" ISLAM IS THE FASTEST GROWING RELIGION"

Im the best Morocco or humanity have ever got, Im Moses of new times, im trying to rescue my people but they're talking shit about me like Moses got shit by jews (im not serious)
Nah im the best moroccan ever, the most handsome moroccan ever

Dont lie
 
Islam, as a religion, will survive regardless of individuals. While many people identify as Muslims, a strong sense of solidarity and brotherhood has been lacking. Although there is some level of unity, it should be strengthened much more. The ongoing turmoil in Palestine has fanned the torch of muslim brotherhood. This spirit of oneness should last regardless of whether we face problems or not.
The ummah is dead lol
 
By the end of this century, we'll all be worshipping superhuman AGI anyway.
maywa denki robot GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8365
1700069176642


@TRUE_CEL , mofo got a prime Pakistani Babe for converting to Islam.

@emeraldglass what type of operation is this
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8365
j
you're going to hell anyways, Jesus is the only way

btw Muslims are converting Europe to Pisslam, ruining it just like they ruined my country 😄
jesus agrees with and supports immigrants
 
The ummah is dead lol
Firstly, let's define Ummah. The Ummah is a global entity that encompasses countries where Islam is the predominant religion or, more broadly, individuals who identify as Muslims. As long as there is a nation with Islam as its main religion or even a community or individual professing belief in Islam, the Ummah exists, even if the practice is not overt. So, theoretically, your assertion is already challenged. Now, for point number two, in practical terms, you'll observe that the majority of mosques continue to attract believers, particularly when compared to other faiths. Hence, your practical theory is also incorrect. Is Islam presently less united than before? Yes. Will this condition persist? Not in my opinion, especially considering the awakening among more Muslims regarding the strength of fraternity and its numerous benefits. The global sense of oppression only intensifies this sentiment.
 
Firstly, let's define Ummah. The Ummah is a global entity that encompasses countries where Islam is the predominant religion or, more broadly, individuals who identify as Muslims. As long as there is a nation with Islam as its main religion or even a community or individual professing belief in Islam, the Ummah exists, even if the practice is not overt. So, theoretically, your assertion is already challenged. Now, for point number two, in practical terms, you'll observe that the majority of mosques continue to attract believers, particularly when compared to other faiths. Hence, your practical theory is also incorrect. Is Islam presently less united than before? Yes. Will this condition persist? Not in my opinion, especially considering the awakening among more Muslims regarding the strength of fraternity and its numerous benefits. The global sense of oppression only intensifies this sentiment.
Why the arab nations aren't Defending Palestine and why algerian are leaving blacks muslim in the désert ?
 
I am talking about this exact point.

Religion has always been carnal. Just like you said the people who did extremes to force it upon the people. They were carnal. Your proving exactly what im saying. Islam is an social ordinance, so is christianity, so is bhuddism. Its all cultural and society ordinances. The same way those people in past shamed and beat the harlot the same way they do today and the same way extremists in todays time people fight for islam is the same way they did back then. See the cycle in things. You think those hoes 500 years ago were as whorish as todays women? Put them in the same box and those old women would look like saintesses. Its the same thing. Same cycle.

Im not saying islam is totally wrong at all, im just letting you know that your argument has no point. Islam is doing exactly what its supposed to do. Its a social culture, this is why the rules behind it literally change and have constantly changed since back then. Your trying to make it seem as if its something its not.

Ok look at it like this:
~ when it comes to animals (carnal humans), a human (in this case a "spiritual" focused person) needs to cage them up or structure them somehow less they themselves get killed or affected by animalistic behavior. Why do you think religion is always what follows after truth seeker movements. After the few individuals that actually gave a crap about truth. Thats why i call it a derivative. Pest control. Carnality is the way of the animal. Religion is the ordinance of the animal nature. Islam, christianity, whatever. Its the same thing. And they are all flawed. The frustration behind the argument for your religion is misdirected and carnal imo.
Not rerally , most religions and its laws tries to manage between satisfying desires (sexual to survival like food to ...)and keeping morality not violated ,if we act fully carnal as u think religion is about we would be like animals only the few best get everything and only power rules not morals and killing the weak and innocent for the self benefits is accepted ,take monogamy as an example ,mongomay is preached by most religions and of all races, u think if we were like animals the average looking working guy would be able to feel the beauty of having a family ? hell no,but monogamy gave him that,idk if other religions have this thing we have in islam called zakat and sadaka ,it means giving a necessary money to the poor every year ,in islam it says the first thing God asks u in judgement day is not if u prayed or anything,he asks u did u give money to the poor and orphans,every single year u have to give like a 1000 dollar to the poor if youre getting like 60k(the calculation of money is different from one islamic group to other,but i belive in the 10% of ur annual income pov).

