figure to encompass all of these, the figure most commonly used is IQ, which is graded on a standard distribution with mean of 100 SD of 15.
As for its validity as a psychometric examination, you're right in that a psychometric exam is valid insofar as it measures some real world quality. For example an exam on extraversion would have to monitor the social lives of participants to see if the test was valid as a measure of their extraversion. For IQ however, intelligence can be broadly conceived as an ability to solve problems, and it just so happens IQ tests-- valid ones at least-- test solely for abstract pattern recognition. Studying for a valid IQ test has been shown to have negligible effects on the result.
So the IQ test in a way validates itself, in that it directly measures general intelligence in the problems that it gives you, but if you wanted to take it a step further and measure the predictiveness of IQ on academic/carreer success, it has also been found to be the #1 most reliable predictor.
TL;DR, you're retarded and probably have sub100iq