no nobody beats hoes today lol ,theyre celebrated in media ,music,everything under the "sexual liberation",nah back then people gave thier life trying to live by their beliefs,nowadays no

no,woman always were hoes,biology doesnt change ,the laws are what changes

who told u rules behind islam changed?the whorish self claimed muslims know that theyre doing what islam doenst permit,my gf who did anal w me she told me that anal is a big sin and i told her i know but we still end up doing it.

couldnt understand the direcrion behind ur last paragraph,because the part of religion taht makes laws of how to live defines it self that its about ccontrolling and direction carnal deisres into a sense of morality and joy for ourseleves
 
Murtad 3ars
 
  • +1
Reactions: st.hamudi but 6‘5
Your better of creating or starting your own movement. Islam is already toast. Its doing what its always done. But for the animal, a country sized fence is almost as if it were no fence at all. Its going to have to be a new religion or derivative. Ultimately to get the attention of the carnal nature your going to have to use different tactics. Marketing, deception, favoritism etc. Look at how "hebrew isrealites" secluded the bible and used the race bait as a pull.

Gonthar is right. Look at my last paragraph above.
yeah but their pull is wrong by the bible itself since they just purposily misinterpreting the meaning of some verses,theres a group called Ummat al Islam,in america started by some black supremasist who try to make islam from religion of all race to black relgion only as a away to revenge whites from stealing christianty.... but a basic muslim with average knowledge could easily expose the fallacies they use to make it as islam is a black religon
 
انا مسلم اخي
ummah never dies, everything will be prophesized back to back ive seen shit happen in the quran thats miraculous, the middle east earthquakes was like no way this book is
magic
 
Why the arab nations aren't Defending Palestine and why algerian are leaving blacks muslim in the désert ?
You say arab, but why? This is a loaded question since you know that other Muslim leaders support Palestine, and certain Arab nations also support Palestine, while the others negotiate the political terrain according to their own conditions. Arabs are not the leaders of the Ummah. But It won't be long before the arab nations force their rules and will on all other countries through diplomacy. Regarding your question about Algeria abandoning black Muslims in the desert, I have never heard of it, so I am unable to comment or provide any information on it. Give it more precise details.
 
Firstly, let's define Ummah. The Ummah is a global entity that encompasses countries where Islam is the predominant religion or, more broadly, individuals who identify as Muslims. As long as there is a nation with Islam as its main religion or even a community or individual professing belief in Islam, the Ummah exists, even if the practice is not overt. So, theoretically, your assertion is already challenged. Now, for point number two, in practical terms, you'll observe that the majority of mosques continue to attract believers, particularly when compared to other faiths. Hence, your practical theory is also incorrect. Is Islam presently less united than before? Yes. Will this condition persist? Not in my opinion, especially considering the awakening among more Muslims regarding the strength of fraternity and its numerous benefits. The global sense of oppression only intensifies this sentiment.
‘ummah is when the whole country rules according to the words of ALLAH subhanaho wa taala,the rulling system and the general conciousness of the population needed both to be islamic in order to call it ummah
كلمة الأمة و الامامة مرتبطين
 
ummah never dies, everything will be prophesized back to back ive seen shit happen in the quran thats miraculous, the middle east earthquakes was like no way this book is
magic
ur preciption of islam is wrong if thats how u think we validate the QUran
 
‘ummah is when the whole country rules according to the words of ALLAH subhanaho wa taala,the rulling system and the general conciousness of the population needed both to be islamic in order to call it ummah
كلمة الأمة و الامامة مرتبطين
Ummah means community or Nation.

“he found there a group of men [ummatan min al-naas] watering (their flocks)”[al-Qasas 28:23]

“And for every Ummah (community or nation) there is a Messenger”[Yoonus 10:47]

“Mankind were one community [ummah]”[al-Baqarah 2:213]

People of the Ummah need to be muslim, they do not need to live in an Islamic land to fall under the Ummah of Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him)
 
  • +1
Reactions: wsada
Ummah means community or Nation.

“he found there a group of men [ummatan min al-naas] watering (their flocks)”[al-Qasas 28:23]

“And for every Ummah (community or nation) there is a Messenger”[Yoonus 10:47]

“Mankind were one community [ummah]”[al-Baqarah 2:213]

People of the Ummah need to be muslim, they do not need to live in an Islamic land to fall under the Ummah of Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him)
communities have united leadership and rules and source of laws,if no they would be called Al nass
 
communities have united leadership and rules and source of laws,if no they would be called Al nass
There was a man in Mecca before the prophet, his name is Zaid bin Amr. He is one of the few monotheists in Makkah who refused to worship idols, traveled extensively in search of true monotheism. After visiting various cities, he returned to Sham and, in Balkan, met a monk who suggested that a man named Muhammad in Mecca would revive the religion of Abraham. The Prophet Muhammad later confirmed that Allah was pleased with Zaid's quest for true monotheism, predicting that on the Day of Judgment, Zaid would arise as an entire Ummah, a unique honor for his unwavering commitment to the religion of Ibrahim amidst challenges. Scholars interpret this as a recognition of Zaid's adherence to Islam before the arrival of Prophet Muhammad.

One man is called an entire Ummah. When the Quran refers to the Ummah, it encompasses every individual who identifies as a Muslim worldwide.
 
Can i still be a muslim if i reject Muhammed as a prophet? I still submit to the almighty God in oneness.
 
proud sand poojeeta lover, unlike you who thirst for Blacked Latina bitches.
“Sand poojeeta” doesn’t exist. And yes we know pajeets are ogling at our bug eyed big noses foids simply because they’re one shade lighter. :feelskek:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8365
jfl, right path. that is why all the major islamic countries are shitholes.
View attachment 2553312
It's amusing how anti-Islam individuals label Islamic countries as shitholes, conveniently ignoring that many of these nations were destabilized by Western interventions in the first place. The same goes for your country, where India is grappling with poverty due to British plunder. Yet, you stand firm in the logic of "I'll mess up your country and then claim you can't lead it." What's even more ironic is that hardline Hindu nationalists, like yourself, blame the Mughal Empire for the decline of so-called grand Hinduism, while history shows that during the Mughal era, India flourished, much like Andalusian Spain.
 
Imagine giving a fuck about what people believe in
its not what one person thinks, is what millions can accomplish.

If everyone wanted to kill browns you would start giving af because they would want to kill you.
 
Can i still be a muslim if i reject Muhammed as a prophet? I still submit to the almighty God in oneness.
No.

“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him))”

[an-Nisa’ 4:59]
 
why should I? I don't like your attitude
You're not a fan of my attitude? That's a feeble argument. Allow me to break down the shortcomings in your religion.

Okay, so the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each 100% God. That means they should possess 100% of the attributes of God. The question for Christians is: Is Jesus independent of God the Father, or dependent on God the Father? If he's independent, that implies two ultimate, independent existences, essentially two gods. On the other hand, if Jesus is dependent on God the Father, he cannot be 100% God, as God is 100% independent. So, which do you prefer?
 
don't ever call God pbuh you braindead, ugly, deformed subhuman
Ironic how you claim to be a Christian yet you cannot prevent yourself from spewing foul-language. At least follow your religion to a tee before trying to criticise others.
 
while history shows that during the Mughal era, India flourished, much like Andalusian Spain.
yes , flourished , according to leftist-islamist historians.

it flourished.

mughal emperors had harems of hindu women , made architectures like Taj Mahal and then chopped the hands of the Hindu architects while the whole country was suffering in poverty.

applied Jijiya Tax on hindus.


yes , you muslims did great things for us.

you only raped our women, lived on our backs by attaching Jijiya tax on us.

you people burned our greatest Nalanda Library .

you muslims played soccer with the heads of the innocent Nalanda scholars.

if this is considered development that our mothers and dauhgters get raped by muslims, we have to pay Jijiya Tax to be alive.

then i spit on this development.

the religion that applies Jijiya Tax on non-muslims and considers non-hijabi women as slaves is not a religion.

its a satanic evil cult.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
No.

“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him))”

[an-Nisa’ 4:59]
Why is Muhammed specifically mentioned. I agree with the La ilaha Ilala. But not the rest. I think its idolatry
 
Why is Muhammed specifically mentioned. I agree with the La ilaha Ilala. But not the rest. I think its idolatry
Because Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) is the final Prophet that Allah has sent, and we have been commanded to obey him.

“He who obeys the Messenger (Muhammad), has indeed obeyed Allah, but he who turns away, then we have not sent you (O Muhammad) as a watcher over them.” [An-Nisa’ 4:80]

 
Why is Muhammed specifically mentioned. I agree with the La ilaha Ilala. But not the rest. I think its idolatry
This may be of further help, regarding Islam:

 
Ironic how you claim to be a Christian yet you cannot prevent yourself from spewing foul-language. At least follow your religion to a tee before trying to criticise others.
not this bullshit again, suck my dick muzzie cockroach
 
You're not a fan of my attitude? That's a feeble argument. Allow me to break down the shortcomings in your religion.

Okay, so the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each 100% God. That means they should possess 100% of the attributes of God. The question for Christians is: Is Jesus independent of God the Father, or dependent on God the Father? If he's independent, that implies two ultimate, independent existences, essentially two gods. On the other hand, if Jesus is dependent on God the Father, he cannot be 100% God, as God is 100% independent. So, which do you prefer?
that's bullshit reasoning and makes zero sense, Jesus being independent of God when he's in his human form doesn't make them two Godsyou retard
 

Similar threads

Gmogger
Replies
211
Views
4K
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
Subhra26
Replies
78
Views
6K
curryascenderr
C
Acion
Replies
18
Views
2K
Pikabro
Pikabro
MaghrebGator
Replies
109
Views
7K
Thebuffdon690
Thebuffdon690

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top